You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: Nature vs Nurture [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
69. Nature vs Nurture
1.) Many children in developed countries, and particularly in the U.S., are bombarded with various growth hormones via the food they eat (beef, dairy products, chicken, etc.). This affects their own biological maturity. A few generations ago, girls did not routinely reach puberty until 16 or even later; a sexually active and/or pregnant 12-year-old would have been unheard of.

2.) If "Nature" didn't intend teen-agers to get pregnant, they wouldn't get pregnant. Ovulation, copulation, fertilization, and gestation are natural functions of the female human body. When, however, nature is subverted, as with the growth hormones fed to cattle and chickens that are then consumed by humans, pregnancy becomes unnatural. The physical maturity of a 12-year-old girl's body isn't sufficient -- size, bone structure, circulatory capacity -- to gestate a fetus safely or adequately. The dangers to the immature mother and a potentially poorly developed fetus are higher than if the mother is physically mature.

3.) "Teen-agers have no business getting pregnant" is an observation on the culture they are having babies in, not their biology. If our culture provided social and economic support for teen-aged parents, none of this would be a problem. The problem is in how we treat young mothers and their children.

4.) We've actually made some strides in this direction in terms of allowing young mothers to remain in school, keep their babies, and have some chance of remaining fully within the social structure. When I was in high school, a girl who got pregnant was immediately removed from the premises and denied any chance of completing her education. She was usually forced/pressured into a marriage that might have been unwanted by her and/or her baby's father. If neither of them had good job prospects, the family was doomed to failure.


Sexuality is indeed natural, and when the social fabric wraps nature in a loving embrace, people tend to be naturally content and happy. When the social wars with the natural, problems can arise.


Tansy Gold, early morning philosopher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC