You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #42: Taking Syria is a big PNAC goal. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
42. Taking Syria is a big PNAC goal.
Not only does it help Israel, but it also provides a conduit for military movement into the Middle East and parts of Central Asia without entering the Persian Gulf through the dangerous Straits of Hormuz. An attack on Iran could then proceed without running the gamut of Russian Sunburn missiles in the Persian Gulf or begging the Turks to let us pass.

Syria also could provide an outlet for Middle Eastern and Central Asian oil and gas, bypassing not only the Persian Gulf, but also the Red Sea whose outlet is a pirate haven and the Black Sea and Bosporus, which are really controlled by Russia.

Such a route would also bypass Turkey, which refused, at the last minute, to let our troops and equipment transit into northern Iraq. Bypassing Turkey also allows the U.S. to make promises to the Kurds that would infuriate the Turks, like supporting an independent Kurdistan.

There is already a pipeline from northern Iraq through Syria to Syrian Mediterranean ports. The pipeline was in use just prior to the war. There is also a small, 8-inch pipeline running through Syria to Haifa in Israel dating from 1947 or so. That pipeline would be replaced with a much larger one.

There is also a pipeline running from Iraq's southern oil fields to the Syria pipeline. That could conceivably be extended to Kuwait or even southwestern Iran.

The likely Bush/PNAC plan would then have the U.S. attack Iran. Theoretically, it wouldn't be necessary to control the entire country, but instead, attempt to break off the southwestern oil field area which abuts Iraq and is populated withe Shia Arabs, like southern Iraq. A pipeline could then be built to join with the southern Iraqi pipeline system for export through Syria.

The U.S. would then secure northwestern Iran which has a high population of Azeris and Kurds. The Azeri areas could be returned to Azerbaijan and the Kurdish area joined with the Kurdish areas of Iraq and Syria to form a Kurdish state. A pipeline could then be built from Azerbaijan south through the new Azerbaijani provinces and Kurdistan to link up with the pipelines going through Syria to the Mediterranean. The pipeline would then displace the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline through Georgia and Turkey, bypassing the Bosporus and other trouble spots and leaving the errant Turks with a port at Ceyhan but not much oil to go through it.

I doubt that the PNAC crowd will be able to even try any of this in the present climate, especially considering what is now going on in the Senate. And of course, neither the Syrians nor the Iranians would give in. The guerrilla attacks on the current Iraqi pipeline system could pale in comparison to what would happen in Iran.

Nonetheless, the PNAC and thus the * administration will fight hard to take Syria as the first step in their plans to take over the Middle East and then the world. When they are defeated in 2008, they will just then go into opposition and wait for their chance in 2012. They have a long term time frame. So should we.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Senate Weighs Measures Urging Bush Set Limits in Iraq ECH1969  Nov-14-05 09:32 PM   #0 
  - This is Republicans trying to save their collective asses in 2006.  NYC Liberal   Nov-14-05 09:35 PM   #1 
  - That's precisely what is going on.  janx   Nov-15-05 09:13 AM   #40 
  - Eventually, they might have to take the money away  daleo   Nov-14-05 11:01 PM   #2 
  - This is a SIGNIFICANT story  shockingelk   Nov-14-05 11:31 PM   #3 
  - Senate Republicans Pushing for a Plan on Ending the War in Iraq  Rose Siding   Nov-14-05 11:49 PM   #4 
  - Let's see if the asshole singles them repukes out and accuses them of...  pinniped   Nov-14-05 11:49 PM   #5 
  - Here's hoping bush took some really brave aides to China with him  Rose Siding   Nov-14-05 11:50 PM   #6 
  - Yep, his "carte blanche" to wage war in Iraq is rapidly evaporating.  Theduckno2   Nov-15-05 12:07 AM   #7 
  - Senate Repubs Pushing for a Plan on Ending the War in Iraq  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #8 
  - Freedom_from_Chains  maddezmom   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #9 
  - The freepers are even wishing  spancks   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #10 
  - I imagine they will start calling for the revolution before sunrise  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #12 
     - YEP, you are correct indeed  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #15 
  - Some highlights from that Freeper Forum:  aden_nak   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #11 
  - This is really going to fuck up Jr's plans for Syria. n/t  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #14 
     - Taking Syria is a big PNAC goal.  amandabeech   Nov-15-05 10:48 AM   #42 
  - they are implioding in the worst of ways  nadinbrzezinski   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #13 
  - It's really kind of sad to watch  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #16 
     - Sad, in a happy way.  spancks   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #17 
  - This is an IMPORTANT story  shockingelk   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #18 
  - "This reflects what has to be done."  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #19 
  - Freeper tag line, at least this one is truthful about them.  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #20 
  - "Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong"  arewenotdemo   Nov-15-05 03:49 PM   #44 
  - Collectively numb as a pounded thumb.  Old and In the Way   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #21 
  - Here's an evem bigger FreepTard meltdown on same subject  RadiDem   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #22 
  - You are right they are really starting to come unglued  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #24 
  - That freeper was being sarcastic. He always gets beaten  janx   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #36 
  - OMIGOD! Read this!  arewenotdemo   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #26 
     - I know, I read that one and thought you have got to be kidding.  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #27 
     - Check out this jewel...  ninkasi   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #37 
        - No.  janx   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #38 
        - I suspect "Z-man" must refer to Zarqawi. Also have to guess  arewenotdemo   Nov-15-05 03:18 PM   #43 
  - I wonder...  damkira   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #23 
  - "Some Republicans have become better Democrats than many Democrats."  arewenotdemo   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #25 
  - Sad, but true. Just hope they don't beat us to the peace marches  Polemonium   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #32 
  - Why aren't we hammering on this war as a purely political war?  Skidmore   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #28 
  - At this point it is just a little to complex for the masses  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #29 
  - Well I'll be damned...just in time for mid-term elections...  Earth_First   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #30 
  - But then again  Freedom_from_Chains   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #31 
  - OMG, that freeper link is hilarious  wicket   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #33 
  - why are freepers so anti-NYT?  Skittles   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #34 
  - Like the looters in a bad Ayn Rand adaptation, the 'in-charge' GOP...  harlinchi   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #35 
  - This is because of lack of leadership from Dems  midnight armadillo   Nov-15-05 09:08 AM   #39 
  - Funny, funny Freepers....  Brooklyn Michael   Nov-15-05 09:50 AM   #41 
  - Wonder why they voted against this when the Dems presented it?  Miss Chybil   Nov-15-05 03:52 PM   #45 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC