zara
(470 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-01-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 47. Texas Supreme Court Judges get contributions from parties... |
|
that appear before them and whose cases they decide. Yet a contribution to a Democrat disqualifies a judge. The fix is in.
|
| -Judge Removed From DeLay's Criminal Case |
onehandle |
Nov-01-05 02:21 PM |
#0 |
-
Delay judge removed |
AngryAmish |
Nov-01-05 02:23 PM |
#1 |
 -
Delay Judge Removed from Case |
SW FL Dem |
Nov-01-05 02:23 PM |
#2 |
  -
How hard can it be to find a non-partisan judge in Texas? |
The Backlash Cometh |
Nov-01-05 02:23 PM |
#3 |
   -
Heh! All Texas judges are elected in partisan races. |
CottonBear |
Nov-01-05 02:25 PM |
#8 |
    -
Well, then he will be removed, won't he? Since the Repubs have |
The Backlash Cometh |
Nov-01-05 02:29 PM |
#16 |
   -
Pretty damn hard. Judges run for office in Texas. |
Shakespeare |
Nov-01-05 02:25 PM |
#9 |
  -
Judge Removed From DeLay's Criminal Case |
cal04 |
Nov-01-05 03:23 PM |
#32 |
 -
Makes Delay look justified. But he can't complain when convicted. |
JudyM |
Nov-01-05 02:26 PM |
#11 |
-
... or bending over ... |
hippiechick |
Nov-01-05 02:32 PM |
#18 |
-
Yeah just heard that |
Bluzmann57 |
Nov-01-05 02:24 PM |
#4 |
 -
If they are repuke, you can bet your life they won't be fair or honest. |
TankLV |
Nov-01-05 09:12 PM |
#68 |
-
wow |
WindRavenX |
Nov-01-05 02:24 PM |
#5 |
-
DeLay needs a judge who contributed to republicans |
Francine Frensky |
Nov-01-05 02:24 PM |
#6 |
 -
Ye GOPpe Judge Shoppe |
radfringe |
Nov-02-05 04:49 AM |
#80 |
-
So what, it just makes him look more gulity. |
The_Casual_Observer |
Nov-01-05 02:24 PM |
#7 |
-
that is a bad, bad precedent |
meganmonkey |
Nov-01-05 02:25 PM |
#10 |
-
So does this mean |
AValdoux |
Nov-01-05 02:26 PM |
#12 |
-
this is good? |
garybeck |
Nov-01-05 02:26 PM |
#13 |
-
Yet Delay is OK with his lawyer is contributing to Kinky?? |
rainbow4321 |
Nov-01-05 02:27 PM |
#14 |
-
Wow! What a can of worms they're opening. |
samdogmom |
Nov-01-05 02:27 PM |
#15 |
 -
Abuse of power |
stepnw1f |
Nov-01-05 02:30 PM |
#17 |
-
Bingo. n/t |
Straight Shooter |
Nov-01-05 02:56 PM |
#23 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-01-05 06:49 PM |
#54 |
-
No shit ! |
lumpy |
Nov-01-05 04:00 PM |
#42 |
-
Probably for the best |
LiberteToujours |
Nov-01-05 02:38 PM |
#19 |
 -
when you have someone who is a fraud like DeLay |
twaddler01 |
Nov-01-05 04:51 PM |
#45 |
-
"How can any one possibly justify this move?" |
anotherdrew |
Nov-01-05 02:41 PM |
#20 |
-
This makes me fucking sick.... |
defiant1 |
Nov-01-05 02:45 PM |
#21 |
-
Is Delay's mother available to take over the judgeship? |
SodoffBush |
Nov-01-05 02:55 PM |
#22 |
 -
You do know they are not on speaking terms, eh? |
TomInTib |
Nov-01-05 05:21 PM |
#51 |
-
So who picks the new judge? |
oxbow |
Nov-01-05 02:59 PM |
#24 |
 -
I believe I heard today that the trial would go to Austin. |
MissMarple |
Nov-01-05 03:02 PM |
#26 |
-
Hmm... Wonder if they could move it to California! |
calipendence |
Nov-01-05 03:11 PM |
#29 |
 -
San Fransisco |
AX10 |
Nov-01-05 03:17 PM |
#31 |
-
Wow that would be terrific!! |
VaYallaDawg |
Nov-01-05 03:37 PM |
#38 |
-
Delay is asking the trial to be |
lumpy |
Nov-01-05 04:08 PM |
#43 |
-
Democrats have become second class citizens |
donkeyotay |
Nov-01-05 03:01 PM |
#25 |
 -
Did Scalito ever donate any money to Republicans? Yank HIM! |
calipendence |
Nov-01-05 03:06 PM |
#28 |
-
GREAT IDEA!!!!.....YANK ALL REPUBLICANS!!! |
goforit |
Nov-01-05 05:09 PM |
#48 |
-
There better be a specific reason given for this |
onenote |
Nov-01-05 03:03 PM |
#27 |
-
DeLay has already picked out the judge he wants. I |
asjr |
Nov-01-05 03:14 PM |
#30 |
-
Well...they can always find an even more extreme Dem judge |
jmowreader |
Nov-01-05 03:25 PM |
#33 |
 -
Certainly if they think they'll get a pass on their 2nd SCOTUS judge |
calipendence |
Nov-01-05 03:36 PM |
#37 |
-
The fix is in in Texas |
chaumont58 |
Nov-01-05 03:25 PM |
#34 |
-
Delay is plainly politicising a criminal case |
Ksec |
Nov-01-05 03:33 PM |
#35 |
-
Hell, let's do his case on "The Peoples' Court". |
Feeney2 |
Nov-01-05 03:33 PM |
#36 |
 -
It smells more like a Kangaroo Court |
mtnester |
Nov-03-05 08:00 AM |
#90 |
-
I hope they're careful to only have a REPUBLICAN judge now |
librechik |
Nov-01-05 03:54 PM |
#39 |
-
So what now? Every Dem in TX needs to motion for Change |
lonestarnot |
Nov-01-05 03:55 PM |
#40 |
-
And when some RW Judge presides over the case, it will be 'fair' |
ck4829 |
Nov-01-05 04:00 PM |
#41 |
-
In my view, it was the correct ruling. |
Neil Lisst |
Nov-01-05 04:48 PM |
#44 |
 -
I agree |
lastliberalintexas |
Nov-01-05 05:01 PM |
#46 |
-
If he's 80, he's got to be DEM, or at least was one. |
Neil Lisst |
Nov-01-05 05:14 PM |
#49 |
-
Who, now, decides which judge should hear the case? How many |
lulu in NC |
Nov-01-05 05:18 PM |
#50 |
 -
Don't know for sure. Should be the presiding judge of Travis cty |
Neil Lisst |
Nov-01-05 06:54 PM |
#55 |
-
Thanks for that detailed and cogent answer! much appreciated. nt |
lulu in NC |
Nov-01-05 07:49 PM |
#57 |
-
You're welcome! |
Neil Lisst |
Nov-01-05 08:03 PM |
#58 |
-
Now we're starting to get it. |
TX-RAT |
Nov-02-05 10:06 AM |
#88 |
-
Texas Supreme Court Judges get contributions from parties... |
zara |
Nov-01-05 05:07 PM |
#47 |
-
The Texas judicial system should be ashamed right now. |
AgadorSparticus |
Nov-01-05 06:07 PM |
#52 |
-
Does anyone have the figures on, |
Realityhack |
Nov-01-05 06:23 PM |
#53 |
 -
I've never known of any Texas judge who gave as many .... |
Neil Lisst |
Nov-01-05 06:59 PM |
#56 |
  -
That argument just doesn't fly with me. If the judge is crooked, then |
loudsue |
Nov-01-05 09:01 PM |
#60 |
   -
Well, it's the LAW. |
Neil Lisst |
Nov-01-05 09:19 PM |
#70 |
  -
"Appearance of impropriety"??? You mean like Scalia going hunting |
loudsue |
Nov-02-05 09:12 AM |
#85 |
  -
You're talking nonsense. |
Neil Lisst |
Nov-02-05 09:22 AM |
#86 |
  -
That was a wide brush |
Caretha |
Nov-02-05 07:33 AM |
#84 |
 -
We are talking about Travis County, not rural Texas |
Neil Lisst |
Nov-02-05 09:28 AM |
#87 |
 -
Potter County......not Potter City |
Caretha |
Nov-03-05 05:46 AM |
#89 |
 -
This stinks to high heaven. |
TankLV |
Nov-01-05 09:22 PM |
#71 |
-
So does that mean that I now can request a different judge |
Giant Robot |
Nov-01-05 08:23 PM |
#59 |
-
Judge Removed From DeLay's Criminal Case |
JJackFlash |
Nov-01-05 09:07 PM |
#61 |
 -
Not LBN, Jack. |
PDittie |
Nov-01-05 09:07 PM |
#62 |
  -
LBN? |
JJackFlash |
Nov-01-05 09:07 PM |
#66 |
 -
Yeah. Not. See? eom |
PDittie |
Nov-01-05 09:47 PM |
#73 |
 -
I started a thread one minute after Yahoo posted the story |
JJackFlash |
Nov-01-05 09:49 PM |
#74 |
 -
Well, actually it was a |
PDittie |
Nov-01-05 09:56 PM |
#75 |
 -
GD? |
JJackFlash |
Nov-01-05 10:01 PM |
#76 |
 -
Sorry 'bout that. GD is |
PDittie |
Nov-02-05 03:33 AM |
#77 |
 -
*hiccup* |
PDittie |
Nov-02-05 03:35 AM |
#78 |
 -
Too bad...now are they going |
zidzi |
Nov-01-05 09:07 PM |
#63 |
  -
I don't think he can get a fair trial if it's a Rethug judge. nm |
texpatriot2004 |
Nov-01-05 09:07 PM |
#64 |
 -
Harriet is free now. Let her preside over her first case. :-)) |
davidwparker |
Nov-01-05 09:07 PM |
#65 |
-
Judge Removed From DeLay's Criminal Case |
JJackFlash |
Nov-01-05 09:07 PM |
#67 |
-
It's a shame the prosecutor and the judge didn't duck hunt together |
jpgray |
Nov-01-05 09:16 PM |
#69 |
-
That should disqualify Roberts and Alito from the Supreme Court! |
Democat |
Nov-01-05 09:41 PM |
#72 |
-
So what was he named? |
yasmina27 |
Nov-02-05 04:43 AM |
#79 |
-
Delay knows he's guilty as hell |
Nightwing |
Nov-02-05 05:07 AM |
#81 |
-
Am I readind this right? |
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel |
Nov-02-05 06:42 AM |
#82 |
-
So if the new judge is a republican, |
screembloodymurder |
Nov-02-05 07:16 AM |
#83 |
-
I love it! |
BareNakedLiberal |
Nov-03-05 01:49 PM |
#91 |