winyanstaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-31-09 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
| 29. I'm sorry, but IMO...it would be IMPOSSIBLE to tell if they were a pervert or not..... |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-31-09 02:37 AM by winyanstaz
Anyways...how exactly would you weed out a "pervert" or child molester? Wouldnt that job be a child molesters' or a perverts dream job?
|
| -US 'stopped Dutch installation of full body scanners' |
struggle4progress |
Dec-30-09 01:14 PM |
#0 |
 -
Dutch to use body scanners for US flights but no other European airports follow move |
struggle4progress |
Dec-30-09 01:16 PM |
#1 |
| -
The Bush Admin stopped The Dutch from installing the body scanners! |
Ian David |
Dec-30-09 01:18 PM |
#2 |
 -
Well Then, The Bush Admin Got Something Right N/T |
DrCory |
Dec-30-09 01:38 PM |
#8 |
 -
Because nobody wants to see The Dutch naked. n/t |
Ian David |
Dec-30-09 01:50 PM |
#9 |
| -
LOL! N/T |
DrCory |
Dec-30-09 02:43 PM |
#13 |
| -
Oh really? |
jmowreader |
Jan-03-10 05:31 PM |
#58 |
| -
While we're looking at other DU threads, please see |
No Elephants |
Dec-31-09 04:20 AM |
#31 |
| -
I do NOT like the idea of the body scanners |
nickinSTL |
Dec-30-09 01:19 PM |
#3 |
| -
I'm with you, nickinSTL! |
I Have A Dream |
Dec-30-09 01:24 PM |
#4 |
| -
I agree with you....but this is a whole new world and perhaps it |
movonne |
Dec-30-09 01:24 PM |
#5 |
| -
no, I don't think it does |
nickinSTL |
Dec-30-09 01:29 PM |
#6 |
| -
I will never fly again..to hell with them. |
winyanstaz |
Dec-30-09 01:33 PM |
#7 |
| -
wow. I hadn't even considered children |
nickinSTL |
Dec-30-09 02:34 PM |
#12 |
| -
that's not really what they see |
crikkett |
Dec-30-09 02:54 PM |
#15 |
| -
That's genius |
Ter |
Jan-01-10 09:01 PM |
#51 |
| -
The people on the next flight? |
RUMMYisFROSTED |
Jan-02-10 09:02 AM |
#56 |
| -
All depends who sat there before |
Ter |
Jan-03-10 02:26 AM |
#57 |
| -
It's not fair to call security personnel "perverts." They would just be doing their jobs. |
totodeinhere |
Dec-30-09 04:03 PM |
#25 |
| -
I'm sorry, but IMO...it would be IMPOSSIBLE to tell if they were a pervert or not..... |
winyanstaz |
Dec-31-09 02:34 AM |
#29 |
| -
It's impossible to weed them out from anywhere for that matter. |
totodeinhere |
Dec-31-09 01:02 PM |
#33 |
| -
That is true..... |
winyanstaz |
Dec-31-09 03:07 PM |
#34 |
| -
Define pervert |
Ter |
Jan-01-10 09:03 PM |
#52 |
| -
Yeah... perverts never get jobs as ambulance attendants or hospital workers... |
jberryhill |
Dec-31-09 07:41 PM |
#37 |
| -
or jobs as scout leaders or priests...yah I know... |
winyanstaz |
Dec-31-09 08:36 PM |
#39 |
| -
It doesn't use gamma or x-rays |
jberryhill |
Jan-01-10 12:01 AM |
#40 |
| -
What energy the scanners use is available for anyone to look up.. |
winyanstaz |
Jan-01-10 01:44 AM |
#45 |
| -
Not "low level" - lower frequency, non-penetrating. /nt |
jberryhill |
Jan-01-10 02:07 AM |
#47 |
| -
The only thing "new" about it is our willingness to forgo civil liberties |
pundaint |
Dec-30-09 04:28 PM |
#26 |
| -
It's disturbing and creepy for sure. |
Odin2005 |
Dec-30-09 03:17 PM |
#19 |
| -
I do not want to see the ocean as my section of aircraft hurtles towards Earth. |
tabasco |
Jan-01-10 12:21 AM |
#43 |
| -
Forced public electronic nakedness should not be required to secure an airline seat. |
seafan |
Dec-30-09 02:20 PM |
#10 |
| -
Fnord! "...bodies reduced to the equivalent of a chalk outline." |
crikkett |
Dec-30-09 02:56 PM |
#16 |
| -
just because the IMAGE is reduced |
blueberrypickn |
Dec-30-09 03:28 PM |
#20 |
| -
are you talking to me? |
crikkett |
Dec-31-09 06:38 AM |
#32 |
| -
Impossible to record an image |
daleo |
Dec-30-09 08:26 PM |
#28 |
| -
The bush administration still haunts us. |
Xenotime |
Dec-30-09 02:23 PM |
#11 |
| -
I disagree with the use of full body scanners. |
totodeinhere |
Dec-30-09 04:00 PM |
#24 |
| -
Just wear a Speedo. n/t |
Downwinder |
Dec-30-09 02:46 PM |
#14 |
| -
You'd be surprised what you can hide in Speedos |
TrogL |
Dec-30-09 03:55 PM |
#22 |
| -
Can you add in the subject (in 2008). Freepers are trying to blame Obama for this of course. |
MidwestTransplant |
Dec-30-09 03:12 PM |
#17 |
| -
Clothing, modesty & HUMAN RIGHTS are for TERRORISTS! |
blueberrypickn |
Dec-30-09 03:15 PM |
#18 |
| -
What's really needed is for the USA to stop |
Plucketeer |
Dec-30-09 04:00 PM |
#23 |
| -
NO, I don't want to have to expose my naked body. |
Alameda |
Jan-01-10 08:48 PM |
#50 |
| -
What the bleep is wrong with us? |
Old Time Pagan |
Dec-30-09 03:42 PM |
#21 |
| -
These imaging machines might actually WORK |
panzerfaust |
Dec-30-09 06:00 PM |
#27 |
| -
and what about the fact that even low dose gamma rays/x-rays |
winyanstaz |
Dec-31-09 02:40 AM |
#30 |
| -
One of my concerns as well n/t |
diamidue |
Dec-31-09 03:35 PM |
#35 |
| -
wonder if it will show tampons...and if so...will that person be flagged |
Gin |
Dec-31-09 05:20 PM |
#36 |
| -
mm waves don't penetrate water |
jberryhill |
Jan-01-10 12:12 AM |
#42 |
| -
Do you understand that flying greatly increases your gamma exposure? |
jberryhill |
Jan-01-10 12:08 AM |
#41 |
| -
What scanners use... |
winyanstaz |
Jan-01-10 01:39 AM |
#44 |
| -
No, the xray backscatter machines were tested, the MMW's are being deployed |
jberryhill |
Jan-01-10 02:03 AM |
#46 |
| -
Much shorter wave-length |
panzerfaust |
Jan-02-10 06:53 AM |
#53 |
| -
Prove they are safe |
quakerboy |
Dec-31-09 07:50 PM |
#38 |
| -
I'd rather the government stop giving visas to these people rather than get a virtual |
Arrowhead2k1 |
Jan-01-10 03:10 AM |
#48 |
| -
Eventually we will all be issued hospital gowns to wear inflight.... |
Hekate |
Jan-01-10 04:33 AM |
#49 |
| -
can dogs sniff out these materials? |
wordpix |
Jan-02-10 08:31 AM |
#54 |
| -
as one security analyst says, you've got to stop these people BEFORE they get to airport |
wordpix |
Jan-02-10 08:33 AM |
#55 |
| -
liveleak video of full body scan |
Shallah Kali |
Jan-04-10 01:15 AM |
#59 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread