You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #39: Abortion? Yeah. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Abortion? Yeah.
There are too many cases of screwed up families - which is why laws governing abortion have traditionally erred on the side of the pregnant person. If the teen is old enough to be having sex (and in theory giving birth) then she is old enough to make the decision to have an abortion. It is *her* life that is largely affected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -AP: Abortion opponents hope to limit access for California girls question everything  Sep-18-05 12:09 PM   #0 
  - So, the (grand)parents have a reproductive 'choice'? Where'd they get it?  TahitiNut   Sep-18-05 12:42 PM   #1 
  - Emancipation Requires more than a Girl getting Pregnant.  happyslug   Sep-18-05 10:49 PM   #10 
     - I was using the term "emancipated" more in a figurative sense.  TahitiNut   Sep-19-05 08:50 AM   #14 
     - Making it harder for minors to get abortions  nvliberal   Sep-19-05 04:16 PM   #49 
     - I will give you an example - ME at 17  HockeyMom   Sep-19-05 07:12 PM   #74 
        - The law reflected rural reality that it developed under.  happyslug   Sep-19-05 09:05 PM   #78 
  - can't wait to vote NO.  fleabert   Sep-18-05 01:22 PM   #2 
  - California "girls" have an ace up their sleeves on this one  SoCalDem   Sep-18-05 01:45 PM   #3 
  - um, getting an abortion in Mexico?  SIU_Blue   Sep-18-05 09:02 PM   #6 
  - There are actually some very good hospitals and clinics there  SoCalDem   Sep-19-05 08:22 AM   #13 
  - not to be racist or anti-Mexican  BSDRebel   Sep-19-05 09:07 AM   #15 
  - Is abortion legal in Mexico?  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Sep-19-05 11:50 AM   #21 
     - hmmm...good question  BSDRebel   Sep-19-05 12:09 PM   #22 
     - Abortion is NOT legal  Le Taz Hot   Sep-19-05 02:20 PM   #31 
  - Yeah, let's go back to the "good old days"  slackmaster   Sep-19-05 01:29 PM   #27 
  - Too bad they couldn't require a procedure for the guy...  LiberalFighter   Sep-18-05 06:29 PM   #4 
  - castration for an accidental pregnancy, how Nazi-esque  dionysus   Sep-18-05 08:59 PM   #5 
  - Castration for denying your daughter an abortion - works for me!!  kestrel91316   Sep-18-05 10:17 PM   #8 
  - why would they require castration of the man?  BSDRebel   Sep-19-05 09:11 AM   #16 
  - That's the dumbest thing I've read on DU, EVER  slackmaster   Sep-19-05 01:30 PM   #28 
  - Don't you think your comment is a bit extreme?  entanglement   Sep-19-05 08:13 PM   #77 
  - simple "conservative" concepts shut down this nonsense  melody   Sep-18-05 09:04 PM   #7 
  - Actually if this were modified, I'd agree with it...  jayctravis   Sep-18-05 10:40 PM   #9 
  - So.... if the girl does not feel comfortable communicating with  question everything   Sep-18-05 10:54 PM   #11 
     - Hopefully if the girl is in this much trouble  jayctravis   Sep-19-05 09:15 AM   #17 
        - Um...this proposition says that a CHILD exists at the moment of conception  Baconfoot   Sep-19-05 01:46 PM   #30 
        - Do you have any idea how much funding for women's shelters have been cut  Lindacooks   Sep-19-05 02:31 PM   #33 
  - I have such mixed feelings about parental consent  noonwitch   Sep-19-05 08:15 AM   #12 
  - Actually, in most cases they don't have rights to make medical...  Solon   Sep-19-05 09:22 AM   #18 
  - Your information about vaccinations is incorrect  LeftyMom   Sep-19-05 12:35 PM   #24 
     - Just going by my own experiences...  Solon   Sep-20-05 03:42 PM   #80 
        - Every state has at least one exemption, all but two have two or more  LeftyMom   Sep-20-05 04:38 PM   #81 
  - The problem with judicial consent  MountainLaurel   Sep-19-05 09:53 AM   #19 
  - Let me ask you this  hogwyld   Sep-19-05 11:48 AM   #20 
  - We would hope your "little princess" would tell you herself.  Bridget Burke   Sep-19-05 12:35 PM   #23 
  - Honestly, no  LeftyMom   Sep-19-05 12:39 PM   #25 
  - If you had a good relationship with your daughter it would be moot  Beaverhausen   Sep-19-05 03:41 PM   #41 
  - And conversely  nvliberal   Sep-19-05 04:26 PM   #52 
     - In all fairness, this horrid proposition provides relief4coerced abortions  Baconfoot   Sep-19-05 04:38 PM   #55 
  - I think that it is likely that this would reduce abortions, but not  Arkansas Granny   Sep-19-05 01:20 PM   #26 
  - Sounds like a reasonable law!  wmills551   Sep-19-05 01:45 PM   #29 
  - No reason for the abortion, maybe (and I'd argue that)...  Mithras61   Sep-19-05 02:27 PM   #32 
  - I can live with that.  wmills551   Sep-19-05 03:21 PM   #38 
     - So I take it you're not pro-choice?  missb   Sep-19-05 03:30 PM   #40 
     - So I take it that you approve no restrictions on abortion?  wmills551   Sep-19-05 03:56 PM   #43 
        - Why should there be any restrictions?  Beaverhausen   Sep-19-05 04:03 PM   #45 
           - I have one daughter  wmills551   Sep-19-05 04:16 PM   #48 
     - Sorry, but...  Mithras61   Sep-19-05 04:27 PM   #53 
     - Re: By the time the foetus is "an unborn child"  420inTN   Sep-19-05 07:45 PM   #75 
     - So you're into intellectual dishonesty?  Zhade   Sep-19-05 04:40 PM   #57 
        - Thanks for the welcome!  wmills551   Sep-19-05 04:45 PM   #59 
           - Oh, don't misunderstand me: you're not welcome here.  Zhade   Sep-19-05 04:47 PM   #60 
              - What type am I?  wmills551   Sep-19-05 04:52 PM   #62 
                 - I've donated before, just didn't this time around.  Zhade   Sep-19-05 05:00 PM   #64 
                    - I suppose you also believe a girl  wmills551   Sep-19-05 05:09 PM   #65 
                       - You dodge the example I gave.  Zhade   Sep-19-05 05:11 PM   #66 
                          - a provision for dealing with the example  wmills551   Sep-19-05 05:19 PM   #67 
                             - Not if Arnold has his way.  Zhade   Sep-19-05 05:20 PM   #68 
                                - So Zhade  wmills551   Sep-19-05 05:26 PM   #69 
  - Where, exactly, is the 'exception for troubled family situations'??  Lindacooks   Sep-19-05 02:32 PM   #34 
  - The post above  wmills551   Sep-19-05 03:12 PM   #36 
     - Also from the article:  Lindacooks   Sep-19-05 09:11 PM   #79 
  - Which one of your precious rights would you like to compromise  missb   Sep-19-05 03:02 PM   #35 
  - I do not think boys or girls  wmills551   Sep-19-05 03:19 PM   #37 
     - Abortion? Yeah.  missb   Sep-19-05 03:29 PM   #39 
     - Just cause a girl is old enough to have sex  wmills551   Sep-19-05 03:59 PM   #44 
     - Do you really think all parent/child relationships are that good?  Beaverhausen   Sep-19-05 03:44 PM   #42 
        - Yes, I believe most families can handle this in a healthy way.  wmills551   Sep-19-05 04:08 PM   #46 
           - Do you have any daughters?  Beaverhausen   Sep-19-05 04:10 PM   #47 
              - As I told you above I have one daughter  wmills551   Sep-19-05 04:19 PM   #50 
                 - So, every family you work with has a good parent/child relationship?  Beaverhausen   Sep-19-05 04:29 PM   #54 
                    - I said most families  wmills551   Sep-19-05 04:43 PM   #58 
                       - I also said "most families"  Beaverhausen   Sep-19-05 04:56 PM   #63 
  - Read the whole prop.It'sUNreasonable to say a"child"exists at conceptionNT  Baconfoot   Sep-19-05 04:39 PM   #56 
     - That is not really important to me.  wmills551   Sep-19-05 04:49 PM   #61 
     - If you're not pro-choice, I could see why it wouldn't be important to you.  missb   Sep-19-05 08:06 PM   #76 
     - A single-cell child doesn't deserve the same protection as a newborn  slackmaster   Sep-19-05 06:04 PM   #72 
  - Little Lurleen-Lou, you ain't killin' our baby  warrens   Sep-19-05 04:19 PM   #51 
  - The knuckledraggers here got the same thing passed last year.  flvegan   Sep-19-05 05:53 PM   #70 
  - "48 percent opposing the parental notification requirement  VegasWolf   Sep-19-05 06:00 PM   #71 
  - can't always trust parents  Kailassa   Sep-19-05 06:59 PM   #73 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC