You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #126: I'm with you, buddy.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #114
126. I'm with you, buddy..
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 07:45 AM by Concerned GA Voter
If I had to ballpark the age of the girl in question, I'd be reluctant to even give her an age as young as 19 tho. And yes, just because someone likes some "cute" with their "sexy" doesn't make them sick -- and such statements are ridiculous and offensive. I, too, have a young looking wife. Some say she looks 16, but she is, in actuality, 28. I have no question about whether she is all woman. I enjoy that she is cute, but I would never touch a child any more than any other emotionally healthy adult would.

I'm bothered by the absolute and condescending attitudes expressed by some people in this thread, but porn is a touchy subject that tends to get people into "judgmental mode." I just want to say that this mode of thought IS HARMFUL -- it is the same tendency that will make fundies feel compelled to condemn people for having any sexual preference that they themselves don't share (e.g. homosexuality, anyone?) You know how to identify this mode of thought? That's right, it's the accusatory tone. Some people actually seem to get off on believing they are, in sexuality, morally superior to others. I think this is probably closer to an illness than knowing what you enjoy and practicing that with another consenting adult.

Edit just to be clear: I'm not familiar with Max Hardcore or any of his products. If he's hurting people, I'm in no way defending that. If he somehow has managed to use actual underage girls, I'm CERTAINLY not defending that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC