You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #52: ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #32
52. ...
:7 Good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Coakley siting voting iregularities rgbecker  Jan-19-10 05:07 PM   #0 
  - It's good to get started on this, it could be close, repukes are cheaters nt  flamingdem   Jan-19-10 05:10 PM   #1 
  - They use the MSM to make is seem close and use massive election fraud to just squeak by.  Bearware   Jan-19-10 05:38 PM   #7 
  - ding ding ding ding ding ding ding. the polls  mopinko   Jan-19-10 06:07 PM   #20 
  - You're right. Bush and other Republicans would not have won if it had not been for  peacetalksforall   Jan-19-10 06:41 PM   #27 
  - Bush and other Republicans would not have APPEARED to have won if it had not been for  AlbertCat   Jan-19-10 07:22 PM   #43 
     - You're right. And thanks for understanding my unedited message. Will do better in word selection  peacetalksforall   Jan-19-10 09:51 PM   #74 
  - Unfortunately, I think we've reached a point where no matter who wins,  newtothegame   Jan-19-10 07:31 PM   #46 
  - "CITING"  Kalifornia.Kid   Jan-19-10 06:19 PM   #21 
  - Better that you said it.  timtom   Jan-19-10 06:23 PM   #22 
  - Yes.  Robb   Jan-19-10 06:49 PM   #32 
  - ...  YvonneCa   Jan-19-10 07:47 PM   #52 
  - That's the first thing that came to mind  MrsMatt   Jan-19-10 07:29 PM   #44 
  - They mostly do,  Mira   Jan-19-10 08:18 PM   #66 
  - Thank you.That and 'iregularities' hurt my...  YvonneCa   Jan-19-10 07:46 PM   #50 
  - Not as bad as making plurals with apostrophes.  PurpleChez   Jan-19-10 07:46 PM   #51 
  - how about that "Joe Kennedy" (I) with his robo-calls? Not Joe, RFK's son  wordpix   Jan-19-10 08:09 PM   #63 
  - MA Sec. of State quick to say pre-casted ballots were destroyed  louis4louis   Jan-19-10 08:21 PM   #68 
  - Gop Scum can't win elections just steal elections  santamargarita   Jan-19-10 05:23 PM   #2 
  - But are'nt the dems just  Pharaoh   Jan-19-10 08:35 PM   #70 
  - that 20% poll drop and the diebold machines should have been red flags  Doctor_J   Jan-19-10 05:28 PM   #3 
  - Why are they using Diebold machines? nt  rhett o rick   Jan-19-10 05:44 PM   #9 
     - Free and fair elections are so important  shawcomm   Jan-19-10 05:59 PM   #14 
     - Bring back the pencil on a string  Tanelorn   Jan-19-10 07:01 PM   #37 
     - Ask William Francis Galvin  slackmaster   Jan-19-10 08:05 PM   #60 
  - Link  Capn Sunshine   Jan-19-10 05:29 PM   #4 
  - Thanks Capn, Been trying to get my old laptop to play a flash of the TV's Page.  rgbecker   Jan-19-10 05:46 PM   #10 
  - Good, Shine The Light And Expose The Scum K & R  Dinger   Jan-19-10 05:32 PM   #5 
  - Ballot Tampering Questioned In Senate Race  Ian David   Jan-19-10 05:33 PM   #6 
  - Someone put the "Scan these when nobody is looking" ballots in the wrong pile. n/t  Ian David   Jan-19-10 05:40 PM   #8 
  - LOL!!!  rgbecker   Jan-19-10 05:50 PM   #12 
  - I would not put it past the Teabaggers to infiltrate the polling  Submariner   Jan-19-10 06:01 PM   #15 
  - Absolutely. During 2008, I volunteered watching the ballot handling and counts locally  Mithreal   Jan-19-10 08:20 PM   #67 
  - In a properly-organized polling place, it would require at least two corrupt officials...  Tesha   Jan-19-10 06:34 PM   #24 
  - Good god. All marked for Brown. And if they caught 5 there must have been many more.  Kablooie   Jan-19-10 05:48 PM   #11 
  - Prosecute those GOP mother fuckers n/t  8 track mind   Jan-19-10 05:59 PM   #13 
  - "Orange Alert" for integrity of election was called by election integrity experts yesterday  emlev   Jan-19-10 06:03 PM   #16 
  - Take the election results to court! Tie it up for months  NecklyTyler   Jan-19-10 06:03 PM   #17 
  - and Threaten WW3  minnesota_liberal   Jan-19-10 07:41 PM   #48 
  - BRAD BLOG calls on candidates not to concede  emlev   Jan-19-10 06:05 PM   #18 
  - Franken's lawyer during Minnesota election was there at presser  KittyWampus   Jan-19-10 06:05 PM   #19 
     - Well, well, well. Can it be that Dems are learning at LONG last?  Hekate   Jan-19-10 06:26 PM   #23 
  - This pre-marking ballots was noted in 2004 in Ohio as well  emlev   Jan-19-10 06:35 PM   #25 
  - Just FYI, Optiscan machines can be programmed to reject "overvotes".  Tesha   Jan-19-10 06:41 PM   #28 
     - I believe that's actually a requirement, now that you mention it.  emlev   Jan-19-10 06:53 PM   #34 
  - Shocker.  MorningGlow   Jan-19-10 06:36 PM   #26 
  - This pre-marking ballots was noted in 2004 in Ohio as well  emlev   Jan-19-10 06:46 PM   #29 
  - These pre-marked ballots were most likely distributed in DEM strongholds? nt  flamingdem   Jan-19-10 06:49 PM   #31 
  - Oh puhleeze. Get a grip.  scytherius   Jan-19-10 06:47 PM   #30 
  - You have a lot to learn  MorningGlow   Jan-19-10 07:09 PM   #39 
  - Well At Least You Have A Profile  Dinger   Jan-19-10 08:09 PM   #64 
  - Secretary of State says there is nothing to it  jacksondem   Jan-19-10 06:49 PM   #33 
  - Yes, but the Sec of State was saying that it was only 2 ballots.  Moosepoop   Jan-19-10 07:13 PM   #40 
  - yeah, I saw that too  DeadEyeDyck   Jan-19-10 08:01 PM   #56 
  - Why doesn't someone grab one of those ballots as evidence. nt  4dsc   Jan-19-10 06:54 PM   #35 
  - Just FYI: Taking a ballot is almost-certainly a crime.  Tesha   Jan-19-10 06:57 PM   #36 
  - Coakley campaign asking voters to report probs at 617-351-6866 n/t  emlev   Jan-19-10 07:07 PM   #38 
  - Is anyone surprised at all?  Guilded Lilly   Jan-19-10 07:14 PM   #41 
  - I hope they get to the bottom of this... K & R n/t  RoccoR5955   Jan-19-10 07:16 PM   #42 
  - Damnit, not again!  Odin2005   Jan-19-10 07:29 PM   #45 
  - CNN has Brown at 52%, Coakley at 47%, no declared winner yet.  Jefferson23   Jan-19-10 07:33 PM   #47 
  - 57% percent reporting  DeadEyeDyck   Jan-19-10 08:03 PM   #58 
  - She's toast.  rayofreason   Jan-19-10 08:07 PM   #62 
     - This looks very bad, I thought she would make it through, damn.  Jefferson23   Jan-19-10 08:11 PM   #65 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-19-10 07:45 PM   #49 
  - ALERT.  Dinger   Jan-19-10 08:07 PM   #61 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-19-10 07:50 PM   #53 
  - I don't know who this "OAKLEY" is, but if what you say is true then  tammywammy   Jan-19-10 07:59 PM   #54 
  - That's Marcia Oakley. n/t  rayofreason   Jan-19-10 08:02 PM   #57 
     - She's going down!  tammywammy   Jan-19-10 08:05 PM   #59 
  - It's COAKLEY not OAKLEY, and you should vent your frustrations somewhere else....  FarLeftFist   Jan-19-10 08:00 PM   #55 
  - I am actually hopeful that some one with government authority will finally investigate this shit.  glitch   Jan-19-10 08:24 PM   #69 
  - Since she has conceded I'd say its over.  quiller4   Jan-19-10 08:36 PM   #71 
  - Let's face the facts  DissedByBush   Jan-19-10 08:39 PM   #72 
  - Coakley should be citing how she and her team ran such a SHITTY campaign.  RBInMaine   Jan-19-10 08:40 PM   #73 
  - Al Gore all over again...but Brown "won"--Coakley should just shut up  live love laugh   Jan-20-10 03:24 AM   #75 
  - What are the chances of getting a madatory audit here? n/t  eridani   Jan-20-10 04:27 AM   #76 
  - none. he won by over a hundred thousand votes  cali   Jan-20-10 05:05 AM   #77 
  - How come she conceded before this issue was resolved.  Xenotime   Jan-20-10 08:30 AM   #78 
  - Kick for the next shift...(nt)  KansDem   Jan-21-10 05:02 PM   #79 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC