You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: They need to improve the oversight. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. They need to improve the oversight.
Here's the problem I see with some of our charter schools in Colorado (SOME, not all - please don't misunderstand me).

Generally, when a charter is formed in conjunction with a public school district, it gets off to a much better start. Conversely, those that start through animosity toward the district - well, they often seem to make decisions simply to be contrary. One school, for example, ignored the district's admonitions against entering into a lease with a certain community member (with whom the district had had previous dealings). The school went ahead with the lease, got screwed on the deal, and had to be bailed out by the district. That only further soured the relationship with the district, of course. Another charter decided they would purchase their own liability and workers' comp insurance instead of participating in the district pool. Of course, they ended up having a huge premium payment which they couldn't pay - so they just didn't. Now they're swinging in the breeze with an Errors and Omissions lawsuit hanging over their head through a wrongful firing.

Here in CO, though the charters are autonomomous in many things, ultimately the district in which they are located is still the "deep pockets" that people turn to when filing lawsuits. So - going back to the O&E situation - the district did request evidence of insurance coverage from the charter (fearing that they may have let their policy lapse). The charter refused the request. The policy WAS lapsed, and now the DISTRICT is named in the lawsuit as a codefendant. They'll end up having to pay from THEIR pool, even though the charter refused training on personnel law and practice, refused to adopt reasonable policies regarding hiring and firing, and did not adequately provide coverage for these situations.

I know charters are often formed to "cut through the bureaucracy", but sometimes bureaucracy exists to cover your risk. More oversight is needed to make sure charters are following at least a somewhat rational course of action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC