You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #151: Was the issue expressly stated as one of self defense? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #143
151. Was the issue expressly stated as one of self defense?
I won't have time to read through the opinion until this weekend.

The thrust of my question is that, during the 1999 WTO attacks (of the police against the citizenry) in Seattle, the mayor used his "emergency powers" to make it a criminal offense to carry a gas mask. It struck me then that, if we have a constitutional right to take protective measures against a tyrannical government, gas masks and related passive protective gear should be just as constitutional as guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC