You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: There Is Room for the 70% Who Oppose the Iraq War and Don't Want an Iran War [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. There Is Room for the 70% Who Oppose the Iraq War and Don't Want an Iran War
Meet Loyal To True Democratic Party Values and True Democracy In The United States Presidential Canditate :

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...


The problem is that the illegal and immoral facist transformation of the US began years ago and it's already been almost completely transformed as of today, and as a result, the only one true democratic candidate who will govern for the People is systematically marginalized by the "transformer$" themselves because they want the People to continue to vote against their best interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Clinton: No Nukes for Iran sabra  Oct-15-07 12:43 PM   #0 
  - OK, Iran decides to build a nuke. What does that mean? War?  Selatius   Oct-15-07 12:46 PM   #1 
  - Prepared? No. Planning to do so anyway?  redqueen   Oct-15-07 01:01 PM   #6 
  - it means; 1st, measurable seismic activity from an underground test are recorded.  ohio2007   Oct-17-07 09:22 PM   #70 
  - Grenada, Panama, Iraq  spotbird   Oct-15-07 12:47 PM   #2 
  - 2007 N .Korea or 1953-2006 N. Korea?  India3   Oct-18-07 07:39 AM   #77 
  - passing the torch.....  ohio2007   Oct-15-07 12:48 PM   #3 
  - The next question is whether a predominantly democratic House and  no_hypocrisy   Oct-15-07 12:49 PM   #4 
  - Hawkish Hill....eager to prove she can blow shit up too.  marmar   Oct-15-07 12:52 PM   #5 
  - War Party much, Senator Clinton?  endarkenment   Oct-15-07 01:02 PM   #7 
  - to Hell with Hill  JackORoses   Oct-15-07 01:17 PM   #8 
  - "unwilling to accept" sound particularly ominous  Lerkfish   Oct-15-07 01:19 PM   #9 
  - Perhaps some Clinton supporters will come along and help explain this comment?  Lerkfish   Oct-15-07 01:20 PM   #10 
  - There's nothing unusual about her current stand  creeksneakers2   Oct-16-07 09:30 AM   #62 
     - She didn't oppose the war with Iraq,  Le Taz Hot   Oct-16-07 09:48 AM   #63 
  - There Is No Room for the 70% Who Oppose the Iraq War and Don't Want an Iran War in The Election  AndyTiedye   Oct-15-07 01:23 PM   #11 
  - There Is Room for the 70% Who Oppose the Iraq War and Don't Want an Iran War  Amonester   Oct-15-07 01:47 PM   #15 
  - that looney fringe left can sit it out.  endarkenment   Oct-15-07 03:37 PM   #21 
     - You're a fucking asshole.  Zhade   Oct-17-07 11:15 PM   #75 
  - I am unable to accept your administration AND the US ability  sfexpat2000   Oct-15-07 01:32 PM   #12 
  - Oh, for a moment I thought the headline was saying that she wouldn't BOMB Iran  Gloria   Oct-15-07 01:34 PM   #13 
  - Why does our country ALWAYS find a smoking gun for war?  superkia   Oct-15-07 01:40 PM   #14 
  - Because the Oil Lord$ never get enuf profits from gouging consumers.  Amonester   Oct-15-07 01:58 PM   #16 
  - OMG their  fenriswolf   Oct-15-07 02:00 PM   #17 
  - so if a canidate runs to the left for the nomination and to the center for  policypunk   Oct-15-07 02:48 PM   #18 
  - I'll see your waterboard and raise you a tooth extraction!  endarkenment   Oct-15-07 03:36 PM   #20 
  - NO nuclear Proliferation like we had with NK under Bush. Fine with me.  rodeodance   Oct-15-07 03:18 PM   #19 
  - She is as dangerous as George Bush.  Michael101   Oct-15-07 03:40 PM   #22 
  - Like it or not  hogwyld   Oct-17-07 05:43 PM   #66 
  - almost a word for word parroting of bush, how predictable n/t  HuffleClaw   Oct-15-07 04:29 PM   #23 
  - Please, no more illegal wars  mvd   Oct-15-07 04:45 PM   #24 
  - LOL: "No Nukes for Iran"  fujiyama   Oct-15-07 05:50 PM   #25 
  - Does that mean the silly woman is going to  ProudDad   Oct-15-07 06:57 PM   #26 
  - Papen: we need to threaten Rydz-Smigly to deflect the NSDAP's talking points  MisterP   Oct-15-07 07:27 PM   #27 
  - Hillary also said no nukes for Iraq  IndianaGreen   Oct-15-07 07:59 PM   #28 
  - Is it ok with Edwards and Obama that Iran have nukes?  Evergreen Emerald   Oct-15-07 08:22 PM   #29 
  - Clinton would use violence against Tehran  seriousstan   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #30 
  - Sen. Clinton is much like Bush in that respect-- she NEEDS a war...  mike_c   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #31 
  - Women are traditionally viewed as weak on issues of defense/war  Alexander   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #32 
     - Women don't need to prove they're tough.  FREEWILL56   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #56 
  - No president takes options off the table; and she's simply saying all options are on the table  journalist3072   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #33 
  - She's really a lapdog of certain interests southwest of Syria  saigon68   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #34 
  - She portrays herself as a warmongering hawk  Pastiche423   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #35 
  - Including the use of tactical nukes! Hillary is an atomic cowboy!  IndianaGreen   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #42 
  - This is a *-invented issue, she has no business falling for this...  newburgh   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #47 
  - Journalist full of shit  yava   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #49 
     - This poster also thought Jesus is better than anything for everyone.  Zhade   Oct-17-07 11:17 PM   #76 
  - Obama, Edwards and Richardson would all say the same thing.  MidwestTransplant   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #36 
  - Good, I'm glad she said it and I sneer at all the big money people  higher class   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #37 
  - umm, the article says "she would consider", NOT she would. facts are inconvenient nt  msongs   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #38 
  - Exactly! Some DUers will go to any extent to make a point for their political expedience  journalist3072   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #40 
     - Are you sure that she is not going to do it...I feel she wants to be  movonne   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #51 
     - The FACT is that I have to use the original headline.  seriousstan   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #53 
  - Look Hillary is not a viable candidate in my book  humbled_opinion   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #39 
  - When we have so many other good candidates, I agree  harun   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #41 
  - You'll be singing "Hail to the Hillary Chief" before you can say  ohio2007   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #43 
  - And a year after that, we will be at war with Iran!  IndianaGreen   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #44 
  - Which goes to the tune of "Pie in the Sky1"  Hardrada   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #54 
  - Then you might want to head here:  harun   Oct-16-07 08:03 AM   #61 
     - What about 'the draft' ?  ohio2007   Oct-17-07 09:28 PM   #72 
  - Now some serious strategy would be for Edwards and Obama ...  humbled_opinion   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #46 
     - It wins in a landslide and keeps most Repug's at home, Hillary  harun   Oct-16-07 08:01 AM   #60 
        - Exactly the repukes have no viable candidates that are meeting  humbled_opinion   Oct-17-07 05:28 PM   #65 
  - Personally I still have Clinton fatigue.  Emillereid   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #52 
  - She's selling herself to those disenchanted with the GOP..  Roland99   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #45 
  - if Clinton wants to look like Goldwater, she'll succeed  flaminbats   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #48 
  - FU*K YOU, HILLARY...and your neocon-eque need to appear "strong"  NoodleyAppendage   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #50 
  - Will Republican Congress members give her the vote to go to war?  LiberalFighter   Oct-15-07 10:58 PM   #55 
  - Any country would have to SAY they'd consider violence...otherwise, Iran would know...  indie_ana_500   Oct-15-07 11:04 PM   #57 
  - Hillary is an abomination!  TwoSparkles   Oct-15-07 11:40 PM   #58 
  - Please, show some respect to the next President  Solar_Power   Oct-17-07 09:10 PM   #68 
  - "The U.S....should be willing to provide Tehran “with a carefully calibrated package of incentives"  MilesColtrane   Oct-16-07 01:44 AM   #59 
  - So I guess the on going monitoring by the IAEA is just bullshit then  Javaman   Oct-16-07 10:32 AM   #64 
  - Shillery will protect us from those horrible evildooers!  Islander Expat   Oct-17-07 08:20 PM   #67 
  - So, we're bitchin over Bush bombing Iran but saying Yay...! for Hillary if  Imagevision   Oct-17-07 09:19 PM   #69 
  - Guess it depends on how reliable her 'intelligence' is and who gathers it for public  ohio2007   Oct-17-07 09:25 PM   #71 
  - Tell us something we don't know, Hillary  Andrushka   Oct-17-07 09:29 PM   #73 
  - "all options....  unkachuck   Oct-17-07 09:31 PM   #74 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC