zanne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 18. Is it wrong to wonder which one of them will die first? |
|
Of natural causes, of course.
|
| - Supreme Court says police may search even if arrest invalid |
cal04 |
Apr-23-08 12:16 PM |
#0 |
 -
Just one more step in our rapidly coming police state. n/t |
LakeSamish706 |
Apr-23-08 12:19 PM |
#1 |
 -
It has been here for sometime. We are just hearing about |
midnight |
Apr-23-08 03:31 PM |
#33 |
 -
Now watch all the DU defenders of this stand up... |
superconnected |
Apr-23-08 05:09 PM |
#41 |
| -
Damn good thing we have a Constitution |
Solly Mack |
Apr-23-08 12:20 PM |
#2 |
| -
Maybe Pelosi should read it, then. |
OKthatsIT |
Apr-24-08 12:59 PM |
#51 |
| -
So much for "fruit of the poisonous tree" |
Dogtown |
Apr-23-08 12:20 PM |
#3 |
| -
This isn't new. Arrest on probable cause for traffic violation is not unconstitutional. |
BadgerLaw2010 |
Apr-23-08 12:38 PM |
#11 |
| -
It angers me, but it is not new. |
uppityperson |
Apr-23-08 12:57 PM |
#15 |
| -
"failure to obey a lawful order |
Dogtown |
Apr-23-08 02:45 PM |
#28 |
| -
Right. As in the case of the Texas mother not wearing a seatbelt. |
High Plains |
Apr-23-08 01:52 PM |
#20 |
| -
I beg to differ |
Dogtown |
Apr-23-08 02:29 PM |
#26 |
| -
What?! |
sakabatou |
Apr-23-08 12:20 PM |
#4 |
| -
Not any more |
Thothmes |
Apr-23-08 06:23 PM |
#43 |
| -
Well fuck |
sakabatou |
Apr-24-08 12:12 AM |
#48 |
| -
'bad tail-lights' to 'felony prison time' in one easy step... |
islandmkl |
Apr-23-08 12:22 PM |
#5 |
| -
Making racist cops jobs that much easier |
Paint It Black |
Apr-23-08 12:24 PM |
#6 |
| -
I wonder if this Supreme Court would hold corporations to the same high standards |
zbdent |
Apr-23-08 12:25 PM |
#7 |
| -
Apples and oranges ... |
93ncsu |
Apr-23-08 12:50 PM |
#13 |
| -
It is no wonder that obtaining conservative judges was what the GOP was all about |
Robbien |
Apr-23-08 12:26 PM |
#8 |
| -
Liberals were part of this ruling too. |
bamalib |
Apr-23-08 01:57 PM |
#21 |
| -
Traffic stops aka. Fishing expeditions |
WilyWondr |
Apr-23-08 12:30 PM |
#9 |
| -
in this state, the cops not only examine the driver when pulled over, but all other occupants of the |
niyad |
Apr-23-08 12:39 PM |
#12 |
| -
What could possibly go wrong? |
eShirl |
Apr-23-08 12:38 PM |
#10 |
| -
Good bye, "probable cause" |
TechBear_Seattle |
Apr-23-08 12:53 PM |
#14 |
| -
What magic device |
TransitJohn |
Apr-23-08 01:06 PM |
#16 |
| -
Probably one of those ... |
93ncsu |
Apr-23-08 01:20 PM |
#17 |
| -
Cop overlooks the law. |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-23-08 01:50 PM |
#19 |
| -
Yes, they did not follow Virginia law ... |
93ncsu |
Apr-23-08 02:00 PM |
#22 |
| -
Maybe I'm missing something but I'm just curious |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-23-08 02:10 PM |
#23 |
| -
Based on the story ... |
93ncsu |
Apr-23-08 03:36 PM |
#34 |
| -
Well, this part seems to be the saving grace in this decision, by Ginsburg. |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-23-08 04:12 PM |
#36 |
| -
Yes, I see your point ... |
93ncsu |
Apr-23-08 04:21 PM |
#37 |
| -
Yes, especially as the people most likely hurt by this decision will be those least able to afford |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-23-08 04:28 PM |
#38 |
| -
Maybe personal recognition? |
uppityperson |
Apr-23-08 02:51 PM |
#30 |
| -
Is it wrong to wonder which one of them will die first? |
zanne |
Apr-23-08 01:43 PM |
#18 |
| -
One word to describe this; BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!! |
pattmarty |
Apr-23-08 02:26 PM |
#24 |
| -
What??? I'm not pro-crack, but this is license for cops to do ANYTHING to search someone. |
truthisfreedom |
Apr-23-08 02:28 PM |
#25 |
| -
Ok, why the anger? |
cstanleytech |
Apr-23-08 02:37 PM |
#27 |
| -
But that's not what happened from my understanding of this article. |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-23-08 02:47 PM |
#29 |
| -
I believe in this instance, |
Dogtown |
Apr-23-08 03:03 PM |
#31 |
| -
So what? Reprimand them then for not following policy but |
cstanleytech |
Apr-23-08 04:06 PM |
#35 |
| -
I think it's great they all agree, but that in it self doesn't make it right. |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-23-08 05:07 PM |
#40 |
| -
Then hopefully a 3rd party from outside the state like the feds |
cstanleytech |
Apr-23-08 07:48 PM |
#44 |
| -
This decision seems to have given all the power regarding |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-23-08 08:12 PM |
#45 |
| -
Fourth amendment only goes so far, |
cstanleytech |
Apr-24-08 07:16 AM |
#49 |
| -
I believe this decision basically guts the Fourth Amendment.. |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-24-08 12:13 PM |
#50 |
| -
Well yeah if you break a law |
cstanleytech |
Apr-24-08 02:17 PM |
#52 |
| -
Actually , the way I read it, if you're just accused of breaking a law |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-24-08 02:45 PM |
#53 |
| -
*shrug* DNA is no more of an issue than fingerprints which |
cstanleytech |
Apr-24-08 05:26 PM |
#55 |
| -
I believe if after eight years of Cheney/Bush shredding the Constitution and |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-24-08 06:12 PM |
#56 |
| -
Remember, this is the same court that made that eminent domain ruling |
closeupready |
Apr-23-08 03:26 PM |
#32 |
| -
You mean Kelo v City of New London? |
D__S |
Apr-23-08 08:58 PM |
#46 |
| -
You have the right |
notesdev |
Apr-23-08 04:35 PM |
#39 |
| -
Next step; don't worry about making any arrests. Just search & seizure at will! |
LynnTheDem |
Apr-23-08 06:13 PM |
#42 |
| -
Our next revolution is way overdue. The French have had six. |
Vidar |
Apr-23-08 09:13 PM |
#47 |
| -
And there are many who ID themselves as Dems who don't think we're |
TOJ |
Apr-24-08 02:50 PM |
#54 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread