Reply #115: Targeted?

[Zavulon]

Sure, because my real problem is with Hillary, and I've got plenty of reasons to have problems with her. I don't give a shit about Edwards' SUV thing, Obama's coal thing, or whatever, because they haven't given me repeated reasons over the years to distrust them. I'm saying I don't trust or like Hillary - you're the one trying to bring the others into it, and I don't see why. I've tried to steer the conversation to Hillary, you keep wanting to talk about others. Hell, I suppose if I was trying to defend Hillary I'd have to resort to that, too.

Keep trusting Hillary and making excuses for her if you want. If you don't remember the stories told by Hillary and Chelsea and the disparity between the two of them, or if you prefer to simply ignore how blatant of a lie Hillary told, go ahead. It's only the icing on a huge festering cake anyway, and you're clearly ready to give her a pass on whatever she says or does. Her failure to admit a mistake on her Iraq war vote, which I tried to bring to your attention, doesn't bother you? Great. You'd rather focus on Edwards and Obama's alleged trangressions, which I either hadn't heard about or don't really care about, and then you refer to MY stance as petty?

Hillary disgusts me, but you're not willing to talk about her. You'd rather defend actions by others that aren't even a blip on my radar, and then you call what I say "targeted?" Silly me, for trying to steer the discussion to the topic I started with.

Having grown bored of your constant digressions from the "I can't stand Hillary" topic, I quit. Because I found your closing remarks pointless and condescending, I won't be coming back to this thread, but feel free to have the final word if you want.