edwardian
(177 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-31-09 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 20. A poster who can understand nuance? |
|
Wow! Maybe there is a reason to keep coming here! Thanks NE for a ray of intelligence and hope.
|
| -Obama administration seeks to block wiretap suit |
kpete |
Oct-30-09 10:12 PM |
#0 |
 -
"the court can "conduct its own independent assessment of our claim." Holder said" |
NYC_SKP |
Oct-30-09 10:16 PM |
#1 |
  -
My gut tells me to be OK with this decision. |
Cant trust em |
Oct-30-09 10:55 PM |
#3 |
| -
Continuation of bad goverment. |
edwardian |
Oct-31-09 07:31 AM |
#19 |
| -
Phew. That was easy. |
Cant trust em |
Oct-31-09 09:41 AM |
#29 |
| -
Exactly. I criticized bush on this very issue, why would I let Obama off the hock for |
still_one |
Nov-01-09 09:20 AM |
#33 |
| -
And Bush started this wiretapping 6-7 months BEFORE 9/11 . . . |
defendandprotect |
Oct-30-09 10:23 PM |
#2 |
| -
Yes, Bush was terrible in so many ways. No one is going to prosecute him, though. |
No Elephants |
Oct-31-09 07:53 AM |
#22 |
| -
If the disclosure would impede trying the Cheney Gang for war crimes |
Overseas |
Oct-30-09 11:06 PM |
#4 |
| -
*giggle* |
No Elephants |
Oct-31-09 07:17 AM |
#17 |
| -
Obama Administration Invokes State Secrets Privilege…Again |
kpete |
Oct-31-09 02:24 AM |
#5 |
| -
In other words, |
Downwinder |
Oct-31-09 02:24 AM |
#6 |
| -
No |
sandnsea |
Oct-31-09 02:24 AM |
#8 |
| -
"we invoking it to preserve executive power" |
ixion |
Oct-31-09 06:09 AM |
#16 |
| -
Self Delete. |
No Elephants |
Oct-31-09 07:54 AM |
#23 |
| -
Yes, the OP has the same statement. What else would the D of J say about asserting the privilege? |
No Elephants |
Oct-31-09 08:03 AM |
#25 |
| -
Holder's full statement |
sandnsea |
Oct-31-09 02:24 AM |
#7 |
| -
"And please just take our word for that -- we wouldn't lie to you!" |
katandmoon |
Oct-31-09 02:24 AM |
#9 |
| -
Phew. That was easy. nt |
Cant trust em |
Oct-31-09 02:24 AM |
#10 |
| -
Yes, so? Again, what do you expect him to say? "Disclosing this |
No Elephants |
Oct-31-09 08:25 AM |
#28 |
| -
Republican payback. |
Skink |
Oct-31-09 02:24 AM |
#11 |
| -
"The Obama administration has essentially adopted the position of the Bush administration in these c |
joeycola |
Oct-31-09 02:24 AM |
#12 |
| -
The key part of that being "more than any other previous administration" |
NYC Liberal |
Oct-31-09 03:13 AM |
#14 |
| -
I have seen that comment about signing statements so many times and it is misleading as hell. |
No Elephants |
Oct-31-09 07:30 AM |
#18 |
| -
A poster who can understand nuance? |
edwardian |
Oct-31-09 07:35 AM |
#20 |
| -
Thank you, but each and all of us has bits of knowledge. Pooled, they are I hope, |
No Elephants |
Oct-31-09 08:12 AM |
#26 |
| -
So you're in favor of nuance as long as it supports your position. |
Cant trust em |
Oct-31-09 12:27 PM |
#30 |
| -
The point of a signing statemen is to highlight differences in the |
24601 |
Oct-31-09 08:00 AM |
#24 |
| -
Sorry, no. The point of a signing statement is whatever the President wants it to be, |
No Elephants |
Oct-31-09 08:16 AM |
#27 |
| -
What you are saying simply isn't accurate - Here's a link to a Bill |
24601 |
Oct-31-09 07:10 PM |
#32 |
| -
Yep, but that's exactly my point though. |
NYC Liberal |
Oct-31-09 02:14 PM |
#31 |
| -
k/r |
Solly Mack |
Oct-31-09 02:24 AM |
#13 |
| -
and the wire-tapping that started BEFORE 911... |
ixion |
Oct-31-09 06:07 AM |
#15 |
| -
Nothing significant about this is new. |
No Elephants |
Oct-31-09 07:50 AM |
#21 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread