John Kerry VonErich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-08-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #112 |
| 115. Not putting blame on the players |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 05:22 PM by John Kerry VonErich
I was talking about the case only. The players are innocent, there is no doubt in that. And their lives will rebuild in time. And when I say victims, I meant the hundreds of rape victims throughout the country who is getting curbbed on this.
|
| -Ex-Lacrosse Players File Sweeping Federal Lawsuit |
laureloak |
Oct-05-07 12:16 PM |
#0 |
-
maybe some good will come of this |
Enrique |
Oct-05-07 12:21 PM |
#1 |
 -
Yep, looks like they want protect everyone from what they went through. |
Mike Daniels |
Oct-05-07 01:54 PM |
#15 |
-
I wish them the VERY best! |
Hepburn |
Oct-05-07 12:25 PM |
#2 |
-
I don't think they have a leg to stand on |
robcon |
Oct-05-07 12:36 PM |
#3 |
 -
Nifong may well be shielded |
Lance_Boyle |
Oct-05-07 12:49 PM |
#5 |
 -
Including the *crime* of |
Sadie4629 |
Oct-05-07 01:35 PM |
#8 |
 -
if this were a case |
melm00se |
Oct-05-07 01:37 PM |
#10 |
-
if what they want is reform |
Blue_Tires |
Oct-05-07 12:45 PM |
#4 |
 -
Lawsuits are just one of the ways to get redresses for grievances... |
Solon |
Oct-05-07 01:51 PM |
#14 |
 -
Yes, they could write to their congressperson! |
FiveGoodMen |
Oct-05-07 05:40 PM |
#20 |
  -
It's done a smashing job of ending the war! Oh wait, no it hasn't |
JVS |
Oct-06-07 07:02 PM |
#66 |
 -
Governments and corporations don't just do things for you when you ask nicely |
bluestateguy |
Oct-05-07 08:55 PM |
#31 |
 -
Armed insurrection for one, that may be a little over the |
pokercat999 |
Oct-06-07 04:39 PM |
#58 |
-
Make no mistake - the rich boys ARE after the money. As pointed out |
T Wolf |
Oct-05-07 01:06 PM |
#6 |
 -
They were damaged for life by that attempt at railroading. |
laureloak |
Oct-05-07 01:22 PM |
#7 |
  -
Duke kid's bonus: plum Wall St job (NY Post April 19, 2007) |
struggle4progress |
Oct-06-07 12:21 AM |
#39 |
   -
Are you serious? Did you hear Evans speaking? |
laureloak |
Oct-10-07 04:04 PM |
#136 |
  -
Damaged for life? |
alcibiades_mystery |
Oct-08-07 05:35 PM |
#117 |
 -
Nobody? |
knight_of_the_star |
Oct-10-07 12:44 AM |
#125 |
  -
And jesse Jackson can exert influence on their lives how? |
alcibiades_mystery |
Oct-10-07 08:45 AM |
#130 |
 -
Being silly? |
knight_of_the_star |
Oct-10-07 04:47 PM |
#138 |
 -
They were exonerated and applauded at twice the volume they were pilloried |
alcibiades_mystery |
Oct-10-07 07:55 PM |
#139 |
 -
How about miscarriage of justice and abuse of the system? |
knight_of_the_star |
Oct-11-07 05:25 PM |
#148 |
 -
Agreed on every point, but that's a different point |
alcibiades_mystery |
Oct-11-07 05:39 PM |
#149 |
 -
No it isn't a non sequitor |
knight_of_the_star |
Oct-11-07 06:22 PM |
#150 |
 -
There was no trial |
alcibiades_mystery |
Oct-12-07 02:04 PM |
#153 |
 -
Agreed |
Mad_Dem_X |
Oct-10-07 08:51 AM |
#131 |
 -
That's the most racist thing I've heard all day. |
Bleachers7 |
Oct-10-07 03:05 PM |
#134 |
 -
They don't live in that state |
Bleachers7 |
Oct-05-07 01:46 PM |
#13 |
  -
"Damaged for life"??? |
dogfacedboy |
Oct-07-07 06:57 AM |
#79 |
   -
Do a google search on these guys |
Bleachers7 |
Oct-07-07 09:23 AM |
#84 |
    -
All they have to do is have |
dogfacedboy |
Oct-08-07 10:18 AM |
#106 |
   -
It included "drunken frat boys and a stripper" SO WHAT? |
JeanGrey |
Oct-08-07 12:43 PM |
#107 |
  -
Agreed |
puffymuffins |
Oct-08-07 12:51 PM |
#108 |
  -
Yes. The point I was making exactly. I think the lawsuit is a good |
JeanGrey |
Oct-08-07 12:54 PM |
#109 |
  -
Actually they can |
knight_of_the_star |
Oct-10-07 12:45 AM |
#126 |
 -
What is your evidence that all of them are rich? |
CreekDog |
Oct-05-07 11:41 PM |
#37 |
 -
I agree. They just want the bucks...if not, they'd use other means to seek |
Triana |
Oct-06-07 10:19 PM |
#70 |
-
I'm just sorry their suit doesn't include |
Sadie4629 |
Oct-05-07 01:36 PM |
#9 |
 -
They have settled with Duke, and that settlement presumably |
lizzy |
Oct-05-07 07:19 PM |
#26 |
 -
Where DO people come up with fictions like yours? |
struggle4progress |
Oct-05-07 08:57 PM |
#32 |
 -
the 88 professors did no such thing n/t |
fishwax |
Oct-05-07 11:28 PM |
#36 |
 -
Do you have evidence for that assertion? |
yardwork |
Oct-06-07 04:07 PM |
#52 |
-
Here's one ..."must come in the form of immediate dismissals"... |
SimpleTrend |
Oct-06-07 06:07 PM |
#62 |
-
of course, that's not from the group of 88 |
fishwax |
Oct-06-07 09:03 PM |
#69 |
-
That's a letter from Houston Baker only - he's no longer at Duke. |
yardwork |
Oct-07-07 11:19 AM |
#89 |
-
The general public can't really verify that, can we? |
SimpleTrend |
Oct-07-07 04:02 PM |
#98 |
-
If the original ad from the group of 88 faculty was so outrageous |
yardwork |
Oct-07-07 04:32 PM |
#99 |
-
Here is the link you are requesting |
toopers |
Oct-10-07 02:10 PM |
#133 |
-
A nasty rightwing hit piece from a rightwing site -- and without the requested ad text |
struggle4progress |
Oct-10-07 09:00 PM |
#141 |
 -
I just delivered what Yardwork asked for . . . |
toopers |
Oct-11-07 06:49 AM |
#145 |
-
what did yardwork ask for that your link delivers? |
fishwax |
Oct-11-07 01:38 PM |
#147 |
-
that's a right-wing rant from a right-wing site |
fishwax |
Oct-10-07 11:27 PM |
#144 |
-
Each of them should get at least $10 million after taxes |
Bleachers7 |
Oct-05-07 01:44 PM |
#11 |
 -
Really? |
fortyfeetunder |
Oct-06-07 03:28 PM |
#47 |
  -
Really |
Bleachers7 |
Oct-07-07 09:24 AM |
#85 |
 -
100m after taxes should be more like. |
ileus |
Oct-07-07 11:42 AM |
#92 |
-
Ironic, indeed |
Zandor |
Oct-05-07 01:46 PM |
#12 |
-
Why are some of you saying they are damaged for life??? |
justjones |
Oct-05-07 02:32 PM |
#16 |
 -
Remember what Ray Donovan said after he and his co-defendants were acquitted of all charges? |
slackmaster |
Oct-05-07 05:05 PM |
#19 |
  -
That still doesn't equate to being damaged for life. |
justjones |
Oct-05-07 05:52 PM |
#21 |
   -
My personal answer to you is that any unjust accusation |
SimpleTrend |
Oct-05-07 06:15 PM |
#23 |
    -
Uh, one of them seems already to have landed a job with six-figure salary |
struggle4progress |
Oct-06-07 12:24 AM |
#40 |
   -
Sure, after he lost another similar job he had lined up before all this. |
mainegreen |
Oct-10-07 09:31 AM |
#132 |
   -
Sure it does |
slackmaster |
Oct-05-07 06:37 PM |
#24 |
   -
Hah? What do you mean they were not charged. |
lizzy |
Oct-05-07 07:21 PM |
#28 |
   -
"... they ultimately were not charged with anything...." |
mahatmakanejeeves |
Oct-06-07 12:52 AM |
#42 |
  -
In this particular case I think that the lacrosse players have had their reputations burnished! |
yardwork |
Oct-06-07 04:11 PM |
#53 |
 -
Well, you've just listed all the things you would never have heard |
lizzy |
Oct-06-07 04:34 PM |
#57 |
  -
Wrong. I knew all this before the accusations surfaced, because I'm a Duke alum |
yardwork |
Oct-06-07 05:16 PM |
#59 |
 -
Maybe you knew, but most people didn't. |
lizzy |
Oct-06-07 05:26 PM |
#60 |
 -
You Seem to Be Saying |
Crisco |
Oct-06-07 05:40 PM |
#61 |
 -
No, I am saying they have suffered a loss of privacy, for one thing. |
lizzy |
Oct-06-07 06:26 PM |
#63 |
 -
You're arguing with someone who had never heard of lacrosse before this case. |
yardwork |
Oct-07-07 11:15 AM |
#88 |
 -
Hah? Are we discussing the game itself here? |
lizzy |
Oct-07-07 11:13 PM |
#104 |
 -
I hope you are right - it's largely up to them, how they behave |
slackmaster |
Oct-07-07 09:33 AM |
#86 |
 -
You still think they are scum |
AngryAmish |
Oct-07-07 11:26 AM |
#91 |
 -
You're not a very effective mind-reader. |
yardwork |
Oct-07-07 08:13 PM |
#102 |
 -
Richard Jewell was not convicted of anything either. |
lizzy |
Oct-05-07 07:20 PM |
#27 |
 -
By that logic Richard Jewell was not damaged for life |
bluestateguy |
Oct-05-07 08:53 PM |
#30 |
  -
Jewell was the person who popped into my mind too when I read the post above... |
SayWhatYo |
Oct-05-07 11:55 PM |
#38 |
 -
Richard Jewell |
AngryAmish |
Oct-07-07 11:24 AM |
#90 |
 -
Because.... |
lancer78 |
Oct-10-07 01:05 AM |
#127 |
-
Regardless of their background or wealth... |
Scooter24 |
Oct-05-07 02:52 PM |
#17 |
-
Yep, get lots of money we are ultimately paying for |
Sukie1941 |
Oct-05-07 05:02 PM |
#18 |
-
Will they now require.... |
PassingFair |
Oct-05-07 06:06 PM |
#22 |
-
While I can see some |
cstanleytech |
Oct-05-07 06:47 PM |
#25 |
 -
Oh give me a break. In US, people sue on a drop of dime, |
lizzy |
Oct-05-07 07:24 PM |
#29 |
-
I never said they did not deserve some |
cstanleytech |
Oct-05-07 10:42 PM |
#34 |
-
They asked for a settlement of 10 millions each, and that obviously |
lizzy |
Oct-05-07 11:25 PM |
#35 |
-
They're looking for punishment. Duke already gave them enough money. |
BadgerLaw2010 |
Oct-10-07 06:49 AM |
#129 |
-
It would be interesting if some really able lawyer were to take up this case from the other side . . |
defendandprotect |
Oct-05-07 10:25 PM |
#33 |
 -
"I don't think the charge ... |
mahatmakanejeeves |
Oct-06-07 01:14 AM |
#43 |
  -
Then how come we all knew that there was no DNA evidence . . . ???? |
defendandprotect |
Oct-06-07 11:47 AM |
#44 |
  -
11 Apr 06: ".. today .. Nifong acknowledged .. DNA tests failed to link any .. lacrosse team members |
struggle4progress |
Oct-06-07 02:43 PM |
#45 |
 -
If you haven't figured it out by now, you probably never will. |
lizzy |
Oct-06-07 03:04 PM |
#46 |
  -
An insult ... but not an answer. |
struggle4progress |
Oct-06-07 03:45 PM |
#50 |
  -
Lab Director: Nifong Never Said to Withhold DNA Evidence |
struggle4progress |
Oct-06-07 03:53 PM |
#51 |
 -
From the Fox site you have linked to: |
mahatmakanejeeves |
Oct-07-07 01:03 PM |
#93 |
 -
I merely note the inconsistency: though the common description is "Nifong withheld evidence" |
struggle4progress |
Oct-07-07 10:41 PM |
#103 |
 -
Thanks for the explanation. |
mahatmakanejeeves |
Oct-08-07 04:33 PM |
#111 |
 -
he withheld evidence that DNA from 4 other males was found |
onenote |
Oct-08-07 01:57 PM |
#110 |
 -
Then again, there are people who argue on this site that there was |
struggle4progress |
Oct-09-07 10:46 PM |
#123 |
 -
you still don't get it -- Nifong withheld exculpatory evidence |
onenote |
Oct-09-07 11:13 PM |
#124 |
  -
So this case has brought back the "OMG! She had sex with somebody!" rape defense? |
struggle4progress |
Oct-10-07 08:51 PM |
#140 |
 -
No physical evidence against the *suspects*. |
BadgerLaw2010 |
Oct-10-07 06:46 AM |
#128 |
 -
Such "evidence" is typically inadmissible |
struggle4progress |
Oct-10-07 09:02 PM |
#142 |
 -
I hope you are not a criminal attorney |
onenote |
Oct-11-07 11:36 AM |
#146 |
 -
Maybe we oughta postpone the law lecture til ya know the difference between Federal and local rules |
struggle4progress |
Oct-11-07 09:34 PM |
#151 |
 -
You just keep digging yourself a deeper hole. |
onenote |
Oct-11-07 10:16 PM |
#152 |
 -
No, there is no evidence for the "other side." |
yardwork |
Oct-06-07 04:15 PM |
#54 |
-
Link to pdf file of 162 pp complaint: |
struggle4progress |
Oct-06-07 12:46 AM |
#41 |
-
Sounds like another case of the privileged |
fortyfeetunder |
Oct-06-07 03:36 PM |
#48 |
 -
No flames, I agree 100%. |
mbperrin |
Oct-06-07 03:39 PM |
#49 |
  -
Underage drinking? |
midlife_mo_Jo |
Oct-07-07 12:09 AM |
#75 |
 -
No sympathy? |
Bubba HoHoHo Tep |
Oct-06-07 04:16 PM |
#55 |
  -
So if there is no remedy, they are ruined for life, then |
mbperrin |
Oct-06-07 06:47 PM |
#64 |
 -
Nice argument. You could tell the same thing to someone |
lizzy |
Oct-07-07 01:09 PM |
#94 |
 -
No, your example proves this legal point. |
mbperrin |
Oct-07-07 01:46 PM |
#97 |
 -
Although I have not argued that the defendants can not be |
lizzy |
Oct-07-07 04:53 PM |
#100 |
 -
No way, So because my buddy |
Pavulon |
Oct-06-07 04:18 PM |
#56 |
  -
Actually, not legal to have strippers for persons of a certain age, |
mbperrin |
Oct-06-07 06:51 PM |
#65 |
   -
Well, I've heard that living well is the best revenge. |
lizzy |
Oct-06-07 07:20 PM |
#68 |
    -
living well |
ptolle |
Oct-06-07 11:09 PM |
#72 |
     -
You lost me after "not having to worry about rent." |
lizzy |
Oct-07-07 12:25 AM |
#77 |
    -
Living well is the best revenge? |
DuStrange |
Oct-06-07 11:21 PM |
#73 |
   -
Living well and making the other people pay through the nose is the best revenge |
JVS |
Oct-07-07 06:41 PM |
#101 |
   -
No, we cannot agree |
midlife_mo_Jo |
Oct-07-07 12:12 AM |
#76 |
   -
I'll second that. |
superconnected |
Oct-08-07 06:53 PM |
#122 |
  -
Only if you're rich |
Posteritatis |
Oct-06-07 10:36 PM |
#71 |
  -
Privilege and resources doesn't give you the license... |
fortyfeetunder |
Oct-06-07 11:30 PM |
#74 |
 -
Well I had no privilege.. |
Pavulon |
Oct-07-07 09:04 AM |
#82 |
 -
Oh brother |
bluestateguy |
Oct-07-07 01:13 AM |
#78 |
 -
No flames....and I will never forget.... |
justjones |
Oct-08-07 06:50 PM |
#121 |
 -
They were responsible. It's the floosy that lied. n/t |
laureloak |
Oct-10-07 04:10 PM |
#137 |
-
More Class-Based Sentiments. Really Unfortunate. |
Paladin |
Oct-06-07 07:17 PM |
#67 |
-
The reforms sound nice but I think they're looking more for a payday |
martymar64 |
Oct-07-07 08:03 AM |
#80 |
-
Pure and Simple |
John Kerry VonErich |
Oct-07-07 08:20 AM |
#81 |
 -
The victim(s) |
Pavulon |
Oct-07-07 09:06 AM |
#83 |
  -
I am talking in general. |
John Kerry VonErich |
Oct-07-07 01:18 PM |
#95 |
 -
Indeed we must be concerned with the victims in this case |
bluestateguy |
Oct-07-07 10:08 AM |
#87 |
  -
True |
John Kerry VonErich |
Oct-07-07 01:20 PM |
#96 |
   -
Yep, |
Tzimisce |
Oct-07-07 11:21 PM |
#105 |
  -
Something nobody's pointed out yet that I've seen |
kgfnally |
Oct-08-07 04:37 PM |
#113 |
 -
But I *AM* concerned about the Lacrosse players. |
kgfnally |
Oct-08-07 04:34 PM |
#112 |
-
Not putting blame on the players |
John Kerry VonErich |
Oct-08-07 05:20 PM |
#115 |
-
I'm just sorry the Duke academic lynching mob hasn't had their due |
policypunk |
Oct-08-07 04:43 PM |
#114 |
 -
You seem a good sort...... |
MarkR1717 |
Oct-08-07 05:32 PM |
#116 |
 -
the academic lynch mob hasn't had their due b/c they're largely a creation of right-wing bloggers |
fishwax |
Oct-08-07 05:54 PM |
#118 |
-
"The Group of 88" had no reason to say anything, |
policypunk |
Oct-08-07 06:31 PM |
#119 |
-
that they had no reason to say anything in an official capacity is irrelevant |
fishwax |
Oct-08-07 06:50 PM |
#120 |
-
Agreed. |
laureloak |
Oct-10-07 03:59 PM |
#135 |
-
It would be interesting to find out how much they'd get. |
cat_girl25 |
Oct-10-07 11:08 PM |
#143 |