You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #55: MISSIVE FROM CHINA: Stimulus – at what cost? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
55. MISSIVE FROM CHINA: Stimulus – at what cost? /

Today is the second day of the dreaded gaokao, the national college entrance exam that more than half of all Chinese kids in their age cohort will sit to determine whether or not they will go to university (just over 60% of the test takers will start college next September) and, much more importantly, which one they will attend. Throughout Beijing anxious parents are standing glumly in the heavy (but cleansing) June rain waiting for their kids to emerge from the exams so that they can pepper them with worried questions. It is a scary time for a lot of people.

In the previous six years the number of students taking the exam has jumped every year, from 5.3 million in 2002 to 10.5 million in 2008. This year, for the first time, the number of students sitting the exam has actually declined to 10.2 million.

The official position is that the decline reflects a drop in the number of 18-year-olds in China, but there has been widespread discussion in the press that the decline was too large to be explained just by the smaller number of high-school graduates, and that in part it reflects fears of rising unemployment among college graduates. College is becoming a less attractive option to some Chinese.

6.1 million college students will graduate this month and, according to the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, about 1 million have been unable to find jobs so far. Over the past three years the number of college graduates finding jobs has stagnated even as the number of graduates has surged, even during the boom years of 2006 and 2007. Part of this was caused by the surge in college enrollment, but at least part of the employment difficulties facing college graduates has been blamed on the very poor quality of university education, especially in the new or newly expanded schools, and its failure to prepare students for the kinds of jobs that the market wants.

Over recent months the government has made finding position for graduates, including in the army and as rural high school teachers, a top priority. The front page of today’s People’s Daily has an article citing a speech by Premier Wen Jiabao in Xi’an (in Shaanxi province) encouraging graduates to widen their job search:

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao has urged the country’s college students to find grassroots jobs in less developed regions as the economic downturn increases pressures in employment market. Visiting Xi’an, capital of central Shaanxi Province, from Friday to Sunday, Wen said employment was one of the government’s priorities for the sake of the country’s economy and for the future of individuals.

“College students, laid-off workers and migrant workers waiting for jobs are my biggest concern,” Wen told job hunters at an employment center. He encouraged graduates from universities and colleges to find work in grassroots regions, and called on employers to create more jobs.

Since the second half of last year, the government has implemented a series of policies to create jobs. The State Council, or Cabinet, also decided to give living allowances to graduates who went to the central and western regions for internships.

Besides exhorting college grads to take the kinds of jobs they usually shun, the government is also still working on boosting growth. The Ministry of Finance recently raised the rebate of export taxes by around 15%, according to another article in today’s People’s Daily. This is part of the move to increase China’s export competitiveness, but I am not sure these kinds of measures are likely to have much positive global impact beyond crowding out export competitors and worsening the global trade environment.

As badly as Chinese exports have been hurt, and exports were down 22.6% year on year in April, Chinese exporters have still done much better than other exporting countries in Asia and elsewhere, suggesting that they have managed to avoid much of the brunt in the contraction in global imports, led by the contraction in the US. This, as I argued in last week’s entry, has as much to do with credit and interest rate policies as it does with any inherent competitive advantage.

Not surprisingly, given these moves, expectations of a rise in the value of the RMB are declining. For the fifth day in a row, according to an article in today’s Bloomberg, the 12 month RMB forward declined, trading currently at 6.714, implying a 1.8% appreciation over the year (because these forward markets cannot easily be arbitraged, they do not price according to interest differentials, as forwards normally do, and so may contain more expectational content that a lot of other forward markets).

Meanwhile an interesting article in always-hard-hitting Caijing worries about the flood of bank credit, and whether borrowers are earning nearly enough to cover interest costs:

Chinese bank lending increased to more than 5 trillion yuan between January and April, nearly three times the credit level reported during the same period last year. Even if new loans average only 500 billion yuan during each of the remaining eight months of 2009, the year’s total would be more than 9 trillion yuan – more than all loans issued over the previous two years combined.

The industrial sector’s recent performance provides solid grounds for concern over this rapid credit growth. A National Statistics Bureau survey of 22 regions found industrial profits totaled only 323 billion yuan during the first quarter, down 32 percent from a year earlier. That means annual profits for all industries will amount to only about 1.6 trillion yuan this year.

Outstanding loans currently stand at 35 trillion yuan. Assuming companies have kept a moderate debt ratio averaging less than 50 percent, their capital investments now exceed 35 trillion yuan. And profits of 1.6 trillion yuan versus 35 trillion in capital investment means an annual return rate of only 4.57 percent, below the weighted loan interest rate of 4.76 percent we saw in March. In this sense, companies seem to be in a rather weak position to finance debt with earnings.

Although the writer of the piece, economist Lu Lei, thinks that continued expansion in the banking system creates enormous risks, he doubts that the PBoC will put the brakes on bank lending for a number of reasons, the most important being that commercial bank lending is at the heart (and lungs and nearly every other organ I can think of) of the fiscal stimulus program, and without it, there is no stimulus.

Looking at tax revenues, local governments nationwide were unable to collect as much in the first quarter as in the same period 2008. In fact, tax receipts fell 1.4 percent, in sharp contrast to the 34.7 percent increase posted a year earlier. Cursed with double pressure from a directive to invest and shrinking revenue, local governments have had every incentive to use banks as financing proxies.

Now we’re faced with the possibility of undesirable negative GDP growth. Banks, concerned about defaults, may grant only 300 billion yuan in new loans every month for the rest of the year. So we’re stuck with a painful choice between two losing scenarios: a more moderate monetary policy that would cripple fiscal policy, leading to an outright “hard-landing;” or continuing a loose monetary policy backed by fiscal spending, which risks future loan losses and a weaker market. To get around the problem, the central bank may be forced to fill holes at banks by pumping in money, in effect imposing an inflation tax on all consumers

Lu lei’s “painful choice” is exactly right, and what an inevitable worrier like me has been worrying about since last summer. In January I wrote about this “all but the kitchen sink” policy, of throwing everything they can into stimulating the economy, and said that although this would certainly result in higher than expected growth this year, it would come at a real cost. I wrote:

This strategy may be politically necessary but ultimately represents a gamble on the duration of the global slowdown. If the duration is short and the slowdown light, it will have been a winning gamble, and once the world takes off again China can get serious about resolving the internal imbalances.

Of course if the global slowdown is long and deep, the gamble will have failed. That means, dear readers, that if Chinese GDP growth in 2009 is higher than I projected – say 8% – I will not whip out the party hats and favors. Instead I will immediately begin whining about the state of the banking system.

To make matters worse there is a story that appeared a few weeks ago in an article in Australian newspaper The Age, warning about something that has been much discussed over the past year, that the fiscal stimulus package, or more precisely, the way it is being financed, could lead to rising contingent debt at the provincial and municipal level.

Beijing will have to jam on the economic brakes to save cities from bankrupting themselves, says a top Chinese adviser. He Fan, an assistant director at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences who frequently advises top leaders, says as much as two-thirds of Beijing’s 4 trillion yuan ($A773 billion) stimulus program will be spent by local governments, financed mainly by state-owned banks.

“Some local governments will virtually go bankrupt,” Professor He told BusinessDay. “Previously, local governments got all their money from selling land. This is not sustainable. Some areas have already sold quotas from the next 30 years.” A number of large cities are thought to be at risk, including Kunming and Hangzhou, with their funding problems exacerbated by a slump in real estate sales.

Professor He goes on to worry that easy money has poured into asset markets as well as questionable projects that were previously rejected by the NDRC.

“Banks have strong incentives to lend to NDRC-approved projects because if they end up as a fiasco, there is no political risk,” he said. “They can say ‘it is not my fault, the NDRC told us to lend’.”

When banks are encouraged to lend huge amounts, and with an implicit guarantee against any losses, it is pretty hard to imagine their not embarking on a wild lending spree. On a related but very different subject, I have been corresponding with Steve Keen, a professor at the University of Western Sydney and someone whose blog I often read and whose unconventional insights I find very valuable and persuasive (the fact that he is an expert in and admirer of the works of Hyman Minsky doesn’t hurt either).

I wrote to him to ask his thoughts on the implications on monetary policy and debt structures of China’s rising savings rate. It seems to me that as savings rise as a share of GDP, this must have dampened the impact of the very loose monetary conditions in China over the past several year. If this is the case, and if savings rates do indeed decline in the next few years, there could be important consequences for monetary policy. I plan to think about this a little more and, if I come up with anything interesting to say, I will write about it. Maybe some of the readers of this blog might have some interesting ideas. Steve Keen’s initial response included the following:

Now that the American private sector has stopped borrowing, but both American and Chinese governments are pumping base money into the system, and American consumers and businesses are desperately trying to delever, the dynamics alter considerably. But I expect the overall result will be a relative fall in the Chinese “savings rate” and a rise in the American one.

Obviously I think looking at this from the point of view of savings rather than debt is why we haven’t worked this out to date. A lower consumption rate is definitely part of it, but the debt flows themselves-which generate the monetary flows that then accumulate in accounts depending on consumption rates–are the driving part of the story, not the consumption rates themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -STOCK MARKET WATCH, Monday June 22 ozymandius  Jun-22-09 05:51 AM   #0 
  - Did anyone else have trouble connecting to DU?  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 05:53 AM   #1 
  - not this morning, but last evening  DemReadingDU   Jun-22-09 05:55 AM   #3 
  - Yes; seems better now. Question:  snot   Jun-22-09 06:01 AM   #7 
  - Canada has emerged as an international exception. Britain is wrestling with this issue.  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:10 AM   #8 
  - Ritholtz weighs in.  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:48 AM   #18 
  - I have. Last night especially.  Joanne98   Jun-22-09 10:49 AM   #48 
  - Market Observation by Tim W. Wood  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 05:55 AM   #2 
  - no goobermental reports today  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 05:56 AM   #4 
  - Oil falls to near $69 as optimism on economy wanes  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 05:58 AM   #5 
  - Crude Oil Declines as World Bank Predicts a Deeper Recession  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:30 AM   #11 
     - Yesterday I Paid $2.60  Demeter   Jun-22-09 06:45 AM   #15 
  - World stocks slip  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:01 AM   #6 
  - Housing Eludes Recovery as Job Losses, Foreclosures Climb  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:13 AM   #9 
  - People who don't have jobs are not gonna rush out and buy houses  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 06:45 AM   #16 
     - I believe this FIRE reliance is pretty recent.  Hugin   Jun-22-09 08:00 AM   #30 
     - Back in the olden days....  AnneD   Jun-22-09 11:43 AM   #61 
     - Near As I Can Reckon, It Always Turned on Jobs  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:14 AM   #38 
     - Morning Marketeers.....  AnneD   Jun-22-09 11:37 AM   #60 
     - And repeat that story millions of times and you pretty well describe this economy.  tclambert   Jun-22-09 03:01 PM   #79 
        - It has always been about jobs...  AnneD   Jun-22-09 03:06 PM   #80 
     - Okay, how 'bout if we outlaw robots?  tclambert   Jun-22-09 02:54 PM   #77 
        - Seriously, how is the robot thing supposed to work?  tclambert   Jun-22-09 03:07 PM   #81 
        - I Rather Think Chairman Mao Was Onto Something  Demeter   Jun-22-09 08:40 PM   #96 
  - Insiders Exit Shares at the Fastest Pace in Two Years (caveat emptor)  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:16 AM   #10 
  - What I wanta know is. . . .  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 06:43 AM   #13 
  - Pension Funds, Probably  Demeter   Jun-22-09 06:47 AM   #17 
  - Pensions, and 401(k), and IRAs  DemReadingDU   Jun-22-09 07:25 AM   #24 
  - Tansy, companies will often buy their own stocks.  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:57 AM   #20 
     - The discussion threads over at Google Finance are just loaded with those of whom you speak.  Hugin   Jun-22-09 08:11 AM   #32 
     - But either way, it's not sustainable, is it?  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 08:29 AM   #33 
        - It is sustainable, IMO, as long as a rally will support the valuations they want.  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 08:49 AM   #35 
        - so what you're saying, then, is that the stock market numbers  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 09:04 AM   #36 
           - "because in fact they are completely divorced from "the economy."  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 09:55 AM   #37 
           - "And don't forget 'hope'."  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 10:19 AM   #39 
           - I would say so.  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 12:14 PM   #65 
           - The market is divorced from the economy....  AnneD   Jun-22-09 11:51 AM   #63 
           - I believe, sir, you are saying that Skynet has already taken over,  tclambert   Jun-22-09 03:18 PM   #85 
              - We primates have ben insanely lucky to make it this far.  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:28 PM   #94 
           - I'm Operating on the Assumption That Every Public Utterance Is a Lie, These Days  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:29 AM   #41 
              - Demeter shoots,  hamerfan   Jun-22-09 02:51 PM   #76 
                 - History proves that effective lying is profitable.  tclambert   Jun-22-09 03:31 PM   #86 
        - There Was a Wonderful Broadway Musical Called "How Now, Dow Jones?"  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:27 AM   #40 
  - Yepper. They're running from something. But who knows, it could just be  Joanne98   Jun-22-09 10:50 AM   #50 
  - Big Japan Firms Less Pessimistic  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:37 AM   #12 
  - Good Morning Marketeers!  Demeter   Jun-22-09 06:43 AM   #14 
  - Dilbert Applies to Our So-Called Economic Policy, Too  Demeter   Jun-22-09 06:51 AM   #19 
  - Debt: 06/18/2009 11,399,258,796,766.10 (DOWN 3,511,431,307.88) (Debt down.)  Festivito   Jun-22-09 07:09 AM   #21 
  - Debt: 06/19/2009 11,397,711,606,020.00 (DOWN 1,547,190,746.10) (Little down.)  Festivito   Jun-22-09 04:10 PM   #92 
  - dollar watch  UpInArms   Jun-22-09 07:11 AM   #22 
  - Dollar gains on euro, but slips against yen  UpInArms   Jun-22-09 07:29 AM   #25 
  - Fed plans repo markets revamp  UpInArms   Jun-22-09 07:21 AM   #23 
  - Martin Weiss: California Collapsing  DemReadingDU   Jun-22-09 07:29 AM   #26 
  - Well that was cheerful reading...  mrdmk   Jun-22-09 01:26 PM   #68 
  - If we all jump up and down at the same time, maybe the San Andreas will give way.  tclambert   Jun-22-09 03:34 PM   #87 
  - Treasurys up on World Bank outlook, Fed buyback  UpInArms   Jun-22-09 07:41 AM   #27 
  - Employers cutting back 401(k) plans  UpInArms   Jun-22-09 07:52 AM   #28 
  - Citi urges governments to pull bank foreclosure trigger  UpInArms   Jun-22-09 07:55 AM   #29 
  - .  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 08:42 AM   #34 
  - I Think the Headline Grossly Misrepresents Citi's Message  Demeter   Jun-22-09 11:09 AM   #54 
     - That's why I was, er, speechless  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 02:49 PM   #74 
  - Obama defends Fed as overseer on systemic risk (Reuters)  Hugin   Jun-22-09 08:05 AM   #31 
  - Now THAT'S Audacity!  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:33 AM   #42 
  - No.  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 02:50 PM   #75 
     - Well, Yes, Most Audacity Is.  Demeter   Jun-22-09 08:46 PM   #97 
  - The audacity of bullshit  Hawkowl   Jun-23-09 01:31 AM   #98 
  - Onion's Sunday Magazine Cover  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:34 AM   #43 
  - The Onion: ever relevant with gallows humor  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 06:56 PM   #95 
  - HERE'S HOW IT'S DONE: Beijing orders stock transfer  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:37 AM   #44 
  - Bankers’ pay soars in attempt to halt exodus  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:41 AM   #45 
  - Move to what? Retirement!  mrdmk   Jun-22-09 03:14 PM   #83 
  - Big names eye Lehman’s debt  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:44 AM   #46 
  - Fiat shake-up at Chrysler hits top gear  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:47 AM   #47 
  - That highlighted paragraph describes essence of what makes Mr. Marchione  Ghost Dog   Jun-22-09 02:29 PM   #71 
  - Swiss bankers at crossroads on secrecy (LIGHT DAWNS ON MATTERHORN)  Demeter   Jun-22-09 10:50 AM   #49 
  - Too Big to be Restructured  Demeter   Jun-22-09 11:00 AM   #51 
  - Waving Goodbye to the TARP  Demeter   Jun-22-09 11:01 AM   #52 
  - ‘It’s time to enshrine Hank Paulson as national hero’ WTF?  Demeter   Jun-22-09 11:06 AM   #53 
  - And I am not so old that I can remember when Congress.....  AnneD   Jun-22-09 12:07 PM   #64 
     - And once upon a time, Wall Street Execs, preaching deregulation, went to prison  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 12:22 PM   #66 
        - The Good Old Days  Demeter   Jun-22-09 02:22 PM   #69 
        - This weekend I re watched All the President's Men...  AnneD   Jun-22-09 02:34 PM   #72 
  - More Bile from Matt Taibbi  Demeter   Jun-22-09 02:27 PM   #70 
  - MISSIVE FROM CHINA: Stimulus – at what cost?  Demeter   Jun-22-09 11:13 AM   #55 
  - GM shows gravity of pension challenge By Tony Jackson  Demeter   Jun-22-09 11:16 AM   #56 
  - Bill Gross: “Staying Rich in the New Normal”  Demeter   Jun-22-09 11:18 AM   #57 
  - Does anybody have a link for support and resistance numbers?  Joanne98   Jun-22-09 11:21 AM   #58 
  - Are you looking for a definitions page?  ozymandius   Jun-22-09 12:27 PM   #67 
  - Looting and How It Came to Pass  Demeter   Jun-22-09 11:22 AM   #59 
  - While California budget woes are making the news; Illinois is silently going through the same issues  Robbien   Jun-22-09 11:43 AM   #62 
  - Opinion: Selling Organs for Cash Should be Option  Pale Blue Dot   Jun-22-09 02:46 PM   #73 
  - .  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 03:01 PM   #78 
  - Yep.  Pale Blue Dot   Jun-22-09 03:13 PM   #82 
  - Why not just convict them of a crime,  zogofzorkon   Jun-22-09 03:14 PM   #84 
     - But you can't execute them by poison gas or lethal injection.  tclambert   Jun-22-09 03:52 PM   #89 
  - So, are we finally at the beginning of the end?  Pale Blue Dot   Jun-22-09 03:46 PM   #88 
  - z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z  Tansy_Gold   Jun-22-09 03:54 PM   #90 
  - What are green shoots?  DemReadingDU   Jun-22-09 05:18 PM   #93 
  - Okay, I couldn't find the Sam Waterston SNL clip. Copyright issues. But here is a re-enactment,  tclambert   Jun-22-09 04:01 PM   #91 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC