Reply #157: You answered your OWN question in another post in this discussion:

[George II]

It's still here in the discussion ..... ferret it out:

alcibiated_mystery:

"there is not sufficient proof to establish quid pro quo in that article"

So, you're admitting there is not enough evidence, but now you're asking for me to show how you're "wrong with evidence from the article"????

Damn this is an easy debate. I wish I ran across your kind in my college debating classes. Thanks for the assist!!