underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-25-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 16. "if something can't be found by us..." is also the argument against evolut |
|
evolution isn't it?
Since THE missing link has never been found it disproves the whole idea. Find the missing link and then we might consider it is the standard line on that....right?
|
| -UK academic gives evidence in intelligent design case |
emad |
Oct-25-05 09:46 AM |
#0 |
 -
What is the "evidence" that he's referring to? |
Charlie Brown |
Oct-25-05 09:50 AM |
#1 |
  -
All I read in the article was this: |
cyberpj |
Oct-25-05 10:23 AM |
#8 |
| -
It's a matter of common sense, not science - at least, in the |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 12:16 PM |
#11 |
| -
How very eloquent. I tend to use the simplistic thunder model... |
cyberpj |
Oct-25-05 01:05 PM |
#14 |
| -
Nice try but you are WAY off |
underpants |
Oct-25-05 01:07 PM |
#15 |
| -
I like that! Wonder how many God/Thunder tales exist - Anyone else? |
cyberpj |
Oct-25-05 01:49 PM |
#17 |
| -
...the Devil is beating his wife |
underpants |
Oct-25-05 01:58 PM |
#18 |
| -
.... is dropping bricks, of course. |
Kailassa |
Oct-25-05 03:28 PM |
#36 |
| -
My grandmother always said that |
Terran |
Oct-25-05 03:56 PM |
#40 |
| -
Old Norse mythology: when Thor gets angry he swings his hammer |
bobbieinok |
Oct-25-05 08:33 PM |
#69 |
| -
Pure heresy!!! |
cshldoc |
Oct-25-05 03:03 PM |
#34 |
| -
Welcome to DU cshldoc! |
cyberpj |
Oct-25-05 04:28 PM |
#43 |
| -
Spaghetti Monster is Juggling Meatballs, you idiots! |
readmoreoften |
Oct-25-05 04:05 PM |
#42 |
| -
LOL! Thanks for that. nt. |
cyberpj |
Oct-25-05 04:31 PM |
#44 |
| -
in Hawaii, it's God moving the furniture around |
yorkiemommie1 |
Oct-25-05 08:08 PM |
#68 |
| -
No, thunder, is God moving his furniture. |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 02:40 PM |
#26 |
| -
Which means it isn't even remotely scientific. |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 05:16 PM |
#51 |
| -
Common sense... |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 05:19 PM |
#52 |
| -
"we don't know who did it but somebody must have"? |
DemItAllAnyway |
Oct-25-05 09:52 AM |
#2 |
| -
Saying even that little is still saying too much. |
Caution |
Oct-25-05 09:58 AM |
#4 |
| -
You gadidit! |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 02:48 PM |
#28 |
| -
sociologist is qualified to determine if ID is a valid biological theory? |
Caution |
Oct-25-05 09:56 AM |
#3 |
| -
Dr. Laura should testify next. |
progressivejazz |
Oct-25-05 10:13 AM |
#6 |
| -
A very eminent scientist - in the history books, like Einstein - |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 02:52 PM |
#30 |
| -
Isn't Warwick where AUT leader Sue Blackwell teaches? |
Coastie for Truth |
Oct-25-05 10:03 AM |
#5 |
| -
Fuller has basically made a career out of criticizing Kuhn |
IntiRaymi |
Oct-25-05 10:20 AM |
#7 |
| -
Now, why would a sociology professor be an expert... |
SidDithers |
Oct-25-05 10:26 AM |
#9 |
| -
so, if i look at a frog and say '' designer must have made that'' -- |
xchrom |
Oct-25-05 11:49 AM |
#10 |
| -
What on earth has "the fact that the 'designer' |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 12:28 PM |
#12 |
| -
I thought you were kidding and making |
jfxgillis |
Oct-25-05 12:50 PM |
#13 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-25-05 02:11 PM |
#20 |
| -
"if something can't be found by us..." is also the argument against evolut |
underpants |
Oct-25-05 01:10 PM |
#16 |
| -
No because it is gratuitous. Whereas nature, itself, the whole |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 02:33 PM |
#22 |
| -
What does common sense have to with anything? |
IntiRaymi |
Oct-25-05 04:49 PM |
#48 |
| -
So what does the hypothesis of design bring to the table, then? |
0rganism |
Oct-25-05 02:36 PM |
#24 |
| -
Who gives tuppence what biologists gain from anything! |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 02:47 PM |
#27 |
| -
Very presumptuous of you |
0rganism |
Oct-25-05 02:49 PM |
#29 |
| -
Alas, I can't guarantee that you merit enlightenment. |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 02:55 PM |
#31 |
| -
Apparently not, because your post leaves me as ignorant as ever |
0rganism |
Oct-25-05 03:25 PM |
#35 |
| -
If you think most Americans share your view, |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 03:44 PM |
#37 |
| -
No, I said they shared YOUR view, genius |
0rganism |
Oct-25-05 03:53 PM |
#38 |
| -
You're too kind. But your insights, very much appreciated, |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 04:33 PM |
#45 |
| -
Red herrings |
IntiRaymi |
Oct-25-05 04:45 PM |
#47 |
| -
Actualy.... |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 05:40 PM |
#56 |
| -
It transforms the theory of the desiners existance from... |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 05:38 PM |
#55 |
| -
Well, there are some mistakes in Darwin's view of evolution |
WindRavenX |
Oct-25-05 02:04 PM |
#19 |
| -
Ooooh! I can't wait... I'll be scanning the headlines every day, |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 02:57 PM |
#32 |
| -
Perhapse you should scan diffrent headlines |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 05:22 PM |
#53 |
| -
It was the Monolith. |
D__S |
Oct-25-05 02:18 PM |
#21 |
| -
A SOCIOLOGIST???????? |
Walt Starr |
Oct-25-05 02:35 PM |
#23 |
| -
THANK YOU..... |
truebrit71 |
Oct-25-05 02:38 PM |
#25 |
| -
A sociologist deals with rather more subtle and abstruse matters |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Oct-25-05 03:01 PM |
#33 |
| -
Like I said, Fuller is a gadfly |
IntiRaymi |
Oct-25-05 04:55 PM |
#49 |
| -
So who designed the designer? Where the hell did he/she come from? |
Karmageddon |
Oct-25-05 03:56 PM |
#39 |
| -
Who Selected The Selected? |
cryingshame |
Oct-25-05 03:58 PM |
#41 |
| -
Thats a missunderstanding of the term 'selected' |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 05:29 PM |
#54 |
| -
Likewise, maybe you are misunderstanding the term "design" |
cryingshame |
Oct-25-05 07:12 PM |
#58 |
| -
Perhapse you could elaborate on that. |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 07:21 PM |
#60 |
| -
I NEVER insert the concept or proposition of a "Creator" or "Being" |
cryingshame |
Oct-25-05 08:04 PM |
#66 |
| -
YOU must then define intelegence |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 09:01 PM |
#70 |
| -
nature |
WindRavenX |
Oct-25-05 06:44 PM |
#57 |
| -
If Nature is capable of "selecting" it is also capable of "designing" |
cryingshame |
Oct-25-05 07:12 PM |
#59 |
| -
there is no consciousness in the act of selection |
WindRavenX |
Oct-25-05 07:23 PM |
#61 |
| -
Very well put. |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 07:28 PM |
#63 |
| -
Incorrect. Selection is defined as an ACT or PROCESS. And You've offered |
cryingshame |
Oct-25-05 08:01 PM |
#64 |
| -
My definition of "intelligence" is related to the brain |
WindRavenX |
Oct-25-05 08:05 PM |
#67 |
| -
Nope. |
Realityhack |
Oct-25-05 07:26 PM |
#62 |
| -
You Failed To Address My Point & Changed The Subject. YOU LOSE |
cryingshame |
Oct-25-05 08:02 PM |
#65 |
| -
I want to know what makes humans think they should be privy to that info |
cyberpj |
Oct-25-05 04:40 PM |
#46 |
| -
I submit this site for your delectation: Panspermia.org |
Barrett808 |
Oct-25-05 05:13 PM |
#50 |
| -
What evidence??? - The headline is deceptive |
Julius Civitatus |
Oct-25-05 09:05 PM |
#71 |
| -
I'm A Designer... |
stepnw1f |
Oct-25-05 09:20 PM |
#72 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread