Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 36. There is if Abramoff directed the tribes to donate the money |
|
Tom Delay's legal troubles are not for donations he gave but for donations he directed others to give.
|
| -(Patrick) Kennedy among leading recipients of convicted lobbyist's clients |
wicket |
Jan-04-06 10:13 AM |
#0 |
 -
Boy, they are quick to try and tag a Democrat in this mess. Where |
54anickel |
Jan-04-06 10:15 AM |
#1 |
  -
Here thay are... |
NFL80 |
Jan-05-06 11:33 AM |
#44 |
| -
Hold It Just A God Damned Minute |
ThomWV |
Jan-04-06 10:25 AM |
#2 |
| -
Tribal contributions have ALWAYS gone to Democrats..they twist this |
patdem |
Jan-04-06 10:30 AM |
#4 |
| -
If you read the whole article: |
yibbehobba |
Jan-04-06 11:16 AM |
#10 |
| -
Now there...That settles it. Kennedy doesn't know that scum Abramoff! |
Tight_rope |
Jan-05-06 08:07 AM |
#38 |
| -
Both say clients, not Abramoff directly. n/t |
420inTN |
Jan-04-06 10:47 AM |
#8 |
| -
Plus the title leaves out the word Democrat |
DoYouEverWonder |
Jan-04-06 04:34 PM |
#28 |
| -
yes, the headline is VERY misleading! |
rodeodance |
Jan-05-06 08:11 AM |
#40 |
| -
Abramhoff has tainted ALL tribal contributions no matter how innocent |
patdem |
Jan-04-06 10:26 AM |
#3 |
| -
Well, if he just gives that money to charity, it's all okay, right? |
gratuitous |
Jan-04-06 10:31 AM |
#5 |
| -
I made a post early this morning |
OKNancy |
Jan-04-06 10:32 AM |
#6 |
| -
See, this is exactly their tactic. Confuse you into thinking that Republi |
jsamuel |
Jan-04-06 10:46 AM |
#7 |
| -
What I think they should look at is this |
jamesinca |
Jan-04-06 10:50 AM |
#9 |
| -
An excellent suggestion |
ernstbass |
Jan-04-06 02:24 PM |
#18 |
| -
gonna see the MSM hoe like never befoe |
Algorem |
Jan-04-06 11:19 AM |
#11 |
| -
That's a very frightening thought... however, |
redqueen |
Jan-04-06 12:59 PM |
#14 |
| -
Well, if we're going to do Guilt by Correlation |
Spinzonner |
Jan-04-06 12:53 PM |
#12 |
| -
Eighth? EIGHTH?! How about we list 1-7, you gutless whore? |
redqueen |
Jan-04-06 12:56 PM |
#13 |
| -
Perhaps they are covering Kennedy because the newspaper |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jan-04-06 01:12 PM |
#16 |
| -
That MIGHT make sense, IF what Kennedy did was illegal. |
redqueen |
Jan-04-06 02:06 PM |
#17 |
| -
So far it hasn't been proven that any member of Congress has |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jan-04-06 02:44 PM |
#20 |
| -
Fine, then there's nothing SMELLY about what Kennedy did, is there? |
redqueen |
Jan-04-06 03:59 PM |
#23 |
| -
There is if Abramoff directed the tribes to donate the money |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jan-05-06 06:48 AM |
#36 |
| -
So you're saying those Dems broke the law as well? |
redqueen |
Jan-05-06 11:46 AM |
#45 |
| -
No, I'm not saying that they broke the law. |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jan-05-06 11:59 AM |
#46 |
| -
Haven't they released the names? |
redqueen |
Jan-05-06 12:12 PM |
#47 |
| -
The Providence Journal... |
Chemical Bill |
Jan-04-06 07:14 PM |
#29 |
| -
BELO???? That explains everything. "Hi!" from Houston, TX |
Justitia |
Jan-04-06 07:38 PM |
#30 |
| -
Back atcha there Houston. |
Chemical Bill |
Jan-04-06 07:47 PM |
#31 |
| -
This article is from the Boston Globe, not the Providence Journal |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jan-05-06 06:48 AM |
#37 |
| -
They reference the Belojo... |
Chemical Bill |
Jan-05-06 11:30 AM |
#43 |
| -
Liberal media MY ASS! |
wicket |
Jan-04-06 02:33 PM |
#19 |
| -
guilt by association but 'once removed' |
HuffleClaw |
Jan-04-06 01:03 PM |
#15 |
| -
This is nothing but a lying smear |
fasttense |
Jan-04-06 03:28 PM |
#21 |
| -
I did a little looking up his history |
OKNancy |
Jan-04-06 03:33 PM |
#22 |
| -
R's "catapulting" propaganda |
OzarkDem |
Jan-04-06 04:09 PM |
#24 |
| -
The tribes are Abramoff's VICTIMS, not CLIENTS, & Kennedy is founder |
Justitia |
Jan-04-06 04:22 PM |
#25 |
| -
Haven't the Indian tribes been trying to build a casino in RI for years? |
newscott |
Jan-04-06 04:25 PM |
#26 |
| -
I've gambled in Indian casinos & given $$$ to Dems, am I suspect too? -nt |
Justitia |
Jan-04-06 04:30 PM |
#27 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-04-06 07:53 PM |
#32 |
| -
Right, because Bush doesn't raise $... he funds his campaigns |
Lavender Brown |
Jan-04-06 07:58 PM |
#33 |
| -
LOL |
wicket |
Jan-04-06 08:31 PM |
#35 |
| -
The Bush family is much richer |
wicket |
Jan-04-06 08:30 PM |
#34 |
| -
It's called politics. Look into it |
Guy Whitey Corngood |
Jan-05-06 08:46 AM |
#42 |
| -
the tactic of saying over and over that it is bi-partisan seems to be |
rodeodance |
Jan-05-06 08:10 AM |
#39 |
| -
Shame on the AP -and the Globe for this misleading headline! |
rodeodance |
Jan-05-06 08:12 AM |
#41 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread