| 263. If one carries an assault-style rifle, |
|
Should one attempt to coordinate it with assault-style shoes and assault-style accoutrements?
|
| -D.C. Circuit panel holds that the District of Columbia's gun control laws violates individual rights |
AngryAmish |
Mar-09-07 11:32 AM |
#0 |
 -
As if the gun ban worked in DC anyway |
Mike Daniels |
Mar-09-07 11:37 AM |
#1 |
  -
True |
KevinJ |
Mar-09-07 12:42 PM |
#6 |
| -
Wait a minute |
virginia mountainman |
Mar-09-07 12:52 PM |
#7 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Mar-09-07 01:03 PM |
#8 |
| -
About time |
Solo_in_MD |
Mar-09-07 11:50 AM |
#2 |
| -
Good |
bluestateguy |
Mar-09-07 12:20 PM |
#3 |
| -
They have always had the right to defend themselves |
krispos42 |
Mar-11-07 12:48 AM |
#143 |
| -
That's comforting given that the DC police are pretty imcompetent |
Mike Daniels |
Mar-12-07 07:49 AM |
#211 |
| -
Another good precedent that reaffirms that "the people" are individuals |
Squatch |
Mar-09-07 12:29 PM |
#4 |
| -
Finally! I was wondering when honest citizens could |
winter999 |
Mar-09-07 12:30 PM |
#5 |
| -
One small correction to the OP |
derby378 |
Mar-09-07 02:40 PM |
#9 |
| -
Potentially a huge decision. The article you link does mention |
NoGOPZone |
Mar-09-07 02:49 PM |
#10 |
| -
en banc panals are quite rare |
AngryAmish |
Mar-10-07 08:29 AM |
#69 |
| -
"If I didn't have this gun |
Bukowski Fan |
Mar-09-07 03:24 PM |
#11 |
| -
"If I didn't have this gun |
friendly_iconoclast |
Mar-09-07 10:44 PM |
#25 |
| -
Appeals Court Guts D.C. Gun Ban (Washington Post) |
davepc |
Mar-09-07 03:52 PM |
#12 |
| -
Sweet! |
meldroc |
Mar-09-07 03:52 PM |
#13 |
| -
Yes! |
brokensymmetry |
Mar-09-07 03:52 PM |
#16 |
| -
AH-gree |
torrentprime |
Mar-15-07 12:17 PM |
#264 |
| -
this was posted already. |
napi21 |
Mar-09-07 03:52 PM |
#14 |
| -
This will be good |
NickB79 |
Mar-09-07 03:52 PM |
#15 |
| -
Great news! |
SlipperySlope |
Mar-09-07 03:52 PM |
#17 |
| -
That's right! |
KevinJ |
Mar-09-07 04:35 PM |
#18 |
| -
Oh noes, now DC's gonna have guns everywhere! |
Lilith Velkor |
Mar-09-07 10:51 PM |
#26 |
| -
Brady Campaign plays the "activist judges" card... |
davepc |
Mar-09-07 05:07 PM |
#19 |
| -
Refresh my memory...where have I heard that term before? |
Squatch |
Mar-09-07 05:15 PM |
#20 |
| -
Activist judges n/t |
DemKR |
Mar-09-07 06:02 PM |
#21 |
| -
Owning a handgun isn't the problem; it's who owns the handgun |
brentspeak |
Mar-09-07 06:46 PM |
#22 |
| -
Wingnut judges: |
struggle4progress |
Mar-09-07 07:26 PM |
#23 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-10-07 08:34 PM |
#126 |
| -
... |
Speaker |
Mar-11-07 06:24 AM |
#152 |
| -
a victory for the second amendment |
mark414 |
Mar-09-07 08:29 PM |
#24 |
| -
Major ruling against D.C. handgun ban |
scavenger |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#27 |
| -
nt |
onehandle |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#28 |
| -
sorry |
scavenger |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#29 |
| -
It's still a good ruling, though! |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#30 |
| -
It's bad thing if you support human life |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#31 |
| -
approx. 180,000,000 unarmed civillians were killed by their own governments (Germany, China, USSR) |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#35 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#37 |
| -
BULLSHIT |
ProudDad |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#51 |
| -
Uh, you just agreed with me on every point, right? |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#54 |
| -
Nope |
ProudDad |
Mar-11-07 08:45 PM |
#188 |
| -
It's not the guns, it's the desperation in the people who use them to kill. nt |
piedmont |
Mar-11-07 10:52 PM |
#203 |
| -
No matter how desperate they are, they're generally less powerful w/o a gun |
billbuckhead |
Mar-12-07 09:37 PM |
#227 |
| -
Assault Rifle is newspeak nazi word, infantry |
Pavulon |
Mar-12-07 10:23 PM |
#229 |
| -
Actually, "assault weapon" is the term the gun-o-phobes invented for certain *scary* semi autos |
piedmont |
Mar-12-07 11:04 PM |
#232 |
| -
Actually Hitler invented the term |
billbuckhead |
Mar-13-07 07:51 PM |
#238 |
| -
Then it must be EEEEEEEEVIL!!!!!!11111 |
piedmont |
Mar-13-07 10:02 PM |
#240 |
| -
So a rifle is not a weapon? |
billbuckhead |
Mar-14-07 12:42 AM |
#241 |
| -
The terms "assault rifle" and "assault weapon" describe two different sets of firearms. |
piedmont |
Mar-14-07 03:22 AM |
#248 |
| -
Semantics semantics semantics from gun worshipping sophists |
billbuckhead |
Mar-14-07 09:39 AM |
#252 |
| -
A rifle is a weapon. A weapon is not necessarily a rifle |
krispos42 |
Mar-14-07 12:02 PM |
#254 |
| -
An assault rifle is a weapon, 2nd amendment weapons are firearms |
billbuckhead |
Mar-14-07 08:20 PM |
#257 |
| -
Okay, mom! :-) |
krispos42 |
Mar-15-07 11:29 AM |
#262 |
| -
If one carries an assault-style rifle, |
slackmaster |
Mar-15-07 11:31 AM |
#263 |
| -
"Storm Rifle". It is an accurate term, so I can't fault them for using it |
krispos42 |
Mar-14-07 02:33 PM |
#255 |
| -
DC Homicide rate |
Hiram Abiff |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#53 |
| -
Any links to prove that assertion? I don't believe it |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 09:20 PM |
#131 |
| -
D.C.homicide |
Hiram Abiff |
Mar-11-07 10:38 PM |
#201 |
| -
Don't worry |
ProudDad |
Mar-11-07 08:50 PM |
#189 |
| -
Are you interested in taking a wager on that? |
slackmaster |
Mar-12-07 03:57 PM |
#222 |
| -
Those statistics have been gone through a dozen times by you and I |
krispos42 |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#57 |
| -
Comparing murder rates b/w Chicago and Gary is foolish |
AngryAmish |
Mar-10-07 08:33 AM |
#70 |
| -
India has less murder than America and they're poorer than Gary, IN |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 06:52 PM |
#113 |
| -
correlation does not equal causation |
Odin2005 |
Mar-10-07 11:50 AM |
#87 |
| -
These people are dying CAUSE they're getting shot. There's your causation |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 08:35 PM |
#127 |
| -
This is a lousy thing |
ProudDad |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#32 |
| -
That's odd-- you don't think the "founding fathers" were capable of expressing their thoughts? |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#33 |
| -
I hope the Supremes rule for the 2nd! |
hollowdweller |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#34 |
| -
... |
Speaker |
Mar-11-07 07:05 AM |
#155 |
| -
Im sure they didnt image phones and internet... |
Endangered Specie |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#43 |
| -
WELL REGULATED MILITIA |
ProudDad |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#48 |
| -
THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#55 |
| -
"The Constitution shall never be construed...to prevent the people of the United States |
MGD |
Mar-10-07 08:13 PM |
#122 |
| -
THE RIGHT...SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. |
poorinnaples |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#56 |
| -
Are YOU getting it? |
krispos42 |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#61 |
| -
So you're saying that the right to bear arms... |
KevinJ |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#62 |
| -
I'm saying the militia is more than the National Guard |
krispos42 |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#64 |
| -
My part of the Unorganized Militia is very well regulated indeed |
slackmaster |
Mar-10-07 10:15 AM |
#80 |
| -
So you shoot earthquakes? |
KevinJ |
Mar-10-07 08:01 PM |
#118 |
| -
Shooting at something after it's happened serves no useful purpose |
slackmaster |
Mar-11-07 09:55 AM |
#164 |
| -
The Miltia was covered in Art 1 Sec 8 |
shield20 |
Mar-10-07 03:24 PM |
#101 |
| -
Every able bodied WHITE male |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 06:55 PM |
#115 |
| -
The Constitution has since been updated |
krispos42 |
Mar-10-07 07:52 PM |
#117 |
| -
And it will be updated somemore, but one cannot deny the original context |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 09:16 PM |
#130 |
| -
And your point is? |
piedmont |
Mar-11-07 10:53 PM |
#204 |
| -
The 2nd amendment was steeped in racism, classism and manifest destiny |
billbuckhead |
Mar-14-07 01:01 AM |
#244 |
| -
What it means is well established. The right to keep arms is for the purpose of a militia. |
lumberjack_jeff |
Mar-10-07 05:21 PM |
#108 |
| -
The first clause doesn't place any restriction on the action of the sentence. |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 08:24 PM |
#123 |
| -
The decision is directly contradictory to legal precedent. |
lumberjack_jeff |
Mar-11-07 08:36 PM |
#185 |
| -
So was Brown v. Board of Education |
piedmont |
Mar-12-07 02:43 AM |
#206 |
| -
Assuming you mean that |
sass29429 |
Mar-11-07 01:48 AM |
#148 |
| -
If the militia is an anachronism, then so is the second amendment. n/t |
lumberjack_jeff |
Mar-11-07 08:42 PM |
#186 |
| -
Well, if they require me to... |
krispos42 |
Mar-12-07 12:09 PM |
#214 |
| -
Repuke judges do help |
KevinJ |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#36 |
| -
The dissenting opinion wasn't against the basic findings... |
LibMan11 |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#42 |
| -
Ha! |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#44 |
| -
Like I said, right-wing judges help |
KevinJ |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#45 |
| -
I see the constitution |
scavenger |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#39 |
| -
Ok then, so lets all nuke up. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#47 |
| -
The government is your friend. Governments NEVER kill their people. |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#58 |
| -
Governments are capable of great evil. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-10-07 09:44 AM |
#75 |
| -
Glad you agree |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 12:23 PM |
#93 |
| -
Oh dear, am I being painted as an expert? |
krispos42 |
Mar-11-07 01:47 AM |
#147 |
| -
One fatal flaw with that argument... |
krispos42 |
Mar-11-07 01:17 AM |
#145 |
| -
But corporate arms merchants are our friends |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 08:31 PM |
#125 |
| -
The fact that corporations make many of them doesn't make them eeeeevil. |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 08:37 PM |
#128 |
| -
Corporations make weapons |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 10:41 PM |
#134 |
| -
Corporations make similac, and grow green beans, and... n/t |
Speaker |
Mar-11-07 07:58 AM |
#157 |
| -
And the use of weapons can be either good, or bad |
krispos42 |
Mar-11-07 12:47 PM |
#178 |
| -
Eisenhower's warning about the military industrial complex |
billbuckhead |
Mar-11-07 07:54 PM |
#184 |
| -
The military-industrial complex only has one big customer... |
krispos42 |
Mar-12-07 12:20 PM |
#215 |
| -
not a controlled weapon |
scavenger |
Mar-10-07 06:26 AM |
#68 |
| -
Nonsense. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-10-07 09:37 AM |
#73 |
| -
Are you honestly |
Pavulon |
Mar-10-07 10:04 AM |
#78 |
| -
Suggesting? I'm 100% sure they would. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-10-07 10:25 AM |
#82 |
| -
Well I disagree |
Pavulon |
Mar-10-07 12:03 PM |
#90 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-12-07 03:44 PM |
#220 |
| -
I'm more interested in your "distinct possibility statement." |
Show_Me _The_Truth |
Mar-10-07 08:01 PM |
#119 |
| -
No people are not ready to riot. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-11-07 10:46 AM |
#170 |
| -
ROTFLMAO |
Speaker |
Mar-11-07 08:10 AM |
#159 |
| -
The congress at that point |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-11-07 10:35 AM |
#167 |
| -
Give me an example |
scavenger |
Mar-10-07 10:59 AM |
#84 |
| -
In any civil war, the army would fragment |
krispos42 |
Mar-10-07 11:50 AM |
#86 |
| -
Yeah, but if more than one side had nukes, you'd be back to MAD-- which is pretty stable. nt |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 12:05 PM |
#91 |
| -
But the redundency would be gone |
krispos42 |
Mar-11-07 09:59 PM |
#199 |
| -
hmm, good point. |
piedmont |
Mar-12-07 03:41 AM |
#208 |
| -
Probably not in the face of power struggles within the rebels themselves |
krispos42 |
Mar-12-07 11:58 AM |
#212 |
| -
Are you familiar |
Pavulon |
Mar-10-07 12:07 PM |
#92 |
| -
So in a civil war some of those 'civilians' would be on one |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-10-07 12:40 PM |
#94 |
| -
The same thing could be said with the entire constitution |
scavenger |
Mar-10-07 01:50 PM |
#97 |
| -
So where are all the bomber basses at in Afghanistan and Iraq? |
scavenger |
Mar-10-07 01:23 PM |
#95 |
| -
How are you going to stand |
lazer47 |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#40 |
| -
Exactly-- see post #8 nt |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#41 |
| -
The same way |
ProudDad |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#49 |
| -
LOL |
Speaker |
Mar-11-07 08:05 AM |
#158 |
| -
I thought the DC circuit was lefty central? |
krispos42 |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#59 |
| -
Hardly - see my post 21 |
KevinJ |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#60 |
| -
And that's another thing to worry about. |
zanne |
Mar-11-07 10:53 AM |
#173 |
| -
DC Circuit is the appellate court |
AngryAmish |
Mar-10-07 08:37 AM |
#71 |
| -
Of course they did |
shield20 |
Mar-10-07 03:39 PM |
#104 |
| -
... |
Speaker |
Mar-11-07 06:54 AM |
#154 |
| -
What part of |
ProudDad |
Mar-11-07 09:03 PM |
#190 |
| -
See post #61 et al. |
krispos42 |
Mar-11-07 09:51 PM |
#198 |
| -
I couldn't agree more. |
Vexatious Ape |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#38 |
| -
It is a bad thing if you are familiar with DC. nt. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#46 |
| -
You've got that right, friend. |
ProudDad |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#50 |
| -
And will everyone comply? |
shield20 |
Mar-10-07 03:34 PM |
#103 |
| -
No law will ever "get rid of the fucking things" |
MGD |
Mar-10-07 06:23 PM |
#112 |
| -
Logic Errors: |
ProudDad |
Mar-11-07 09:07 PM |
#192 |
| -
Do you doubt the ability of Americans to manufacture guns and their ammunition at home? |
piedmont |
Mar-12-07 02:47 AM |
#207 |
| -
I, for one, do not doubt the ability at all |
krispos42 |
Mar-13-07 12:50 PM |
#233 |
| -
Smokeless powder could also be produced in home labs. |
piedmont |
Mar-13-07 05:13 PM |
#237 |
| -
True, although I would not want to try it |
krispos42 |
Mar-14-07 03:38 AM |
#249 |
| -
This is SICK!!! |
ProudDad |
Mar-14-07 02:24 AM |
#246 |
| -
So are meth labs and bath-tub gin. See the connection? nt |
piedmont |
Mar-14-07 03:19 AM |
#247 |
| -
No |
ProudDad |
Mar-14-07 09:15 PM |
#258 |
| -
Knowledge does not die |
krispos42 |
Mar-14-07 03:54 AM |
#250 |
| -
Straw man fallacies: |
MGD |
Mar-12-07 01:57 PM |
#216 |
| -
. |
Speaker |
Mar-11-07 08:15 AM |
#160 |
| -
And this is a good thing? |
ProudDad |
Mar-11-07 09:05 PM |
#191 |
| -
Fortunately, my rights are not subject to the approval of your neighbors. n/t |
Speaker |
Mar-12-07 02:26 AM |
#205 |
| -
DC certainly has more than its share of crooks and criminals |
slackmaster |
Mar-10-07 09:58 AM |
#76 |
| -
Why? Doesn't make sense... |
shield20 |
Mar-10-07 03:33 PM |
#102 |
| -
Fuck this |
ProudDad |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#52 |
| -
I used to be pro-gun control ..... |
Doremus |
Mar-10-07 05:35 AM |
#63 |
| -
You are a smart person... |
FyurFly |
Mar-10-07 05:36 AM |
#66 |
| -
Guns are pretty much ineffective against tanks |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 11:34 AM |
#85 |
| -
Not according to .50 Caliber Terror.com!!!!!! |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 11:58 AM |
#89 |
| -
There are other ways a citizenry can deal with tanks than with guns |
NickB79 |
Mar-10-07 02:23 PM |
#100 |
| -
Not generally against tanks. Softer targets yes. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-10-07 03:58 PM |
#105 |
| -
I don't understand the fixation with tanks |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 06:52 PM |
#114 |
| -
Tanks have done a damn good job against 2nd amend type guns |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 08:04 PM |
#120 |
| -
You do undestand that IEDs are IMPROVISED? |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 08:11 PM |
#121 |
| -
I rather my county have antitank missiles than the next door idiot have a gun |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 08:25 PM |
#124 |
| -
While that may be your preference, it isn't grounded in reality. nt |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 08:38 PM |
#129 |
| -
Guerillas can't win with guns but they sure can win with missiles |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 09:23 PM |
#132 |
| -
Guerillas can't win WITHOUT guns, bill. |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 09:26 PM |
#133 |
| -
When the Christians took over Rome |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 11:09 PM |
#135 |
| -
Not insurgencies. |
piedmont |
Mar-10-07 11:21 PM |
#137 |
| -
Actual revolutions trump "insurgencies" everywhere except gunnerworld |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 11:54 PM |
#138 |
| -
And we were discussing situations that call for insurgencies before you entered the thread. |
piedmont |
Mar-11-07 12:03 AM |
#139 |
| -
A-bombs are "tools" too |
billbuckhead |
Mar-11-07 12:12 AM |
#140 |
| -
And useless for civilian-led insurgencies. Try to keep up. nt |
piedmont |
Mar-11-07 12:13 AM |
#141 |
| -
A-bombs are useless for civilian led insurgencies? |
billbuckhead |
Mar-11-07 12:17 AM |
#142 |
| -
If not useless, then virtually impossible to acquire and manage. |
piedmont |
Mar-11-07 12:51 AM |
#144 |
| -
Concede, concede, concede. I'm supposed to take your arguments serious? |
billbuckhead |
Mar-11-07 07:37 PM |
#180 |
| -
That's the best you can do? nt |
piedmont |
Mar-11-07 10:50 PM |
#202 |
| -
Says the guy who's only argument is: |
krispos42 |
Mar-11-07 01:53 AM |
#149 |
| -
I thought guns had no effect in our high murder rate, it's all societal problems |
billbuckhead |
Mar-11-07 07:44 PM |
#181 |
| -
Ummmm.... I was referring to you... n/t |
krispos42 |
Mar-12-07 12:03 PM |
#213 |
| -
All these nations with low murder rates have no problems, like France? |
billbuckhead |
Mar-14-07 12:58 AM |
#243 |
| -
Never mind |
krispos42 |
Mar-14-07 03:57 AM |
#251 |
| -
Only America has social problems that cause gunfire |
billbuckhead |
Mar-14-07 09:55 AM |
#253 |
| -
Part of any insurgency is stealing from the invaders |
krispos42 |
Mar-13-07 12:56 PM |
#234 |
| -
I'm not sure that is correct. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-11-07 10:51 AM |
#172 |
| -
There are other problems |
krispos42 |
Mar-11-07 01:13 PM |
#179 |
| -
My point, which I'm sure you already know, is that an armed citizenry |
Doremus |
Mar-10-07 05:51 PM |
#109 |
| -
they are pretty ineffective against tanks. |
ProudDad |
Mar-11-07 09:09 PM |
#193 |
| -
Does it really matter |
madville |
Mar-10-07 05:36 AM |
#65 |
| -
You see the logical disconnect at the core of most attempted gun bans |
slackmaster |
Mar-10-07 10:00 AM |
#77 |
| -
But when we see someone with an assault rifle we'll know for sure he's the enemy |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 07:51 PM |
#116 |
| -
And then what? Use harsh language? |
krispos42 |
Mar-11-07 01:57 AM |
#150 |
| -
all it takes is the votes, and we'll come for your guns |
anotherdrew |
Mar-10-07 06:12 AM |
#67 |
| -
That's sarcasm, right? (n/t) |
benEzra |
Mar-10-07 09:32 AM |
#72 |
| -
I suppose it is |
anotherdrew |
Mar-10-07 01:35 PM |
#96 |
| -
molon labe, friend. |
aikoaiko |
Mar-10-07 02:00 PM |
#98 |
| -
Good, It is a political nightmare issue |
Pavulon |
Mar-10-07 09:39 AM |
#74 |
| -
So I don't have a right to be safe. |
zanne |
Mar-10-07 10:21 AM |
#81 |
| -
You most certainly do have a right to BE safe |
slackmaster |
Mar-10-07 10:44 AM |
#83 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Mar-10-07 02:11 PM |
#99 |
| -
It is already ILLEGAL for kids to have guns |
Pavulon |
Mar-10-07 04:31 PM |
#106 |
| -
This is a great ruling for privacy |
slackmaster |
Mar-10-07 10:11 AM |
#79 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-10-07 11:55 AM |
#88 |
| -
This *was* settled law. See Quilci vs. Morton Grove. |
lumberjack_jeff |
Mar-10-07 05:17 PM |
#107 |
| -
the DC circuit is not bound by other circuit courts |
Bacchus39 |
Mar-10-07 05:57 PM |
#110 |
| -
The DC law went much further... |
benEzra |
Mar-10-07 05:58 PM |
#111 |
| -
Let's let rednecks&neocons tell African Americans how to govern themselves |
billbuckhead |
Mar-10-07 11:17 PM |
#136 |
| -
Clarify who is better |
sass29429 |
Mar-11-07 01:35 AM |
#146 |
| -
The problem with your logic is... |
zanne |
Mar-11-07 10:50 AM |
#171 |
| -
No one can be trusted with firearms, law enforcement by necessity. |
billbuckhead |
Mar-12-07 07:25 PM |
#225 |
| -
Umm. |
Pavulon |
Mar-12-07 10:14 PM |
#228 |
| -
How are you different from the Authoritarian Neocons, then? |
krispos42 |
Mar-13-07 01:16 PM |
#235 |
| -
So people who believe that the 2ndA is an individual right are "rednecks and neocons"? |
benEzra |
Mar-11-07 06:41 AM |
#153 |
| -
No, not all. Many of us Democrats cherish our rifles and shotguns. n/t |
ShortnFiery |
Mar-11-07 09:21 AM |
#163 |
| -
I'm a Democrat and I love my... |
FyurFly |
Mar-11-07 09:47 PM |
#197 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-11-07 09:14 PM |
#194 |
| -
NeoCONS and rednecks are the leaders of the "gun rights" movement |
billbuckhead |
Mar-12-07 05:43 PM |
#224 |
| -
You're slipping... |
poorinnaples |
Mar-11-07 07:56 AM |
#156 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-11-07 09:10 AM |
#161 |
| -
Not at all... |
poorinnaples |
Mar-11-07 09:59 AM |
#165 |
| -
Wow! Thanks! |
zanne |
Mar-11-07 10:09 AM |
#166 |
| -
Actions... |
poorinnaples |
Mar-11-07 10:38 AM |
#168 |
| -
You're so right. |
zanne |
Mar-11-07 10:44 AM |
#169 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-11-07 10:55 AM |
#174 |
| -
And... |
poorinnaples |
Mar-11-07 11:48 AM |
#175 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-11-07 11:55 AM |
#176 |
| -
And... |
poorinnaples |
Mar-11-07 12:16 PM |
#177 |
| -
Interesting |
ProudDad |
Mar-11-07 09:16 PM |
#195 |
| -
I love Jim Webb!!! |
FyurFly |
Mar-11-07 09:22 PM |
#196 |
| -
A majority of all American economic classes are for stronger gun laws |
billbuckhead |
Mar-12-07 07:46 PM |
#226 |
| -
Nope, quickest way |
Pavulon |
Mar-12-07 10:29 PM |
#231 |
| -
Bullshit. All the POTUS candidates in the lead lap are pro gun regulation |
billbuckhead |
Mar-14-07 12:44 AM |
#242 |
| -
Thank you for reminding me of the gun-grabbers' prejudice against me |
dmesg |
Mar-15-07 02:43 PM |
#265 |
| -
Settled Law |
Thothmes |
Mar-12-07 06:59 AM |
#210 |
| -
Good. The vast majority of gun problems in DC are rooted in poverty, not the legality of guns. (nt) |
w4rma |
Mar-11-07 03:26 AM |
#151 |
| -
Poverty isn't KILLING these people, BULLETS are KILLING these Americans |
billbuckhead |
Mar-11-07 07:46 PM |
#182 |
| -
and the hand gun ban did what to save them? |
Bacchus39 |
Mar-11-07 07:49 PM |
#183 |
| -
You seem to be quite ignorant as to the cause of violence... |
Jack_DeLeon |
Mar-12-07 02:25 PM |
#217 |
| -
Firearms enhance violence and escalate fights into murders |
billbuckhead |
Mar-12-07 05:32 PM |
#223 |
| -
I have lots of bullets now |
Pavulon |
Mar-12-07 10:26 PM |
#230 |
| -
And how were bullets killing them if there was a gun ban in effect |
Mike Daniels |
Mar-13-07 01:18 PM |
#236 |
| -
BTW, lets legalize murder cause crooks won't the obey the laws. Gunner logic |
billbuckhead |
Mar-13-07 07:56 PM |
#239 |
| -
Excellent, Now we can liquidate the Homeland Security Department |
ShortnFiery |
Mar-11-07 09:16 AM |
#162 |
| -
Just a minor point - The National Cathedral is Episcopal, not Roman Catholic. n/t |
Springster |
Mar-12-07 05:47 AM |
#209 |
| -
Another GREAT decision from the DC Circuit |
ProudDad |
Mar-11-07 08:43 PM |
#187 |
| -
Consider your fear n/t |
FyurFly |
Mar-11-07 10:01 PM |
#200 |
| -
My fear? |
ProudDad |
Mar-14-07 02:22 AM |
#245 |
| -
Guns will never go away EVER! |
FyurFly |
Mar-14-07 02:36 PM |
#256 |
| -
Why, thank you for your support... |
ProudDad |
Mar-14-07 09:16 PM |
#259 |
| -
This is the longest thread I ever started |
AngryAmish |
Mar-12-07 02:41 PM |
#218 |
| -
Are you really angry? |
ProudDad |
Mar-14-07 09:18 PM |
#260 |
| -
I'm suprised it hasent been exiled to the gungeon by now... |
davepc |
Mar-12-07 03:37 PM |
#219 |
| -
I totally disagree that this in any way overturns 70-odd years of law |
slackmaster |
Mar-12-07 03:56 PM |
#221 |
| -
The only change it would make would be to replace the |
benEzra |
Mar-14-07 10:25 PM |
#261 |
| -
Well, my beloved hometown (DC) doesn't actually "ban" handguns |
dmesg |
Mar-15-07 02:57 PM |
#266 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore