tonysam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-06-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. PETA is a wackadoodle group |
|
that if anybody knew their TRUE motives, they wouldn't get a dime.
At least of anybody who isn't a natural sucker.
|
| -PETA’s use of First Lady in advertisement angers White House |
V_Byl |
Jan-06-10 12:51 PM |
#0 |
-
You left out the part stating... |
FarLeftFist |
Jan-06-10 01:03 PM |
#1 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-06-10 01:07 PM |
#2 |
 -
PETA can afford an expensive lawsuit |
SPedigrees |
Jan-06-10 01:14 PM |
#3 |
-
Looks like I am one of those... |
nyc 4 Biden |
Jan-06-10 01:42 PM |
#5 |
 -
Yeah, you are. PETA doesn't care about how domesticated animals |
tonysam |
Jan-06-10 01:56 PM |
#9 |
  -
I never said anything about domesticated animals. |
nyc 4 Biden |
Jan-06-10 03:35 PM |
#17 |
  -
No, it's not true. It's a falsehood that you keep spreading. |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 04:34 PM |
#20 |
 -
Me too |
LiberalLovinLug |
Jan-06-10 01:56 PM |
#10 |
  -
PETA doesn't think any domesticated animals should exist. |
tonysam |
Jan-06-10 01:58 PM |
#11 |
 -
PETA's postion on pets |
LiberalLovinLug |
Jan-06-10 03:27 PM |
#15 |
 -
Proof? (nt) |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 04:35 PM |
#21 |
 -
Who needs proof? *Everyone* KNOWS they are attention-whores & hypocrites. |
Matariki |
Jan-06-10 08:36 PM |
#37 |
 -
Whee! You're a live one. |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 09:01 PM |
#40 |
 -
It's all you deserve in this thread Ignis. |
Matariki |
Jan-07-10 08:23 PM |
#51 |
 -
Oh the shame! Oh the drama! Oh the dearth of facts! |
Ignis |
Jan-07-10 09:46 PM |
#54 |
 -
PETArded |
Marxist Hypocrite |
Jan-16-10 02:17 PM |
#58 |
-
PETA is a wackadoodle group |
tonysam |
Jan-06-10 01:56 PM |
#8 |
-
I don't think there will be a lawsuit |
marshall |
Jan-06-10 02:02 PM |
#13 |
-
But if the NRA used them, they would shut up about it. |
RedCloud |
Jan-06-10 01:28 PM |
#4 |
-
whatever happened to black pride? |
PeakFun |
Jan-06-10 01:48 PM |
#6 |
-
PETA: the ultimate crybaby group |
bluestateguy |
Jan-06-10 01:54 PM |
#7 |
-
Well ,Michelle did have a mink coat that was missplaced at a Chicago |
saracat |
Jan-06-10 02:01 PM |
#12 |
 -
She should fire her deputy press secretary, then. |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 04:32 PM |
#18 |
  -
Perhaps not now. |
saracat |
Jan-06-10 07:02 PM |
#23 |
   -
Or perhaps not ever. Why don't you write and ask? (nt) |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 07:16 PM |
#28 |
  -
Because it isn't an big issue to me? As long as she doesn't buy fur now, It shouldn't matter if she |
saracat |
Jan-06-10 07:22 PM |
#33 |
  -
I agree with this statement: |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 08:56 PM |
#38 |
  -
michelle obama wears fur? |
seeinfweggos |
Jan-06-10 07:16 PM |
#29 |
 -
Not only did you reply to the wrong post... |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 07:21 PM |
#32 |
 -
i'm just saying that IF peta picked a fur-wearer for their ad they sure look stupid(er) |
seeinfweggos |
Jan-06-10 07:31 PM |
#34 |
 -
Oh, they've done that several times with "famous" vegetarians. |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 08:59 PM |
#39 |
 -
was it really her coat? that article uses the word "reportedly" |
UpInArms |
Jan-06-10 05:29 PM |
#22 |
-
Well, you know, "some people say" ... |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 07:16 PM |
#27 |
-
Please this was not the only report of Michelle and her mink. Many papers had this and didn't use |
saracat |
Jan-06-10 07:18 PM |
#30 |
-
okay - then cite those articles |
UpInArms |
Jan-06-10 09:29 PM |
#45 |
-
Whether you like or dislike PETA, it's WRONG to use Michele Obama's image without permission |
groundloop |
Jan-06-10 02:03 PM |
#14 |
 -
Why? (nt) |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 04:33 PM |
#19 |
-
Think about it. It's actually quite obvious. |
Matariki |
Jan-06-10 07:08 PM |
#24 |
-
Because? (nt) |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 07:11 PM |
#25 |
-
Obvious. Using a person's image implies endorsement. Endorsement requires permission. |
Matariki |
Jan-06-10 08:19 PM |
#36 |
-
Mmm, tasty insults. I knew they were coming. |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 09:10 PM |
#42 |
-
I'll assume you were expecting insults because you knew you were needling people |
Matariki |
Jan-07-10 08:22 PM |
#50 |
-
There's never any excuse for personal attacks. |
Ignis |
Jan-07-10 09:52 PM |
#55 |
-
She looks great. Goes well with the President's ad. |
Xenotime |
Jan-06-10 03:29 PM |
#16 |
-
peta are a buch of nuts |
seeinfweggos |
Jan-06-10 07:13 PM |
#26 |
-
Interesting. |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 07:19 PM |
#31 |
-
the answers to your questions are: yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and no |
seeinfweggos |
Jan-06-10 07:33 PM |
#35 |
-
I suppose consistent bigotry is better than the wishy-washy kind. |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 09:02 PM |
#41 |
-
so thinking peta is a ridiculous organization makes one a bigot? |
seeinfweggos |
Jan-06-10 09:25 PM |
#43 |
 -
The organization, or the people working therein? |
Ignis |
Jan-06-10 09:27 PM |
#44 |
-
an organization is made up of the people working theirin |
seeinfweggos |
Jan-06-10 09:39 PM |
#46 |
-
ignis let me clarify |
seeinfweggos |
Jan-06-10 09:48 PM |
#47 |
-
Thank you for clarifying. |
Ignis |
Jan-07-10 01:14 PM |
#48 |
 -
This is the most well reasoned thing you posted in this thread. |
Matariki |
Jan-07-10 08:34 PM |
#52 |
  -
Then you haven't read the entire thread. (Edited) |
Ignis |
Jan-07-10 09:44 PM |
#53 |
 -
Methinks you doth protest much |
Marxist Hypocrite |
Jan-16-10 02:46 PM |
#60 |
 -
Double Standards |
Marxist Hypocrite |
Jan-16-10 02:41 PM |
#59 |
-
You joined and kicked this thread with bullshit from the far right CCF? |
flvegan |
Jan-16-10 02:53 PM |
#61 |
-
What a leap! |
LiberalLovinLug |
Jan-07-10 01:19 PM |
#49 |
-
Get real. That's not bigotry. |
Zhade |
Jan-07-10 10:04 PM |
#56 |
-
OK, you win. |
Ignis |
Jan-07-10 10:17 PM |
#57 |