Reply #44: Uhhh, think about it?

[-..__...]

If he was "innocent" (meaning... he wasn't involved in the shootout), then my earlier comment about the dealership owner having a more "powerful caliber" firearm on hand wouldn't apply (meaning... why would he need to use a more powerful handgun against an innocent person)?

Considering the 'victim' :sarcasm: had already lied twice to investigators; once about even being at the previous crime scene (which he later admitted to being at), and second... stating that his injury was the result of a basketball game, :eyes:, any claim or pretense of "innocence" sounds highly unlikely.

Besides... stating guilt or innocence in the court of public opinion doesn't clear, convict or bury anyone. If it did, Bush (the other one, would have been cremated long ago. :smoke: