Lefty48197
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-31-05 06:31 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Start the filibuster now |
 |
Refer to the nomination as "dead in the water". No point in even discussing the nomination. No point in even delving into the personal/professional history of Alito. It's all moot. He won't serve on the Supreme Court, so there's no need to even discuss the issue. Start the filibuster now.
|
Samuel Alito Named Nominated Bush for USSC. |
Rockholm |
Oct-31-05 06:13 AM |
#0 |

Start the filibuster now |
Lefty48197 |
Oct-31-05 06:31 AM |
#1 |
 
Are you waiting for Bush to nominate a liberal? |
Concerned GA Voter |
Oct-31-05 04:17 PM |
#142 |

But... |
zonkra |
Oct-31-05 05:17 PM |
#143 |
 
why she won't say that: |
bkcc |
Nov-01-05 03:54 PM |
#175 |

Don't be silly |
Lefty48197 |
Nov-01-05 08:26 PM |
#176 |

Here's a link |
MaineDem |
Oct-31-05 07:01 AM |
#2 |
 
Why didn't Harriet Myers get an up, or down, vote? |
Miss Chybil |
Oct-31-05 08:57 AM |
#42 |

Um, she was a fake-out? |
Hissyspit |
Oct-31-05 09:06 AM |
#47 |
 
I don't think Meirs was a fake-out... |
rayofreason |
Oct-31-05 09:38 AM |
#60 |
  
I don't think even unanimous Dem support for Miers would have gotten her |
highplainsdem |
Oct-31-05 10:03 AM |
#81 |
  
I'm sorry, but that is incredibly naive |
lastliberalintexas |
Oct-31-05 10:22 AM |
#93 |
 
no difference? |
rayofreason |
Oct-31-05 10:59 AM |
#114 |
 
And anyone who knows anything about Miers career in Texas |
lastliberalintexas |
Oct-31-05 11:11 AM |
#115 |
 
Cave or not.. |
rayofreason |
Oct-31-05 12:11 PM |
#132 |
 
What did * gain from this "fake out"? |
BlueManDude |
Oct-31-05 11:11 AM |
#116 |

This is what Bush gained. |
readmoreoften |
Oct-31-05 06:25 PM |
#152 |

two different things here |
BlueManDude |
Nov-01-05 01:45 PM |
#171 |

Because she wasn't qualified.... |
CardInAustin |
Oct-31-05 10:32 AM |
#98 |

But, I thought there was no litmus test for justices? |
Miss Chybil |
Oct-31-05 09:53 PM |
#162 |

Alito next nominee for Supreme Court |
muchacho |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#3 |
 
just saw it on BBC also n/t |
Gelliebeans |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#4 |
 
Link:Bush to Nominate Alito to Supreme Court |
cal04 |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#5 |
  
more info on Alito |
radfringe |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#9 |
 
A woman has to inform her husband that she's getting an abortion? |
Lefty48197 |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#12 |
  
This alone is reason for "Saclito" to be rejected! |
MaineDem |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#18 |
   
it will be. |
MarsThe Cat |
Oct-31-05 08:21 AM |
#36 |
   
Yes indeed |
PaDUer |
Oct-31-05 10:53 AM |
#111 |
  
In the neo-con Reich Wing it works that way |
liberal N proud |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#19 |
  
No, silly, a woman has to get her husband's PERMISSION |
adigal |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#20 |
   
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 08:22 PM |
#161 |
  
We have just as much right to die from complications in delivery... |
Hissyspit |
Oct-31-05 09:08 AM |
#49 |
  
oh, come now. The husband doesn't own the wife; just the fetus! |
Iris |
Oct-31-05 09:28 AM |
#56 |
   
When it can be transplanted into his scrotum, then we'll talk. |
philosophie_en_rose |
Oct-31-05 10:20 AM |
#90 |
  
So much for breakfast! |
hogwyld |
Oct-31-05 11:51 AM |
#125 |
  
yeah, but until then, if HIS fetus is in some woman's womb, well, that's |
Iris |
Oct-31-05 05:22 PM |
#144 |
  
If HIS fetus is in some woman's womb, well he's out of luck. |
philosophie_en_rose |
Oct-31-05 07:42 PM |
#159 |
  
thanks! |
Iris |
Oct-31-05 07:46 PM |
#160 |
  
The need for disclosure is important for those who need informed |
nolabels |
Oct-31-05 10:00 AM |
#79 |
  
I agree, that's totally fucked up |
alarcojon |
Oct-31-05 10:21 AM |
#92 |
  
Inform or get permission? |
TexasRob |
Oct-31-05 11:48 AM |
#122 |
 
In a perfect world, the woman would talk to the father of the baby |
AllyCat |
Oct-31-05 01:20 PM |
#139 |
 
I think you are missing what was said |
TS Quint |
Oct-31-05 05:40 PM |
#145 |
 
Wake-up. That scenario occurs everyday. |
me b zola |
Oct-31-05 07:35 PM |
#158 |
 
And how do we say that is okay? The HUSBAND needs to be told |
AllyCat |
Nov-01-05 11:06 AM |
#169 |
 
This isn't about rape |
TexasRob |
Nov-01-05 02:01 PM |
#172 |
 
Rob...lets look at this from another angle. |
AllyCat |
Nov-01-05 03:00 PM |
#173 |
 
What is she had an extramarital affair? |
Lefty48197 |
Nov-01-05 08:31 PM |
#177 |
 
absolutely |
TexasRob |
Nov-02-05 01:11 PM |
#178 |
 
Thanks for the info. More at law.com |
cal04 |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#13 |
 
Ah, relax. it's the American Taliban! |
fortyfeetunder |
Oct-31-05 08:18 AM |
#35 |
 
good site for non-lawyer types. |
okieinpain |
Oct-31-05 08:26 AM |
#37 |
 
Um. Santa is a secular figure? Last time I checked |
JudyM |
Oct-31-05 09:42 AM |
#61 |
 
Santa isn't a religious figure. (n/t) |
TheVirginian |
Oct-31-05 03:15 PM |
#140 |
 
It's better than that: Not only is Santy Claus not a religious figure... |
0rganism |
Oct-31-05 03:53 PM |
#141 |
 
you're joking |
JudyM |
Oct-31-05 06:14 PM |
#151 |
 
His nickname's 'Scalito' for being a copy of Scalia.-Dems must filibuster! |
FourStarDemocrat |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#6 |
 
Well this makes it a scary Halloween |
Danmel |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#7 |
 
I don't know how accurate this site is |
cal04 |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#8 |
 
More background on "Scalia lite" |
sugapablo |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#10 |
 
bad news |
shayes51 |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#11 |
 
Might be a mixed bag |
kick_them_hard |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#14 |
  
Moderate Repubs and Dems were hoping for... |
Disturbed |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#17 |
  
No mixed bag |
tavalon |
Oct-31-05 08:29 AM |
#39 |
  
He basically said the Supreme Court "forced" him to do it - presumably |
Iris |
Oct-31-05 09:29 AM |
#58 |
   
Right. Before he had to follow precedent. Now he can make it. |
MidwestTransplant |
Oct-31-05 10:08 AM |
#85 |
  
exactly |
Iris |
Oct-31-05 12:35 PM |
#138 |
  
Another anti-choice nomination is a huge suprise. |
Daftly |
Oct-31-05 06:58 PM |
#154 |
 
He was the lone dissenter |
Scooter24 |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#15 |
  
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 07:30 AM |
#23 |
   
OOH I NEED ONE |
Skittles |
Oct-31-05 07:41 AM |
#26 |
    
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 08:00 AM |
#28 |
     
I think she was being sarcastic. |
smirkymonkey |
Oct-31-05 08:10 AM |
#32 |
     
Wow.... |
Puglover |
Oct-31-05 08:52 AM |
#41 |
    
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 09:04 AM |
#45 |
    
I'd prefer a bazooka or a howitzer |
Jacobin |
Oct-31-05 09:29 AM |
#57 |
     
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 09:51 AM |
#65 |
      
...because the owners are effectively limited to either military or police |
jpgray |
Oct-31-05 10:28 AM |
#97 |
     
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 10:41 AM |
#101 |
     
How does that disprove anything I've said? |
jpgray |
Oct-31-05 10:42 AM |
#105 |
     
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 10:45 AM |
#106 |
     
Let's do a little reading skills 101 for you |
jpgray |
Oct-31-05 10:47 AM |
#107 |
     
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 10:48 AM |
#109 |
     
A citizen can legally acquire a DD or machine gun without police/military? |
jpgray |
Oct-31-05 10:49 AM |
#110 |
     
I own three such items. |
mr pink |
Nov-01-05 03:38 PM |
#174 |
     
Some Anti-aircraft would be nice asset around this community |
nolabels |
Oct-31-05 10:10 AM |
#86 |
    
Damn. |
PunkPop |
Oct-31-05 10:11 AM |
#87 |
     
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 10:20 AM |
#91 |
    
I don't believe I said that... |
Puglover |
Oct-31-05 10:39 AM |
#100 |
    
I hear ICBMs are more effective. |
Zhade |
Oct-31-05 06:10 PM |
#150 |
   
Good thing no crooks used BARs or Tommy guns before the NFA |
jpgray |
Oct-31-05 09:48 AM |
#64 |
    
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 09:55 AM |
#68 |
   
No change in machine gun violence after the NFA of 1934? |
jpgray |
Oct-31-05 10:20 AM |
#89 |
   
Look man... |
silvermachine |
Oct-31-05 12:09 PM |
#131 |
   
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 10:47 AM |
#108 |
  
source please? |
Sivafae |
Oct-31-05 12:20 PM |
#135 |
 
These Jerks NEVER did want to nominate a woman ... |
ElectroPrincess |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#16 |
 
Alito is bad. ALSO. Guess this will knock Libby right off the news |
Fluffdaddy |
Oct-31-05 07:19 AM |
#21 |

What fortunate timing |
tavalon |
Oct-31-05 08:01 AM |
#29 |

Yes. But don't fret |
JoFerret |
Oct-31-05 10:23 AM |
#95 |

BBC: Alito named as Supreme Court nominee |
bigworld |
Oct-31-05 07:20 AM |
#22 |
 
Scary news indeed. What a way to begin the week, with a big |
SCRUBDASHRUB |
Oct-31-05 07:32 AM |
#24 |

Fight it? |
michreject |
Oct-31-05 09:55 AM |
#67 |

This guy is so extreme that we could possibly get help from the |
second edition |
Oct-31-05 11:36 AM |
#121 |

I agree. |
ncanadianlee |
Oct-31-05 05:42 PM |
#146 |

Tin foil hat being placed on head. |
Vinca |
Oct-31-05 07:34 AM |
#25 |
 
An angry fight over a nominee is a wonderful distraction from Fitzgerald. |
joeunderdog |
Oct-31-05 09:05 AM |
#46 |
 
I agree,this about changing the subject, shoring up the base, |
second edition |
Oct-31-05 10:04 AM |
#83 |

Troubling Alito Cases |
Tony_Illinois |
Oct-31-05 07:53 AM |
#27 |
 
depressing |
shayes51 |
Oct-31-05 08:04 AM |
#30 |

Fillibuster: Just like Miers: No up and Down Vote |
bettyellen |
Oct-31-05 08:08 AM |
#31 |

Quick Vote |
DesertRat |
Oct-31-05 08:11 AM |
#33 |

Back to the Roots! We White Males ROCK! |
onehandle |
Oct-31-05 08:17 AM |
#34 |
 
do you mean the backseat or behind it pushing it? |
KenCarson |
Oct-31-05 09:07 AM |
#48 |
  
that depends... |
MarsThe Cat |
Oct-31-05 09:13 AM |
#50 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-31-05 09:17 AM |
#51 |

Two words: Bork 'em. nt |
deadparrot |
Oct-31-05 08:28 AM |
#38 |

what a slap in the face to all women |
bluedog |
Oct-31-05 08:41 AM |
#40 |
 
Release |
7P Dude |
Oct-31-05 10:00 AM |
#80 |

Hey, before birth, the mother has to fully support and |
second edition |
Oct-31-05 11:51 AM |
#123 |

That last line |
TexasRob |
Nov-01-05 01:37 PM |
#170 |

Is anyone really surprised? |
randomelement |
Oct-31-05 09:01 AM |
#43 |

We all knew there had to be a shit storm to distract from the treason |
lonestarnot |
Oct-31-05 09:02 AM |
#44 |
 
Duh. |
trapper914 |
Oct-31-05 09:25 AM |
#55 |

If he's confirmed ... |
ElectroPrincess |
Oct-31-05 09:21 AM |
#52 |
 
seems almost quaint that follks were once concerned w/JFK's religous |
Iris |
Oct-31-05 09:31 AM |
#59 |

Yeah, can we say "foaming at the mouth" RW Catholic? |
ElectroPrincess |
Oct-31-05 09:47 AM |
#63 |

Yikes! |
0007 |
Oct-31-05 09:21 AM |
#53 |

Destroy him, destroy his family now |
AngryAmish |
Oct-31-05 09:24 AM |
#54 |
 
Brilliant strategy!!!!! |
rayofreason |
Oct-31-05 09:52 AM |
#66 |
  
I assume that is a facetious statement ! |
lumpy |
Oct-31-05 10:41 AM |
#103 |
 
Maybe not literally |
hogwyld |
Oct-31-05 12:06 PM |
#130 |

Candy Crawley (cnn) seems very happy about this nomination |
Julius Civitatus |
Oct-31-05 09:44 AM |
#62 |
 
She is such a shill |
closeupready |
Oct-31-05 10:03 AM |
#82 |
 
The hell they will. |
Arkana |
Nov-01-05 09:09 AM |
#165 |

Bush makes a choice to cheer conservatives (New SC Nominee Announced) |
MazeRat7 |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#69 |
 
Yea - vintage shrub act |
mazzarro |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#70 |
 
Slapped the face of women on top of it. He is going to teach us. If |
kikiek |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#71 |
  
I for one am happy he didn't chose Janice Rogers Brown, Priscilla |
napi21 |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#72 |
 
Don't need to wait. Look up his record. Not to mention there are |
kikiek |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#75 |
 
bring on the filibuster. n/t |
triguy46 |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#73 |
 
Always looking for a fight... What's his MAJOR problem? |
kurth |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#74 |
 
Before we move on, a last word on Harriet Miers (with a grain of salt) |
Marc A |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#76 |

that's definitely not the last word... |
Stevious |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#77 |

I tend to agree. The feathers he most ruffled with Harriet were the |
kikiek |
Oct-31-05 09:58 AM |
#78 |

Unfortunately, we don't have a choice, we have to do what we |
second edition |
Oct-31-05 10:07 AM |
#84 |
 
I pulled this off the GOP website, so it begins |
losdiablosgato |
Oct-31-05 10:23 AM |
#94 |

Democrats also fell for other scams |
kurth |
Oct-31-05 11:18 AM |
#120 |

Good Day for Evangelnazis |
justanothercitizen |
Oct-31-05 10:15 AM |
#88 |

So Miers was the only good woman candidate? Pretty pathetic to fall back |
JudyM |
Oct-31-05 10:24 AM |
#96 |

My question: will people like Leahy and Feingold cave this time, too? n/t |
confludemocrat |
Oct-31-05 10:38 AM |
#99 |
 
Prediction on how long before Oral Hatchet is whining about an "upperdown" |
yellowcanine |
Oct-31-05 10:41 AM |
#102 |

But what's his bowling average? |
kskiska |
Oct-31-05 10:42 AM |
#104 |

Alito Said Ban on Machine Guns Was Unconstitutional |
JPZenger |
Oct-31-05 10:58 AM |
#112 |
 
"Machine Gun Sam" |
JPZenger |
Oct-31-05 12:04 PM |
#129 |

There has never been a mass killing with a legally owned machinegun |
slackmaster |
Oct-31-05 06:01 PM |
#147 |

OTOH... |
Realityhack |
Oct-31-05 06:05 PM |
#148 |

Opinion is deeply divided on that one |
slackmaster |
Oct-31-05 07:35 PM |
#157 |

Of course! The lone dissenter in Casey! |
Norquist Nemesis |
Oct-31-05 10:58 AM |
#113 |

Bad move on George's part ... |
hippiechick |
Oct-31-05 11:13 AM |
#117 |

Chuck on msnbc live talking about Alito |
No DUplicitous DUpe |
Oct-31-05 11:13 AM |
#118 |

I think, O'conner did mentioned, if Bush didn't pick woman, she'll come |
Rainscents |
Oct-31-05 11:14 AM |
#119 |
 
That may be our only hope (for the next 3+ years) |
Seabiscuit |
Oct-31-05 11:52 AM |
#126 |
 
I do not think she can do that. Once you resign you resign. |
losdiablosgato |
Oct-31-05 11:53 AM |
#127 |

She has not resigned yet. |
NYC Liberal |
Oct-31-05 07:05 PM |
#155 |

She has presented a resignation letter, she has |
losdiablosgato |
Nov-01-05 09:11 AM |
#166 |

...effective upon the confirmation of a replacment... |
NYC Liberal |
Nov-01-05 09:16 AM |
#167 |

Yeah and when Alito is confirmed she is out of there |
losdiablosgato |
Nov-01-05 09:25 AM |
#168 |

"Nucular option" time? |
Seabiscuit |
Oct-31-05 11:51 AM |
#124 |
 
Exactly |
hogwyld |
Oct-31-05 12:12 PM |
#133 |

This nomination should shut down the Senate |
EndElectoral |
Oct-31-05 12:01 PM |
#128 |
 
Lets hope the Dems have the b*lls for a Fillibuster |
lenegal |
Oct-31-05 12:18 PM |
#134 |

If this guy gets in....... |
TriMetFan |
Oct-31-05 12:22 PM |
#136 |
 
Agreed except... |
Realityhack |
Oct-31-05 06:09 PM |
#149 |

Tossing the extremists their red meat. |
stubtoe |
Oct-31-05 12:23 PM |
#137 |

The Sad thing is he will be confirmed. There is no doubt or hope. |
Daftly |
Oct-31-05 06:55 PM |
#153 |

Everyone start practicing |
hogwyld |
Oct-31-05 07:06 PM |
#156 |

With Rosa in rotunda, Bush wanted Janice Rogers Brown |
dargondogon |
Oct-31-05 10:36 PM |
#163 |

An important element of strategy: Alito threatens MUCH MORE THAN ROE: |
Nothing Without Hope |
Nov-01-05 05:31 AM |
#164 |