BrownOak
(391 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-25-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
| 59. But the difference is |
|
When you're after records for a civil action, in almost all cases, you're trying to secure documentation of an action that was not done specifically for trial purposes. A better analogy for this would be if you were representing an accident victim in a civil action and sent them to a medical provider for tests to be used in the trial. Or, to use an analogy from outside of the court, it would be like getting the results of your medical tests when you went in for an MRI or other type of tests.
The point is that it's different when you are requesting a procedure and requesting the results up front than it is when you are going in after the fact to find where information has been filed.
|
| -Defense Attorneys Seek Toxicology Reports On Accuser In Duke Case |
FreakinDJ |
May-22-06 09:00 PM |
#0 |
 -
The accuser is looking for a civil attorney |
ugarte |
May-23-06 01:00 AM |
#1 |
 -
got a link for that? |
TorchTheWitch |
May-23-06 03:27 AM |
#3 |
 -
I think this link should work |
FreakinDJ |
May-23-06 01:16 PM |
#9 |
| -
Not at all, but thanks anyway |
TorchTheWitch |
May-23-06 06:02 PM |
#14 |
| -
? |
hoboken123 |
May-23-06 10:26 PM |
#22 |
| -
I was being sarcastic |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 08:35 AM |
#29 |
| -
I'm still missing your point |
hoboken123 |
May-24-06 10:28 AM |
#39 |
| -
Not to speak for Torchie, but |
BrownOak |
May-24-06 01:55 PM |
#43 |
| -
Only the defense requires skepticism? |
hoboken123 |
May-24-06 03:00 PM |
#44 |
| -
Agreed, except |
BrownOak |
May-24-06 04:18 PM |
#45 |
| -
That's ok |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 05:34 PM |
#48 |
| -
Did I say that? |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 05:27 PM |
#47 |
| -
Oh that will work |
FreakinDJ |
May-23-06 09:12 AM |
#5 |
| -
Calling "Gloria Allred"..."Gloria Allred". No out-of-court "silence" |
zann725 |
May-24-06 09:08 AM |
#32 |
| -
Does ANYONE care about this case? |
Placebo |
May-23-06 01:09 AM |
#2 |
| -
That's an odd question |
TorchTheWitch |
May-23-06 03:29 AM |
#4 |
| -
It smells like another Tawana Brawley case |
IndianaGreen |
May-23-06 06:37 PM |
#15 |
| -
Tawana Brawley |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 08:42 AM |
#30 |
| -
From the Evidence Turned Over Last Week |
BrownOak |
May-23-06 10:38 AM |
#6 |
| -
Darn shame about the toxicology test |
chookie |
May-23-06 12:26 PM |
#7 |
| -
Victim must AGREE to toxicology screening |
FreakinDJ |
May-23-06 01:10 PM |
#8 |
| -
I think toxicology tests can be ordered by emergency room doc |
onenote |
May-23-06 01:25 PM |
#10 |
| -
Only with victim's consent |
FreakinDJ |
May-23-06 01:38 PM |
#11 |
| -
Here's what I found |
chookie |
May-23-06 01:40 PM |
#12 |
| -
Yes I tried looking for North Carolina outline as well |
FreakinDJ |
May-23-06 01:53 PM |
#13 |
| -
Not when you are looking for evidence of date rape drug |
IndianaGreen |
May-23-06 06:54 PM |
#16 |
| -
Of course Nifong has a choice |
TorchTheWitch |
May-23-06 07:41 PM |
#17 |
| -
Choices |
BrownOak |
May-23-06 08:47 PM |
#18 |
| -
Yes, but... |
Moosepoop |
May-23-06 08:54 PM |
#19 |
| -
Right, but how long does it take to run a tox report? n/t |
BrownOak |
May-23-06 10:49 PM |
#23 |
| -
it's not an issue of DOING the test |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 06:02 AM |
#27 |
| -
At any other hospital, that would make sense, but... |
jberryhill |
May-24-06 08:54 AM |
#31 |
| -
Not necessarily |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 09:51 AM |
#35 |
| -
No Question? |
jberryhill |
May-24-06 11:33 AM |
#41 |
| -
Not always |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 06:19 PM |
#49 |
| -
Filling in the blanks |
jberryhill |
May-24-06 08:08 PM |
#52 |
| -
I've said no such thing |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 10:36 PM |
#55 |
| -
Okay fine.. |
jberryhill |
May-25-06 01:13 PM |
#64 |
| -
With all the attention on this case |
BrownOak |
May-24-06 09:11 AM |
#33 |
| -
Not small at all |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 10:11 AM |
#37 |
| -
This is true |
AngryAmish |
May-24-06 10:15 AM |
#38 |
| -
Ain't that the truth! |
Tyrone Slothrop |
May-24-06 04:36 PM |
#46 |
| -
But the difference is |
BrownOak |
May-25-06 09:41 AM |
#59 |
| -
A very minor point |
chookie |
May-24-06 01:36 AM |
#25 |
| -
Point taken... so let's get into that conjecture |
BrownOak |
May-24-06 09:22 AM |
#34 |
| -
He said he turned over everything he HAS |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 05:44 AM |
#26 |
| -
Consent |
BrownOak |
May-24-06 09:58 AM |
#36 |
| -
Why lie? |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 10:54 AM |
#40 |
| -
But we've left the public arena and are now dealing with |
BrownOak |
May-24-06 11:43 AM |
#42 |
| -
that happens too |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 06:52 PM |
#50 |
| -
Nice example, that really hit home... literally |
BrownOak |
May-25-06 09:59 AM |
#60 |
| -
Now there's some good lawyering! |
Moosepoop |
May-23-06 10:15 PM |
#20 |
| -
The Evidence of Innocence: Strong and Clear |
IndianaGreen |
May-23-06 10:26 PM |
#21 |
| -
All that has what to do with my post? |
Moosepoop |
May-23-06 11:06 PM |
#24 |
| -
Please do it before the thread gets locked... |
jberryhill |
May-24-06 08:21 PM |
#54 |
| -
If this thread gets locked first, |
Moosepoop |
May-25-06 11:05 AM |
#62 |
| -
Apparently... |
jberryhill |
May-25-06 01:15 PM |
#65 |
| -
You've seen the documents? |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 08:23 AM |
#28 |
| -
Hey, Torch... |
Moosepoop |
May-24-06 07:23 PM |
#51 |
| -
Not having trumpeted anything about that subject... |
jberryhill |
May-24-06 08:15 PM |
#53 |
| -
To be clear |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 11:19 PM |
#57 |
| -
To be even clearer |
jberryhill |
May-25-06 09:19 AM |
#58 |
| -
Right thought, wrong motion |
BrownOak |
May-25-06 10:19 AM |
#61 |
| -
who are you quoting? |
TorchTheWitch |
May-25-06 12:52 PM |
#63 |
| -
Really |
TorchTheWitch |
May-24-06 11:07 PM |
#56 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread