You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: NJ's 5th Congressional District was a victim of GOP phone pranks in 2002 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. NJ's 5th Congressional District was a victim of GOP phone pranks in 2002
Democratic candidate Ann Sumers was competing against Republican Scott Garrett for Marge Roukema's vacated congressional seat. In the last week leading up to Election Day, thousands of households in the 5th Congressional District received daily anonymous, "robo-calls" which targeted Ann Sumers. The calls basically followed this outline: "This is a call concerning Democrat Ann Sumers...(pause of 5 seconds, then resume)...Ann Sumers wants to raise your taxes. She voted to raise taxes on NJ residents 3 times. Call Ann Sumers, and tell her you're sick and tired of her raising your taxes."

Click. End of message. No "this was paid for by Friends To Elect Republican Scott Garrett", no identification, no nothing. Caller ID didn't work, *69 didn't work.

As I said, these calls were spammed to 5th Congressional District household on a daily basis for an entire week, sometimes several times a day. Some people who were annoyed by them actually thought it was Ann Sumers herself who was behind the calls because of the clever pause after the "This is a call concerning Democrat Ann Sumers"; people would hang up before they heard the rest of the message, believing it was a call from Ann Sumers.

There was something else: Ann Sumers never "voted to raise taxes on NJ residents 3 times" -- she couldn't have, because had never held a political office before.

Needless to say, the Garrett campaign denied knowing anything about the calls. "We'd like to know who's behind them, too." Ha, ha, yeah right. Turned out the Club For Growth was putting millions into getting Garrett elected, and they're the most likely culprit.

Campaign finance reform laws? What reform? Anybody can make harrassing, misleading, anonymous phone calls to the public and get away with it if its regards an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC