Reply #68: Nader's a what??

[mstrsplinter326]

the equivalent of someone who condones and sets up rape? that's beyond the realm of political, that's a personal attack. You sound like the repukkks I know.

More importantly, dividing of the progressives and moderates??? The progressives should have their own party (the dems of 50+ years ago) and the moderates should be the fence riders who sway the elections. That's the way it should work. Should.
The moderates and right-leaning moderates now have a party in the current dem's. That's not the way it should be, that's what Naderites understand. We don't like Bush anymore than you do, but we understand that if we allow the dems to be right of center in one election, whats to stop them from trying the same bull in every election. What to stop the 'better than the other guy' argument?? When does it end. Of course bush is bad, but Kerry is only slightly better. Why isn't there a good candidate. And I don't want to hear the no one would elect a progressive like DK. That's crap. No one knows the truths about the current state of the union, and if they did they'd go running to Dennis.