mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-27-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
| -Not so fast, Democrats tell Nader |
Freddie Stubbs |
Feb-26-08 02:15 PM |
#0 |
 -
Sweet! |
Catshrink |
Feb-26-08 02:19 PM |
#1 |
| -
Yeah, he sure "energized" .3% in 2004 |
skipos |
Feb-26-08 02:20 PM |
#2 |
  -
Hey, we could have used that .3% - nt |
JustABozoOnThisBus |
Feb-26-08 05:15 PM |
#44 |
| -
Exactly. Now I hope they exact .3% of his life in aggravation :-) nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Feb-26-08 06:09 PM |
#51 |
| -
Time For Him To Pay Up |
Me. |
Feb-26-08 02:29 PM |
#3 |
| -
i wonder what pat of being the superior person it means to not pay |
roguevalley |
Feb-26-08 03:54 PM |
#17 |
| -
Didn't You Know? Superior People Don't Have To Pay Bills. |
Me. |
Feb-26-08 05:14 PM |
#43 |
| -
This is the PA Dem's court bill |
frog92969 |
Feb-26-08 06:56 PM |
#64 |
| -
Apperently the court felt the reasons were legit |
Freddie Stubbs |
Feb-27-08 06:34 AM |
#84 |
| -
1.4% |
frog92969 |
Feb-27-08 11:09 PM |
#103 |
| -
Exactly, the DLC endlessly bashes Nader but opposes impeaching Bush |
New Dawn |
Feb-27-08 11:16 PM |
#104 |
| -
I think Nader has a lawsuit against them . . . !!! |
defendandprotect |
Feb-27-08 10:14 PM |
#95 |
| -
Instant runoff voting sounds good. |
frog92969 |
Feb-27-08 11:23 PM |
#105 |
| -
Well, we none the less have third parties; the only problem is . . . |
defendandprotect |
Feb-28-08 10:55 AM |
#108 |
| -
And what reason would that be? |
GoneOffShore |
Feb-28-08 12:47 PM |
#110 |
| -
I thought the supreme court installed bu$h. |
frog92969 |
Feb-28-08 02:29 PM |
#111 |
| -
Why hate Ralph? |
GoneOffShore |
Feb-28-08 04:25 PM |
#112 |
| -
I'm sure his Republican backers will be glad to pick up the tab.... |
Tarheel_Dem |
Feb-26-08 02:34 PM |
#4 |
| -
that's what they were doing in the last go-rounds |
katty |
Feb-26-08 04:08 PM |
#22 |
| -
Will the Dems hire Ken Starr's firm again to stop Ralph? |
Adenoid_Hynkel |
Feb-28-08 07:34 PM |
#116 |
| -
In fairness, |
f the letter |
Feb-26-08 02:35 PM |
#5 |
| -
Part of it was under his control. He chose to use paid signature gatherers, |
pnwmom |
Feb-26-08 04:57 PM |
#36 |
| -
All national campaigns use paid signature companies. |
bamalib |
Feb-26-08 06:50 PM |
#62 |
| -
So? If you do that, you have to be prepared to have a good number of |
pnwmom |
Feb-26-08 07:02 PM |
#67 |
| -
You are right. He should pay bills an expect challenges. |
bamalib |
Feb-26-08 07:07 PM |
#69 |
| -
Nader holds himself out as the candidate of the grassroots. |
pnwmom |
Feb-26-08 11:49 PM |
#80 |
| -
We will fight him state by state to keep him off of the ballots |
bluestateguy |
Feb-26-08 02:38 PM |
#6 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-26-08 03:19 PM |
#12 |
| -
Indeed it is. |
mzmolly |
Feb-26-08 03:32 PM |
#13 |
| -
Amen. This ain't no tickle fight. |
mac56 |
Feb-26-08 04:58 PM |
#37 |
| -
ABSOLUTELY! |
mzmolly |
Feb-26-08 03:32 PM |
#14 |
| -
Doesn't sound very DEMOCRATIC to me... |
iaviate1 |
Feb-26-08 05:49 PM |
#48 |
| -
Its unfair to have more than two |
creeksneakers2 |
Feb-26-08 06:23 PM |
#53 |
| -
FWIW thats what we have already... |
Jack_DeLeon |
Feb-27-08 01:44 AM |
#82 |
| -
The Fact of The Matter Is |
iamjoy |
Feb-26-08 06:30 PM |
#56 |
| -
Amen. How can we actualize instant runoff voting? |
f the letter |
Feb-26-08 07:35 PM |
#71 |
| -
Y E S ! |
frog92969 |
Feb-27-08 02:38 AM |
#83 |
| -
Obama Supports It |
iamjoy |
Feb-27-08 06:29 PM |
#92 |
| -
Not IRV |
DuStrange |
Feb-28-08 09:27 AM |
#107 |
| -
I've had this explained to me before. |
frog92969 |
Feb-26-08 06:46 PM |
#60 |
| -
I'm not interested in being democratic. I'm interested in winning. |
bluestateguy |
Feb-26-08 06:58 PM |
#65 |
| -
Now that is real democratic of you |
RantinRavin |
Feb-26-08 07:46 PM |
#73 |
| -
What has Nader done since 2000 besides running for President? |
EmperorHasNoClothes |
Feb-26-08 02:48 PM |
#7 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-26-08 02:58 PM |
#10 |
| -
He's run on his record from the 1960s of actually doing good for this country |
LynneSin |
Feb-26-08 04:20 PM |
#30 |
| -
What good? Corvair was a neat car! |
JustABozoOnThisBus |
Feb-26-08 05:16 PM |
#45 |
| -
lots of stuff - do you think the media going to cover progressive action? |
Adenoid_Hynkel |
Feb-28-08 07:34 PM |
#117 |
| -
It's not a "poll tax", Ralph. |
MilesColtrane |
Feb-26-08 02:53 PM |
#8 |
| -
This Pennsylvanian has three words for Nader |
TommyO |
Feb-26-08 02:56 PM |
#9 |
| -
ROFL!!! |
DeSwiss |
Feb-26-08 03:06 PM |
#11 |
| -
I can imagine his response? |
ElboRuum |
Feb-26-08 03:40 PM |
#15 |
| -
Ha! Serves him right! What an ass! |
demo dutch |
Feb-26-08 03:51 PM |
#16 |
| -
Ooooh what a shame Ralph |
knight_of_the_star |
Feb-26-08 03:59 PM |
#18 |
| -
"Rooney said the party was not trying to keep third-party or independent candidates off the ballot." |
depakid |
Feb-26-08 04:00 PM |
#19 |
| -
Right |
AlbertCat |
Feb-26-08 04:43 PM |
#35 |
| -
When was the last time Congress stood up to Bush and held him accountable? |
depakid |
Feb-26-08 05:00 PM |
#38 |
| -
You have a point there. I am sure lots of folks here would agree that the expectations were high |
IsItJustMe |
Feb-26-08 05:42 PM |
#47 |
| -
Nader is as much a political opponent of the Democrats as the Rethugs. |
pnwmom |
Feb-26-08 05:00 PM |
#39 |
| -
"...whose positions reflect the attitudes and beliefs of a sizable portion of their base." |
mac56 |
Feb-26-08 05:01 PM |
#40 |
| -
Pennsylvanians kicked Ralph's sorry ass off the ballot last time |
creeksneakers2 |
Feb-26-08 06:25 PM |
#55 |
| -
"A sinister sabotage was thwarted." LOL. |
depakid |
Feb-26-08 07:57 PM |
#74 |
| -
That's right |
creeksneakers2 |
Feb-26-08 09:41 PM |
#77 |
| -
Someone should tell Darth Nader to go fly a landspeeder into a cliff face... |
Mythsaje |
Feb-26-08 04:04 PM |
#20 |
| -
How is it a poll tax to be expected to settle one's bills |
LittleClarkie |
Feb-26-08 04:07 PM |
#21 |
| -
REPUB IN TRAINING.... LOOKING FOR A WEDGE ISSUE TO KILL THE ELECTION |
happygoluckytoyou |
Feb-26-08 04:11 PM |
#23 |
| -
He doesn't need to run for president in order to get his message out |
Winebrat |
Feb-26-08 04:11 PM |
#24 |
| -
And so who are you to tell him that? Really. |
newburgh |
Feb-26-08 04:17 PM |
#28 |
| -
You can't compare Kucinich to Nader - that's just plain insultive |
LynneSin |
Feb-26-08 04:24 PM |
#31 |
| -
I'm not telling him anything. I'm stating an opinion. |
Winebrat |
Feb-26-08 04:26 PM |
#32 |
| -
Dennis Kucinich is someone who pays his bills |
pnwmom |
Feb-26-08 05:02 PM |
#41 |
| -
Kucinich Is Not Nader |
iamjoy |
Feb-26-08 06:37 PM |
#58 |
| -
So if the Democrats don't have a chance with Nader in the race, as all the |
newburgh |
Feb-26-08 04:12 PM |
#25 |
| -
I hope you have enjoyed the last seven years with Junior as president instead of Al Gore |
Lasher |
Feb-26-08 04:16 PM |
#27 |
| -
Al From disagrees with you |
mdmc |
Feb-28-08 06:30 PM |
#113 |
| -
Yes, paying the bills does seem to be a Democratic thing to do. |
tabasco |
Feb-26-08 04:17 PM |
#29 |
| -
Wake up. We're not living under a Parliamentary system. Nader is not an ally. |
pnwmom |
Feb-26-08 05:05 PM |
#42 |
| -
Nader doesn't need to run |
mdmc |
Feb-28-08 06:32 PM |
#114 |
| -
If you graphed an election strategy on a continuum |
creeksneakers2 |
Feb-26-08 07:01 PM |
#66 |
| -
like we haven't suffered enough for his ego for the past eight years? |
NorthernSpy |
Feb-26-08 04:13 PM |
#26 |
| -
That's good to hear! |
Kajsa |
Feb-26-08 04:30 PM |
#33 |
| -
Awesome! |
racaulk |
Feb-26-08 04:37 PM |
#34 |
| -
That's almost to good to be true. |
IsItJustMe |
Feb-26-08 05:34 PM |
#46 |
| -
Ralph Ralph Ralph |
Myrina |
Feb-26-08 06:07 PM |
#49 |
| -
Ralph can get a rumpled suit from The Salvation Army store |
DainBramaged |
Feb-26-08 06:08 PM |
#50 |
| -
You judge people by where they buy clothes? |
bamalib |
Feb-26-08 06:55 PM |
#63 |
| -
You read way too much into my post |
DainBramaged |
Feb-26-08 07:43 PM |
#72 |
| -
I see this differently, and I wonder what people here think of this. |
Peace Patriot |
Feb-26-08 06:11 PM |
#52 |
| -
Finally some sanity |
Lilith Velkor |
Feb-26-08 06:30 PM |
#57 |
| -
Decent post, but don't use hyperbole like "dark lords" next time. |
seawolf |
Feb-27-08 04:34 PM |
#87 |
| -
I don't tailor my rhetoric to stupid people. I'm not a politician. "Dark lords" it is. |
Peace Patriot |
Feb-28-08 12:32 PM |
#109 |
| -
You are so right on! |
lark |
Feb-27-08 04:40 PM |
#89 |
| -
Poooooor Little Nader, I guess its back to obscurity |
jzodda |
Feb-26-08 06:24 PM |
#54 |
| -
fuck nader BUT he is better than 75% of the democrat scum in washington |
natrat |
Feb-26-08 06:44 PM |
#59 |
| -
None of the Democrats handed the election of 2000 to the Rethugs. Nader did. |
pnwmom |
Feb-26-08 07:04 PM |
#68 |
| -
yea and kerrey delivered the next one |
natrat |
Feb-26-08 07:32 PM |
#70 |
| -
kerrey????? |
DainBramaged |
Feb-26-08 08:00 PM |
#75 |
| -
What kind of Democrat are you? |
pnwmom |
Feb-26-08 11:45 PM |
#78 |
| -
IFC made an interesting documentary of 2004 -- "...So Goes The Nation" . . . |
defendandprotect |
Feb-27-08 10:19 PM |
#97 |
| -
Better brush up on history |
depakid |
Feb-26-08 09:01 PM |
#76 |
| -
Here's history: 97,000 votes went to Nader in Florida in 2000, |
pnwmom |
Feb-26-08 11:47 PM |
#79 |
| -
And how many were diverted to Buchanon? |
depakid |
Feb-27-08 04:15 PM |
#86 |
| -
And the Democrats have done NOTHING since about any of this .. . |
defendandprotect |
Feb-27-08 10:22 PM |
#98 |
| -
Wrong, the U.S. Supreme Court did -n/t |
coalition_unwilling |
Feb-27-08 04:59 PM |
#91 |
| -
Of course, the r-w Gang of 5 on the Supremes stole the election . . . |
defendandprotect |
Feb-27-08 10:23 PM |
#99 |
| -
al from |
mdmc |
Feb-27-08 08:09 PM |
#93 |
| -
Al From gave you the corporate-sponsored DLC . . . which regularly attacks Dean --- !!! |
defendandprotect |
Feb-27-08 10:24 PM |
#100 |
| -
In 2008 we have a choice between two dlc types to run against |
mdmc |
Feb-28-08 06:37 PM |
#115 |
| -
Really, what about the 250,000 DEMOCRATS in Florida who voted for Bush? |
defendandprotect |
Feb-27-08 10:16 PM |
#96 |
| -
don't you mean DemocratIC scum? |
Adenoid_Hynkel |
Feb-28-08 07:36 PM |
#118 |
| -
don't you mean DemocratIC scum? |
Adenoid_Hynkel |
Feb-28-08 07:36 PM |
#119 |
| -
Ralph Nader |
parkeradison |
Feb-26-08 06:48 PM |
#61 |
| -
So... Nader's a deadbeat. Why am I not surprised? |
Seabiscuit |
Feb-27-08 12:17 AM |
#81 |
| -
You're not "surprised" because you've been fed SMEAR propaganda for |
defendandprotect |
Feb-27-08 10:27 PM |
#101 |
| -
so mr. nader wants to run but hasn't settled his own accounts from the last time... |
Javaman |
Feb-27-08 09:25 AM |
#85 |
| -
Nader is about as relevant as LaRouche at this point |
fujiyama |
Feb-27-08 04:37 PM |
#88 |
| -
Nail his wallet to the ground. |
goforit |
Feb-27-08 04:42 PM |
#90 |
| -
LOL Hahahaha!!! |
Megahurtz |
Feb-27-08 09:33 PM |
#94 |
| -
If this was happening in Russia... |
New Dawn |
Feb-27-08 10:56 PM |
#102 |
| -
what's with nader? did his run in 2000 help the country? |
samsingh |
Feb-28-08 01:54 AM |
#106 |
| -
do you really think working people will be better off in 2009? |
mdmc |
Mar-01-08 07:56 AM |
#120 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread