bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-21-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
| 22. could they be held for contempt of congress |
| -Snow says offer for interviews would be withdrawn if subpoenas are issued for White House staffers |
sabra |
Mar-21-07 01:01 PM |
#0 |
-
Gosh, that'll just break Pat Leahy's heart, won't it? |
hatrack |
Mar-21-07 01:02 PM |
#1 |
 -
ROFL |
AZDemDist6 |
Mar-21-07 01:05 PM |
#3 |
-
Perfect |
TrogL |
Mar-21-07 01:03 PM |
#2 |
-
Somebody should tell Frankenliar this ain't a negotiation |
FredScuttle |
Mar-21-07 01:05 PM |
#4 |
 -
Failure to comply with said subpoenas is contempt of congress which sends the matter straight to |
MGD |
Mar-21-07 11:55 PM |
#52 |
-
OK, let's see if I understand this. |
Turbineguy |
Mar-21-07 01:05 PM |
#5 |
 -
great!!!! |
wake.up.america |
Mar-21-07 01:10 PM |
#13 |
 -
Self-deleted |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Mar-21-07 02:00 PM |
#26 |
 -
It's classic abbot and costello... |
Javaman |
Mar-22-07 10:01 AM |
#56 |
-
well gee golly |
Epiphany4z |
Mar-21-07 01:06 PM |
#6 |
-
lol |
Solly Mack |
Mar-21-07 01:07 PM |
#7 |
-
ooh..........I bet Leahy is scared........NOT! |
tulsakatz |
Mar-21-07 01:08 PM |
#8 |
-
I think that the Democrats should accept an offer from the |
theoldman |
Mar-21-07 01:08 PM |
#9 |
 -
I'd go for that, but only if he & Cheney were in there, too. n/t |
WritersBlock |
Mar-21-07 01:09 PM |
#11 |
 -
And leave the country permanently |
LiberalFighter |
Mar-21-07 11:20 PM |
#50 |
-
Thank you, Snowjob, for that summary of the bleedin' obvious of what will happen if your master is |
WritersBlock |
Mar-21-07 01:08 PM |
#10 |
-
NO a subpoena means YOU COME NOW!!!!!!! |
benld74 |
Mar-21-07 01:09 PM |
#12 |
 -
Rove will refuse to come, citing executive privelege, then it will go to court. |
AlinPA |
Mar-21-07 01:45 PM |
#23 |
-
it will go to court first.... |
mike_c |
Mar-21-07 01:57 PM |
#24 |
-
Read here about Executive Privilege and blocking subpoenas |
Whoa_Nelly |
Mar-21-07 03:01 PM |
#40 |
-
Thank you. nt |
AlinPA |
Mar-21-07 03:18 PM |
#42 |
-
Sounds like Christopher Lloyd's character in the Star Trek movie. |
jobycom |
Mar-21-07 01:10 PM |
#14 |
-
Duh! |
deminks |
Mar-21-07 01:12 PM |
#15 |
-
Clinton did it--------------- |
Bitwit1234 |
Mar-21-07 01:13 PM |
#16 |
 -
sounds like precedent to me! |
shanti |
Mar-21-07 02:20 PM |
#30 |
-
That would be the "interview" that is NOT under oath? The one |
texpatriot2004 |
Mar-21-07 01:31 PM |
#17 |
-
No shit? You really mean that Tony? Pretty high on the "D'UH" meter. nt |
sutz12 |
Mar-21-07 01:35 PM |
#18 |
-
Tony Snow just said a "good faith" offer is better than a subpoena? |
0007 |
Mar-21-07 01:35 PM |
#19 |
 -
Well.........for him it is. |
sutz12 |
Mar-21-07 01:37 PM |
#20 |
 -
......the White House offered an extremely generous offer, |
0007 |
Mar-21-07 01:41 PM |
#21 |
-
Tell Tony that this IS NOT a very generous offer... |
KansDem |
Mar-21-07 02:19 PM |
#29 |
-
NEED TO CALL OUT THE WH ON THIS BS!! |
whoneedstickets |
Mar-21-07 04:47 PM |
#44 |
-
could they be held for contempt of congress |
alyce douglas |
Mar-21-07 01:42 PM |
#22 |
-
WHO CARES IF THEY ARE WITHDRAWN? |
nodehopper |
Mar-21-07 01:58 PM |
#25 |
-
Um, I thought "subpoena" meant you had to testify anyway... |
Frank Cannon |
Mar-21-07 02:13 PM |
#27 |
-
I didn't know he had a sense of humor. |
aquart |
Mar-21-07 02:17 PM |
#28 |
 -
don't think it's a sense of humor |
shanti |
Mar-21-07 02:21 PM |
#31 |
 -
LOL |
saigon68 |
Mar-21-07 02:22 PM |
#32 |
-
So Bush threatens to withdraw his offer containing nothing. |
Kagemusha |
Mar-21-07 02:24 PM |
#33 |
-
The epitome of an empty threat |
dotcosm |
Mar-21-07 02:27 PM |
#34 |
-
This is embarrassing... |
KansDem |
Mar-21-07 02:30 PM |
#35 |
 -
Bush does not govern anyway (lectures, manages, takes etc) |
rodeodance |
Mar-21-07 02:55 PM |
#38 |
-
Oh BOO-HOO |
Concerned GA Voter |
Mar-21-07 02:49 PM |
#36 |
-
well, then time to take em back! |
rodeodance |
Mar-21-07 02:53 PM |
#37 |
-
You gotta love these assholes- |
Kool Kitty |
Mar-21-07 03:00 PM |
#39 |
-
Bring it on (Now where did I hear that before?) nt |
JerseygirlCT |
Mar-21-07 03:06 PM |
#41 |
-
Oh, this is gonna be fun! |
NastyRiffraff |
Mar-21-07 03:19 PM |
#43 |
-
"What do they have to hide" say it loud and say it often. |
salin |
Mar-21-07 07:31 PM |
#45 |
-
Fox News Prick. nt |
onehandle |
Mar-21-07 08:46 PM |
#46 |
-
Ooooooo. I bet Congress is shakin' in its boots. n/t |
indie_ana_500 |
Mar-21-07 08:47 PM |
#47 |
-
take them up on their offer and then... |
anotherdrew |
Mar-21-07 10:59 PM |
#48 |
 -
Can't do that |
MonkeyFunk |
Mar-21-07 11:17 PM |
#49 |
-
ah well, and so goes another cunning plan n/t |
anotherdrew |
Mar-21-07 11:44 PM |
#51 |
-
Let me guess, it's up to DOJ to prosecute or not? I'm sure they will get around |
Springster |
Mar-22-07 05:42 AM |
#55 |
-
Oh, darn! |
Sherman A1 |
Mar-22-07 05:32 AM |
#53 |
-
What? |
iwillalwayswonderwhy |
Mar-22-07 05:41 AM |
#54 |