You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: That arrangement is actually quite common [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That arrangement is actually quite common
Prime/sub-contractors and all that. It's very common for a big company like GD to respond to and be awarded a lucrative solicitation only to outsource final design/assembly to sub-contractos. Some mom-and-pop contractors might have phenomenal products, but get squeezed by the big boys, so they sometimes have no option but to piggyback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -G.A.O. Backs Boeing on Aerial Tanker Deal maddezmom  Jun-18-08 01:12 PM   #0 
  - Boeing  Parche   Jun-18-08 01:14 PM   #1 
  - I can't say I am fond of Alabama  policypunk   Jun-18-08 01:31 PM   #5 
     - And I'm not fond of  OwnedByFerrets   Jun-18-08 01:53 PM   #8 
     - I tease  policypunk   Jun-18-08 01:57 PM   #10 
     - No it won't. Boeing suffered consequences for that fraud.  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 02:43 PM   #14 
        - bullshit!  policypunk   Jun-18-08 03:00 PM   #20 
           - Amazing, isnt it?  OwnedByFerrets   Jun-18-08 04:33 PM   #30 
              - useful idiots  policypunk   Jun-19-08 03:39 PM   #40 
  - Use This Against McSame  rsmith6621   Jun-18-08 01:21 PM   #2 
  - McCain shut down a corporate fraud on a massive scale  policypunk   Jun-18-08 01:24 PM   #3 
  - Boeing should have been banned from the competition  policypunk   Jun-18-08 01:29 PM   #4 
  - Boeing was rejected for criteria that were NOT specified in the RFP  Squatch   Jun-18-08 01:49 PM   #6 
     - False  policypunk   Jun-18-08 01:55 PM   #9 
        - The GAO disagrees with you.  Squatch   Jun-18-08 02:07 PM   #11 
           - The GAO is getting Duncan Hunter and Maria Cantwell off their ass  policypunk   Jun-18-08 02:14 PM   #12 
           - Nah, that's not it.  Squatch   Jun-18-08 02:21 PM   #13 
           - And their ruling makes sense. n/t  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 02:47 PM   #16 
              - I agree...  Squatch   Jun-18-08 02:49 PM   #17 
                 - Since Airbus didn't design the plane that the contract proposal asked for  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 02:51 PM   #18 
                    - That arrangement is actually quite common  Squatch   Jun-18-08 02:54 PM   #19 
                       - That's not what I meant.  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 03:00 PM   #21 
                          - Aha...I see. It's been a long day.  Squatch   Jun-18-08 03:02 PM   #23 
                          - again false  policypunk   Jun-18-08 03:12 PM   #24 
                             - Yeah, well it should make you sick to rally around Airbus.  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 03:38 PM   #27 
                                - you have that wrong too  policypunk   Jun-18-08 07:20 PM   #34 
  - Boeing greasing palms again....  OwnedByFerrets   Jun-18-08 01:51 PM   #7 
  - Your bias is showing. Many more American jobs would be produced through a  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 02:45 PM   #15 
  - Exactly  Parche   Jun-18-08 03:17 PM   #25 
  - You really think Boeing "bought" the GAO?  BigDaddy44   Jun-18-08 03:01 PM   #22 
     - If you dont think its possible  OwnedByFerrets   Jun-18-08 04:31 PM   #29 
        - No, Airbus did. How else did they get the contract while costing $91 mil MORE?  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 04:50 PM   #32 
           - because they got more for the money  policypunk   Jun-18-08 07:25 PM   #35 
              - They got a plane that wasn't specified in the contract proposal  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 09:51 PM   #36 
  - maddezmom  Diclotican   Jun-18-08 03:33 PM   #26 
  - The Airbus craft is too big to fit on our runways.  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 03:41 PM   #28 
     - pnwmom  Diclotican   Jun-18-08 05:43 PM   #33 
        - Here's more, from Bloomberg news.  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 09:55 PM   #37 
           - pnwmom  Diclotican   Jun-19-08 04:18 AM   #38 
              - Boeing expected to win the contract because they were offering to  pnwmom   Jun-19-08 10:09 AM   #39 
  - Here's a good reason for revisiting the decision: a huge miscalculation of COSTS.  pnwmom   Jun-18-08 04:48 PM   #31 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC