You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #145: I just delivered what Yardwork asked for . . . [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
toopers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #141
145. I just delivered what Yardwork asked for . . .
besides, there are tons of other articles out there if you google "group of 88".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Ex-Lacrosse Players File Sweeping Federal Lawsuit laureloak  Oct-05-07 12:16 PM   #0 
  - maybe some good will come of this  Enrique   Oct-05-07 12:21 PM   #1 
  - Yep, looks like they want protect everyone from what they went through.  Mike Daniels   Oct-05-07 01:54 PM   #15 
  - I wish them the VERY best!  Hepburn   Oct-05-07 12:25 PM   #2 
  - I don't think they have a leg to stand on  robcon   Oct-05-07 12:36 PM   #3 
  - Nifong may well be shielded  Lance_Boyle   Oct-05-07 12:49 PM   #5 
  - Including the *crime* of  Sadie4629   Oct-05-07 01:35 PM   #8 
  - if this were a case  melm00se   Oct-05-07 01:37 PM   #10 
  - if what they want is reform  Blue_Tires   Oct-05-07 12:45 PM   #4 
  - Lawsuits are just one of the ways to get redresses for grievances...  Solon   Oct-05-07 01:51 PM   #14 
  - Yes, they could write to their congressperson!  FiveGoodMen   Oct-05-07 05:40 PM   #20 
  - It's done a smashing job of ending the war! Oh wait, no it hasn't  JVS   Oct-06-07 07:02 PM   #66 
  - Governments and corporations don't just do things for you when you ask nicely  bluestateguy   Oct-05-07 08:55 PM   #31 
  - Armed insurrection for one, that may be a little over the  pokercat999   Oct-06-07 04:39 PM   #58 
  - Make no mistake - the rich boys ARE after the money. As pointed out  T Wolf   Oct-05-07 01:06 PM   #6 
  - They were damaged for life by that attempt at railroading.  laureloak   Oct-05-07 01:22 PM   #7 
  - Duke kid's bonus: plum Wall St job (NY Post April 19, 2007)  struggle4progress   Oct-06-07 12:21 AM   #39 
  - Are you serious? Did you hear Evans speaking?  laureloak   Oct-10-07 04:04 PM   #136 
  - Damaged for life?  alcibiades_mystery   Oct-08-07 05:35 PM   #117 
     - Nobody?  knight_of_the_star   Oct-10-07 12:44 AM   #125 
     - And jesse Jackson can exert influence on their lives how?  alcibiades_mystery   Oct-10-07 08:45 AM   #130 
        - Being silly?  knight_of_the_star   Oct-10-07 04:47 PM   #138 
           - They were exonerated and applauded at twice the volume they were pilloried  alcibiades_mystery   Oct-10-07 07:55 PM   #139 
              - How about miscarriage of justice and abuse of the system?  knight_of_the_star   Oct-11-07 05:25 PM   #148 
                 - Agreed on every point, but that's a different point  alcibiades_mystery   Oct-11-07 05:39 PM   #149 
                    - No it isn't a non sequitor  knight_of_the_star   Oct-11-07 06:22 PM   #150 
                       - There was no trial  alcibiades_mystery   Oct-12-07 02:04 PM   #153 
     - Agreed  Mad_Dem_X   Oct-10-07 08:51 AM   #131 
        - That's the most racist thing I've heard all day.  Bleachers7   Oct-10-07 03:05 PM   #134 
  - They don't live in that state  Bleachers7   Oct-05-07 01:46 PM   #13 
  - "Damaged for life"???  dogfacedboy   Oct-07-07 06:57 AM   #79 
  - Do a google search on these guys  Bleachers7   Oct-07-07 09:23 AM   #84 
  - All they have to do is have  dogfacedboy   Oct-08-07 10:18 AM   #106 
  - It included "drunken frat boys and a stripper" SO WHAT?  JeanGrey   Oct-08-07 12:43 PM   #107 
     - Agreed  puffymuffins   Oct-08-07 12:51 PM   #108 
        - Yes. The point I was making exactly. I think the lawsuit is a good  JeanGrey   Oct-08-07 12:54 PM   #109 
  - Actually they can  knight_of_the_star   Oct-10-07 12:45 AM   #126 
  - What is your evidence that all of them are rich?  CreekDog   Oct-05-07 11:41 PM   #37 
  - I agree. They just want the bucks...if not, they'd use other means to seek  Triana   Oct-06-07 10:19 PM   #70 
  - I'm just sorry their suit doesn't include  Sadie4629   Oct-05-07 01:36 PM   #9 
  - They have settled with Duke, and that settlement presumably  lizzy   Oct-05-07 07:19 PM   #26 
  - Where DO people come up with fictions like yours?  struggle4progress   Oct-05-07 08:57 PM   #32 
  - the 88 professors did no such thing n/t  fishwax   Oct-05-07 11:28 PM   #36 
  - Do you have evidence for that assertion?  yardwork   Oct-06-07 04:07 PM   #52 
     - Here's one ..."must come in the form of immediate dismissals"...  SimpleTrend   Oct-06-07 06:07 PM   #62 
        - of course, that's not from the group of 88  fishwax   Oct-06-07 09:03 PM   #69 
        - That's a letter from Houston Baker only - he's no longer at Duke.  yardwork   Oct-07-07 11:19 AM   #89 
           - The general public can't really verify that, can we?  SimpleTrend   Oct-07-07 04:02 PM   #98 
              - If the original ad from the group of 88 faculty was so outrageous  yardwork   Oct-07-07 04:32 PM   #99 
                 - Here is the link you are requesting  toopers   Oct-10-07 02:10 PM   #133 
                    - A nasty rightwing hit piece from a rightwing site -- and without the requested ad text  struggle4progress   Oct-10-07 09:00 PM   #141 
                    - I just delivered what Yardwork asked for . . .  toopers   Oct-11-07 06:49 AM   #145 
                       - what did yardwork ask for that your link delivers?  fishwax   Oct-11-07 01:38 PM   #147 
                    - that's a right-wing rant from a right-wing site  fishwax   Oct-10-07 11:27 PM   #144 
  - Each of them should get at least $10 million after taxes  Bleachers7   Oct-05-07 01:44 PM   #11 
  - Really?  fortyfeetunder   Oct-06-07 03:28 PM   #47 
  - Really  Bleachers7   Oct-07-07 09:24 AM   #85 
  - 100m after taxes should be more like.  ileus   Oct-07-07 11:42 AM   #92 
  - Ironic, indeed  Zandor   Oct-05-07 01:46 PM   #12 
  - Why are some of you saying they are damaged for life???  justjones   Oct-05-07 02:32 PM   #16 
  - Remember what Ray Donovan said after he and his co-defendants were acquitted of all charges?  slackmaster   Oct-05-07 05:05 PM   #19 
  - That still doesn't equate to being damaged for life.  justjones   Oct-05-07 05:52 PM   #21 
  - My personal answer to you is that any unjust accusation  SimpleTrend   Oct-05-07 06:15 PM   #23 
  - Uh, one of them seems already to have landed a job with six-figure salary  struggle4progress   Oct-06-07 12:24 AM   #40 
     - Sure, after he lost another similar job he had lined up before all this.  mainegreen   Oct-10-07 09:31 AM   #132 
  - Sure it does  slackmaster   Oct-05-07 06:37 PM   #24 
  - Hah? What do you mean they were not charged.  lizzy   Oct-05-07 07:21 PM   #28 
  - "... they ultimately were not charged with anything...."  mahatmakanejeeves   Oct-06-07 12:52 AM   #42 
  - In this particular case I think that the lacrosse players have had their reputations burnished!  yardwork   Oct-06-07 04:11 PM   #53 
     - Well, you've just listed all the things you would never have heard  lizzy   Oct-06-07 04:34 PM   #57 
     - Wrong. I knew all this before the accusations surfaced, because I'm a Duke alum  yardwork   Oct-06-07 05:16 PM   #59 
        - Maybe you knew, but most people didn't.  lizzy   Oct-06-07 05:26 PM   #60 
           - You Seem to Be Saying  Crisco   Oct-06-07 05:40 PM   #61 
              - No, I am saying they have suffered a loss of privacy, for one thing.  lizzy   Oct-06-07 06:26 PM   #63 
              - You're arguing with someone who had never heard of lacrosse before this case.  yardwork   Oct-07-07 11:15 AM   #88 
                 - Hah? Are we discussing the game itself here?  lizzy   Oct-07-07 11:13 PM   #104 
     - I hope you are right - it's largely up to them, how they behave  slackmaster   Oct-07-07 09:33 AM   #86 
     - You still think they are scum  AngryAmish   Oct-07-07 11:26 AM   #91 
        - You're not a very effective mind-reader.  yardwork   Oct-07-07 08:13 PM   #102 
  - Richard Jewell was not convicted of anything either.  lizzy   Oct-05-07 07:20 PM   #27 
  - By that logic Richard Jewell was not damaged for life  bluestateguy   Oct-05-07 08:53 PM   #30 
  - Jewell was the person who popped into my mind too when I read the post above...  SayWhatYo   Oct-05-07 11:55 PM   #38 
  - Richard Jewell  AngryAmish   Oct-07-07 11:24 AM   #90 
  - Because....  lancer78   Oct-10-07 01:05 AM   #127 
  - Regardless of their background or wealth...  Scooter24   Oct-05-07 02:52 PM   #17 
  - Yep, get lots of money we are ultimately paying for  Sukie1941   Oct-05-07 05:02 PM   #18 
  - Will they now require....  PassingFair   Oct-05-07 06:06 PM   #22 
  - While I can see some  cstanleytech   Oct-05-07 06:47 PM   #25 
  - Oh give me a break. In US, people sue on a drop of dime,  lizzy   Oct-05-07 07:24 PM   #29 
     - I never said they did not deserve some  cstanleytech   Oct-05-07 10:42 PM   #34 
        - They asked for a settlement of 10 millions each, and that obviously  lizzy   Oct-05-07 11:25 PM   #35 
           - They're looking for punishment. Duke already gave them enough money.  BadgerLaw2010   Oct-10-07 06:49 AM   #129 
  - It would be interesting if some really able lawyer were to take up this case from the other side . .  defendandprotect   Oct-05-07 10:25 PM   #33 
  - "I don't think the charge ...  mahatmakanejeeves   Oct-06-07 01:14 AM   #43 
  - Then how come we all knew that there was no DNA evidence . . . ????  defendandprotect   Oct-06-07 11:47 AM   #44 
  - 11 Apr 06: ".. today .. Nifong acknowledged .. DNA tests failed to link any .. lacrosse team members  struggle4progress   Oct-06-07 02:43 PM   #45 
     - If you haven't figured it out by now, you probably never will.  lizzy   Oct-06-07 03:04 PM   #46 
     - An insult ... but not an answer.  struggle4progress   Oct-06-07 03:45 PM   #50 
     - Lab Director: Nifong Never Said to Withhold DNA Evidence  struggle4progress   Oct-06-07 03:53 PM   #51 
        - From the Fox site you have linked to:  mahatmakanejeeves   Oct-07-07 01:03 PM   #93 
           - I merely note the inconsistency: though the common description is "Nifong withheld evidence"  struggle4progress   Oct-07-07 10:41 PM   #103 
              - Thanks for the explanation.  mahatmakanejeeves   Oct-08-07 04:33 PM   #111 
     - he withheld evidence that DNA from 4 other males was found  onenote   Oct-08-07 01:57 PM   #110 
        - Then again, there are people who argue on this site that there was  struggle4progress   Oct-09-07 10:46 PM   #123 
           - you still don't get it -- Nifong withheld exculpatory evidence  onenote   Oct-09-07 11:13 PM   #124 
           - So this case has brought back the "OMG! She had sex with somebody!" rape defense?  struggle4progress   Oct-10-07 08:51 PM   #140 
           - No physical evidence against the *suspects*.  BadgerLaw2010   Oct-10-07 06:46 AM   #128 
              - Such "evidence" is typically inadmissible  struggle4progress   Oct-10-07 09:02 PM   #142 
                 - I hope you are not a criminal attorney  onenote   Oct-11-07 11:36 AM   #146 
                    - Maybe we oughta postpone the law lecture til ya know the difference between Federal and local rules  struggle4progress   Oct-11-07 09:34 PM   #151 
                       - You just keep digging yourself a deeper hole.  onenote   Oct-11-07 10:16 PM   #152 
  - No, there is no evidence for the "other side."  yardwork   Oct-06-07 04:15 PM   #54 
  - Link to pdf file of 162 pp complaint:  struggle4progress   Oct-06-07 12:46 AM   #41 
  - Sounds like another case of the privileged  fortyfeetunder   Oct-06-07 03:36 PM   #48 
  - No flames, I agree 100%.  mbperrin   Oct-06-07 03:39 PM   #49 
  - Underage drinking?  midlife_mo_Jo   Oct-07-07 12:09 AM   #75 
  - No sympathy?  Bubba HoHoHo Tep   Oct-06-07 04:16 PM   #55 
  - So if there is no remedy, they are ruined for life, then  mbperrin   Oct-06-07 06:47 PM   #64 
     - Nice argument. You could tell the same thing to someone  lizzy   Oct-07-07 01:09 PM   #94 
        - No, your example proves this legal point.  mbperrin   Oct-07-07 01:46 PM   #97 
           - Although I have not argued that the defendants can not be  lizzy   Oct-07-07 04:53 PM   #100 
  - No way, So because my buddy  Pavulon   Oct-06-07 04:18 PM   #56 
  - Actually, not legal to have strippers for persons of a certain age,  mbperrin   Oct-06-07 06:51 PM   #65 
  - Well, I've heard that living well is the best revenge.  lizzy   Oct-06-07 07:20 PM   #68 
  - living well  ptolle   Oct-06-07 11:09 PM   #72 
  - You lost me after "not having to worry about rent."  lizzy   Oct-07-07 12:25 AM   #77 
  - Living well is the best revenge?  DuStrange   Oct-06-07 11:21 PM   #73 
     - Living well and making the other people pay through the nose is the best revenge  JVS   Oct-07-07 06:41 PM   #101 
  - No, we cannot agree  midlife_mo_Jo   Oct-07-07 12:12 AM   #76 
  - I'll second that.  superconnected   Oct-08-07 06:53 PM   #122 
  - Only if you're rich  Posteritatis   Oct-06-07 10:36 PM   #71 
  - Privilege and resources doesn't give you the license...  fortyfeetunder   Oct-06-07 11:30 PM   #74 
     - Well I had no privilege..  Pavulon   Oct-07-07 09:04 AM   #82 
  - Oh brother  bluestateguy   Oct-07-07 01:13 AM   #78 
  - No flames....and I will never forget....  justjones   Oct-08-07 06:50 PM   #121 
  - They were responsible. It's the floosy that lied. n/t  laureloak   Oct-10-07 04:10 PM   #137 
  - More Class-Based Sentiments. Really Unfortunate.  Paladin   Oct-06-07 07:17 PM   #67 
  - The reforms sound nice but I think they're looking more for a payday  martymar64   Oct-07-07 08:03 AM   #80 
  - Pure and Simple  John Kerry VonErich   Oct-07-07 08:20 AM   #81 
  - The victim(s)  Pavulon   Oct-07-07 09:06 AM   #83 
  - I am talking in general.  John Kerry VonErich   Oct-07-07 01:18 PM   #95 
  - Indeed we must be concerned with the victims in this case  bluestateguy   Oct-07-07 10:08 AM   #87 
  - True  John Kerry VonErich   Oct-07-07 01:20 PM   #96 
  - Yep,  Tzimisce   Oct-07-07 11:21 PM   #105 
  - Something nobody's pointed out yet that I've seen  kgfnally   Oct-08-07 04:37 PM   #113 
  - But I *AM* concerned about the Lacrosse players.  kgfnally   Oct-08-07 04:34 PM   #112 
     - Not putting blame on the players  John Kerry VonErich   Oct-08-07 05:20 PM   #115 
  - I'm just sorry the Duke academic lynching mob hasn't had their due  policypunk   Oct-08-07 04:43 PM   #114 
  - You seem a good sort......  MarkR1717   Oct-08-07 05:32 PM   #116 
  - the academic lynch mob hasn't had their due b/c they're largely a creation of right-wing bloggers  fishwax   Oct-08-07 05:54 PM   #118 
     - "The Group of 88" had no reason to say anything,  policypunk   Oct-08-07 06:31 PM   #119 
        - that they had no reason to say anything in an official capacity is irrelevant  fishwax   Oct-08-07 06:50 PM   #120 
        - Agreed.  laureloak   Oct-10-07 03:59 PM   #135 
  - It would be interesting to find out how much they'd get.  cat_girl25   Oct-10-07 11:08 PM   #143 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC