Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 37. They are NOT stupid, they are NOT incompetent |
|
They are flat out lying and obstructing justice. And, their game is "catch me if you can."
|
| -White House: Computer hard drives tossed |
Newsjock |
Mar-22-08 12:17 AM |
#0 |
 -
What a coincedence. The Friday News Dump is about Dumping! |
Bonobo |
Mar-22-08 12:18 AM |
#1 |
| -
Ode to the Nancy Disaster |
The Stranger |
Mar-22-08 12:30 AM |
#2 |
| -
This can't be legal. |
tridim |
Mar-22-08 12:38 AM |
#3 |
 -
I'm pretty sure they're required to save it all. |
aquart |
Mar-22-08 12:56 AM |
#5 |
| -
who actually ordered the hard drives to be destroyed? |
bambino |
Mar-22-08 10:31 AM |
#61 |
| -
I'm sure it was structured in such a way that nobody is responsible. |
sofa king |
Mar-22-08 11:26 AM |
#70 |
| -
I hope you right |
bambino |
Mar-22-08 11:37 AM |
#72 |
 -
If history is anything to go by, neither will happen. |
TheMadMonk |
Mar-23-08 07:01 AM |
#122 |
| -
To be fair though... |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 12:19 PM |
#80 |
| -
it's not that long ago is it? |
bambino |
Mar-22-08 12:31 PM |
#87 |
| -
I would imagine they could look in many places... |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 12:48 PM |
#88 |
| -
But in the WH, I believe records must be retained for the archives |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:24 PM |
#100 |
| -
But most likely not on the drives themselves. |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 11:26 PM |
#114 |
| -
You probably didn't work for the White House |
jmowreader |
Mar-22-08 09:38 PM |
#108 |
| -
Ayes. |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 11:24 PM |
#113 |
| -
let me guess: some young bimbo/bimba who slobbers over himself at the sight of Dickhead & Chimperor |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:23 PM |
#99 |
| -
Ha ha ha! |
Enthusiast |
Mar-23-08 12:38 AM |
#118 |
| -
they are probably required to destroy it in fact |
erebusman |
Mar-22-08 09:56 PM |
#109 |
| -
Agreed. It's about protecting individual privacy |
djohnson |
Mar-22-08 10:29 PM |
#110 |
| -
When have they ever worried about minor details |
cornermouse |
Mar-22-08 03:35 AM |
#13 |
| -
That sums them up perfectly. |
CrispyQGirl |
Mar-22-08 09:45 AM |
#50 |
| -
legal!? who the hell is gonna challenge them or call them on it? |
orleans |
Mar-22-08 04:21 AM |
#18 |
| -
What we may be saying is that no one now has sufficient POWER to oppose |
defendandprotect |
Mar-22-08 12:26 PM |
#86 |
| -
It's absolutely not legal -- Presidential Records Act. But impeachment... |
tpsbmam |
Mar-22-08 08:32 AM |
#35 |
| -
It's called "obstruction of justice" ... |
Gonnuts |
Mar-22-08 08:51 AM |
#39 |
| -
ahhhh..... "Destruction of Justice" |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 08:57 AM |
#41 |
| -
we start by putting the people who ordered it in jail.. after the election |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 08:58 AM |
#42 |
| -
Sorry, but the cases will be tossed out of court... |
mediaman007 |
Mar-22-08 10:16 AM |
#59 |
| -
I thought Chimpy was going to Rid us of, Activist Judges |
bahrbearian |
Mar-22-08 10:53 AM |
#65 |
| -
he replaced them with Machiavellian Corporatist NeoCon Fascist Judges... |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 11:42 AM |
#73 |
| -
The white house is lying, and the best lies have truth in them |
DissedByBush |
Mar-22-08 09:35 AM |
#47 |
| -
We even do that in businesses and home computers. They still |
jwirr |
Mar-22-08 10:57 AM |
#66 |
| -
we are not bound by Federal Law 'NOT TO' destroy them |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 11:59 AM |
#78 |
| -
Bush doesn't think he's bound by |
DissedByBush |
Mar-22-08 03:39 PM |
#96 |
| -
it is different when the "Voices" tell you you're on a mission from god.. if god tells you to bomb |
sam sarrha |
Mar-22-08 09:36 PM |
#107 |
| -
Not always |
DissedByBush |
Mar-22-08 03:40 PM |
#97 |
| -
Legal? |
mhoran |
Mar-22-08 12:26 PM |
#84 |
| -
No |
sakabatou |
Mar-24-08 10:44 AM |
#124 |
| -
Sounds more like destruction of legal evidence, to me. nt |
Hekate |
Mar-22-08 12:46 AM |
#4 |
| -
Whoa, whoa, WHOA!!!! I want to be a good citizen |
Tab |
Mar-22-08 01:08 AM |
#6 |
| -
destruction probably means pulverized, then burned and the ashes |
rurallib |
Mar-22-08 10:08 AM |
#56 |
| -
I dunno.... |
AlbertCat |
Mar-22-08 11:59 AM |
#77 |
| -
Maybe not |
dixiegrrrrl |
Mar-22-08 12:26 PM |
#85 |
| -
"We were so busy being ourselves we didn't even notice that we broke the law for the millionth time. |
truthisfreedom |
Mar-22-08 03:16 AM |
#7 |
| -
K&R 5 for further discussion and evidence of the most corrupt American govt ever EOM |
themartyred |
Mar-22-08 03:20 AM |
#8 |
| -
Workstation Hard Drives Ok But What About The Servers |
lligrd |
Mar-22-08 03:26 AM |
#9 |
| -
Look no further than the servers. |
greyghost |
Mar-22-08 03:30 AM |
#11 |
| -
Or The Backups Of The Servers |
lligrd |
Mar-22-08 03:36 AM |
#14 |
| -
Bingo:) |
greyghost |
Mar-22-08 03:46 AM |
#15 |
| -
Cryptographic expiration. |
Pavulon |
Mar-22-08 09:48 AM |
#51 |
| -
Yes - but then the retention policy means nothing. Official white house |
bluerum |
Mar-22-08 12:24 PM |
#83 |
| -
Mzzzz Payton says it's too expensive |
Supersedeas |
Mar-24-08 10:43 AM |
#123 |
| -
good catch |
barbtries |
Mar-22-08 05:57 AM |
#20 |
| -
Ayes... like tape backups... |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 12:21 PM |
#81 |
| -
That's what I was thinking |
vanboggie |
Mar-22-08 01:31 PM |
#94 |
| -
This is breaking the law to cover up criminal actions |
Botany |
Mar-22-08 03:30 AM |
#10 |
| -
She's Defending the Civil Liberties of the Dali Lama and Tibet |
Demeter |
Mar-22-08 07:33 AM |
#27 |
| -
Well Nancy should have to answer that and this is the place to get some results! |
sce56 |
Mar-22-08 01:20 PM |
#93 |
| -
"the hard drives are GENERALLY sent offsite" |
bean fidhleir |
Mar-22-08 03:34 AM |
#12 |
| -
What kind of retarded email system is this? |
crimsonblue |
Mar-22-08 04:14 AM |
#16 |
| -
asdf |
InsultComicDog |
Mar-22-08 04:15 AM |
#17 |
| -
that way they can write the history they imagine |
barbtries |
Mar-22-08 05:52 AM |
#19 |
| -
Nah. |
cornermouse |
Mar-22-08 06:29 AM |
#21 |
| -
Unless its a dem. |
ooglymoogly |
Mar-22-08 11:53 AM |
#76 |
| -
It's all part of the Bush Institute Master Plan |
jmowreader |
Mar-22-08 06:30 AM |
#22 |
| -
We are going to have to carry investigations into the next administration. |
Joanne98 |
Mar-22-08 06:33 AM |
#23 |
| -
'Fraid so. But better late than never. |
stubtoe |
Mar-22-08 10:44 AM |
#64 |
| -
my fantasy is * can't stay on the ranch for long---will be called back to court again and again |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:26 PM |
#101 |
| -
gonna be an eternal screaming shame if we don't put them into jail |
Algorem |
Mar-22-08 06:49 AM |
#24 |
| -
great way to put it |
barbtries |
Mar-22-08 07:56 AM |
#29 |
| -
That's a heck of a Ministry of Truth memory hole |
muriel_volestrangler |
Mar-22-08 07:06 AM |
#25 |
| -
There not a chance in hell that the data wasn't stored someplace else . . . |
Shannon2008 |
Mar-22-08 07:15 AM |
#26 |
| -
My guess: check the RNC. Of course, they've probably destroyed their hard drives, too |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:27 PM |
#102 |
| -
The fact that Bushco has been getting away with this shit is a slap in most Americans faces... |
Imagevision |
Mar-22-08 07:47 AM |
#28 |
| -
my face has been slapped so many times |
barbtries |
Mar-22-08 07:58 AM |
#30 |
| -
Laws? What laws? |
Lastlaughin08 |
Mar-22-08 08:04 AM |
#31 |
| -
Jack Broughton faced court-martial for destroying 25-ft of F-105 gun-camera film. |
DemoTex |
Mar-22-08 08:09 AM |
#32 |
| -
Similar with the Gondola cut in Italy |
Pavulon |
Mar-22-08 10:08 AM |
#57 |
| -
You bring up a good point. I think that what finally brought Nixon down |
jwirr |
Mar-22-08 11:11 AM |
#69 |
| -
Two certainties: 1) this is illegal as hell; 2) NOTHING will be done |
grannylib |
Mar-22-08 08:12 AM |
#33 |
| -
So, let's pretend they're telling the truth |
Tab |
Mar-22-08 08:15 AM |
#34 |
| -
They are NOT stupid, they are NOT incompetent |
Gman |
Mar-22-08 08:38 AM |
#37 |
| -
I stand corrected |
Tab |
Mar-22-08 10:07 AM |
#55 |
| -
You got it! |
Gman |
Mar-22-08 08:11 PM |
#98 |
| -
This is the 21st century equivalent of shredding documents |
Gman |
Mar-22-08 08:37 AM |
#36 |
| -
Since when? |
The Backlash Cometh |
Mar-22-08 08:40 AM |
#38 |
| -
LOL. Bill & his staff should have taken all of the letters. |
jwirr |
Mar-22-08 11:28 AM |
#71 |
| -
the White House uses Microsoft Exchange |
flyingfysh |
Mar-22-08 08:56 AM |
#40 |
| -
Two Things: how did Fitz do a thorough investigation with this being the case; and |
Supersedeas |
Mar-22-08 08:59 AM |
#43 |
| -
What difference does it make? |
Bandit |
Mar-22-08 09:28 AM |
#45 |
| -
agreed Fitz should have confiscated those Emails and |
lovuian |
Mar-22-08 11:50 AM |
#75 |
| -
The only comfort we can take |
disndat |
Mar-22-08 09:12 AM |
#44 |
| -
Jesus Christ! |
blogslut |
Mar-22-08 09:32 AM |
#46 |
| -
Cheney: |
mahatmakanejeeves |
Mar-22-08 09:43 AM |
#48 |
| -
Hmmmm.. |
OhioChick |
Mar-22-08 09:43 AM |
#49 |
| -
Move along people there's nothing to see here. |
Bosso 63 |
Mar-22-08 09:51 AM |
#52 |
| -
Nothing about this administration surprises me anymore. I suppose |
snappyturtle |
Mar-22-08 09:53 AM |
#53 |
| -
This is a crime! |
RoccoR5955 |
Mar-22-08 10:02 AM |
#54 |
| -
I have a vision of thugs with sledge hammers |
rurallib |
Mar-22-08 10:12 AM |
#58 |
| -
The White House has been under court order to archive emails Since the Oliver North Days |
PuppyBismark |
Mar-22-08 10:20 AM |
#60 |
| -
and the sheeple |
pansypoo53219 |
Mar-22-08 10:31 AM |
#62 |
| -
It's the same as shredding documents... |
tinrobot |
Mar-22-08 10:43 AM |
#63 |
| -
They will never |
Magleetis |
Mar-22-08 11:00 AM |
#67 |
| -
Church Lady says: |
DeSwiss |
Mar-22-08 11:06 AM |
#68 |
| -
They are Guilty and in your face destroyed evidence |
lovuian |
Mar-22-08 11:47 AM |
#74 |
| -
Time for more cautiously worded criticism |
abq e streeter |
Mar-22-08 12:07 PM |
#79 |
| -
Ah . . . but gov't has been capturing ALL our e-mails so someone has this . . . !! |
defendandprotect |
Mar-22-08 12:24 PM |
#82 |
| -
Brilliant! |
tinrobot |
Mar-22-08 01:09 PM |
#89 |
| -
AT&T no doubt |
wordpix |
Mar-22-08 08:29 PM |
#103 |
| -
White House Obstructs Justice and Breaks another Law |
fascisthunter |
Mar-22-08 01:10 PM |
#90 |
| -
WTF |
JTucker |
Mar-22-08 01:10 PM |
#91 |
| -
Apparantly they can get away with anything and everything |
Lorien |
Mar-22-08 01:52 PM |
#95 |
| -
This alone is impeachable |
guyanakoolaid |
Mar-22-08 01:11 PM |
#92 |
| -
Completely illegal. |
blackspade |
Mar-22-08 08:46 PM |
#104 |
| -
Most companies back up weekly, some daily. There should be multiple backups of these machines. |
EndElectoral |
Mar-22-08 08:59 PM |
#105 |
| -
yes there should ... |
erebusman |
Mar-22-08 11:03 PM |
#112 |
| -
Throwing away hard drives is just like illegally shredding |
Maestro |
Mar-22-08 09:33 PM |
#106 |
| -
This is child's play to them |
BecauseBushSaysSo |
Mar-22-08 10:33 PM |
#111 |
| -
What kind of email system do they have at the WH? |
Codedonkey |
Mar-22-08 11:38 PM |
#115 |
| -
Remember the missing Nixon tape recording? |
Zambero |
Mar-22-08 11:50 PM |
#116 |
| -
What happened to the Clinton hard drives? |
Ztarbod |
Mar-22-08 11:59 PM |
#117 |
| -
since clinton only log into email 1 time in his whole presidency - the day he |
superconnected |
Mar-23-08 01:52 AM |
#121 |
| -
here's the main thing |
proud2bamerican2 |
Mar-23-08 01:03 AM |
#119 |
| -
What else would crooks do? |
superconnected |
Mar-23-08 01:50 AM |
#120 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread