You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #43: Bingo [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Bingo
Black children are not "people", so they have "no feelings". :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Swim club offers olive branch after racism allegations(invites kids back) RamboLiberal  Jul-12-09 08:55 PM   #0 
  - How "nice" of them. I heard a class-action suit was filed. Maybe that  babylonsister   Jul-12-09 08:57 PM   #1 
  - I hope they don't get Judge Smales  izquierdista   Jul-12-09 09:17 PM   #5 
  - Self delete. n/t  wisteria   Jul-12-09 10:56 PM   #12 
  - Nope, too late!  wundermaus   Jul-12-09 08:58 PM   #2 
  - To late for what? n/t  wisteria   Jul-12-09 11:24 PM   #16 
  - I need to play that clip every morning!  ejbr   Jul-13-09 06:54 AM   #52 
     - LOL ~  goclark   Jul-13-09 08:01 AM   #80 
  - I wouldn't be in any hurry to accept the invitation.  rurallib   Jul-12-09 08:59 PM   #3 
  - They just reported on this on the local Philly news.  drm604   Jul-12-09 09:03 PM   #4 
  - I think it would be a positive thing to leave it up to the kids. Maybe something even  zonkers   Jul-12-09 09:20 PM   #6 
  - Agreed, zonkers.  bertman   Jul-12-09 09:22 PM   #7 
  - Disagree. Kids are trusting and racists did not shed their racism in a week.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 06:35 AM   #45 
     - Some members were outraged. I am not saying "halt the discrimination probe.  zonkers   Jul-13-09 09:38 AM   #100 
  - In one of the articles  zalinda   Jul-12-09 10:37 PM   #11 
  - Thank you for being brave enough to comment on this article when it isn't the  wisteria   Jul-12-09 11:33 PM   #19 
  - if 65 kids showed up at a pool I was swimming in I would get out and demand my money back.  Devil_Fish   Jul-12-09 11:40 PM   #22 
  - You have a point, people join these small pool clubs to avoid the crowding of the public pools.  wisteria   Jul-13-09 12:20 AM   #30 
  - They had to know how many kids were coming  rocktivity   Jul-13-09 12:59 AM   #35 
  - No shit.  Ian David   Jul-13-09 07:03 AM   # 
  - Right ~ they knew and for safety reasons  goclark   Jul-13-09 08:19 AM   #88 
  - People did not make color based remarks to the water. They did make racial remarks to the kids.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 06:44 AM   #49 
  - I have a child who has problems with crowds.  msanthrope   Jul-12-09 11:56 PM   #25 
  - Does that family have 13 kids? Do the math.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 07:07 AM   #59 
     - They didn't pay 1,900 for a yearly membership. They paid for a few summer sessions. I wouldn't  JTFrog   Jul-13-09 07:19 AM   #66 
     - Ooooookay, Have you ever been to a Christmas Swim in Pa?  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 08:09 AM   #85 
        - No, but I've enjoyed many balmy days in Spring and Fall. And the club might offer year round event  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 08:22 AM   #90 
     - Bulk sales often get a discount from the price charged individuals. Besides, this  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 08:18 AM   #87 
     - No, You do the math. The daycare kids were there for  msanthrope   Jul-13-09 12:03 PM   #111 
        - Have you seen the contract? You are saying they didn't have a membership.  Wizard777   Jul-14-09 07:17 AM   #122 
           - You are deliberately misquoting me because you are losing the  msanthrope   Jul-14-09 12:17 PM   #125 
  - If true, that would have been a reason to storm the office of club's management, not  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 06:42 AM   #48 
  - Two of the reasons that people did not "bother reading"  ejbr   Jul-13-09 07:03 AM   #57 
     - He threw the kids out and returned the check Creative Steps had given him and  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 11:35 AM   #107 
        - Which, albeit inadvertantly, reinforced the belief that racism played a part n/t  ejbr   Jul-13-09 11:39 AM   #109 
           - And you are so dead certain of inadvertency how, exactly? If a newspaper reporter were  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 11:47 AM   #110 
              - I meant to put inadvertantly in quotes as  ejbr   Jul-13-09 12:28 PM   #113 
                 - But it was SUCH a CLASSIC Freudian slip!!!  Karenina   Jul-13-09 02:17 PM   #115 
                 - Even if not specifically racial. Your interpretation still boils down to...  TheMadMonk   Jul-13-09 11:22 PM   #119 
  - At the very least, I think I would wait for the results of the investigation  Blasphemer   Jul-13-09 01:04 AM   #36 
     - Blatantly racist comments are only a poor choice of words when they come from JUDGE Sotomayor.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 07:21 AM   #68 
        - You keep using this thread to bash Sotomayor. Why don't you just start a thread on it? n/t  JTFrog   Jul-13-09 07:53 AM   #78 
        - I did. But I continue to find who we will and will not give a free pass on racism to be interesting  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 08:04 AM   #81 
        - Wow. What does the SCOTUS issue  BumRushDaShow   Jul-13-09 08:07 AM   #84 
           - Apparently some people like to use racism in their contemplations of racism.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 08:32 AM   #91 
              - I'm not going to address the Sotomayor issue here but as far as the arguments for racism here...  Blasphemer   Jul-13-09 11:20 AM   #102 
  - Embarassment is a wonderful incentive for civic responsibility  brooklynite   Jul-12-09 09:23 PM   #8 
  - Legal action is an even stronger incentive.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 06:52 AM   #51 
  - Ding-dongs, you can't unring the bell ....  Brother Buzz   Jul-12-09 09:46 PM   #9 
  - I fail to see how accusing a swim club of racism when none might have existed will enlighten anyone.  wisteria   Jul-12-09 11:28 PM   #18 
     - I did not use the word 'racism'  Brother Buzz   Jul-13-09 12:03 AM   #26 
        - What was the damaged if it was not the suggestion of racism?  wisteria   Jul-13-09 12:24 AM   #31 
           - Yes. Investigate. Prosecute and penalize. That's exactly how it should be played out forever.  JTFrog   Jul-13-09 06:19 AM   #42 
           - Did you read the article? Extending the olive branch was what lawyers advised  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 06:55 AM   #53 
  - I hoped they'd reconsider because of a backlash from the members.  Iggo   Jul-12-09 10:19 PM   #10 
  - The members voted overwhelmingly  MellowDem   Jul-12-09 11:03 PM   #14 
  - If in fact some members made racist comments, my guess is they will cancel their own memberships.  wisteria   Jul-12-09 11:23 PM   #15 
  - No, but club is responsible for kicking the kids out after racist remarks by some members.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 07:20 AM   #67 
  - Good. That's what I wanted to hear.  Iggo   Jul-12-09 11:34 PM   #20 
  - My bet is most of the member didn't know about the incident  RamboLiberal   Jul-13-09 12:19 AM   #29 
  - The article also talks about legal advice to try to get the two groups together. Besides,  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 07:00 AM   #55 
  - Drudge says the owner is an Obama supporter.  Ian David   Jul-13-09 07:08 AM   #60 
     - Drudge is not known for reliability. However, there are many reasons why a business person supports  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 07:17 AM   #64 
        - We've all heard stories of people saying, "I'm voting for the n*gger!"  Ian David   Jul-13-09 07:31 AM   #71 
           - Voting is a different issue from "supporting." We don't really know how anyone votes.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 07:44 AM   #75 
  - The director said she couldn't see taking them back there. They've been scarred.  JTFrog   Jul-13-09 06:24 AM   #44 
  - It is good to see they are reviewing their policies regarding safety concerns.  wisteria   Jul-12-09 11:01 PM   #13 
  - 65 kids WOULD NOT overcrowd the kind of facility a club such as that...  TheMadMonk   Jul-13-09 12:17 AM   #28 
     - They invited them back,but need to discuss the safety matters.  wisteria   Jul-13-09 12:31 AM   #33 
        - They invited them back when public embarrassment forced them to back down.  TheMadMonk   Jul-13-09 03:04 AM   #38 
           - Not only public embarrassment. Legal advice.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 07:33 AM   #72 
  - i would be afraid of what they would do to my child after that experience  humanahumana   Jul-12-09 11:24 PM   #17 
  - OH, please. What harm? It seems to me you have some issues yourself.  wisteria   Jul-12-09 11:39 PM   #21 
     - sure, i have plenty of issues with racism... especially when directed at my young children  humanahumana   Jul-12-09 11:48 PM   #23 
     - Were you there?Are you so certain that what transpired was racism?  wisteria   Jul-13-09 12:15 AM   #27 
        - where you? i am usually at work during those hours but if my kid told me about the remarks reported  humanahumana   Jul-13-09 12:27 AM   #32 
           - Did you ever consider this just might have been a safety issue?  wisteria   Jul-13-09 12:37 AM   #34 
              - So you do have a dog in this fight. That explains it. n/t  JTFrog   Jul-13-09 06:46 AM   #50 
     - So the harm, according to you, was caused by the suggestion of racism  Karenina   Jul-13-09 03:45 AM   #39 
     - I did read the entire story. The kids showed up at the pool. Racial remarks were made.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 07:06 AM   #58 
     - Are you sure? Because one of the kids said racial remarks were made.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 07:36 AM   #73 
        - More than only one kid cited racial remarks.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 08:07 AM   #83 
           - I've only read that one Kid told a teacher that. But it does bolster credibility if it was more.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 09:03 AM   #97 
              - Did you read the story linked in the OP? It says "some" kids reported racial comments.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 11:36 AM   #108 
     - Exactly! Reverse discrimination is still discrimination.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 07:29 AM   #69 
        - Yes that's it! Those kids are racists!  JTFrog   Jul-13-09 07:47 AM   #76 
        - First we must be absolutely sure that the victim is in deed a victim.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 08:06 AM   #82 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-13-09 08:13 AM   #86 
           - That's right we're not supposed to reply to these.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 08:43 AM   #93 
           - Yet, you're posting about reverse discrimination with no evidence whatever, not even an allegation.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 08:32 AM   #92 
              - No I'm merely presenting a counter argument or alternative view.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 08:51 AM   #95 
                 - That appears to be contrary to the known facts of this case  ShamelessHussy   Jul-13-09 11:45 PM   #120 
                    - There are facts and there are facts.  Wizard777   Jul-14-09 07:12 AM   #121 
                       - Yeah, well the court of public opinion has heard enough  ShamelessHussy   Jul-14-09 08:58 AM   #124 
        - If only there were evidence anywhere in this story of reverse discrimination, you might have a point  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 08:19 AM   #89 
           - The reverse discrimination would be in assuming that since there is an allegation of racism -  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 08:55 AM   #96 
              - The allegation by the kids is not the only fact we know, though. Besides, you claimed reverse  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 11:27 AM   #104 
              - There were multiple allegations  kwassa   Jul-13-09 02:31 PM   #116 
                 - Have you ever had a job? Who says all managers are competent?  Wizard777   Jul-14-09 07:42 AM   #123 
  - Mmmmm-hmmmm....  Subdivisions   Jul-12-09 11:53 PM   #24 
  - can we guess how many of the 'regulars' will not show that day? the real story is  tomm2thumbs   Jul-13-09 02:20 AM   #37 
  - Huh? Those who run the club evicted the kids and returned the check after the kids were victims of  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 07:30 AM   #70 
  - Whatever the reason  dipsydoodle   Jul-13-09 03:46 AM   #40 
  - Huh? Doing the right things to atone? They haven't done anything at all.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 07:51 AM   #77 
  - They were given LEGAL ADVICE to do so.  JTFrog   Jul-13-09 05:56 AM   #41 
  - Bingo  BumRushDaShow   Jul-13-09 06:20 AM   #43 
  - In the original thread on this, I urged swift and comprehensive legal  mbperrin   Jul-13-09 07:16 AM   #63 
     - Well that sure does beat the hell out of playing Mega Millions.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 07:42 AM   #74 
        - Not really. The fact that there are two side {at least} to a lawsuit does not mean  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 08:46 AM   #94 
           - The Judge or Jury will either decide for or against and that's 50/50.  Wizard777   Jul-13-09 09:07 AM   #98 
              - It's not the same as tossing a coin. The result is not random. One team or another wins  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 11:25 AM   #103 
  - Fuck them  nc4bo   Jul-13-09 06:38 AM   #46 
  - "These children are scarred. How can I take those children back there?" she said.  JTFrog   Jul-13-09 06:40 AM   #47 
  - I would take the kids and go back.  Ian David   Jul-13-09 07:09 AM   #62 
  - It's not so much that I'm surprised this sort of thing still goes on.  Ian David   Jul-13-09 07:00 AM   #54 
  - Communities around the country  BumRushDaShow   Jul-13-09 07:18 AM   #65 
     - yep nt  goclark   Jul-13-09 04:45 PM   #117 
  - i WOULD HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH IT TOO  nvme   Jul-13-09 07:02 AM   #56 
  - And that stupid, stoner dog! n/t  Ian David   Jul-13-09 07:08 AM   #61 
  - Selected quotes from the article linked in the OP.  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 08:00 AM   #79 
  - Thanks for helping me out with that part  goclark   Jul-13-09 09:26 AM   #99 
     - You're welcome. Also, bear in mind that the headline of the story is misleading. The kids have not  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 11:31 AM   #106 
        - I understand but I don't think they should go back  goclark   Jul-13-09 12:48 PM   #114 
  - If Strom Thurmond had been elected president  rocktivity   Jul-13-09 10:16 AM   #101 
  - Newt, is that you?  No Elephants   Jul-13-09 11:29 AM   #105 
  - Trent Lott, actually  rocktivity   Jul-13-09 12:11 PM   #112 
  - Or John Mc Cain maybe ~  goclark   Jul-13-09 07:20 PM   #118 
  - Obviously not ideal, but a half way decent solution.  Vidar   Jul-14-09 02:31 PM   #126 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC