Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
| 45. What difference does it make? |
|
It really doesn't matter what these criminals do or how many laws they break or how much evidence they destroy. It has already been decided "Impeachment is OFF the table" Democrats absolutely REFUSE to hold these criminals accountable. To them the most important thing in the world is getting re-elected.. Nothing else is of any consequence..They strongly believe if they try and hold them accountable the American people will turn on them..They are so isolated they don't have any feeling at all for how the American people truly feel. I truly feel sorry for the America my grandchildren are going to inherit.
|
| -White House: Computer hard drives tossed |
Newsjock |
Mar-22-08 12:17 AM |
#0 |
 -
What a coincedence. The Friday News Dump is about Dumping! |
Bonobo |
Mar-22-08 12:18 AM |
#1 |
| -
Ode to the Nancy Disaster |
The Stranger |
Mar-22-08 12:30 AM |
#2 |
| -
This can't be legal. |
tridim |
Mar-22-08 12:38 AM |
#3 |
 -
I'm pretty sure they're required to save it all. |
aquart |
Mar-22-08 12:56 AM |
#5 |
| -
who actually ordered the hard drives to be destroyed? |
bambino |
Mar-22-08 10:31 AM |
#61 |
| -
I'm sure it was structured in such a way that nobody is responsible. |
sofa king |
Mar-22-08 11:26 AM |
#70 |
| -
I hope you right |
bambino |
Mar-22-08 11:37 AM |
#72 |
 -
If history is anything to go by, neither will happen. |
TheMadMonk |
Mar-23-08 07:01 AM |
#122 |
| -
To be fair though... |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 12:19 PM |
#80 |
| -
it's not that long ago is it? |
bambino |
Mar-22-08 12:31 PM |
#87 |
| -
I would imagine they could look in many places... |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 12:48 PM |
#88 |
| -
But in the WH, I believe records must be retained for the archives |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:24 PM |
#100 |
| -
But most likely not on the drives themselves. |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 11:26 PM |
#114 |
| -
You probably didn't work for the White House |
jmowreader |
Mar-22-08 09:38 PM |
#108 |
| -
Ayes. |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 11:24 PM |
#113 |
| -
let me guess: some young bimbo/bimba who slobbers over himself at the sight of Dickhead & Chimperor |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:23 PM |
#99 |
| -
Ha ha ha! |
Enthusiast |
Mar-23-08 12:38 AM |
#118 |
| -
they are probably required to destroy it in fact |
erebusman |
Mar-22-08 09:56 PM |
#109 |
| -
Agreed. It's about protecting individual privacy |
djohnson |
Mar-22-08 10:29 PM |
#110 |
| -
When have they ever worried about minor details |
cornermouse |
Mar-22-08 03:35 AM |
#13 |
| -
That sums them up perfectly. |
CrispyQGirl |
Mar-22-08 09:45 AM |
#50 |
| -
legal!? who the hell is gonna challenge them or call them on it? |
orleans |
Mar-22-08 04:21 AM |
#18 |
| -
What we may be saying is that no one now has sufficient POWER to oppose |
defendandprotect |
Mar-22-08 12:26 PM |
#86 |
| -
It's absolutely not legal -- Presidential Records Act. But impeachment... |
tpsbmam |
Mar-22-08 08:32 AM |
#35 |
| -
It's called "obstruction of justice" ... |
Gonnuts |
Mar-22-08 08:51 AM |
#39 |
| -
ahhhh..... "Destruction of Justice" |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 08:57 AM |
#41 |
| -
we start by putting the people who ordered it in jail.. after the election |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 08:58 AM |
#42 |
| -
Sorry, but the cases will be tossed out of court... |
mediaman007 |
Mar-22-08 10:16 AM |
#59 |
| -
I thought Chimpy was going to Rid us of, Activist Judges |
bahrbearian |
Mar-22-08 10:53 AM |
#65 |
| -
he replaced them with Machiavellian Corporatist NeoCon Fascist Judges... |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 11:42 AM |
#73 |
| -
The white house is lying, and the best lies have truth in them |
DissedByBush |
Mar-22-08 09:35 AM |
#47 |
| -
We even do that in businesses and home computers. They still |
jwirr |
Mar-22-08 10:57 AM |
#66 |
| -
we are not bound by Federal Law 'NOT TO' destroy them |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 11:59 AM |
#78 |
| -
Bush doesn't think he's bound by |
DissedByBush |
Mar-22-08 03:39 PM |
#96 |
| -
it is different when the "Voices" tell you you're on a mission from god.. if god tells you to bomb |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 09:36 PM |
#107 |
| -
Not always |
DissedByBush |
Mar-22-08 03:40 PM |
#97 |
| -
Legal? |
mhoran |
Mar-22-08 12:26 PM |
#84 |
| -
No |
sakabatou |
Mar-24-08 10:44 AM |
#124 |
| -
Sounds more like destruction of legal evidence, to me. nt |
Hekate |
Mar-22-08 12:46 AM |
#4 |
| -
Whoa, whoa, WHOA!!!! I want to be a good citizen |
Tab |
Mar-22-08 01:08 AM |
#6 |
| -
destruction probably means pulverized, then burned and the ashes |
rurallib |
Mar-22-08 10:08 AM |
#56 |
| -
I dunno.... |
AlbertCat |
Mar-22-08 11:59 AM |
#77 |
| -
Maybe not |
dixiegrrrrl |
Mar-22-08 12:26 PM |
#85 |
| -
"We were so busy being ourselves we didn't even notice that we broke the law for the millionth time. |
truthisfreedom |
Mar-22-08 03:16 AM |
#7 |
| -
K&R 5 for further discussion and evidence of the most corrupt American govt ever EOM |
themartyred |
Mar-22-08 03:20 AM |
#8 |
| -
Workstation Hard Drives Ok But What About The Servers |
lligrd |
Mar-22-08 03:26 AM |
#9 |
| -
Look no further than the servers. |
greyghost |
Mar-22-08 03:30 AM |
#11 |
| -
Or The Backups Of The Servers |
lligrd |
Mar-22-08 03:36 AM |
#14 |
| -
Bingo:) |
greyghost |
Mar-22-08 03:46 AM |
#15 |
| -
Cryptographic expiration. |
Pavulon |
Mar-22-08 09:48 AM |
#51 |
| -
Yes - but then the retention policy means nothing. Official white house |
bluerum |
Mar-22-08 12:24 PM |
#83 |
| -
Mzzzz Payton says it's too expensive |
Supersedeas |
Mar-24-08 10:43 AM |
#123 |
| -
good catch |
barbtries |
Mar-22-08 05:57 AM |
#20 |
| -
Ayes... like tape backups... |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 12:21 PM |
#81 |
| -
That's what I was thinking |
vanboggie |
Mar-22-08 01:31 PM |
#94 |
| -
This is breaking the law to cover up criminal actions |
Botany |
Mar-22-08 03:30 AM |
#10 |
| -
She's Defending the Civil Liberties of the Dali Lama and Tibet |
Demeter |
Mar-22-08 07:33 AM |
#27 |
| -
Well Nancy should have to answer that and this is the place to get some results! |
sce56 |
Mar-22-08 01:20 PM |
#93 |
| -
"the hard drives are GENERALLY sent offsite" |
bean fidhleir |
Mar-22-08 03:34 AM |
#12 |
| -
What kind of retarded email system is this? |
crimsonblue |
Mar-22-08 04:14 AM |
#16 |
| -
asdf |
InsultComicDog |
Mar-22-08 04:15 AM |
#17 |
| -
that way they can write the history they imagine |
barbtries |
Mar-22-08 05:52 AM |
#19 |
| -
Nah. |
cornermouse |
Mar-22-08 06:29 AM |
#21 |
| -
Unless its a dem. |
ooglymoogly |
Mar-22-08 11:53 AM |
#76 |
| -
It's all part of the Bush Institute Master Plan |
jmowreader |
Mar-22-08 06:30 AM |
#22 |
| -
We are going to have to carry investigations into the next administration. |
Joanne98 |
Mar-22-08 06:33 AM |
#23 |
| -
'Fraid so. But better late than never. |
stubtoe |
Mar-22-08 10:44 AM |
#64 |
| -
my fantasy is * can't stay on the ranch for long---will be called back to court again and again |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:26 PM |
#101 |
| -
gonna be an eternal screaming shame if we don't put them into jail |
Algorem |
Mar-22-08 06:49 AM |
#24 |
| -
great way to put it |
barbtries |
Mar-22-08 07:56 AM |
#29 |
| -
That's a heck of a Ministry of Truth memory hole |
muriel_volestrangler |
Mar-22-08 07:06 AM |
#25 |
| -
There not a chance in hell that the data wasn't stored someplace else . . . |
Shannon2008 |
Mar-22-08 07:15 AM |
#26 |
| -
My guess: check the RNC. Of course, they've probably destroyed their hard drives, too |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:27 PM |
#102 |
| -
The fact that Bushco has been getting away with this shit is a slap in most Americans faces... |
Imagevision |
Mar-22-08 07:47 AM |
#28 |
| -
my face has been slapped so many times |
barbtries |
Mar-22-08 07:58 AM |
#30 |
| -
Laws? What laws? |
Lastlaughin08 |
Mar-22-08 08:04 AM |
#31 |
| -
Jack Broughton faced court-martial for destroying 25-ft of F-105 gun-camera film. |
DemoTex |
Mar-22-08 08:09 AM |
#32 |
| -
Similar with the Gondola cut in Italy |
Pavulon |
Mar-22-08 10:08 AM |
#57 |
| -
You bring up a good point. I think that what finally brought Nixon down |
jwirr |
Mar-22-08 11:11 AM |
#69 |
| -
Two certainties: 1) this is illegal as hell; 2) NOTHING will be done |
grannylib |
Mar-22-08 08:12 AM |
#33 |
| -
So, let's pretend they're telling the truth |
Tab |
Mar-22-08 08:15 AM |
#34 |
| -
They are NOT stupid, they are NOT incompetent |
Gman |
Mar-22-08 08:38 AM |
#37 |
| -
I stand corrected |
Tab |
Mar-22-08 10:07 AM |
#55 |
| -
You got it! |
Gman |
Mar-22-08 08:11 PM |
#98 |
| -
This is the 21st century equivalent of shredding documents |
Gman |
Mar-22-08 08:37 AM |
#36 |
| -
Since when? |
The Backlash Cometh |
Mar-22-08 08:40 AM |
#38 |
| -
LOL. Bill & his staff should have taken all of the letters. |
jwirr |
Mar-22-08 11:28 AM |
#71 |
| -
the White House uses Microsoft Exchange |
flyingfysh |
Mar-22-08 08:56 AM |
#40 |
| -
Two Things: how did Fitz do a thorough investigation with this being the case; and |
Supersedeas |
Mar-22-08 08:59 AM |
#43 |
| -
What difference does it make? |
Bandit |
Mar-22-08 09:28 AM |
#45 |
| -
agreed Fitz should have confiscated those Emails and |
lovuian |
Mar-22-08 11:50 AM |
#75 |
| -
The only comfort we can take |
disndat |
Mar-22-08 09:12 AM |
#44 |
| -
Jesus Christ! |
blogslut |
Mar-22-08 09:32 AM |
#46 |
| -
Cheney: |
mahatmakanejeeves |
Mar-22-08 09:43 AM |
#48 |
| -
Hmmmm.. |
OhioChick |
Mar-22-08 09:43 AM |
#49 |
| -
Move along people there's nothing to see here. |
Bosso 63 |
Mar-22-08 09:51 AM |
#52 |
| -
Nothing about this administration surprises me anymore. I suppose |
snappyturtle |
Mar-22-08 09:53 AM |
#53 |
| -
This is a crime! |
RoccoR5955 |
Mar-22-08 10:02 AM |
#54 |
| -
I have a vision of thugs with sledge hammers |
rurallib |
Mar-22-08 10:12 AM |
#58 |
| -
The White House has been under court order to archive emails Since the Oliver North Days |
PuppyBismark |
Mar-22-08 10:20 AM |
#60 |
| -
and the sheeple |
pansypoo53219 |
Mar-22-08 10:31 AM |
#62 |
| -
It's the same as shredding documents... |
tinrobot |
Mar-22-08 10:43 AM |
#63 |
| -
They will never |
Magleetis |
Mar-22-08 11:00 AM |
#67 |
| -
Church Lady says: |
DeSwiss |
Mar-22-08 11:06 AM |
#68 |
| -
They are Guilty and in your face destroyed evidence |
lovuian |
Mar-22-08 11:47 AM |
#74 |
| -
Time for more cautiously worded criticism |
abq e streeter |
Mar-22-08 12:07 PM |
#79 |
| -
Ah . . . but gov't has been capturing ALL our e-mails so someone has this . . . !! |
defendandprotect |
Mar-22-08 12:24 PM |
#82 |
| -
Brilliant! |
tinrobot |
Mar-22-08 01:09 PM |
#89 |
| -
AT&T no doubt |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:29 PM |
#103 |
| -
White House Obstructs Justice and Breaks another Law |
fascisthunter |
Mar-22-08 01:10 PM |
#90 |
| -
WTF |
JTucker |
Mar-22-08 01:10 PM |
#91 |
| -
Apparantly they can get away with anything and everything |
Lorien |
Mar-22-08 01:52 PM |
#95 |
| -
This alone is impeachable |
guyanakoolaid |
Mar-22-08 01:11 PM |
#92 |
| -
Completely illegal. |
blackspade |
Mar-22-08 08:46 PM |
#104 |
| -
Most companies back up weekly, some daily. There should be multiple backups of these machines. |
EndElectoral |
Mar-22-08 08:59 PM |
#105 |
| -
yes there should ... |
erebusman |
Mar-22-08 11:03 PM |
#112 |
| -
Throwing away hard drives is just like illegally shredding |
Maestro |
Mar-22-08 09:33 PM |
#106 |
| -
This is child's play to them |
BecauseBushSaysSo |
Mar-22-08 10:33 PM |
#111 |
| -
What kind of email system do they have at the WH? |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 11:38 PM |
#115 |
| -
Remember the missing Nixon tape recording? |
Zambero |
Mar-22-08 11:50 PM |
#116 |
| -
What happened to the Clinton hard drives? |
Ztarbod |
Mar-22-08 11:59 PM |
#117 |
| -
since clinton only log into email 1 time in his whole presidency - the day he |
superconnected |
Mar-23-08 01:52 AM |
#121 |
| -
here's the main thing |
proud2bamerican2 |
Mar-23-08 01:03 AM |
#119 |
| -
What else would crooks do? |
superconnected |
Mar-23-08 01:50 AM |
#120 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread