Reply #92: The PNAC and Rice ... don't get me started ...

[V Lee]

They did let it happen. The evidence is overwhelming.

As the PNAC neocons wrote, a "catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" would help them move ahead with their plan of preemptive invasions (attacks) of oil-rich Middle Eastern countries, first Iraq, then Iran, and onward. All in cooperation with their buddies Israel and Saudi Arabia.

I've also heard that sometime in July-Aug of 2001 an FBI agent reported that he was "trying to stop someone from hijacking an airplane and crashing it into the World Trade Center."

Why do you think Bush spent so much of August 2001 away from Washington, safely at his ranch? They knew something big was coming and Washington was a target.

And why did they delete 27 pages of evidence from the 9/11 Commission report that showed that members of the Saudi government financially supported some of the 9/11 hijackers? And why did the FBI block court subpoenas to talk to them?

And then there's Rice. I just about lost it when, testifying before the 9/11 Commission, she said that no one could have imagined that Al Qaeda would use planes as missiles and crash them into things. HELLO!!! EARTH TO CONDI! HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF A LITTLE THING CALLED “WORLD WAR II?” THE JAPANESE? KAMIKAZE PILOTS??? RING ANY $@#^*&$ BELLS, CONDI???

Jumpin’ Jesus on a pogo stick … I just about blew cheese puffs out my nose when she said that.

The truth is, if your memory goes back farther than your last political campaign, you’ll realize that America’s enemies have used planes as missiles and crashed them into American targets thousands of times (in WWII alone) in the past. If you’re unable to imagine that it could happen again in the future, then you’re too @%#$*& incompetent to be in a high-level government position, period!

Condi, go home and spend some time watching the History Channel, you might learn something and we’d all be safer.