JPZenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 85. Plenty of time for a caucus or primary |
|
There is plenty of time for a new caucus or primary in each state. It was not the voter's fault that the rules were violated. In Florida, it was the GOP controlled legislature that pushed the early primary, not most of the Dems.
Let's have an even playing field. If the legislatures won't approve a new primary, then the state party can hold a caucus on its own.
Howard Dean said the actual decision on seating the existing delegates will be made by a credentials committee. It sounded like that committee would not meet until the convention started. That is an option - wait until there is a winner, and then let the existing delegations be seated.
|
| -Hillary: FL and MI should be heard |
shadowrider |
Feb-09-08 03:16 PM |
#0 |
-
Then they need to have new elections.... |
ingac70 |
Feb-09-08 03:17 PM |
#1 |
 -
I agree. |
dbonds |
Feb-09-08 03:59 PM |
#14 |
-
then have another caucus/ primary, we have til august. |
fenriswolf |
Feb-09-08 03:17 PM |
#2 |
-
What a principled stand! |
IrishBloodEngHeart |
Feb-09-08 03:18 PM |
#3 |
 -
Exactly. This is a huge reason I cannot stand her. |
Oregonian |
Feb-10-08 10:40 AM |
#67 |
-
you think it's fair that the voters in MI and FL |
paulk |
Feb-10-08 05:35 PM |
#73 |
 -
Or course it's not fair. But it's not fair to change the rules and go back on your promise |
Oregonian |
Feb-10-08 08:01 PM |
#75 |
-
as for the rules - this is a Presidential election |
paulk |
Feb-10-08 08:12 PM |
#77 |
-
Those people don't have to have a say, period. |
Lance_Boyle |
Feb-11-08 10:44 AM |
#78 |
-
thanks for support Democratic principles and ideals |
DrDan |
Feb-11-08 04:00 PM |
#88 |
-
Yep always about the I instead of the We with her (n/t) |
harun |
Feb-11-08 12:52 PM |
#82 |
-
Hillary Campaign is Circling the Drain |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Feb-11-08 01:00 PM |
#83 |
-
get over it. |
thunder rising |
Feb-09-08 03:18 PM |
#4 |
 -
No Fair Cheating |
badgervan |
Feb-09-08 05:50 PM |
#35 |
-
If she insists on counting FL and MI delegates, her popularity will only nosedive. |
closeupready |
Feb-11-08 07:35 PM |
#89 |
-
She won't care, as long as she gets the delegates. |
razorman |
Feb-13-08 11:32 AM |
#91 |
-
Let them do a caucus in April. |
CanonRay |
Feb-09-08 03:20 PM |
#5 |
 -
It costs the States a LOT to run an election -- who will pay? NT. |
JMDEM |
Feb-09-08 04:08 PM |
#15 |
-
Maybe Hillary will loan them the money |
marshall |
Feb-10-08 08:46 AM |
#64 |
-
In our paper: the state party would pay for the caucus, not the state. |
knitter4democracy |
Feb-10-08 05:24 PM |
#71 |
-
Let them do a caucus in April. |
CanonRay |
Feb-09-08 03:20 PM |
#6 |
-
Uh, those races are over. It's Washington and Louisiana today. |
bluestateguy |
Feb-09-08 03:22 PM |
#7 |
 -
lol |
RUMMYisFROSTED |
Feb-09-08 04:13 PM |
# |
 -
Had they brokered a deal before their primaries ... |
BearSquirrel2 |
Feb-09-08 05:36 PM |
#33 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-09-08 10:32 PM |
#48 |
-
She may be making a big mistake. |
PATRICK |
Feb-09-08 03:25 PM |
#8 |
 -
If she fights this without a redo of those primaries, she will lose the general election |
still_one |
Feb-09-08 05:01 PM |
#26 |
-
Agreed. This would be the deal breaker on my vote. |
faygokid |
Feb-09-08 06:14 PM |
#38 |
-
This is one scenario that would get this Dem to sit out |
RamboLiberal |
Feb-10-08 02:06 AM |
#58 |
-
she's against Caucuses, she wants to keep the flawed delegations as they are |
JackORoses |
Feb-09-08 03:26 PM |
#9 |
-
Pfft... |
Spider Jerusalem |
Feb-09-08 03:34 PM |
#10 |
-
No surprise, more of the same. |
faygokid |
Feb-09-08 03:46 PM |
#11 |
 -
Yeah I'd call that winning the battle and losing the war |
RamboLiberal |
Feb-10-08 02:10 AM |
#59 |
-
I have one thing to say to Hillary |
Malva Zebrina |
Feb-09-08 03:56 PM |
#12 |
 -
She won the POPULAR VOTE |
CatnHat |
Feb-09-08 04:14 PM |
#18 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-09-08 04:38 PM |
#21 |
  -
what are you talking about? The DNC told the candidates NOT to run in MI and FL |
still_one |
Feb-09-08 05:05 PM |
#27 |
   -
I sincerely doubt there will be a "do-over" |
shadowrider |
Feb-09-08 05:28 PM |
#30 |
  -
Will if she wins the nomination because of that tactic, I predict Obama supporters |
still_one |
Feb-09-08 10:17 PM |
#46 |
  -
I think she was OK with not counting FL and MI when the decision was made? |
pinkpops |
Feb-09-08 06:02 PM |
#37 |
   -
Then if she wins either without having MI and FL delegates seated |
still_one |
Feb-09-08 10:21 PM |
#47 |
  -
Actually Mr O has voted to the left of Ms H in the |
pokercat999 |
Feb-10-08 12:31 PM |
#68 |
  -
Obama's name was not on the ballot in Michigan -n/t |
coalition_unwilling |
Feb-11-08 11:41 AM |
#79 |
 -
my my my.... |
ObamaJacksome |
Feb-09-08 10:46 PM |
#50 |
-
Hold another caucus or primary. Problem solved. |
Alexander |
Feb-09-08 03:57 PM |
#13 |
 -
She voted for the war in Iraq |
Malva Zebrina |
Feb-09-08 04:44 PM |
#22 |
-
this reply was meant for catnhat |
Malva Zebrina |
Feb-09-08 04:50 PM |
#23 |
-
No worries. I agree completely with everything you said. |
Alexander |
Feb-09-08 05:33 PM |
#32 |
-
Obama would have won Michigan, and Hillary takes Florida. |
Carrieyazel |
Feb-09-08 04:13 PM |
#16 |
 -
Revote in Michigan |
apcalc |
Feb-09-08 04:59 PM |
#25 |
-
Why bother with the primary season at all? |
Vinca |
Feb-09-08 04:13 PM |
#17 |
 -
Yeah, she's the Inevitable Queen. |
Oregonian |
Feb-10-08 08:02 PM |
#76 |
-
Florida's rule-busting primary: |
Speciesamused |
Feb-09-08 04:18 PM |
#19 |
 -
Does she really think she can win the general election without Obama supporters? |
still_one |
Feb-09-08 05:07 PM |
#28 |
  -
Lets not start that GOP "I'll take my ball an go home crap" |
Fluffdaddy |
Feb-09-08 05:39 PM |
#34 |
 -
That isn't GOP crap, if they seat MI and FL without a redo, we WILL lose |
still_one |
Feb-09-08 10:16 PM |
#45 |
 -
Then you got 4-8 more years of GOP wing-nuts |
Fluffdaddy |
Feb-10-08 12:04 AM |
#54 |
 -
I usually advise against getting mad and taking the ball and bat home |
RamboLiberal |
Feb-10-08 02:31 AM |
#61 |
 -
This is HilBilly's truest measure: they are willing to destroy the |
coalition_unwilling |
Feb-11-08 12:04 PM |
#80 |
-
The ones who showed up for the beauty pageant were heard.. |
SoCalDem |
Feb-09-08 04:31 PM |
#20 |
-
Very simple Hillary, if you win because of this without do a redo of the primaries, NO VOTE FROM ME |
still_one |
Feb-09-08 04:57 PM |
#24 |
 -
there's no time for that..... |
ObamaJacksome |
Feb-09-08 10:49 PM |
#51 |
-
Honor our party leader's decisions? |
RamboLiberal |
Feb-10-08 02:56 AM |
#62 |
-
which is why excluding the delegates from those states was suicidal |
0rganism |
Feb-09-08 05:19 PM |
#29 |
 -
Dean will be against it ... |
BearSquirrel2 |
Feb-09-08 05:56 PM |
#36 |
-
This will be a litmus test |
shadowrider |
Feb-09-08 06:32 PM |
#39 |
-
No they shouldn't...and you wouldn't say so if you didn't win them |
boricua79 |
Feb-09-08 05:29 PM |
#31 |
-
Clinton won on "Hillary vs. None of the Above" ballots |
high density |
Feb-09-08 07:40 PM |
#40 |
-
Do over |
JerseygirlCT |
Feb-09-08 08:04 PM |
#41 |
-
This crap is why I didn't vote for Hillary. You can't just change the rules. |
Jersey Ginny |
Feb-09-08 08:56 PM |
#42 |
 -
This is EXACTLY like her saying she'll decide her own presidential powers... |
Zhade |
Feb-09-08 11:07 PM |
#52 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-10-08 10:06 AM |
#66 |
-
erm |
HuffleClaw |
Feb-09-08 08:57 PM |
#43 |
-
What is wrong with this woman? |
lancer78 |
Feb-09-08 09:40 PM |
#44 |
 -
hey man! |
ObamaJacksome |
Feb-09-08 10:41 PM |
#49 |
  -
What is negative about it? |
lancer78 |
Feb-10-08 12:12 AM |
#55 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-10-08 10:01 AM |
#65 |
-
Is anyone really surprised at this dirty stuff? |
JeanGrey |
Feb-09-08 11:28 PM |
#53 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-10-08 12:43 AM |
#56 |
-
she really needs delegates now |
ursi |
Feb-10-08 12:56 AM |
#57 |
-
Amazing how cutesy the Clinton campaign was to remain on the ballot |
RamboLiberal |
Feb-10-08 02:18 AM |
#60 |
-
How about superdelegates? |
Pigwidgeon |
Feb-10-08 08:12 AM |
#63 |
-
Last fall one thing, now the opposite |
SOS |
Feb-10-08 12:56 PM |
#69 |
-
Well there's a fucking surprise! nt |
Earth_First |
Feb-10-08 02:31 PM |
#70 |
-
Where was she when it counted? She helped screw MI and FL. |
knitter4democracy |
Feb-10-08 05:27 PM |
#72 |
-
I agree |
Mz Pip |
Feb-10-08 06:21 PM |
#74 |
-
I will gladly vote again. This time for Obama and not uncommitted. |
sarcasmo |
Feb-11-08 12:13 PM |
#81 |
-
I don't see how she can justify this stance. This is akin to the Bush shenanigans in Florida 2000. |
yellowcanine |
Feb-11-08 01:05 PM |
#84 |
-
Plenty of time for a caucus or primary |
JPZenger |
Feb-11-08 01:20 PM |
#85 |
-
You can't be serious |
inMD |
Feb-11-08 01:27 PM |
#86 |
-
Hill's Big Fat Pres Primary |
grassfed |
Feb-11-08 01:38 PM |
#87 |
-
Previously agreed they wouldn't count, but now that she's down she's willing to CHEAT. Nice. |
NoodleyAppendage |
Feb-11-08 09:29 PM |
#90 |
 -
Let every vote (for me) count |
The Croquist |
Feb-13-08 03:26 PM |
#92 |
-
Bullshit. You wouldn't give a fuck if Obama had won those states, so go sell your "concern"... |
truebrit71 |
Feb-13-08 03:46 PM |
#93 |