atommom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-16-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
| 55. I'm guessing any Kansans who frequent DU already did vote against |
|
the conservative idiots! We obviously need to keep working on the rest of the state, though.
|
| -NYT: Kansas Debate Challenges Science Itself |
mcscajun |
May-16-05 10:31 AM |
#0 |
 -
Is it possible to expel a state? |
Zynx |
May-16-05 10:32 AM |
#1 |
 -
And where do you propose |
proud2Blib |
May-16-05 10:43 AM |
#6 |
 -
To the polls and vote the Conservative idiots out |
Toots |
May-16-05 06:11 PM |
#35 |
| -
Well I sure didn't vote for any of these yahoos |
proud2Blib |
May-16-05 06:26 PM |
#37 |
| -
I'm guessing any Kansans who frequent DU already did vote against |
atommom |
May-16-05 08:36 PM |
#55 |
| -
You'd have to expel a lot more states than you might think |
atommom |
May-16-05 10:48 AM |
#7 |
| -
More power to you, and keep up the fight! |
mcscajun |
May-16-05 12:38 PM |
#19 |
| -
And Kansas happens to be sitting where?? |
Roland99 |
May-16-05 10:35 AM |
#2 |
| -
Interesting link you've got there... |
mcscajun |
May-16-05 10:39 AM |
#3 |
| -
Maybe it's where the Jesus Fish came from. |
Roland99 |
May-16-05 10:43 AM |
#5 |
| -
That's one reason we have so many good paleontologists here |
atommom |
May-16-05 10:50 AM |
#8 |
| -
Somewhat related, but this is where the term "Rock Chalk Jayhawk" |
Scout1071 |
May-16-05 07:17 PM |
#45 |
| -
"The University of Kansas, located in a BLUE county" |
XemaSab |
May-16-05 08:16 PM |
#50 |
| -
If they want to redefine science, let's redefine religion |
daleo |
May-16-05 10:42 AM |
#4 |
| -
Strangely, IDers have it as much right on this point as their critics. |
eallen |
May-16-05 10:51 AM |
#9 |
| -
It is not poorly defined at all. |
K-W |
May-16-05 11:04 AM |
#11 |
| -
Really? Let's hear your definition. |
eallen |
May-16-05 11:13 AM |
#12 |
| -
A dictionary should be able to clear up your confusion. |
K-W |
May-16-05 11:14 AM |
#13 |
| -
The dictionary makes my point quite well. |
eallen |
May-16-05 11:45 AM |
#16 |
| -
No subject is excluded from sceintific investigation. |
K-W |
May-16-05 01:11 PM |
#24 |
| -
So, let's not define science as having restricted subject matter. |
eallen |
May-16-05 01:48 PM |
#25 |
| -
Things do not exist until proven to not exist. |
K-W |
May-16-05 04:14 PM |
#30 |
| -
Burden of proof, language, and logic |
eallen |
May-16-05 04:52 PM |
#33 |
| -
Supernatural = violating known scientific laws |
Zynx |
May-16-05 11:33 AM |
#15 |
| -
When scientists find break from known scientific law, they change the law. |
eallen |
May-16-05 11:54 AM |
#17 |
| -
No, scientists don't change scientific laws. They change theories |
Zynx |
May-16-05 03:00 PM |
#27 |
| -
I have little use for supernatural BS. |
eallen |
May-16-05 03:48 PM |
#28 |
| -
"Fairies do exist" is indeed a scientific claim. |
K-W |
May-16-05 04:19 PM |
#31 |
| -
"Fairies don't exist" |
XemaSab |
May-16-05 08:22 PM |
#53 |
| -
well said |
realcountrymusic |
May-16-05 12:55 PM |
#22 |
| -
The distinction between natural and supernatural is not "poorly defined" |
struggle4progress |
May-16-05 06:36 PM |
#38 |
| -
Sigh. That's what KW said above. |
eallen |
May-16-05 07:29 PM |
#46 |
| -
Natural phenomena are phenomena subject to "natural law" and |
struggle4progress |
May-16-05 08:17 PM |
#51 |
| -
When you START with the notion that Man was the sole objective of Creation |
TahitiNut |
May-16-05 11:04 AM |
#10 |
| -
WP did a big old puff piece on Phillip Johnson (ID proponent) |
yellowcanine |
May-16-05 11:31 AM |
#14 |
| -
Yes, they challenge science |
triguy46 |
May-16-05 12:29 PM |
#18 |
| -
Holding a public debate to determine the validity of evolutionary theory |
hatrack |
May-16-05 12:42 PM |
#20 |
| -
I suggest the above debaters |
drduffy |
May-16-05 12:52 PM |
#21 |
| -
I suggest you go back and reread those texts. |
eallen |
May-16-05 02:38 PM |
#26 |
| -
Theism is not science because it is irrational. |
K-W |
May-16-05 04:25 PM |
#32 |
| -
Perhaps you should go back and review |
drduffy |
May-16-05 06:01 PM |
#34 |
| -
I agree partly... |
eallen |
May-16-05 07:37 PM |
#48 |
| -
actually eallen |
drduffy |
May-16-05 08:12 PM |
#49 |
| -
add to the list Richard Feynman's "The Character of Physical Law." |
kodi |
May-16-05 07:13 PM |
#42 |
| -
add to the list Richard Feynman's "The Character of Physical Law." |
kodi |
May-16-05 07:13 PM |
#43 |
| -
That has been ID's intent all along. |
damntexdem |
May-16-05 01:03 PM |
#23 |
| -
In other words, a bible study plan is now "science". |
Zhade |
May-16-05 03:59 PM |
#29 |
| -
The reality the Religious Right is not open to objective analysis |
kodi |
May-16-05 06:18 PM |
#36 |
| -
nice article |
drduffy |
May-16-05 06:46 PM |
#39 |
| -
i remember where he stood as he spoke it, in ashen mud outside auschwitz |
kodi |
May-16-05 07:00 PM |
#40 |
| -
Nice article! It's a scary situation. |
atommom |
May-16-05 07:12 PM |
#41 |
| -
the fundies have said |
drduffy |
May-16-05 08:19 PM |
#52 |
| -
This Kansan could not be more embarrassed for my state. |
Scout1071 |
May-16-05 07:14 PM |
#44 |
| -
I agree about the zip code. I know some great people in Topeka, |
atommom |
May-16-05 07:34 PM |
#47 |
| -
ah Wichita... |
drduffy |
May-16-05 08:23 PM |
#54 |
| -
619? Whose zip code is THAT? |
atommom |
May-16-05 08:43 PM |
#56 |
| -
Can't we just take the reddest state |
Peake |
May-16-05 08:45 PM |
#57 |
| -
"If they had their own place, would they stop trying... |
mcscajun |
May-16-05 09:06 PM |
#58 |
| -
Should I feel bad about being tolerant enough to live alongside |
Peake |
May-16-05 10:12 PM |
#59 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread