You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #227: It doesn't [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
McSpazitron Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #223
227. It doesn't
But it also doesn't say that is the Federal government's role or the Supreme Court's to define it either.

And that is the heart of this decision. SCOTUS deferred to the local residents in defining "Public Use" - through voting and local legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Supreme Ct: Govts can seize homes, bus for econ dev UpInArms  Jun-23-05 09:35 AM   #0 
  - ...and the Corporation reigned, supreme over all. n/t  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 09:36 AM   #1 
  - Yeah, but here's the sick kicker -  JerseygirlCT   Jun-23-05 10:38 AM   #99 
     - It only proves one thing.  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 10:39 AM   #102 
     - Why does anyone think it's anything but a show?  JRob   Jun-23-05 11:38 AM   #153 
     - What do you mean by that?  conservdem   Jun-23-05 01:08 PM   #234 
        - It seems to me that there is all this noise being generated on both...  JRob   Jun-23-05 01:33 PM   #247 
           - Rob, that seems to be the truth doesnt it?  shance   Jun-23-05 03:21 PM   #295 
     - Yep, and I'm afraid progressives will pay a severe price for this  William Seger   Jun-23-05 11:44 AM   #159 
     - We can only hope.  losdiablosgato   Jun-23-05 11:58 AM   #168 
     - Hope? Afraid that's gone when the real Democrats dissappeared.  reprobate   Jun-23-05 12:51 PM   #216 
     - Great idea!  JerseygirlCT   Jun-23-05 01:38 PM   #248 
     - You want sadder, the freepers agree with us,this is a bad decision.  losdiablosgato   Jun-23-05 11:57 AM   #167 
     - Its not sad that they agree, its good. Its more likely this terrible ruling  conservdem   Jun-23-05 01:16 PM   #242 
     - You got that right!!!!! I couldn't believe my ears when I heard Stevens  DuaneBidoux   Jun-23-05 01:42 PM   #249 
     - O'Connor dissented  smirkymonkey   Jun-23-05 01:53 PM   #253 
     - I know, I'm shocked as well to be in agreement with that bunch! n/t  FourStarDemocrat   Jun-23-05 02:18 PM   #267 
  - wow, just like China now...  NewJeffCT   Jun-23-05 09:37 AM   #2 
  - "Freedom is on the March" coming to a town near you n/t  Sydnie   Jun-23-05 09:37 AM   #3 
  - Yeah, before we know it, freedom will be marching to Canada  MADem   Jun-23-05 02:01 PM   #260 
  - F**K!  gauguin57   Jun-23-05 09:37 AM   #4 
  - I waved goodbye to America on Nov. 4, 2004  getmeouttahere   Jun-23-05 09:41 AM   #12 
  - just another signal from those that brought you *Co on 12/12/00  UpInArms   Jun-23-05 09:45 AM   #20 
  - Liberals on the wrong side on this one  JoFerret   Jun-23-05 11:14 AM   #138 
  - How about December 12, 2000.  Straight Shooter   Jun-23-05 09:48 AM   #27 
     - Freepers are pissed too  Abathar   Jun-23-05 11:51 AM   #166 
        - Why don't you believe it?  Mitt Chovick   Jun-23-05 01:14 PM   #240 
        - Those who give all to the concept of US Gov. will backlash the strongest.  Peake   Jun-23-05 01:56 PM   #257 
  - THE BUCK STAYS HERE! In my wallet...  JRob   Jun-23-05 11:41 AM   #157 
  - What are you even talking about?  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 01:48 PM   #251 
     - But the compensation does NOT have to be at market value  Eloriel   Jun-23-05 02:52 PM   #287 
  - Your house? Not your house anymore.  Ready4Change   Jun-23-05 09:38 AM   #5 
  - I'll bet that even if they take your house....  obreaslan   Jun-23-05 10:41 AM   #107 
     - The Homeowner Is Compensated  iamjoy   Jun-23-05 11:19 AM   #144 
  - Bye bye American Dream! If you've got it and a rich bastard wants it...  havocmom   Jun-23-05 09:39 AM   #6 
  - Yeah. Pointless to buy a home now.  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 09:42 AM   #15 
  - Yeah, bye bye housing bubble too!  havocmom   Jun-23-05 09:51 AM   #38 
     - The liberals on the court are the ones who ruled for this  losdiablosgato   Jun-23-05 12:11 PM   #175 
        - there are no liberals on SCOTUS  havocmom   Jun-23-05 12:41 PM   #208 
        - What "liberal"? This ruling shows there are none.  reprobate   Jun-23-05 12:55 PM   #220 
  - Yup -- that's how Dubya and his pals got the land for the stadium for  Vitruvius   Jun-23-05 10:36 AM   #95 
     - If I'm not mistaken, they declared many properties "condemned"  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:49 AM   #115 
  - True conservatives should be outraged  bluestateguy   Jun-23-05 09:39 AM   #7 
  - Yah the conservative judges sided with O'Connor (against this)  Charles19   Jun-23-05 10:07 AM   #59 
  - Yeah, I didn't understand that... n/t  Hun Joro   Jun-23-05 10:40 AM   #103 
  - Over in freperville they are as mad at this as we are  losdiablosgato   Jun-23-05 12:35 PM   #201 
  - And the Wal-Mart shopping freeptards CHEERED!  bushisanidiot   Jun-23-05 09:39 AM   #8 
  - Actually, you're wrong...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 10:00 AM   #49 
  - Freeptards sell their home to the chinese run Wal-marts  bushisanidiot   Jun-23-05 10:07 AM   #58 
  - Whatever...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 10:11 AM   #64 
     - Cl;arence Thomas and Antonin Scalia tried  JoFerret   Jun-23-05 11:16 AM   #139 
  - yeah they are  pazarus   Jun-23-05 11:33 AM   #148 
  - "Lord President Walton"  AX10   Jun-23-05 10:45 AM   #111 
  - Rec for greatest. This means we have no property rights anymore.  elehhhhna   Jun-23-05 09:40 AM   #9 
  - Isn't this what we were criticizing Chavez for?  billbuckhead   Jun-23-05 09:42 AM   #14 
     - China does it all the time  NewJeffCT   Jun-23-05 09:49 AM   #30 
     - Chavez takes land and builds shopping malls?  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:27 AM   #82 
     - no....in fact, just the opposite...  ret5hd   Jun-23-05 10:44 AM   #110 
  - Can we seize Texas & sell it to Costco?  NewJeffCT   Jun-23-05 09:40 AM   #10 
  - This from the "liberal" SCOTUS...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 09:40 AM   #11 
  - I really don't know how much more of this shit I can take.  olafvikingr   Jun-23-05 09:42 AM   #13 
     - I just ventured into the cesspool...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 09:45 AM   #17 
        - Freeper calls it Communism:  elehhhhna   Jun-23-05 09:49 AM   #31 
        - It isn't communism. It's fascism.  tk2kewl   Jun-23-05 09:55 AM   #42 
        - So true. The sooner people get that Democracy has been replaced...  olddad56   Jun-23-05 11:40 AM   #155 
        - "Communism = Facsism"- Susan Sontag  FourStarDemocrat   Jun-23-05 02:22 PM   #269 
        - For once, we are in total agreement with the Freepers.  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 09:56 AM   #43 
        - Check my post above.  tk2kewl   Jun-23-05 10:03 AM   #53 
        - Hell is freezing over.....n/t  pacoyogi   Jun-23-05 10:12 AM   #65 
        - Not commnism when done for PRIVATE interests  havocmom   Jun-23-05 10:16 AM   #70 
        - It's FASCISM You Stupid Fucktard Freepers! n/t  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 11:45 AM   #162 
           - Freepers are always afraid to use the word Fascism. I wonder why... n/t  FourStarDemocrat   Jun-23-05 02:23 PM   #271 
        - This ENTIRE court needs to be removed.  AX10   Jun-23-05 10:25 AM   #80 
  - Unbelievable....Remind me, what country is this?  truebrit71   Jun-23-05 09:43 AM   #16 
  - why did the more liberal court members vote for this?  NewJeffCT   Jun-23-05 09:45 AM   #18 
  - Because there is no "liberal" anymore.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:29 AM   #86 
  - Afraid of judge assassinations?  OKthatsIT   Jun-23-05 10:37 AM   #97 
  - Because they don't interpret the Constitution "strictly"  davepc   Jun-23-05 12:27 PM   #192 
  - But they can't require an easment for a bike path (Dolan v Tigard OR)  tk2kewl   Jun-23-05 09:45 AM   #19 
  - As I suspected...  Inland   Jun-23-05 10:14 AM   #68 
  - gee..... where are all the republicans ?  madrchsod   Jun-23-05 09:45 AM   #21 
  - The conservatives on the court were in the majority.  igil   Jun-23-05 10:12 AM   #66 
  - planning new strip malls and box stores where our houses currently stand  fryguy   Jun-23-05 10:22 AM   #78 
  - Republicans were RIGHT - Liberals were WRONG  seaofcrisis   Jun-23-05 11:22 AM   #146 
     - how can you say such a thing?  hfojvt   Jun-23-05 12:00 PM   #170 
     - You're only half right...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:14 PM   #177 
        - who r u kidding?  seaofcrisis   Jun-23-05 01:18 PM   #243 
        - Who said I was talking specifically about Conn.?  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 01:21 PM   #245 
        - Amen.  Old and In the Way   Jun-23-05 01:27 PM   #246 
  - I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United Corporations of America...  Junkdrawer   Jun-23-05 09:46 AM   #22 
  - that's it?? that's all we get for a story???  dweller   Jun-23-05 09:47 AM   #23 
  - see updated original post  UpInArms   Jun-23-05 09:50 AM   #34 
  - I have been waiting for  MuseRider   Jun-23-05 09:47 AM   #24 
  - No surprise, and no problem.  Inland   Jun-23-05 09:47 AM   #25 
  - there WAS another quasi-requirement  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 09:51 AM   #36 
  - Increased local tax revenue = public use (now with text)  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 09:58 AM   #48 
     - Goes hand in hand with their ruling that money is a form of speech.  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 10:01 AM   #50 
  - So entirely wrong...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 09:57 AM   #45 
     - Nope. It happens, and its not a problem.  Inland   Jun-23-05 10:09 AM   #61 
        - You are completely and utterly and devastatingly wrong.  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 10:18 AM   #72 
        - You are entirely correct.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:33 AM   #90 
        - No offense taken. You have your interests.  Inland   Jun-23-05 10:35 AM   #93 
        - How does this ruling address zoning laws?  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:37 AM   #96 
        - Of course it does.  Inland   Jun-23-05 11:01 AM   #128 
           - That's a stretch.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 11:06 AM   #132 
        - My points are backed up by hard facts...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 10:41 AM   #106 
           - To me, its not a question of whose ox is being gored. To you, it is.  Inland   Jun-23-05 11:12 AM   #135 
              - So...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:04 PM   #172 
        - I agree.  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 11:59 AM   #169 
        - Are you a major developer yourself?  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 10:39 AM   #100 
        - ROFL! I own my three bedroom condo!  Inland   Jun-23-05 10:58 AM   #123 
           - Don't Kid Yourself  smb   Jun-23-05 11:08 AM   #133 
           - And pay for it.  Inland   Jun-23-05 11:14 AM   #137 
           - Perhaps more tax revenue can be generated by using the land your...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:27 PM   #193 
        - Meanwhile, back in the Reality-Based World....  smb   Jun-23-05 11:03 AM   #131 
           - I guess the cost of land doesn't fit into reality based world anymore.  Inland   Jun-23-05 11:18 AM   #142 
              - Million Dollar Mansion  RobinA   Jun-23-05 12:19 PM   #184 
              - That is EXACTLY OUR POINT!!!  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:31 PM   #196 
  - The majority: Souter, Breyer, Kennedy, Bader Ginsberg and Stevens  Rose Siding   Jun-23-05 09:48 AM   #26 
  - No, it actually makes perfect sense...  IrateCitizen   Jun-23-05 09:51 AM   #35 
  - What is up with  Doomy   Jun-23-05 09:56 AM   #44 
  - this ruling has interesting implications that could be positive  samsingh   Jun-23-05 10:32 AM   #88 
     - How does it remove that notion? n/t  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:35 AM   #92 
     - Seems to me, this would only ENCOURAGE an armed response. n/t  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 10:53 AM   #118 
     - Unfortunately, it also removes the notion  Rose Siding   Jun-23-05 11:08 AM   #134 
     - The Davidians weren't on valuable land...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:17 PM   #180 
  - Maybe those people affected can file a class action suit  Mandate My Ass   Jun-23-05 09:48 AM   #28 
  - If our politicians have any sanity there will be an amendment push...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 09:50 AM   #32 
     - We should start calling NOW.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:38 AM   #98 
        - This is from a freeper...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 10:52 AM   #117 
        - That is a most excellent idea!  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:58 AM   #125 
        - Agreed.  potone   Jun-23-05 11:34 AM   #149 
           - There may not be if you are looking to buy in an urban neighborhood...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:18 PM   #183 
           - It came to this starting in the 80's, when the leaders of the right  redqueen   Jun-23-05 12:56 PM   #222 
  - I'm in agreement with Rehnquist, Scalia, O'Connor and Thomas here...  IrateCitizen   Jun-23-05 09:49 AM   #29 
  - Why would the "liberal" judges vote Yes on such an Abomination?  KoKo01   Jun-23-05 10:04 AM   #54 
  - Why are DU members surprised?  wild potato   Jun-23-05 02:46 PM   #283 
  - What the Fuck?  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 12:13 PM   #176 
     - Souter and Stevens were appointed by Republicans  IrateCitizen   Jun-23-05 12:35 PM   #202 
        - Weird.  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 12:45 PM   #211 
        - Stevens and Souter are as liberal as anyone on that court  Mitt Chovick   Jun-23-05 01:20 PM   #244 
  - that's funny, because CASTRO thought the same thing, and  ixion   Jun-23-05 09:50 AM   #33 
  - Only conservative justices dissented.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:40 AM   #104 
     - damn...  ixion   Jun-23-05 10:53 AM   #119 
        - Sheesh,  RobinA   Jun-23-05 12:22 PM   #188 
  - Furious!!!!!!  Cicero   Jun-23-05 09:51 AM   #37 
  - There already seems to be universal, bipartisan outrage...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 10:02 AM   #52 
  - We've been sold out by the very judges we thought we could trust.  SlipperySlope   Jun-23-05 09:53 AM   #39 
  - Ergo, none of them are worthy of our trust. n/t  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 09:57 AM   #47 
  - This needs to be a HUGE issue in the confirmation process of judges  tk2kewl   Jun-23-05 09:54 AM   #40 
  - Exactly wrong for  igil   Jun-23-05 10:15 AM   #69 
     - I stand corrected.  tk2kewl   Jun-23-05 10:26 AM   #81 
  - This decision makes me sick to my stomach  Politicub   Jun-23-05 09:55 AM   #41 
  - Ok you got me  YankeyMCC   Jun-23-05 09:57 AM   #46 
  - Well Hello Wedge Issue! How many home owning bushies think this is ok??  frictionlessO   Jun-23-05 10:01 AM   # 
  - I can't believe I'm in agreement with Scalia, Rehnquist,Thomas  nikraye   Jun-23-05 10:01 AM   #51 
  - My thoughts exactly. My world is..............  Bonhomme Richard   Jun-23-05 10:06 AM   #56 
  - Okay I think my head is officially exploding. WTF is wrong with  rockedthevoteinMA   Jun-23-05 10:11 AM   #63 
  - Word  XemaSab   Jun-23-05 10:28 AM   #84 
  - I am appalled at the liberal judges. What are they THINKING?  gauguin57   Jun-23-05 10:06 AM   #55 
  - makes me ill to say, but i'm with Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas on this one  fryguy   Jun-23-05 10:06 AM   #57 
  - Walmart is getting their money's worth, huh?  bettyellen   Jun-23-05 10:08 AM   #60 
  - "... nor shall private property be taken for public use"...  SnoopDog   Jun-23-05 10:11 AM   #62 
  - LOL here's the loophole:  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 10:19 AM   #73 
  - I would argue that...  SnoopDog   Jun-23-05 10:28 AM   #85 
  - haven't read the opinion yet  fryguy   Jun-23-05 10:21 AM   #75 
  - I would argue that you cannot expand to a more broader understanding..  SnoopDog   Jun-23-05 10:30 AM   #87 
  - it is a good argument  fryguy   Jun-23-05 10:39 AM   #101 
  - Hey, ya think that means that this ruling can be used to shut down  NCevilDUer   Jun-23-05 10:51 AM   #116 
     - Not unless you can use the land for an enterprise that generates...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:20 PM   #186 
        - How bout removing the wallyworld and replacing it with a  NCevilDUer   Jun-23-05 12:37 PM   #204 
           - How would they generate more tax revenue than a Wallyworld?  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:39 PM   #207 
              - For one thing, wallyworld operates on a basis that protects itself  NCevilDUer   Jun-23-05 01:53 PM   #255 
  - For the sake of accuracy  drm604   Jun-23-05 10:36 AM   #94 
     - No, I know of the 'without just compensation" part...  SnoopDog   Jun-23-05 10:48 AM   #113 
        - interesting thought  fryguy   Jun-23-05 10:58 AM   #122 
        - I like your just compensation idea!  drm604   Jun-23-05 11:37 AM   #152 
  - Hell getting cold: I agree with the "conservative" wing of the court  RatRacer   Jun-23-05 10:12 AM   #67 
  - OMG, that is simply wrong on so many levels.  bunny planet   Jun-23-05 10:17 AM   #71 
  - Court decision on taking of homes  LibertyLover   Jun-23-05 10:20 AM   #74 
  - Looks like we agree with the Freepers  bluestateguy   Jun-23-05 10:23 AM   #79 
  - While I proudly support, O'Conner, Renquist, Scalia, Thomas...  AX10   Jun-23-05 10:21 AM   #76 
  - The worst part of this...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 10:22 AM   #77 
  - I just got sicker.  flvegan   Jun-23-05 10:27 AM   #83 
     - Yeah, living in the reality-based community...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 10:32 AM   #89 
  - So now corporations enjoy eminent domain... nt  NCevilDUer   Jun-23-05 10:34 AM   #91 
  - This totally sucks! The Constitution says "public use" not "public good"!  GodlessBiker   Jun-23-05 10:41 AM   #105 
  - Loophole alert!  kgfnally   Jun-23-05 10:57 AM   #121 
     - The Constitution limits government power.  GodlessBiker   Jun-23-05 11:44 AM   #158 
        - So Here's What I'm Wondering  RobinA   Jun-23-05 12:31 PM   #197 
           - Politicians should worry when DU and Freepers agree so strongly on this.  GodlessBiker   Jun-23-05 12:42 PM   #209 
              - They'll only worry if we make enough noise.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 01:09 PM   #236 
  - No-win situation for the left  zbdent   Jun-23-05 10:43 AM   #108 
  - And create deceptive issues  PATRICK   Jun-23-05 10:58 AM   #124 
  - Who gives a $#*@?  redqueen   Jun-23-05 11:03 AM   #130 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-23-05 10:44 AM   #109 
  - Start calling your senators and reps NOW!  redqueen   Jun-23-05 10:48 AM   #112 
  - This is going to big abused like nothing else  Lorien   Jun-23-05 10:48 AM   #114 
  - It doesn't just affect private homeowners. Small businesses  Patiod   Jun-23-05 10:53 AM   #120 
  - These are the situations that worry me.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 11:01 AM   #127 
     - So who do you appeal to?  Frangible   Jun-23-05 11:21 AM   #145 
        - Congress.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 11:39 AM   #154 
        - the city council and/or mayor, its a local issue not a federal one  NNguyenMD   Jun-23-05 12:16 PM   #179 
           - And it CERTAINLY isn't hard to corrupt a local official...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:25 PM   #191 
           - No, the SCOTUS just made it a federal issue.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 01:01 PM   #225 
  - Geez...  smb   Jun-23-05 10:58 AM   #126 
  - OMG! I was hoping this wouldn't pass!  progressivebydesign   Jun-23-05 11:02 AM   #129 
  - What the FUCK???  Frangible   Jun-23-05 11:14 AM   #136 
  - Here in Sugar Land, the City's giving property away at half-price  elehhhhna   Jun-23-05 11:16 AM   #140 
  - I almost always agree with Stevens and the liberal bloc but not  usregimechange   Jun-23-05 11:17 AM   #141 
  - How they gonna reconcile the major tax-breaks to these businesses  elehhhhna   Jun-23-05 11:18 AM   #143 
  - Shocking: Government Power to Take Property Backed by Top Court  Prag   Jun-23-05 11:31 AM   #147 
  - This crap will continue to escalate until we collectively make a stand  JRob   Jun-23-05 11:34 AM   #150 
  - I can't fucking believe this one......  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 11:34 AM   #151 
  - In a totalitarian state they have both sides attacking the middle  nolabels   Jun-23-05 02:08 PM   #263 
  - Now That I've Read the Full NYT Article ...  Crisco   Jun-23-05 11:40 AM   #156 
  - my thoughts exactly, its the city thats accountable not SCOTUS  NNguyenMD   Jun-23-05 12:15 PM   #178 
  - The problem with leaving it in town hands...  NewJeffCT   Jun-23-05 12:21 PM   #187 
  - sickening  cthrumatrix   Jun-23-05 12:17 PM   #181 
  - The SCOTUS should have upheld the 5th amendment...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:23 PM   #189 
     - well, they've already trashed most of the other Amendments...  NorthernSpy   Jun-23-05 12:59 PM   #224 
  - big business wins another one  pazarus   Jun-23-05 11:45 AM   #160 
  - Is there a compensation clause in the ruling?  ckramer   Jun-23-05 11:45 AM   #161 
  - oh--and I hope the supporters homes are seized first  pazarus   Jun-23-05 11:49 AM   #163 
  - Maybe we can start by seizing the property of the 5 justices...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:24 PM   #190 
  - Chalk me up as another person outraged by this  ridgerunner   Jun-23-05 11:50 AM   #164 
  - Folks  are_we_united_yet   Jun-23-05 11:50 AM   #165 
  - Be careful how the SCOTUS decision is interpreted....  McSpazitron   Jun-23-05 12:04 PM   #171 
  - So basically they gave local municipalities carte blanche...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:08 PM   #173 
  - I wasn't trying to make you feel relieved...  McSpazitron   Jun-23-05 12:29 PM   #195 
     - We have rights under the Constitution...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:36 PM   #203 
     - Here is the text of the Fifth Amendment,  McSpazitron   Jun-23-05 12:45 PM   #210 
        - So that gave them the right to declare increased tax revenue from...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:48 PM   #212 
           - You are right in that the local government decides  McSpazitron   Jun-23-05 12:55 PM   #221 
              - Where in the 5th amendment does it say that local governments...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 12:58 PM   #223 
                 - It doesn't  McSpazitron   Jun-23-05 01:04 PM   #227 
                    - @$#%!#%^#@$  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 01:07 PM   #232 
     - WTF?  smb   Jun-23-05 12:49 PM   #215 
        - It's not about life support issues...  McSpazitron   Jun-23-05 01:02 PM   #226 
        - I love how these corporate whore "journalists" tell us what we should do.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 01:07 PM   #231 
  - Well said but I don't think this nuance buys land owners anything  are_we_united_yet   Jun-23-05 12:20 PM   #185 
  - Of course, you're right in that  McSpazitron   Jun-23-05 12:39 PM   #206 
  - If they won't define "public use", who will? n/t  redqueen   Jun-23-05 01:05 PM   #229 
  - what does this line mean?  NNguyenMD   Jun-23-05 12:10 PM   #174 
  - You are exactly, 100% correct....  McSpazitron   Jun-23-05 12:48 PM   #214 
  - Stevens Is An Idiot  smb   Jun-23-05 12:52 PM   #217 
     - Thank you.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 01:11 PM   #239 
  - no wonder the government jails armed robbers...  NorthernSpy   Jun-23-05 12:18 PM   #182 
  - I think we've FINALLY found an issue  hughee99   Jun-23-05 12:28 PM   #194 
  - Means the Trans-Texas Corridor can be built where ever TX wants it  rainbow4321   Jun-23-05 12:32 PM   #198 
  - I think we need a Revolution. n/t  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 12:32 PM   #199 
  - AAARGH! This was a fucking slam dunk for the homeowners  0rganism   Jun-23-05 12:33 PM   #200 
  - This is outrageous.  cat_girl25   Jun-23-05 12:37 PM   #205 
  - Liberals voted for this! This scares me...  SeekerofTruth   Jun-23-05 12:48 PM   #213 
  - Oh, Great....  smb   Jun-23-05 12:54 PM   #219 
  - Even freepers are outraged, this is truly a Corporatist Kleptocracy  theearthisround   Jun-23-05 12:54 PM   #218 
  - Some Freepers have gone beyond outrage...  youspeakmylanguage   Jun-23-05 01:04 PM   #228 
  - I do wonder...  NorthernSpy   Jun-23-05 01:11 PM   #238 
  - It is not often I have common ground with Freepers n/t  are_we_united_yet   Jun-23-05 02:02 PM   #261 
  - Totally sucks  LilBitRad   Jun-23-05 01:07 PM   #230 
  - Renters are not immune to this ruling either.  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 01:07 PM   #233 
  - let's have a "top ten corrupt Supreme court decisions" T-shirt  Robert Oak   Jun-23-05 01:09 PM   #235 
  - as a matter of principle, not a bad ruling  onenote   Jun-23-05 01:10 PM   #237 
  - That's a very positive outlook.  redqueen   Jun-23-05 01:14 PM   # 
  - I'm glad you have faith,  LilBitRad   Jun-23-05 01:14 PM   #241 
  - Oh be fucking serious.  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 01:55 PM   #256 
     - what if the facts of the case were this:  onenote   Jun-23-05 02:01 PM   #259 
        - Government should lose that one just as it should have lost this one.  GodlessBiker   Jun-23-05 02:18 PM   #266 
        - By what I see,  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 03:08 PM   #293 
  - We lose our freedom to people who answer to no one.  DuaneBidoux   Jun-23-05 01:44 PM   #250 
  - has NOBODY here heard of eminent domain?  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 01:52 PM   #252 
  - I view it as Big Business giving notice they intend ..  are_we_united_yet   Jun-23-05 01:58 PM   #258 
  - it's always been ominous.  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 02:03 PM   #262 
     - "meaningful and useful"  LiberteToujours   Jun-23-05 02:14 PM   #264 
     - i can say this though...  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 02:25 PM   #272 
        - uhh... houses are useful.. to live in.  starscape   Jun-23-05 02:34 PM   #277 
     - I agree with you only in part. My prediction is we're likely  are_we_united_yet   Jun-23-05 02:22 PM   #270 
     - Heh. Try living in Southern California. n/t  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 03:14 PM   #294 
  - Read the frickin' Constitution!  GodlessBiker   Jun-23-05 02:20 PM   #268 
     - why don't you read the constitution...  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 02:28 PM   #273 
     - You're kidding, right?  GodlessBiker   Jun-23-05 02:32 PM   #274 
     - not that i disagree with you...  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 02:39 PM   #279 
        - .. or a putt putt golf course.. or an oil drill  starscape   Jun-23-05 02:44 PM   #282 
           - But in the 19th century  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 02:48 PM   # 
              - I would say that...  starscape   Jun-23-05 02:53 PM   #288 
                 - I agree with you.  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 02:57 PM   #290 
     - whoa... you really trust the government...  starscape   Jun-23-05 02:39 PM   #278 
        - i don't really trust the government anymore.  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 02:41 PM   #281 
           - That provision _already existed_  LiberteToujours   Jun-23-05 02:46 PM   #284 
              - You're probably right.  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 02:51 PM   #286 
     - Read which Constitution?  wild potato   Jun-23-05 02:54 PM   #289 
        - So let me get this straight...  PittPoliSci   Jun-23-05 03:00 PM   #291 
           - Either it's living or it isn't  wild potato   Jun-23-05 03:22 PM   #296 
  - This map shows where "PoleTown" used to be before GM forced them out:  Peake   Jun-23-05 01:53 PM   #254 
  - sad.. shows that this has been happening...  starscape   Jun-23-05 02:48 PM   #285 
  - Bow down to the Great God Capitalism  Old sixties guy   Jun-23-05 02:16 PM   #265 
  - You tell 'em, Old sixties guy!  KevinJ   Jun-23-05 02:34 PM   #276 
  - Damn right, old sixties guy  starscape   Jun-23-05 02:40 PM   #280 
  - Amen Brutha!  Megahurtz   Jun-23-05 03:22 PM   #297 
  - Even self-proclaimed "conservatives" are unhappy about this.  HuckleB   Jun-23-05 02:33 PM   #275 
  - Traditionally, this would probably be a conservative issue..  starscape   Jun-23-05 03:08 PM   #292 
  - Thread #2  Moderator   Jun-23-05 03:22 PM   #298 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC