You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #63: I get your point,, but your history is wrong [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
RoseMead Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #53
63. I get your point,, but your history is wrong
The First Crusade was begun in 1095 by Pope Urban II, It was directed at recapturing Jerusalem, and was the only crusade that actually achieved that goal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Crusade

The Albigensian Crusade was launched by Pope Innocent III in 1209. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albigensian_Crusade

The Albigensian Crusade was dircted against the Cathars, who practiced a form of dualistic, Gnostic Christianity. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathars) To call them goddess worshippers is incorret. Rather, they were Christian heretics, whose beliefs were similar in some ways to those of the Bogomils and the Paulicians. They believed that the material world was evil and had been created by an evil, lesser god, while all that was truely good and holy existed outside of the material world. Therefore, they argued, Jesus could not have been the son of the good God and also have incarnated materially, which amounted to a challenge against he concept of Jesus as "true God and true man." The Church persecuted them because of these beliefs, and the king of France ultimately joined in because it allowed him to crush the nobility of the Languedoc region. The Languedoc (southern France) had a different language and culture than that of Northern France and the nobles there were very powerful. When the pope issued a decree that all Cathar lands could be rightfully confiscated, the king and the northern nobility saw it as holy permission for a brutal land grab and a chance to bring the Languedoc nobility under tighter control.

I also don't know that it's fair to say that Catharism was closer to "original" Christianity than the official Church teachings of the time, because I've never seen any evidence that original Christianity was dualist. But it is fair to say that Catharism was gnostic, and Gnosticism is a very old variant of Christianity.


Catharism and the Albigensian Crusade are special interests of mine. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC