Reply #292: Don't know if you are referring to me. If you are, though, "You lie."

[No Elephants]

Originally, I had posted that she was pro-corporation (and pro-law and order). I gave as my reasons oth her work experience in prosecution and as a corporate lawyer and, even more significantly, her decisions as a judge in lower courts. Those are soiid reasons.

I never said she was conservative or she had to be conservative because Obama is the same as Bush. In fact, I've never said that Obama is the same as Bush. I have pointed out on some occasions. when he takes the same position(s) that Bush took, but that is different from saying he is just the same as ush.

And, if you read the thread, you would have seen that I acknowledged that I originally worried about how she might rule in the SCOTUS because of her prior work experience and decisions, but, said apparently I was wrong.

But I won't hold it against you if you don't let facts get in your way.