slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. More information about the ship |
| -US vessel 'shoots at Suez boat' |
muriel_volestrangler |
Mar-24-08 06:49 PM |
#0 |
-
Why does a container ship even have weapons? And by what |
babylonsister |
Mar-24-08 06:56 PM |
#1 |
 -
Protection from pirates which are off the coast of Madagascar and upper West Africa |
L0oniX |
Mar-24-08 06:58 PM |
#3 |
  -
It seems to have been in the Suez Canal |
FarCenter |
Mar-24-08 09:10 PM |
#12 |
 -
Piracy is a major problem for commercial ships |
slackmaster |
Mar-24-08 07:02 PM |
#4 |
-
A few years ago the Chinese went in and cleaned up the straits of Mallacca (sp) but nobody |
ohio2007 |
Mar-24-08 07:54 PM |
#9 |
 -
Those straits have always been pirate-infested waters |
knight_of_the_star |
Mar-26-08 03:06 AM |
#60 |
-
But where does it say that they were attacked? |
kimmylavin |
Mar-24-08 08:12 PM |
#11 |
-
Why not just insure your cargo? |
wuushew |
Mar-24-08 09:29 PM |
#15 |
 -
Because the pirates tend to kill the crew if demands aren't met promptly |
sergeiAK |
Mar-24-08 09:55 PM |
#16 |
 -
People are ready to use violence in defense of material things because... |
Rage for Order |
Mar-24-08 09:55 PM |
#17 |
  -
Why was the U.S. war against the Barbary pirates a good thing? |
wuushew |
Mar-24-08 10:05 PM |
#18 |
 -
I don't think the seas should be policed, per se |
Rage for Order |
Mar-24-08 10:21 PM |
#19 |
 -
Because pirates murder their victims all too often |
slackmaster |
Mar-25-08 10:29 AM |
#40 |
-
Too many people still buy into the romantic image of the classic era of piracy |
Mike Daniels |
Mar-25-08 11:00 AM |
#41 |
-
I never said pirates weren't thugs |
wuushew |
Mar-25-08 11:14 AM |
#42 |
-
Just a nit, but they weren't all men |
slackmaster |
Mar-25-08 12:19 PM |
#43 |
-
Is it merchant marines who do this sort of thing? |
Zodiak Ironfist |
Mar-25-08 04:47 PM |
#53 |
-
Merchant marine = civilian sailor as opposed to navy sailor. |
hedgehog |
Mar-25-08 07:45 PM |
#55 |
-
Yes, and I believe their certification is called a "Z Card" |
slackmaster |
Mar-26-08 07:07 AM |
#61 |
-
Global Container Lines ship ... pic here... |
EVDebs |
Mar-24-08 06:58 PM |
#2 |
 -
More information about the ship |
slackmaster |
Mar-24-08 07:04 PM |
#5 |
-
From your post it was a 'chartered' MV. Did US Navy charter it ? |
EVDebs |
Mar-24-08 07:11 PM |
#7 |
-
The article about this in the Navy Times.... |
icymist |
Mar-25-08 02:08 PM |
#51 |
-
Military Sea Lift Command chartered the ship. |
Thothmes |
Mar-25-08 07:57 PM |
#57 |
-
Nice shooting, Tex......I'll bet they were surprised, eh? |
Hulk |
Mar-24-08 07:07 PM |
#6 |
-
the ship had sailed from Dubai and was transporting used military equipment |
ohio2007 |
Mar-24-08 07:47 PM |
#8 |
 -
It sounds like the ship was in Egyptian waters, then |
daleo |
Mar-24-08 07:55 PM |
#10 |
-
I find this highly suspect |
bluesmail |
Mar-24-08 09:12 PM |
#13 |
-
more.... |
unkachuck |
Mar-24-08 09:18 PM |
#14 |
-
U.S. warship fires on Egyptian craft, killing one |
sad_one |
Mar-25-08 06:18 AM |
#20 |
 -
Well, this doesn't sound good. |
Kool Kitty |
Mar-25-08 06:18 AM |
#21 |
  -
I'm worried too |
sad_one |
Mar-25-08 06:18 AM |
#23 |
 -
FYI, "nuclear sub" means nuclear powered, not nuclear armed. nt |
greyl |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#31 |
 -
Freedom is on the march! |
Amonester |
Mar-25-08 06:18 AM |
#22 |
 -
What exactly is a "Global Patriot"? |
frebrd |
Mar-25-08 06:18 AM |
#24 |
  -
yeah, that's the most retarded name for a ship ever. bush must have named it personally |
darue |
Mar-25-08 06:18 AM |
#26 |
   -
kicking your reply. |
snot |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#34 |
   -
At least they did not name it "Global Crusader" |
TheBorealAvenger |
Mar-25-08 06:43 AM |
#37 |
  -
A lot of container ships have theme names |
Posteritatis |
Mar-25-08 09:06 PM |
#58 |
 -
The toxic U.S. |
izquierdista |
Mar-25-08 06:18 AM |
#25 |
  -
And use the Space Program to launch all the depleted-uranium |
Amonester |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#27 |
 -
Now it's a U.S. Warship? Earlier today |
SimpleTrend |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#28 |
  -
Kind of halfway between the two |
Posteritatis |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#29 |
 -
Not surprised after the USS Cole I am thinking the Navy does not want to take any chances. n/ |
MiltonF |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#30 |
 -
We may yet overtake Israel as the world's number one rogue state. |
Vidar |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#32 |
 -
WAIT, WAIT, WAIT! Yesterday, it was a US container ship, now it's a US warship?! |
DRoseDARs |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#33 |
-
must be a privately contracted container/warship -- |
snot |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#35 |
-
Pic here: |
MaineDem |
Mar-25-08 06:19 AM |
#36 |
-
An American cargo ship under contract to the U.S. Navy opened fire on a small Egyptian boat |
maddezmom |
Mar-25-08 10:24 AM |
#38 |
 -
US Navy teams authorized to respond to threats: navy chief |
maddezmom |
Mar-25-08 10:26 AM |
#39 |
 -
now we're privatizing the navy, too---not surprised with BushCo in charge |
wordpix |
Mar-25-08 02:24 PM |
#52 |
-
Not that I'm a fan of privatization, but we have always used |
hedgehog |
Mar-25-08 07:45 PM |
#54 |
-
The Govt has chartered civilian commercial vessels |
Thothmes |
Mar-25-08 07:50 PM |
#56 |
-
U.S. ship (not USN ship) shoots at small boat in Suez Canal |
underpants |
Mar-25-08 12:36 PM |
#44 |
-
That's what happens when bushco hires trigger happy rent-n-army....... |
Double T |
Mar-25-08 12:36 PM |
#45 |
-
The Navy has its own floating Blackwater? Who knew? |
acmavm |
Mar-25-08 12:36 PM |
#46 |
-
accident waiting for the excuse to bomb Iran to pieces |
gasperc |
Mar-25-08 12:36 PM |
#47 |
 -
Won't be long , April 7th or 8th from what I've read. |
bagrman |
Mar-25-08 12:36 PM |
#49 |
-
crap, this is what they said last April |
gasperc |
Mar-25-08 12:36 PM |
#50 |
-
Fallan isn't in the way now. 1 nuke sub a has been sent and another battle group. |
bagrman |
Mar-26-08 01:41 AM |
#59 |
-
I saw this story before but I didn't know they were mercenaries. |
Lasher |
Mar-25-08 12:36 PM |
#48 |