You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #21: I totally agree. I'm all for keeping them on their toes. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I totally agree. I'm all for keeping them on their toes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Pelosi says no to C-SPAN request on floor proceedings seriousstan  Dec-22-06 08:07 PM   #0 
  - I fear it's gonna be the same old shit  bambo53   Dec-22-06 08:10 PM   #1 
  - Thank you for your concern.  aquart   Dec-22-06 08:12 PM   #3 
  - No, it's not the "same old shit." And there's a difference between Reps and Dems. nt  MookieWilson   Dec-22-06 08:19 PM   #6 
     - I have yet to see any real difference but I keep hope  Toots   Dec-25-06 08:25 AM   #55 
  - I want openness!! (n/t)  muddleofpudd   Dec-22-06 08:12 PM   #2 
  - I'm with you. But I have to caution you -- here's a sample of what we'd see with more openness...  8_year_nightmare   Dec-22-06 08:47 PM   #12 
     - Good! I wanna see it!  muddleofpudd   Dec-22-06 09:07 PM   #13 
     - I totally agree. I'm all for keeping them on their toes.  8_year_nightmare   Dec-22-06 11:09 PM   #21 
     - What you want to see will be a bias view from sponsors of CNN. Nancy  The Wielding Truth   Dec-23-06 02:03 PM   #33 
        - CNN  MonkeyFunk   Dec-24-06 01:51 PM   #49 
           - Ummm C-Span  Me-Oh-My   Dec-26-06 12:09 AM   #65 
     - "going for the gold" ? what the hell is that? n/t  orleans   Dec-23-06 04:26 AM   #28 
     - nose gold! (eom)  diane in sf   Dec-23-06 07:50 PM   #41 
     - self delete as question was answered as I read further  conservdem   Dec-25-06 08:43 AM   #56 
  - We can't have Americans seeing footage of all those...  Kutjara   Dec-22-06 08:15 PM   #4 
  - That was disappointing.nt  nam78_two   Dec-22-06 08:18 PM   #5 
  - It prevents preening and showboating by individual members. nt  MookieWilson   Dec-22-06 08:19 PM   #7 
  - This decision stinks  ChazII   Dec-22-06 08:20 PM   #8 
  - The decision was a no brainer!!  pocoloco   Dec-22-06 08:40 PM   #11 
     - Sorry, I misread the intent of Sen.Pelosi  ChazII   Dec-23-06 01:43 PM   #32 
  - "Dignity and Decorum" would be better...  stillcool47   Dec-22-06 08:24 PM   #9 
  - Good.. It prevents C-Span camera operators from being  annabanana   Dec-22-06 08:38 PM   #10 
  - As opposed to ostensibly public servants  muddleofpudd   Dec-22-06 09:13 PM   #14 
  - My point was that C-Span is not a disinterested interlocutor. .  annabanana   Dec-22-06 09:25 PM   #16 
     - I agree- any changes to the way things are run are suspect  Tellurian   Dec-23-06 12:31 AM   #22 
  - I concur ...  ShortnFiery   Dec-22-06 09:16 PM   #15 
  - Bollocks  kgfnally   Dec-23-06 01:07 AM   #24 
  - but since we are NOT going to get a camera on each seat . .  annabanana   Dec-23-06 06:45 AM   #29 
  - Bad move. Editors of what we see? With no coverage  greccogirl   Dec-23-06 06:48 PM   #37 
     - No one is suggesting taking the existing cameras out. . .n/t  annabanana   Dec-23-06 06:51 PM   #38 
     - There will be the same  MonkeyFunk   Dec-24-06 01:53 PM   #50 
  - The question to be asked is why is assh*le Brian Lamb only asking for this now?  NoodleyAppendage   Dec-22-06 10:09 PM   #17 
  - There was an article posted recently which said that the Republicans  Judi Lynn   Dec-22-06 10:15 PM   #18 
  - Actually, he tried to get it in1995 too, after the Repukes took over  NYC Liberal   Dec-22-06 10:19 PM   #19 
     - Translation. He expected Dems to cave where Repukes did not...well, tough sh*t.  NoodleyAppendage   Dec-22-06 10:25 PM   #20 
        - Translation: He expected dems to be more  pokercat999   Dec-23-06 06:55 PM   #39 
           - I am afraid you are correct.  conservdem   Dec-25-06 08:50 AM   #57 
  - Brian Lamb is highly suspect IMHO  Contrite   Dec-23-06 12:38 AM   #23 
  - Why can't we have a camera for each seat?  kgfnally   Dec-23-06 01:09 AM   #25 
  - Its OK to have cameras on the Public but not cameras  lovuian   Dec-23-06 01:12 AM   #26 
  - I only want to see the EMPTY seats shown when they all give their  SoCalDem   Dec-23-06 04:11 AM   #27 
  - I think that's already SOP.  sofa king   Dec-24-06 04:49 PM   #52 
  - I would love better coverage..  sendero   Dec-25-06 09:20 AM   #61 
  - On Washington Journal this morning  Bukowski Fan   Dec-23-06 07:54 AM   #30 
  - Desire for secrecy: another black mark for Pelosi.  Vidar   Dec-23-06 08:04 AM   #31 
  - Lay off Nancy and get some common sense. Keep it simple. If you let  The Wielding Truth   Dec-23-06 02:15 PM   #34 
  - Fixed wide angle cameras would solve the problem.  pokercat999   Dec-23-06 06:58 PM   #40 
  - Wide angle? Yea, and Nancy's a problem?  The Wielding Truth   Dec-23-06 08:35 PM   #42 
     - We do have better things to do. One major thing is  pokercat999   Dec-24-06 05:49 AM   #43 
        - Okay, but there's a big world that needs attention. Let's get cameras  The Wielding Truth   Dec-24-06 09:48 AM   #48 
        - Good points your making.  conservdem   Dec-25-06 08:53 AM   #58 
  - Again  MonkeyFunk   Dec-24-06 01:55 PM   #51 
  - Secrecy? I don't see any secrecy here.  NYC Liberal   Dec-24-06 09:19 PM   #53 
  - Wow  Puglover   Dec-25-06 09:26 AM   #62 
  - She is right on in her decision!  Rainscents   Dec-23-06 06:04 PM   #35 
  - at first i disagreed with nancy on this, but after reading all the posts, i changed my mind. (eom)  leQ   Dec-23-06 06:34 PM   #36 
  - It's all about the speaker.  robcon   Dec-24-06 07:26 AM   #44 
  - I agree with Pelosi.  Vinca   Dec-24-06 07:45 AM   #45 
  - Does the cameras "create" the negative images, or  conservdem   Dec-25-06 08:57 AM   #59 
     - The person behind the camera picks and chooses what to show.  Vinca   Dec-25-06 01:08 PM   #64 
  - So let me understand, there will still be camera coverage as before?  tinfoilinfor2005   Dec-24-06 08:38 AM   #46 
  - I think people should know that nobody is there and no one is paying attention.  leesa   Dec-24-06 08:58 AM   #47 
  - Now let the Republicans scream for the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE  eagler   Dec-24-06 11:00 PM   #54 
  - I think they should have let them.  hollowdweller   Dec-25-06 09:11 AM   #60 
  - If partisan fairness were guaranteed, it might make sense  LisaM   Dec-25-06 11:59 AM   #63 
  - How hard has Brian Lamb pushed the GOP for the last 6 years for the very same thing?  Roland99   Dec-26-06 02:59 AM   #66 
     - Smart choice by Pelosi  PBass   Dec-26-06 03:31 AM   #67 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC