You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #14: One problem... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. One problem...
Recusal on SC issues is left up to the individual judge, and I don't see Scalia bowing out.

There is no appeal of Scalia's decision as whether or not to recuse himself. The only option -- and it won't change the trial at hand -- is impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -US high court judge said to slam detainee rights (Scalia) sabra  Mar-26-06 11:34 AM   #0 
  - Scalia is a very ignorant MFer, isn't he.  LynnTheDem   Mar-26-06 11:38 AM   #1 
  - According to Scalia, quoted in this article, US law should be all about  Judi Lynn   Mar-26-06 11:44 AM   #2 
  - Please! Please! I'll Buy the Beer!  AndyTiedye   Mar-26-06 01:38 PM   #12 
  - The problem with this thinking is  tularetom   Mar-26-06 11:44 AM   #3 
  - Careful, Antonin, there are 140,000 potential POWs still in Iraq  coalition_unwilling   Mar-27-06 04:04 PM   #47 
  - We have to take the country back and that absolutely includes  rzemanfl   Mar-26-06 11:45 AM   #4 
  - The Constitution follows where the military goes  LiberalPartisan   Mar-26-06 11:48 AM   #5 
  - Oh so NOW it it's a WAR`  supernova   Mar-26-06 12:00 PM   #6 
  - Don't forget that it IS a war so CinC can wiretap, and pretty much anythin  BR_Parkway   Mar-26-06 12:09 PM   #7 
     - So much more convenient  supernova   Mar-26-06 12:26 PM   #8 
  - "Justice" Scalia is the ultimate oxymoron  Dudley_DUright   Mar-26-06 12:35 PM   #9 
  - At the Nuremburg trials the followers of the Regime thought  lovuian   Mar-26-06 01:20 PM   #10 
  - Scalia must recuse himself if such a case comes before The Court.  no_hypocrisy   Mar-26-06 01:27 PM   #11 
  - One problem...  Sgent   Mar-26-06 02:00 PM   #14 
  - he decided he didn't have to recuse himself  annabanana   Mar-26-06 02:36 PM   #15 
     - He has no integrity at all  mvd   Mar-28-06 02:29 PM   #57 
  - i guess is Scalia had his way there would not have been any trials  cantstandbush   Mar-26-06 01:45 PM   #13 
  - Another anti-human rights  lumpy   Mar-26-06 02:43 PM   #16 
  - Recusal is not in a Neo-Con's ethical vocabulary  Supersedeas   Mar-28-06 01:55 PM   #55 
  - Newsweek: US High Court Judge reportedly slams detainee rights  Charlie Brown   Mar-26-06 02:52 PM   #17 
  - OK Fat Tony  fujiyama   Mar-26-06 02:52 PM   #18 
     - GWB said after 9/11  lumpy   Mar-27-06 04:06 PM   #48 
  - Scalia really needs to be impeached  Mr_Spock   Mar-26-06 03:28 PM   #19 
  - "War is war". What a fine legal mind.  Inland   Mar-26-06 03:34 PM   #20 
  - kick  OKNancy   Mar-26-06 06:34 PM   #21 
  - US high court judge said to slam detainee rights (Reuters)  norml   Mar-26-06 06:35 PM   #22 
  - This is disappointing, even coming from Scalia  Jack Rabbit   Mar-26-06 06:35 PM   #23 
  - It's nice to get all the war criminals on record  Webster Green   Mar-26-06 06:35 PM   #24 
  - If there was a country called Al Qaeda I'd have no problem with this.  Kagemusha   Mar-26-06 06:35 PM   #25 
  - kick  OKNancy   Mar-27-06 03:46 PM   #26 
  - Scalia says civil rights for Guantanamo inmates 'crazy'  Radio_Guy   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #27 
  - Either treat them as criminals, or treat them as POWs.  baldguy   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #28 
  - The international community is going to eventually get  MadMaddie   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #29 
  - "Foreigners, in foreign countries, have no rights ..."  DBoon   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #30 
  - That statement alone is grounds for impeachment.  baldguy   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #42 
  - Crazy? No... What's Crazy is You Sitting on the Supreme Court  stepnw1f   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #31 
  - Not according to the 14th Amendment, Mr "Justice":  NYC Liberal   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #32 
  - Bingo. And all top USC lawyers agree with exactly that.  LynnTheDem   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #34 
  - Little fact:  NYC Liberal   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #40 
     - And several are PROVEN to be INNOCENT.  LynnTheDem   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #43 
        - Did you know that nine Chinese citizens are being held  NYC Liberal   Mar-27-06 03:54 PM   #45 
           - Yeppers. I did know that.  LynnTheDem   Mar-27-06 03:59 PM   #46 
              - Ooh but they're "foreigners." Can't let them have rights!  NYC Liberal   Mar-27-06 04:19 PM   #49 
                 - Under the USC, "foreigners" clearly have rights. Not to mention  LynnTheDem   Mar-27-06 04:31 PM   #51 
                    - First thing any tyrranical regime does: dehumanize the opposition.  NYC Liberal   Mar-27-06 04:38 PM   #53 
                       - Yep. ALWAYS.  LynnTheDem   Mar-27-06 04:46 PM   #54 
  - Maybe he thinks the 14th doesn't really exist  ThoughtCriminal   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #36 
  - Really. Can he even read?  sutz12   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #38 
  - exactly.  endarkenment   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #41 
  - That's just it - not a State but the Feds in DC.  Rex   Mar-27-06 04:31 PM   #52 
  - Can somebody explain  ThoughtCriminal   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #33 
  - In one word.  LynnTheDem   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #35 
  - In other words, Scalia Supports Kidnapping  dubyadubya3   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #37 
  - Human rights? That's crazy talk.  endarkenment   Mar-27-06 03:47 PM   #39 
     - "banality of evil". Well that sums up bush & his cabal perfectly.  LynnTheDem   Mar-27-06 03:48 PM   #44 
  - Dude, he fucking helped PICKED who would be POTUS in 2000.  Rex   Mar-27-06 04:28 PM   #50 
  - Va f'enculo.  fshrink   Mar-28-06 02:11 PM   #56 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC