Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-17-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #58 |
| 73. In the US, widows don't pay the estate tax. |
|
It's after both parents die that their offspring pay it.
|
| -Treat us like lesbians, say sisters in UK tax fight |
Thankfully_in_Britain |
Sep-13-06 12:16 PM |
#0 |
-
That sucks |
BeautifulLoser |
Sep-13-06 12:17 PM |
#1 |
 -
why? |
dwickham |
Sep-13-06 01:33 PM |
#4 |
-
domestic partnership |
Alameda |
Sep-13-06 05:28 PM |
#5 |
 -
domestic partnerships are supposed to be in lieu of marriage |
dwickham |
Sep-14-06 02:21 PM |
#10 |
-
Anyone should be able to register a domestic partnership. |
Xithras |
Sep-14-06 06:04 PM |
#13 |
 -
should anyone be able to get married? |
dwickham |
Sep-14-06 10:53 PM |
#17 |
-
Under united states tax code, adult, cohabitating siblings won't be |
politicat |
Sep-15-06 12:24 AM |
#22 |
 -
what is a domestic corporation? |
dwickham |
Sep-15-06 12:42 PM |
#23 |
-
Love is not the concern of the state. |
Xithras |
Sep-15-06 02:43 PM |
#24 |
-
Absolutely. That is what marriage is. |
politicat |
Sep-16-06 02:04 AM |
#27 |
-
Yes. |
Xithras |
Sep-15-06 02:47 PM |
#25 |
-
It is all that Dame Theodora's fault |
happyslug |
Sep-16-06 11:33 PM |
#47 |
-
Why Not? n/t |
qwertyMike |
Sep-16-06 08:43 PM |
#39 |
-
I (male) shared a house with a guy |
qwertyMike |
Sep-16-06 08:51 PM |
#40 |
-
How do you know they chose not to get married . . . |
toopers |
Sep-17-06 03:21 PM |
#64 |
-
actually they did |
dsc |
Sep-16-06 08:31 PM |
#37 |
-
...Well, I doubt no one warned this would be one outcome |
Kagemusha |
Sep-13-06 12:19 PM |
#2 |
 -
I hadn't considered that as a possibility. |
SandyPond |
Sep-14-06 03:13 PM |
#11 |
 -
Male and female roommates |
heliarc |
Sep-15-06 12:09 AM |
#20 |
-
It's different |
Ravenseye |
Sep-15-06 02:53 PM |
#26 |
 -
Uh... |
heliarc |
Sep-16-06 06:49 AM |
#29 |
-
In cases of 'abuse' where roommates are just trying to get tax breaks |
cryingshame |
Sep-17-06 07:19 AM |
#53 |
-
But that would put the EU on the slippery slope to ... |
damntexdem |
Sep-13-06 01:31 PM |
#3 |
 -
Next it will be giving tax breaks to people and their pets |
whutgives |
Sep-13-06 08:47 PM |
#7 |
-
Wait to this argument hits the US. |
happyslug |
Sep-13-06 07:43 PM |
#6 |
-
While I am 100% in favor of allowing gay marriage |
MathGuy |
Sep-14-06 01:47 PM |
#8 |
 -
Well, the freepers think homosexuality is creepy |
AngryAmish |
Sep-14-06 01:53 PM |
#9 |
  -
It didn't say that they were lovers |
SandyPond |
Sep-14-06 03:38 PM |
#12 |
 -
Tina Turner |
qwertyMike |
Sep-16-06 09:01 PM |
#41 |
 -
I don't think the problem is creepiness. It's logic. Marriage isn't all |
1932 |
Sep-14-06 11:58 PM |
#19 |
 -
The NJ Domestic Partnership laws allows any two adults to register as a DP |
haruka3_2000 |
Sep-16-06 02:40 AM |
#28 |
-
Every adult should have the "pick ONE" option |
SoCalDem |
Sep-14-06 06:05 PM |
#14 |
 -
Agree completely. |
Xithras |
Sep-14-06 06:09 PM |
#15 |
  -
and the single man or woman who has an uninsured sister/parent |
SoCalDem |
Sep-14-06 06:12 PM |
#16 |
 -
And please to keep the word "Marriage" out of it. Too many connotations |
cryingshame |
Sep-17-06 07:22 AM |
#54 |
-
You can only have two people in a gay or hetero couple. You could have |
1932 |
Sep-14-06 11:44 PM |
#18 |
-
Change the tax law, if necessary |
sandnsea |
Sep-15-06 12:20 AM |
#21 |
 -
I disagree. |
1932 |
Sep-16-06 09:47 AM |
#30 |
  -
A family home should not be taxes |
sandnsea |
Sep-16-06 01:26 PM |
#32 |
 -
It's not the "family" home. Had it been the family home -- |
1932 |
Sep-16-06 05:13 PM |
#33 |
 -
Is is the family home |
sandnsea |
Sep-16-06 05:33 PM |
#34 |
 -
My point is, if it were the family home, they would have already owned a |
1932 |
Sep-16-06 06:52 PM |
#35 |
 -
The threshold for inheritance tax is £285,000 |
muriel_volestrangler |
Sep-16-06 07:52 PM |
#36 |
 -
Since housing costs have increased |
sandnsea |
Sep-16-06 10:54 PM |
#42 |
  -
I'm not sure how wise it is socially and economically to let property |
1932 |
Sep-16-06 11:09 PM |
#44 |
   -
home, savings, jewelry, heirlooms |
sandnsea |
Sep-16-06 11:31 PM |
#46 |
  -
If you want to argue that a million is just the right exemption and that |
1932 |
Sep-16-06 11:41 PM |
#48 |
  -
Wow |
sandnsea |
Sep-17-06 12:36 AM |
#49 |
  -
I am very enthusiastic about accumulation of wealth |
1932 |
Sep-17-06 08:37 AM |
#55 |
  -
We're not talking about rich people here |
sandnsea |
Sep-17-06 01:04 PM |
#62 |
  -
Ugh. The only way for working people to have security SHOULDN'T be |
1932 |
Sep-18-06 04:36 AM |
#75 |
  -
No, this is precisely a matter of relationships |
muriel_volestrangler |
Sep-17-06 03:55 AM |
#51 |
 -
See my last post below. |
1932 |
Sep-17-06 08:54 AM |
#57 |
  -
Your examples sound very unlikely to me |
muriel_volestrangler |
Sep-17-06 05:09 PM |
#67 |
 -
The bigger the house, and the longer it has been in the family, the more |
1932 |
Sep-17-06 08:52 PM |
#70 |
 -
I just don't see it that way |
sandnsea |
Sep-17-06 12:52 PM |
#61 |
 -
Two friends currently have the choice of the lifelong committment |
muriel_volestrangler |
Sep-17-06 04:55 PM |
#65 |
 -
In the US, it's 99% of people |
sandnsea |
Sep-17-06 05:03 PM |
#66 |
 -
Currently, it's 6% of estates that pay some inheritance tax |
muriel_volestrangler |
Sep-17-06 05:18 PM |
#68 |
 -
Thanks |
sandnsea |
Sep-17-06 10:08 PM |
#71 |
 -
The parents could have set up a trust giving the daughters a life |
1932 |
Sep-16-06 11:06 PM |
#43 |
 -
Yes, that is what they want - the option to create legal obligations |
muriel_volestrangler |
Sep-17-06 03:10 AM |
#50 |
 -
As I said, I don't think siblings should get tax-free transfers at death |
1932 |
Sep-17-06 08:46 AM |
#56 |
 -
I disagree. |
1932 |
Sep-16-06 09:48 AM |
#31 |
-
I have much more sympathy for this couple |
dsc |
Sep-16-06 08:40 PM |
#38 |
 -
Yes. Donate legal title to a charity and retain the right to live in the |
1932 |
Sep-16-06 11:13 PM |
#45 |
-
that depends |
dsc |
Sep-17-06 05:45 AM |
#52 |
-
Just to clarify... |
1932 |
Sep-17-06 10:58 AM |
#60 |
-
This Story Isn't What Some of You Seem to Think - It's "Death Tax" Time |
Crisco |
Sep-17-06 09:08 AM |
#58 |
 -
I agree, and I'd just like to add two points. |
1932 |
Sep-17-06 09:29 AM |
#59 |
 -
Because couples BOTH contribute to the estate |
sandnsea |
Sep-17-06 02:46 PM |
#63 |
  -
Dead People Never Lose What They've Worked For |
Crisco |
Sep-17-06 07:35 PM |
#69 |
 -
And can afford to pay for that info |
sandnsea |
Sep-17-06 10:09 PM |
#72 |
 -
In the US, widows don't pay the estate tax. |
Eric J in MN |
Sep-17-06 10:23 PM |
#73 |
-
The solution is to let them pay the tax gradually... |
Eric J in MN |
Sep-17-06 10:25 PM |
#74 |