You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: Your answer must be a joke...or at least I hope so.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Your answer must be a joke...or at least I hope so....
I am aware of much more evidence in this case and am very comfortable stating, OJ Simpson killed these two people and got away with it.

I have been to several presentations on evidence in this case that wasn't covered in the media and it is ridiculous that Simpson walked away from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Skakel Case Deposition Raises Eyebrows (real killer found?) NorthernSun  Jun-29-06 11:54 AM   #0 
  - The DA is a Joke  wakeme2008   Jun-29-06 11:58 AM   #1 
  - He is, he just doesn't want his rep ruined by admitting  Warpy   Jun-29-06 12:38 PM   #7 
  - Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was correct?  sparosnare   Jun-29-06 12:02 PM   #2 
  - I was suspect of the conviction because of Fuhrman's involvement  noonwitch   Jun-29-06 12:11 PM   #3 
  - wha? Furhman was involved in the Kennedy  BareNakedLiberal   Jun-29-06 12:16 PM   #4 
  - I think he wrote a book-that was the extent of his involvement.  lizzy   Jun-29-06 12:20 PM   #5 
     - Was the book one of the reasons for re-opening the case?  Kingshakabobo   Jun-29-06 01:12 PM   #11 
     - That book pointed to Michael Skakel  sandnsea   Jun-29-06 07:18 PM   #16 
     - And so freaking what? Prosecutor is supposed to have  lizzy   Jun-29-06 07:45 PM   #19 
        - But he did follow the book  sandnsea   Jun-29-06 08:18 PM   #20 
     - thanks! For a minute I thought he had been  BareNakedLiberal   Jun-29-06 07:20 PM   #17 
        - He did  sandnsea   Jun-29-06 08:20 PM   #21 
           - Holy Sh*t!  BareNakedLiberal   Jun-30-06 12:01 PM   #34 
  - I can't wait for the lawsuit if this is true  NorthernSun   Jun-29-06 12:21 PM   #6 
  - He wrote a book.  lizzy   Jun-29-06 01:07 PM   #9 
     - Libel and slander  NorthernSun   Jul-01-06 02:32 AM   #52 
  - BS - That jury was going to acquit no matter what....  HardWorkingDem   Jun-29-06 01:05 PM   #8 
     - Wrong  NorthernSun   Jun-29-06 01:41 PM   #13 
     - I couldn't say for sure whether or not  zalinda   Jun-29-06 03:59 PM   #14 
     - Have you ever been involved in a "major" investigation before?  HardWorkingDem   Jun-30-06 01:44 AM   #29 
     - I understand that mistakes can be made  zalinda   Jun-30-06 09:11 AM   #33 
     - not just Furman  zreosumgame   Jun-30-06 01:42 PM   #36 
     - So what? Someone has to be first......  HardWorkingDem   Jun-30-06 01:39 AM   #28 
        - The OJ defense team pointed out the contaminated blood  NorthernSun   Jun-30-06 01:01 PM   #35 
           - ALL blood from a crime scene will be "contaminated".....  HardWorkingDem   Jun-30-06 11:38 PM   #48 
     - I agree , and some jurors said as much after the trial n/t  LostinVA   Jun-29-06 07:34 PM   #18 
     - And they should have  wakeme2008   Jun-29-06 08:57 PM   #24 
        - Your answer must be a joke...or at least I hope so....  HardWorkingDem   Jun-30-06 01:36 AM   #27 
           - lol I am not joking  wakeme2008   Jun-30-06 05:14 AM   #32 
           - um, dude...  zreosumgame   Jun-30-06 01:44 PM   #37 
           - Why the sarcasm? Legal professionals do that all the time  LostinVA   Jun-30-06 01:59 PM   #39 
           - No, I have been present at seminars where....  HardWorkingDem   Jun-30-06 11:39 PM   #49 
           - Who provided the evidence at the presentations?  LiberalFighter   Jun-30-06 05:04 PM   #41 
              - Professionals from the field.....  HardWorkingDem   Jun-30-06 11:42 PM   #50 
  - Wasn't Skakel like the third person they were SURE did this crime?  Kingshakabobo   Jun-29-06 01:12 PM   #10 
  - Dunn is who pulled Fuhrman into the case.  LiberalHeart   Jun-30-06 03:18 AM   #31 
  - What was wrong also the law they used to prosecute the case.  LiberalFighter   Jun-30-06 05:09 PM   #42 
  - He took the 5th because this case is going nowhere  AngryAmish   Jun-29-06 01:16 PM   #12 
     - But what's the advantage to him over just saying "No"?  pnwmom   Jun-29-06 07:04 PM   #15 
     - If it's adjudicated as manslaughter, not murder, there may be a statue of  2020   Jun-29-06 08:28 PM   #23 
        - Hi 2020! Welcome to DU!  pnwmom   Jun-29-06 10:36 PM   #26 
     - Only if you really would incriminate yourself  sandnsea   Jun-29-06 08:27 PM   #22 
     - Did you even read the article?  dsc   Jun-29-06 09:06 PM   #25 
     - Of course he has no duty to confess. But that assumes he's guilty.  pnwmom   Jun-30-06 02:59 AM   #30 
        - so you want cops peeking in your window?  zreosumgame   Jun-30-06 01:47 PM   #38 
           - Of course not. But if they asked me if I killed somebody in a deposition,  pnwmom   Jun-30-06 02:39 PM   #40 
              - almost never that cut and dried  zreosumgame   Jun-30-06 05:44 PM   #43 
              - This is a case where the prosecutor already has a conviction. He has  pnwmom   Jun-30-06 06:14 PM   #45 
                 - Never ever talk without your lawyer there.  bling bling   Jul-01-06 01:54 AM   #51 
              - Heh. I'd say no, too--whether I did it or not.  sofa king   Jun-30-06 06:07 PM   #44 
                 - I think most people would, sofa king.  pnwmom   Jun-30-06 06:15 PM   #46 
                    - The legal proceeding that gave rise to the deposition  tom22   Jun-30-06 09:06 PM   #47 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC