rcrush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-04-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Does seeing the occasional accidental boobie or occasional F word going to destroy society? |
|
Edited on Mon May-04-09 09:31 AM by rcrush
I think the bigger crime is how they censor those R rated movies for network television. How does one watch Die Hard with all the cuss words cut out? Its not right!
|
| -High court throws out ruling on Janet Jackson (wardrobe malfunction) |
jefferson_dem |
May-04-09 09:18 AM |
#0 |
 -
SCOTUS: aganist boobies, in favor of boobs |
havocmom |
May-04-09 09:20 AM |
#1 |
| -
Does seeing the occasional accidental boobie or occasional F word going to destroy society? |
rcrush |
May-04-09 09:29 AM |
#2 |
  -
That's why Republicans love small government. It can fit inside your TV and vagina. |
No Elephants |
May-05-09 05:30 AM |
#33 |
| -
DUzy. |
Occulus |
May-05-09 10:06 AM |
#41 |
| -
this was a one sentence order that was inevitable after last week's ruling |
onenote |
May-04-09 09:39 AM |
#3 |
| -
Must you break a string of puns with a factual post? Twisted! (Thanks. Good info.) |
No Elephants |
May-05-09 05:39 AM |
#34 |
| -
The appeals court should reconsider -- and make the same ruling again. |
damntexdem |
May-04-09 02:16 PM |
#4 |
| -
Yep. |
aquart |
May-04-09 08:21 PM |
#30 |
| -
What a joke |
Dappleganger |
May-04-09 04:22 PM |
#5 |
| -
Thank god it wan't a PENIS!!! |
TankLV |
May-04-09 04:38 PM |
#6 |
| -
That Janet Jackson had had very interesting plastic surgery. |
aquart |
May-04-09 08:20 PM |
#29 |
| -
What do you have against a penis? (does Groucho brow twitch). |
No Elephants |
May-05-09 05:41 AM |
#35 |
| -
Jackson flash to be re-examined |
dipsydoodle |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#7 |
| -
We certainly cannot move forward and put this behind us. |
endarkenment |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#8 |
| -
It did give a whole new meaning to the phrase "half time show." |
No Elephants |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#12 |
| -
Should have gone for two |
central scrutinizer |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#19 |
| -
One for money, two for the show? |
No Elephants |
May-05-09 05:27 AM |
#32 |
| -
lol - your puns lac-taste :) j/k |
tomm2thumbs |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#20 |
| -
thanks for the mammary's! n/t |
8 track mind |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#22 |
| -
DU Humor. Love it! nt |
ItNerd4life |
May-05-09 12:32 PM |
#42 |
| -
If I recall, wasn't the entire performance based around the |
hedgehog |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#9 |
| -
What nipple? |
HopeHoops |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#10 |
| -
I think only the leather part was supposed to come off, leaving her breast semi-covered by |
No Elephants |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#14 |
| -
You're wearing a skin-tight leather outfit on a hot stage... |
HopeHoops |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#17 |
| -
Wasn't "I want you naked by the end of this song" part of the lyrics? |
No Elephants |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#11 |
| -
It was |
jmowreader |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#26 |
| -
Sadly, the power of the neo theos on the SCOTUS will last many years beyond |
No Elephants |
May-05-09 05:20 AM |
#31 |
| -
This would be the ultimate slap in the face of the previous administration, to undo the arbitrary |
truthisfreedom |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#13 |
| -
And G-d knows, we've all been searching the photos and videos ! |
hedgehog |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#15 |
| -
Shhhh. Next thing you know, the Internet porn police will be monitoring DU. |
No Elephants |
May-05-09 05:46 AM |
#36 |
| -
This is how the Roberts Court chooses to spend its time? |
aquart |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#16 |
| -
apparently. what does that say about roberts? (besides "jerk!") ugh. n/t |
orleans |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#18 |
| -
Does he smoke? I'm hoping he smokes. |
aquart |
May-04-09 08:19 PM |
#28 |
| -
Yes, exactly. |
Stellabella |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#23 |
| -
they spent their time issuing a one sentence order sending the case back to the lower court |
onenote |
May-05-09 07:46 AM |
#39 |
| -
Oh noes! Boobs! |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#21 |
| -
Cup catastrophe to be heard by the SC? |
pleah |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#24 |
| -
eventually maybe. But all they did yesterday was send the case back to the lower court |
onenote |
May-05-09 07:48 AM |
#40 |
| -
They should have stuck to tying her down and waterboarding her, but no... |
Grinchie |
May-04-09 05:46 PM |
#25 |
| -
no time to look into torture |
Betty |
May-04-09 05:58 PM |
#27 |
| -
So, that's why Obama wanted to look forward! |
No Elephants |
May-05-09 05:50 AM |
#37 |
| -
I want my tittilation!...nt |
LeftHander |
May-05-09 07:29 AM |
#38 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread