You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: But I'm not guilty! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. But I'm not guilty!
Whatever happened to due process?
I object to presenting myself as guilty - to a TSA employee yet - in order to be deemed innocent.
I don't know what the answer is ultimately, but giving up any more liberty doesn't work for me.
I do not believe that the TSA is capable of actually preventing an incident. I find them to be arrogant, poorly trained, and utterly incompetent individuals for the most part.
Whoever thought we would accept virtual strip searches in this country? What's next? If there's a car bomb (God forbid), will we pull into scanners in highway rest stops? What about street scanners? Ridiculous? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -New scanners break child porn laws dipsydoodle  Jan-04-10 05:35 PM   #0 
  - that's ironic  seeinfweggos   Jan-04-10 05:37 PM   #1 
  - Especialy given  dipsydoodle   Jan-04-10 05:41 PM   #4 
     - well if it's anything like the terrorist watch list  seeinfweggos   Jan-04-10 05:47 PM   #10 
        - Thanks for the laugh  AnOhioan   Jan-04-10 07:58 PM   #45 
  - So terrorists, make sure you recruit some teens and have them fly out of Britain  high density   Jan-04-10 05:38 PM   #2 
  - Here's what I want to know about the scanners:  hedgehog   Jan-04-10 05:40 PM   #3 
  - You could have fun by taping obscene messages under your clothes. n/t  Ian David   Jan-04-10 05:42 PM   #5 
  - bwahahaha - that's great - you can  tomm2thumbs   Jan-04-10 06:16 PM   #25 
     - It's easier  dipsydoodle   Jan-04-10 06:27 PM   #27 
  - Agreed.  Fearless   Jan-04-10 05:44 PM   #6 
  - The actual answers  notesdev   Jan-04-10 05:45 PM   #7 
  - Can you compare the dose to.... flying?  jberryhill   Jan-04-10 05:53 PM   #15 
     - It's like getting an x-ray at a doctor  notesdev   Jan-04-10 05:56 PM   #16 
        - No it's not...  jberryhill   Jan-04-10 05:58 PM   #18 
        - There is some concern about the frequency being used  daleo   Jan-05-10 05:03 PM   #67 
        - It's magnetic radiation. It's not nearly as harmful as x-rays if harmful at all.  Arrowhead2k1   Jan-04-10 05:58 PM   #19 
           - No one has ever established how much radiation is safe for any given individual  avaistheone1   Jan-04-10 06:28 PM   #28 
           - Yes they have. nt  Robb   Jan-05-10 07:41 AM   #64 
           - Actually we do have some good cell phone studies that raise serious questions about their safety.  avaistheone1   Jan-04-10 06:34 PM   #30 
  - There are doubts as to whether  dipsydoodle   Jan-04-10 05:50 PM   #13 
  - but...but..  bergie321   Jan-04-10 07:00 PM   #36 
     - Not true.  Robb   Jan-05-10 07:42 AM   #65 
  - I just saw a DU post that said experts have said they would not have caught the undie bomber.  wroberts189   Jan-04-10 06:00 PM   #20 
  - I agree  TheEuclideanOne   Jan-04-10 06:15 PM   #24 
  - So the question then becomes, can you conceal anything in  hedgehog   Jan-04-10 06:50 PM   #32 
     - Depends on how you're trying to be dangerous.  JoeyT   Jan-04-10 09:34 PM   #47 
  - But I'm not guilty!  Loge23   Jan-04-10 07:16 PM   #40 
  - this article says they would not have found the crotchbomber's materials  Shallah Kali   Jan-04-10 07:18 PM   #41 
  - Number 2 is probably yes  jmowreader   Jan-04-10 07:50 PM   #44 
  - What are these children likely to be doing while they're scanned?  Fridays Child   Jan-04-10 05:46 PM   #8 
  - "is the standing human form indecent now"  jberryhill   Jan-04-10 05:51 PM   #14 
  - "is the standing human form indecent now?"  FiveGoodMen   Jan-04-10 07:11 PM   #38 
  - is the standing human form indecent now?  seeinfweggos   Jan-05-10 04:04 PM   #66 
  - I doubt that...  jberryhill   Jan-04-10 05:46 PM   #9 
  - BREAKING NEWS: Thousands of registered sex offenders fill out applications for the TSA.  Arrowhead2k1   Jan-04-10 05:49 PM   #11 
  - That was my first thought as well. Talk about a system ripe for abuse. nt  wroberts189   Jan-04-10 05:58 PM   #17 
     - only after they were turned down by a seminary.  ChairmanAgnostic   Jan-04-10 07:05 PM   #37 
  - Paranoia meet... paranoia!  depakid   Jan-04-10 05:49 PM   #12 
  - Exactly. nt  Psephos   Jan-04-10 09:55 PM   #49 
  - There will be no problems  Turbineguy   Jan-04-10 06:03 PM   #21 
  - .. and republicans :) nt  wroberts189   Jan-04-10 06:07 PM   #22 
  - Cool.. so now I can see what J-Lo really looks like :) Woohoo... TSA here I come. nt  wroberts189   Jan-04-10 06:08 PM   #23 
  - Yes - and about 600 other people every hour!  jberryhill   Jan-04-10 06:16 PM   #26 
  - It will be too old as soon as Rush Limbaugh walks through.  wroberts189   Jan-04-10 06:51 PM   #33 
  - No need to wait  hedgehog   Jan-04-10 06:52 PM   #34 
     - I don't know .. there could be bombs in those boobs. And those hips are a little wide.  wroberts189   Jan-04-10 06:58 PM   #35 
  - Im against these scanners.....  Socal31   Jan-04-10 06:31 PM   #29 
  - These freaks of nature will do what they can to terrorize...  JuniperLea   Jan-04-10 06:39 PM   #31 
  - Let's face it. There's no fucking solution to any of this. They'll just stick bombs up their body  truthisfreedom   Jan-04-10 07:15 PM   #39 
  - already done -New Technique of Storing Bomb Materials Inside Body Cavity Nearly Kills a Saudi Prince  Shallah Kali   Jan-04-10 07:21 PM   #42 
     - Yep!  JoeyT   Jan-04-10 09:39 PM   #48 
  - Someone needs to look up the definition of child pornography.  MineralMan   Jan-04-10 07:22 PM   #43 
  - Define "indecent image". Does that include **any** nudity?  alp227   Jan-04-10 08:04 PM   #46 
  - Yes, it does nt  JelloSka   Jan-05-10 11:43 PM   #68 
  - Thought about this when they first mentioned it...  chrisa   Jan-04-10 09:58 PM   #50 
  - scans on the internet?  nilram   Jan-05-10 01:01 AM   #51 
  - just as tsa people are prohibited from stealing from luggage  Shallah Kali   Jan-05-10 01:31 AM   #52 
  - And of course we all know people never do something they  LisaL   Jan-05-10 01:51 AM   #53 
  - This is beyond stupid.  Behind the Aegis   Jan-05-10 02:46 AM   #54 
  - This is absurd nonsense.  leveymg   Jan-05-10 04:44 AM   #55 
  - There's your (general) "cui bono!"  Behind the Aegis   Jan-05-10 04:47 AM   #56 
     - I think we finally agree on something  leveymg   Jan-05-10 05:02 AM   #57 
        - That explains the cold here in New Olreans....Hell is freezing over.  Behind the Aegis   Jan-05-10 05:06 AM   #58 
           - How are things down there?  leveymg   Jan-05-10 05:08 AM   #59 
              - Colder than a frost giant's dinkus buried in the snow!  Behind the Aegis   Jan-05-10 05:10 AM   #60 
                 - This is why people drink Vodka.  leveymg   Jan-05-10 05:23 AM   #61 
  - A modest proposal  MetaTrope   Jan-05-10 06:12 AM   #62 
  - I pointed that out and got accused of having a sick mind.  Odin2005   Jan-05-10 07:39 AM   #63 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC