You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: What does gay sex have to do with multiple matrimony? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. What does gay sex have to do with multiple matrimony?
If those people want to have sex with each other outside of marriage, no one is stopping them.

This is a ploy by the Right wing to attack gay civil rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Utah Polygamy Ban Challenged; U.S. Supreme Court's Sodomy Ruling Is Cited rodbarnett  Jan-26-04 01:01 PM   #0 
  - What does gay sex have to do with multiple matrimony?  cprise   Jan-26-04 01:05 PM   #1 
  - The general theory is that no sexual relationship between consenting...  Mary Pat   Jan-26-04 01:42 PM   #6 
  - And so it isn't.  liberal_veteran   Jan-26-04 01:49 PM   #12 
  - but the gov't has a legitimate concern.  slksln   Jan-26-04 01:51 PM   #14 
  - The language governing such issues could simply be changed to...  Mary Pat   Jan-26-04 02:00 PM   #25 
  - Yes, but it doesn't work that way.  shimmergal   Jan-26-04 08:13 PM   #45 
  - So what does marriage have to do with that  Toots   Jan-26-04 05:15 PM   #38 
  - I agree with this  gate of the sun   Jan-31-04 08:08 PM   #53 
  - It may seem that way  Sandpiper   Jan-26-04 01:50 PM   #13 
  - Masturbation?  Damn Hippie   Jan-26-04 01:06 PM   #2 
  - Y OU are the PERP, We (Society at large) are the VICTIM  FoeOfBush   Jan-26-04 01:43 PM   #7 
  - Let's see now...  Damn Hippie   Jan-26-04 01:55 PM   #18 
     - I heard a comedian say  gimme a break   Jan-26-04 03:19 PM   #31 
  - Well you certainly can't be a Republican ~ We all know they  Toots   Jan-26-04 05:18 PM   #39 
     - Oh Puh-leeeeeze!! LOL!  platinumPens   Jan-26-04 05:21 PM   #40 
  - Inherent logical fallacy  TrogL   Jan-26-04 01:12 PM   #3 
  - I expected this  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 01:14 PM   #4 
  - How?  htuttle   Jan-26-04 01:36 PM   #5 
  - Many  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 01:46 PM   #10 
     - Apples and oranges.  liberal_veteran   Jan-26-04 01:52 PM   #15 
     - Sure  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 01:54 PM   #17 
        - Whether you trust them or not, they are not always wrong.  liberal_veteran   Jan-26-04 02:00 PM   #24 
           - They are not always right either  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 02:30 PM   #27 
     - I don't think that argument will work...  htuttle   Jan-26-04 01:53 PM   #16 
     - Lots of people oppose changes in marriage  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 01:55 PM   #19 
        - If this were peacetime, and the economy wasn't in the toilet, perhaps  htuttle   Jan-26-04 01:59 PM   #23 
           - There I disagree  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 02:30 PM   #28 
     - We already do that with heterosexual marriages  trent21   Jan-26-04 02:58 PM   #30 
     - You're probably right about the GOP's reaction ...  BattyDem   Jan-26-04 09:04 PM   #50 
  - Actually this will be laughed out of court.  liberal_veteran   Jan-26-04 01:46 PM   #9 
  - How dare you, Muddle.  Poseidon   Jan-26-04 02:48 PM   #29 
  - But the Supremes DIDN'T allow Gay Marriage.....  Bridget Burke   Jan-26-04 03:33 PM   #33 
  - Scalia: Brother-Sister Sex is next!  yellowcanine   Jan-26-04 01:46 PM   #8 
  - More realistically  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 01:56 PM   #20 
     - Is that all you believe marriage is about?  Toots   Jan-26-04 05:25 PM   #41 
        - That is my point  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 08:29 PM   #47 
           - sorry, but....  ldf   Jan-31-04 08:57 PM   #55 
  - Good.  alonso_quijano   Jan-26-04 01:46 PM   #11 
  - BWAHAHAHA! They are so pathetic. Consider what might be a  roguevalley   Jan-26-04 01:56 PM   #21 
  - I agree with you...  slksln   Jan-26-04 01:58 PM   #22 
     - Also think of domestic and divorce law  cprise   Jan-26-04 02:29 PM   #26 
  - One more polygamy story from Utah!  JudiLyn   Jan-26-04 03:28 PM   #32 
  - this is wrong  gate of the sun   Jan-31-04 08:13 PM   #54 
  - I've read through this thread and still see no logical connection  platinumPens   Jan-26-04 03:41 PM   #34 
  - good point. Marriage is about two people, whatever their sexes.  pinto   Jan-26-04 03:47 PM   #35 
  - Why?  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 03:54 PM   #36 
     - why not?  pinto   Jan-26-04 03:57 PM   #37 
     - Exactly  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 06:03 PM   #43 
     - A marriage license is a secular legal contract  htuttle   Jan-26-04 05:35 PM   #42 
        - The Supremes  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 06:05 PM   #44 
           - But the marriage contract was not changed in the sodomy case  Amager   Jan-26-04 08:21 PM   #46 
              - They raised the issue  Muddleoftheroad   Jan-26-04 08:30 PM   #48 
                 - I'm not following you. The previous USSC decision on gay rights  Amager   Jan-26-04 09:33 PM   #51 
  - But if a court ruled that a ban on same sex marriages was unconstitutional  Freddie Stubbs   Jan-31-04 07:42 PM   #52 
  - This is a right wing ploy  Democat   Jan-26-04 08:40 PM   #49 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC