You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #106: Ah, but his gamble did not pay off, did it? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #96
106. Ah, but his gamble did not pay off, did it?
http://www.iags.org/iraqpipelinewatch.htm

2005
186. January 1 - attack on a pipeline from Kirkuk to Bayji.
187. January 1 - attack on a pipeline linking the southern cities of Karbala and Hillah, 46 miles south of Baghdad near the Musabayb power station.
188. January 7 - attack on gas pipeline 9 miles north of Tikrit.
189. January 8 - attack on an oil pipeline running from northern fields to Bayji in the Safra area, 43 miles southwest of Kirkuk. Two guard posts for an oil protection force were also blown up around the area and one guard was wounded.
190. January 8 - attack on a gas pipeline in the Fatha area near Bayji.
191. January 11 - 2:00am rocket attack on a gas pipeline that runs to Bayji near the Fatha production station.
192. January 11 - 6:30am attack on an oil pipeline that runs to Bayji in the Zegheitoun area, 35 miles southwest of Kirkuk. The pipeline had just been brought online on January 9th.
193. January 13 - 10:30pm attack on oil pipeline near Fatha.
194. January 14 - improvised explosive device detonated after midnight damaging an oil pipeline near Bayji and sparking a large fire.
195. January 14 - attack on a pipeline linking Kirkuk and the Daura refinery, near Samarra.
196. January 14 - rocket attack on pipeline complex near Fatha sparked large blaze.
197. January 17 - a bomb blew off a section of a pipeline in Fatha.
198. January 21 - 07:00am attack on pipeline in the al-Tharthar region 12 miles south of Samarra interrupted the flow of oil to the Bayji refinery.
199. February 2 - attack on oil pipeline connecting Bayji refinery to Daura refinery. The attack took place near Samarra.
200. Fabruary 5 - attack on a cluster of eight pipelines west of Samarra connecting the Bayji and Daura refineries.
201. February 6 - attack on pipeline carrying crude oil from Kirkuk to Bayji.
202. February 9 - attack on a gas pipeline before dawn in Fatha, about 15 miles north of Bayji.
203. February 9 - rocket attack on a pipeline linking Kirkuk to Bayji.
204. February 13 - 10:00pm attack on oil pipeline at the al-Dibbis oil field 31 miles north of Kirkuk.
205. February 14 - another attack on oil pipeline at al-Dibbis.
206. February 16 - attack on pipeline carrying crude from Kirkuk to Bayji near Fatha.
207. February 16 - attack on pipeline carrying crude from Kirkuk to Daura refinery.
208. February 16 - another attack on pipeline near Fatha.
209. February 16 - attack on pipeline in the Bajwan area, northwest of Kirkuk.
210. February 16 - gunmen killed Colonel Ibrahim Ahmed in charge of pipeline security. The killing took place at Ajeel west of Kirkuk.
211. February 25 - late night attack on a pipeline connecting the Dibbis oil fields with Kirkuk.
212. March 2 - 10pm attack on gas pipeline to Bayji near Al-Safra 30 miles west of Kirkuk caused the shutdown of two of the Bayji power station's four turbines.
213. March 3 - attack on a gas pipeline that links Kirkuk to Dibbis.
214. March 7 - attack on pipeline near Samarra, 60 miles northwest of Baghdad.
215. March 8 - 1pm attack on oil pipeline feeding Al-Daura refinery near Jorf al-Sakhr, 35 miles south of Baghdad.
216. March 9 - attack on oil pipeline feeding the Daura refinery in Jorf al-Sakhr, 46 miles south of Baghdad.
217. March 12 - attack on oil pipeline connecting Bayji and Daura in Al-Tharthar, near Samarra.
218. March 12 - Rocket-propelled grenades were launched at a pipeline running from Kirkuk to Daura.
219. March 15 - attack on oil pipeline in Fatha which carries crude from Kirkuk to Bayji.
220. March 25 - attack on oil pipeline which connects Iraq northern oilfields with the Daura refinery.
221. March 27 - 9:00am attack on oil pipeline which carries crude from Kirkuk to Bayji. Repairs on the line had just been completed the day before.
222. April 4 - attack on pipeline running through the Riyad area near Bayji.
223. April 13 - bomb on oil pipeline near Kirkuk killed an Iraqi oil security chief and eight of his men, who were in the process of defusing another explosive device, and sparked a fire on the pipeline.
224. April 17 - attack near Fatha on oil pipeline from Kirkuk to the Bayji refinery.
225. April 18 - twin blasts at an internal oil pipeline near Kirkuk.
226. April 25 - Insurgents blew up pumps used for domestic supplies near Bay Hassam, 19 miles west of Kirkuk.

These are the attacks on the oil infrastructure in IraqNam only since the beginning of the year.

Oil exports from Iraq are far below their pre-invasion levels.

Do I detect from your posts that you believed that America would actually be able to conquer these oil fields successfully, and that Britain had to follow to get its fair share? Then this demented, amoral and naive notion has been dashed against the rocks by reality, as the aboriginal peoples of the middle east do not suffer invasions by westerners quietly and anyone who has read the attempts of others to do so in the last two thousand years will see that we are in a long line of failed conquerers.

Blair's blunder belongs to Blair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Breaking News: British Exit Poll predicts Labour Win by 66 seats brooklynite  May-05-05 04:01 PM   #0 
  - Okay, that's a lot fewer than the 120 predicted, right?  Jacobin   May-05-05 04:02 PM   #1 
  - A lot lower.  grytpype   May-05-05 04:11 PM   #10 
  - Excellent  Jacobin   May-05-05 04:16 PM   #15 
     - Whose faced gets slapped by giving 40 seats to Tories and 3 to LibDems?  AP   May-05-05 04:42 PM   #19 
        - So, what's your take on it?  Jacobin   May-05-05 04:58 PM   #45 
        - My take on it:  AP   May-05-05 05:21 PM   #59 
           - Okay, I'm having a problem understanding this  Jacobin   May-05-05 05:35 PM   #65 
           - May I add a little point in your defense  DrDebug   May-05-05 05:38 PM   #70 
           - We had massive protests in the US too, and when it came down to it...  AP   May-05-05 06:00 PM   #74 
           - The polls on the invasion of IraqNam  Jacobin   May-05-05 06:15 PM   #85 
              - By November 2004, most Americans thought it was a mistake and they  AP   May-05-05 06:22 PM   #87 
                 - Bush got an increase in Congress. Blair will get a decrease in parliment  sonicx   May-05-05 06:24 PM   #88 
                 - Because NOBODY is on the side of progressives. The media doesn't like  AP   May-05-05 06:28 PM   #91 
                 - By a small margin in 11/04.....not so in Britain  Jacobin   May-05-05 07:06 PM   #102 
                    - The bankers come behind the oil companies (bush is an oil man)  AP   May-05-05 07:15 PM   #104 
                       - I know that what I am saying goes against DU orthodoxy  Jacobin   May-05-05 07:25 PM   #112 
                          - So record oil co profits have been a coincidence? Just because Bush wasn't  AP   May-05-05 07:33 PM   #113 
                             - As I say  Jacobin   May-05-05 07:40 PM   #117 
                                - Bush represents the interests of oil and oil service companies.  AP   May-05-05 08:00 PM   #122 
                                   - I think you have part of this backward  Zynx   May-05-05 10:09 PM   #153 
           - Let me add this . . .  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 06:30 PM   #92 
              - Leadership involves both leading and following.  AP   May-05-05 06:45 PM   #96 
              - Then Blair should have told the British people the truth  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 07:11 PM   #103 
              - Have you considered that resisting...  AP   May-05-05 07:19 PM   #107 
                 - Does that post need editing?  muriel_volestrangler   May-05-05 07:22 PM   #108 
                 - Just heard last week that Iran is the UK's number one or two trading...  AP   May-05-05 07:25 PM   #111 
                 - Except it is not working  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 07:35 PM   #114 
              - Ah, but his gamble did not pay off, did it?  Jacobin   May-05-05 07:18 PM   #106 
                 - I really don't think you understand what I'm saying.  AP   May-05-05 07:24 PM   #110 
                    - If the idea was to calm the middle east  Jacobin   May-05-05 07:35 PM   #115 
                    - "the neo-cons...are not noted for their geo-political prowess." Oh really?  AP   May-05-05 07:43 PM   #119 
                       - allow me to jump in here with a question  Kenneth ken   May-05-05 09:00 PM   #137 
                          - that's what i've been wondering  Jacobin   May-05-05 09:04 PM   #139 
                          - Here's how:  AP   May-05-05 09:13 PM   #143 
                             - Texas is not where the oligarchs are  Jacobin   May-05-05 09:45 PM   #147 
                             - mmm well, okay  Kenneth ken   May-05-05 09:46 PM   #148 
                                - Oppostion to Bush wouldn't have stopped Bush.  AP   May-05-05 09:59 PM   #150 
                                   - I'll disagree and leave it at that  Kenneth ken   May-05-05 10:06 PM   #152 
                    - This is where we differ  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 07:51 PM   #121 
                       - I'm with you on the first two paragraphs...  AP   May-05-05 08:10 PM   #126 
              - Then why not Lib Dems???  sandnsea   May-05-05 07:39 PM   #116 
                 - There is that racial issue of 'uncontrolled immigration'  Jacobin   May-05-05 07:42 PM   #118 
                 - Just for kicks  sandnsea   May-05-05 08:57 PM   #136 
                    - I'm not in Britain  Jacobin   May-05-05 09:05 PM   #140 
                 - The Lib Dems seem to have won 4% more votes than in 2001  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 08:00 PM   #123 
                    - Oh I see  sandnsea   May-05-05 08:55 PM   #135 
                       - Think of British elections as like congressional elections  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 09:33 PM   #144 
                          - I get that  sandnsea   May-05-05 09:41 PM   #145 
                             - Once again, there was no big move to the Tories  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 10:01 PM   #151 
                                - #135  sandnsea   May-05-05 10:12 PM   #154 
                                   - According to the British Forum thread, BBC is projecting a 10 st LD gain  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 10:48 PM   #158 
           - I'm sorry, I cannot fucking BELIEVE I read these words from you.  Zhade   May-05-05 08:07 PM   #124 
           - Iraq and terrorism are not related  TolstoyAndy   May-05-05 08:12 PM   #127 
           - The significant problem I have with your post  rpannier   May-05-05 08:35 PM   #133 
           - Let's see whether I've understood you  moggie   May-05-05 09:13 PM   #142 
        - Answer: a certain flea-bitten poodle  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 05:19 PM   #56 
        - I think it's a function of turnout.  grytpype   May-05-05 05:19 PM   #57 
           - BBC just said there was a record turn out  Jacobin   May-05-05 05:20 PM   #58 
              - I should have said "turnout of Labor voters"  grytpype   May-05-05 05:24 PM   #61 
                 - Why would they not turn out?  Jacobin   May-05-05 05:37 PM   #68 
                    - Yes, and I think that's really what happened  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 06:39 PM   #95 
                       - Yes, I'm seeing that on the BBC talkathon thing, right now  Jacobin   May-05-05 08:32 PM   #131 
  - Blair will be gone sooner rather than later, thankfully  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 04:47 PM   #24 
  - Last one I saw was 80 seats which was low. Hope they're humiliated.  autorank   May-05-05 04:02 PM   #2 
  - It's good news  Anarcho-Socialist   May-05-05 04:05 PM   #3 
  - sorry to dupe you.  Henny Penny   May-05-05 04:05 PM   #4 
  - a mod will do it.  sonicx   May-05-05 04:06 PM   #5 
  - Brits to Blair: We already have a monarch. You are replaceable - See!  Pithy Cherub   May-05-05 04:07 PM   #6 
  - well we all know how good the "polls" are!  1956   May-05-05 04:09 PM   #8 
     - It's a paper ballot, don't worry n/t  Anarcho-Socialist   May-05-05 04:10 PM   #9 
     - Ah but Blair is horribly weakened  Pithy Cherub   May-05-05 04:13 PM   #11 
        - The Labour MPs who are due to lose their seats are predominantly  Anarcho-Socialist   May-05-05 04:15 PM   #14 
  - Poll Details  brooklynite   May-05-05 04:08 PM   #7 
  - ack, tories did too good.  sonicx   May-05-05 04:14 PM   #12 
     - Nobody should be surprised if Tories pick up over 40 seats and LDs only 3  AP   May-05-05 04:40 PM   #17 
     - they're doing about the same as last time in terms of vote share  communerd   May-05-05 04:49 PM   #25 
  - My dream is that Blair gets 1.5 years as PM with a good Dem in the WH.  AP   May-05-05 04:14 PM   #13 
  - BBC5 - Streaming Radio  Synnical   May-05-05 04:23 PM   #16 
  - my dream is that Blair gets frog marched to the Tower  GreenArrow   May-05-05 04:56 PM   #26 
     - Whatever.  AP   May-05-05 05:06 PM   #52 
        - whatever, "whatever"  GreenArrow   May-05-05 05:37 PM   #67 
           - He's probably a better politician than Clinton.  AP   May-05-05 06:05 PM   #82 
              - I don't dispute his political ability  GreenArrow   May-05-05 09:09 PM   #141 
  - So, is Blair finished as PM?  goodboy   May-05-05 04:41 PM   #18 
  - It's mostlikely 5 more wars eh. years n/t  DrDebug   May-05-05 04:45 PM   #20 
  - unbelievable...especially with that leaked memo?!?!  goodboy   May-05-05 04:47 PM   #22 
  - Nope -- Blair made history tonight  dolstein   May-05-05 04:47 PM   #23 
     - Hmm...(nt)  goodboy   May-05-05 05:01 PM   #48 
     - Two words: supported Lieberman.  Zhade   May-05-05 08:09 PM   #125 
     - Oh my!  alcibiades_mystery   May-05-05 05:02 PM   #49 
     - You say "socialist roots"  Lydia Leftcoast   May-05-05 05:05 PM   #51 
  - this would be a very good result  communerd   May-05-05 04:46 PM   #21 
  - bbc exit poll gives Lab majority of 66  Henny Penny   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #27 
  - Blair Win?  BamaLefty   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #28 
  - yes if he keeps his seat!  Henny Penny   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #29 
  - He was expected to  Jacobin   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #30 
  - yeah, get ready for it. bushies will swear this is a direct result of  okieinpain   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #32 
  - the brits didn't have much choice  still_one   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #40 
  - Link the BBC results page  muriel_volestrangler   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #31 
  - CNN's analysis is such crap  yvr girl   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #33 
  - It is significant because a lot of the Labour MPs due to lose  Anarcho-Socialist   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #39 
     - I'm not saying it isn't significant  yvr girl   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #42 
  - I'll be very happy with a chastened Labour  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #34 
  - Exit poll suggests Labour victory  DrDebug   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #35 
  - exit polls in UK and ukraine  Pharaoh   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #36 
  - The US exit poll was very good  DrDebug   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #37 
  - Exit Polls?  montanacowboy   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #38 
  - 66 will be spun as a major defeat!  joeybee12   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #41 
  - And so far the main beneficiaries are the racist, Neocon pro-warTories.  non sociopath skin   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #44 
     - See #56. This is not all Tory gains.  Zhade   May-05-05 08:13 PM   #128 
  - chris mullins gets just 17900  Henny Penny   May-05-05 04:57 PM   #43 
     - Wouldn't base much on that result  ikri   May-05-05 05:03 PM   #50 
        - yes it is a very safe labour seat,  Henny Penny   May-05-05 05:25 PM   #62 
           - Sunderland North 5.1% from LAB to CON  DrDebug   May-05-05 05:30 PM   #64 
  - exit polls  bluestateguy   May-05-05 04:59 PM   #46 
  - First result  DrDebug   May-05-05 05:00 PM   #47 
  - Lower count for Labour than the Exit Poll suggested  brooklynite   May-05-05 05:12 PM   #53 
     - yep... and higher for lib dems! :D  redsoxliberal   May-05-05 05:16 PM   #54 
        - Yep, I heard that, too!  Robeson   May-05-05 05:17 PM   #55 
        - Told ya so!!!  lovuian   May-05-05 05:22 PM   #60 
  - Sunderland North Results  sonicx   May-05-05 05:30 PM   #63 
  - DOUBLE the swing to Tories suggested by exit poll!!  communerd   May-05-05 05:36 PM   #66 
     - Or: swing of 5.5% from Labour to Lib Dems  muriel_volestrangler   May-05-05 05:43 PM   #71 
  - Houghton & Washington East results  sonicx   May-05-05 05:38 PM   #69 
  - If the pattern is repeated you got a Neocon UK ...  non sociopath skin   May-05-05 05:50 PM   #72 
     - It's a safe seat. it seems to me that protest votes are more likely there  sonicx   May-05-05 05:58 PM   #73 
  - Rutherglen & Hamilton West result  sonicx   May-05-05 06:01 PM   #75 
  - Blair won the last election with 161 seats over the minimum  Spazito   May-05-05 06:03 PM   #76 
  - Tories expect to gain 50 more MPs  AP   May-05-05 06:04 PM   #77 
  - he's not smiling!  Henny Penny   May-05-05 06:04 PM   #78 
  - So, when do you think Blair hands the leadership to Mr Brown?  understandinglife   May-05-05 06:04 PM   #79 
  - things are too up in the air to make sense of anything yet  Obviousman   May-05-05 06:04 PM   #80 
  - But if this is replicated, as it seems it will be, in marginal seats ...  non sociopath skin   May-05-05 06:08 PM   #83 
     - All we have so far are safe seat results  sonicx   May-05-05 06:12 PM   #84 
  - If the exit polls are relatively accurate...  Spazito   May-05-05 06:04 PM   #81 
  - Barnsley Central is a Labour hold  sonicx   May-05-05 06:19 PM   #86 
  - all the early declarations..  Henny Penny   May-05-05 06:27 PM   #90 
  - Labour holds Rotherham  sonicx   May-05-05 06:27 PM   #89 
  - Tories have gained Putney.  Henny Penny   May-05-05 06:31 PM   #93 
  - 6.5% from LAB to CON  sonicx   May-05-05 06:36 PM   #94 
  - Green and LibDem swing gives seat to Tories.  AP   May-05-05 06:48 PM   #97 
     - We're likely to see a lot of that tonight.  non sociopath skin   May-05-05 06:59 PM   #100 
  - a few more safers in, tally is 18 LAB , 1 CON  sonicx   May-05-05 06:51 PM   #98 
  - 26 LAB, 2 LD, 1 CON  sonicx   May-05-05 06:56 PM   #99 
  - Join the official UK Election Strand upstairs at ....  non sociopath skin   May-05-05 07:05 PM   #101 
  - BBC world- Blair to only win by 30-50 seats  brettdale   May-05-05 07:18 PM   #105 
  - Wow.....The poodle is getting a shave tonight  Jacobin   May-05-05 08:36 PM   #134 
  - Tories take Ilford  Henny Penny   May-05-05 07:23 PM   #109 
  - "5 times a night for amnesty"????  Henny Penny   May-05-05 07:48 PM   #120 
  - BBC One now estimates Labour's majority will be 76  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 08:23 PM   #129 
  - i've been watching for about 2 hours now  chimpsrsmarter   May-05-05 08:27 PM   #130 
  - Hey Galloway just won, thats a big victory for him  chimpsrsmarter   May-05-05 08:34 PM   #132 
  - BBC Online: 352 seats declared at 7 pm PDT  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 09:03 PM   #138 
  - Who the hell here remembers Blair at Camp David in 2001?  Whoa_Nelly   May-05-05 09:43 PM   #146 
  - Labour in no mood to party  cal04   May-05-05 09:52 PM   #149 
  - Labour has earned the right to form the next government  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 10:36 PM   #155 
  - George Galloway just kicked blair in the ass and accused labour  chimpsrsmarter   May-05-05 10:38 PM   #156 
  - Ok...I don't understand their politics...am I supposed to be happy to see  lonestarnot   May-05-05 10:46 PM   #157 
  - Labour are to the left of the U.S. Democratic Party  Anarcho-Socialist   May-05-05 10:51 PM   #159 
     - Alrightie then going to celebrate!  lonestarnot   May-05-05 11:02 PM   #160 
  - Polly Toynbee (Guardian Utd): Tony Blair alone bears the blame  Jack Rabbit   May-05-05 11:59 PM   #161 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC