Rainscents
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-23-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 35. She is right on in her decision! |
|
If she allow this, MSM media will use against Dems!
|
| -Pelosi says no to C-SPAN request on floor proceedings |
seriousstan |
Dec-22-06 08:07 PM |
#0 |
 -
I fear it's gonna be the same old shit |
bambo53 |
Dec-22-06 08:10 PM |
#1 |
 -
Thank you for your concern. |
aquart |
Dec-22-06 08:12 PM |
#3 |
 -
No, it's not the "same old shit." And there's a difference between Reps and Dems. nt |
MookieWilson |
Dec-22-06 08:19 PM |
#6 |
| -
I have yet to see any real difference but I keep hope |
Toots |
Dec-25-06 08:25 AM |
#55 |
| -
I want openness!! (n/t) |
muddleofpudd |
Dec-22-06 08:12 PM |
#2 |
| -
I'm with you. But I have to caution you -- here's a sample of what we'd see with more openness... |
8_year_nightmare |
Dec-22-06 08:47 PM |
#12 |
| -
Good! I wanna see it! |
muddleofpudd |
Dec-22-06 09:07 PM |
#13 |
| -
I totally agree. I'm all for keeping them on their toes. |
8_year_nightmare |
Dec-22-06 11:09 PM |
#21 |
| -
What you want to see will be a bias view from sponsors of CNN. Nancy |
The Wielding Truth |
Dec-23-06 02:03 PM |
#33 |
| -
CNN |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-24-06 01:51 PM |
#49 |
| -
Ummm C-Span |
Me-Oh-My |
Dec-26-06 12:09 AM |
#65 |
| -
"going for the gold" ? what the hell is that? n/t |
orleans |
Dec-23-06 04:26 AM |
#28 |
| -
nose gold! (eom) |
diane in sf |
Dec-23-06 07:50 PM |
#41 |
| -
self delete as question was answered as I read further |
conservdem |
Dec-25-06 08:43 AM |
#56 |
| -
We can't have Americans seeing footage of all those... |
Kutjara |
Dec-22-06 08:15 PM |
#4 |
| -
That was disappointing.nt |
nam78_two |
Dec-22-06 08:18 PM |
#5 |
| -
It prevents preening and showboating by individual members. nt |
MookieWilson |
Dec-22-06 08:19 PM |
#7 |
| -
This decision stinks |
ChazII |
Dec-22-06 08:20 PM |
#8 |
| -
The decision was a no brainer!! |
pocoloco |
Dec-22-06 08:40 PM |
#11 |
| -
Sorry, I misread the intent of Sen.Pelosi |
ChazII |
Dec-23-06 01:43 PM |
#32 |
| -
"Dignity and Decorum" would be better... |
stillcool47 |
Dec-22-06 08:24 PM |
#9 |
| -
Good.. It prevents C-Span camera operators from being |
annabanana |
Dec-22-06 08:38 PM |
#10 |
| -
As opposed to ostensibly public servants |
muddleofpudd |
Dec-22-06 09:13 PM |
#14 |
| -
My point was that C-Span is not a disinterested interlocutor. . |
annabanana |
Dec-22-06 09:25 PM |
#16 |
| -
I agree- any changes to the way things are run are suspect |
Tellurian |
Dec-23-06 12:31 AM |
#22 |
| -
I concur ... |
ShortnFiery |
Dec-22-06 09:16 PM |
#15 |
| -
Bollocks |
kgfnally |
Dec-23-06 01:07 AM |
#24 |
| -
but since we are NOT going to get a camera on each seat . . |
annabanana |
Dec-23-06 06:45 AM |
#29 |
| -
Bad move. Editors of what we see? With no coverage |
greccogirl |
Dec-23-06 06:48 PM |
#37 |
| -
No one is suggesting taking the existing cameras out. . .n/t |
annabanana |
Dec-23-06 06:51 PM |
#38 |
| -
There will be the same |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-24-06 01:53 PM |
#50 |
| -
The question to be asked is why is assh*le Brian Lamb only asking for this now? |
NoodleyAppendage |
Dec-22-06 10:09 PM |
#17 |
| -
There was an article posted recently which said that the Republicans |
Judi Lynn |
Dec-22-06 10:15 PM |
#18 |
| -
Actually, he tried to get it in1995 too, after the Repukes took over |
NYC Liberal |
Dec-22-06 10:19 PM |
#19 |
| -
Translation. He expected Dems to cave where Repukes did not...well, tough sh*t. |
NoodleyAppendage |
Dec-22-06 10:25 PM |
#20 |
| -
Translation: He expected dems to be more |
pokercat999 |
Dec-23-06 06:55 PM |
#39 |
| -
I am afraid you are correct. |
conservdem |
Dec-25-06 08:50 AM |
#57 |
| -
Brian Lamb is highly suspect IMHO |
Contrite |
Dec-23-06 12:38 AM |
#23 |
| -
Why can't we have a camera for each seat? |
kgfnally |
Dec-23-06 01:09 AM |
#25 |
| -
Its OK to have cameras on the Public but not cameras |
lovuian |
Dec-23-06 01:12 AM |
#26 |
| -
I only want to see the EMPTY seats shown when they all give their |
SoCalDem |
Dec-23-06 04:11 AM |
#27 |
| -
I think that's already SOP. |
sofa king |
Dec-24-06 04:49 PM |
#52 |
| -
I would love better coverage.. |
sendero |
Dec-25-06 09:20 AM |
#61 |
| -
On Washington Journal this morning |
Bukowski Fan |
Dec-23-06 07:54 AM |
#30 |
| -
Desire for secrecy: another black mark for Pelosi. |
Vidar |
Dec-23-06 08:04 AM |
#31 |
| -
Lay off Nancy and get some common sense. Keep it simple. If you let |
The Wielding Truth |
Dec-23-06 02:15 PM |
#34 |
| -
Fixed wide angle cameras would solve the problem. |
pokercat999 |
Dec-23-06 06:58 PM |
#40 |
| -
Wide angle? Yea, and Nancy's a problem? |
The Wielding Truth |
Dec-23-06 08:35 PM |
#42 |
| -
We do have better things to do. One major thing is |
pokercat999 |
Dec-24-06 05:49 AM |
#43 |
| -
Okay, but there's a big world that needs attention. Let's get cameras |
The Wielding Truth |
Dec-24-06 09:48 AM |
#48 |
| -
Good points your making. |
conservdem |
Dec-25-06 08:53 AM |
#58 |
| -
Again |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-24-06 01:55 PM |
#51 |
| -
Secrecy? I don't see any secrecy here. |
NYC Liberal |
Dec-24-06 09:19 PM |
#53 |
| -
Wow |
Puglover |
Dec-25-06 09:26 AM |
#62 |
| -
She is right on in her decision! |
Rainscents |
Dec-23-06 06:04 PM |
#35 |
| -
at first i disagreed with nancy on this, but after reading all the posts, i changed my mind. (eom) |
leQ |
Dec-23-06 06:34 PM |
#36 |
| -
It's all about the speaker. |
robcon |
Dec-24-06 07:26 AM |
#44 |
| -
I agree with Pelosi. |
Vinca |
Dec-24-06 07:45 AM |
#45 |
| -
Does the cameras "create" the negative images, or |
conservdem |
Dec-25-06 08:57 AM |
#59 |
| -
The person behind the camera picks and chooses what to show. |
Vinca |
Dec-25-06 01:08 PM |
#64 |
| -
So let me understand, there will still be camera coverage as before? |
tinfoilinfor2005 |
Dec-24-06 08:38 AM |
#46 |
| -
I think people should know that nobody is there and no one is paying attention. |
leesa |
Dec-24-06 08:58 AM |
#47 |
| -
Now let the Republicans scream for the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE |
eagler |
Dec-24-06 11:00 PM |
#54 |
| -
I think they should have let them. |
hollowdweller |
Dec-25-06 09:11 AM |
#60 |
| -
If partisan fairness were guaranteed, it might make sense |
LisaM |
Dec-25-06 11:59 AM |
#63 |
| -
How hard has Brian Lamb pushed the GOP for the last 6 years for the very same thing? |
Roland99 |
Dec-26-06 02:59 AM |
#66 |
| -
Smart choice by Pelosi |
PBass |
Dec-26-06 03:31 AM |
#67 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread