Gemini Cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
It gets tiresome when they always wear the white party gloves when the boxing gloves would be so much better.
|
| -Dems Tell Bush To Lay Off Gays |
dwickham |
Jan-14-05 01:46 PM |
#0 |
-
Finally... |
aikido15 |
Jan-14-05 01:48 PM |
#1 |
 -
let's see what happens in '06 and '08 |
gWbush is Mabus |
Jan-14-05 01:50 PM |
#4 |
-
Let's hope there's something to see... |
aikido15 |
Jan-14-05 01:53 PM |
#6 |
-
It's headlines in the "left" wing media as we speak..(sarcasm) |
nibbana |
Jan-14-05 03:56 PM |
#29 |
-
I'm glad they're standing up for this. |
GOPBasher |
Jan-14-05 01:49 PM |
#2 |
-
I'll wait and see about the spine |
Mojambo |
Jan-14-05 01:49 PM |
#3 |
 -
ROFL |
aikido15 |
Jan-14-05 01:54 PM |
#8 |
 -
That's for sure! |
Confound W |
Jan-14-05 01:56 PM |
#14 |
 -
Especially When Your Arms Are Tied Behind Your Back |
AndyTiedye |
Jan-14-05 07:24 PM |
#32 |
-
Filibuster hard, Filibuster fast and Filibuster long.. |
Mojambo |
Jan-14-05 08:37 PM |
#41 |
-
Who did we have to blow to get this done? |
IanDB1 |
Jan-14-05 01:53 PM |
#5 |
 -
Hey, I see Mission Control! |
IanDB1 |
Jan-14-05 01:54 PM |
#9 |
-
The story isn't finished. |
geomon666 |
Jan-14-05 01:53 PM |
#7 |
-
should work. Bush knows how to make Americans "laid off" |
WMliberal |
Jan-14-05 01:54 PM |
#10 |
-
sounds like just a fundraising letter |
Cocoa |
Jan-14-05 01:55 PM |
#11 |
 -
In theory, you're right, but in action, the Dems have been deficient |
keopeli |
Jan-14-05 01:57 PM |
#16 |
-
Had to read that title twice ... to "lay off" means to let go from the job |
meti57b |
Jan-14-05 01:55 PM |
#12 |
 -
LOL. Dems want bush to fire all gays? n/t |
VegasWolf |
Jan-14-05 01:57 PM |
#15 |
-
This makes me lose more faith in the Dem party |
keopeli |
Jan-14-05 01:56 PM |
#13 |
 -
What about bi-sex??? |
Rainscents |
Jan-14-05 02:07 PM |
#17 |
  -
Actually, since they don't think people are born gay... |
Zhade |
Jan-14-05 02:21 PM |
#22 |
   -
I agree... |
Rainscents |
Jan-14-05 02:57 PM |
#26 |
  -
Probably, look how many of them are secretly bi and married too |
BR_Parkway |
Jan-14-05 02:31 PM |
#24 |
 -
where were you during the election? |
Cocoa |
Jan-14-05 02:07 PM |
#18 |
 -
Um..the Dems DID take a position against the amendment before the election |
nothingshocksmeanymore |
Jan-14-05 02:12 PM |
#20 |
 -
Where have you been??? |
Rainscents |
Jan-14-05 02:19 PM |
#21 |
  -
LOL, they "speak" and that's ALL they do |
LTRS |
Jan-14-05 07:54 PM |
#35 |
 -
Yes, the Dems took a stand at some point, but that's not the point |
keopeli |
Jan-14-05 05:05 PM |
#31 |
-
yeah right, after the election... |
superconnected |
Jan-14-05 02:11 PM |
#19 |
-
'Bout time n/t |
Psephos |
Jan-14-05 02:24 PM |
#23 |
-
I thank you for the post |
hiley |
Jan-14-05 02:46 PM |
#25 |
-
Tom.. |
Kikosexy2 |
Jan-14-05 03:26 PM |
#27 |
-
I too am glad to see the DNC standing up |
donheld |
Jan-14-05 03:45 PM |
#28 |
-
He will.. He has "used" the issue enough for now.. It's back on the shelf |
SoCalDem |
Jan-14-05 04:54 PM |
#30 |
 -
Don't Bet On It |
AndyTiedye |
Jan-14-05 07:37 PM |
#34 |
-
I think they will "talk" about it, but in order to have the issue for next |
SoCalDem |
Jan-14-05 08:54 PM |
#42 |
-
They Can Always Go Further |
AndyTiedye |
Jan-15-05 09:15 AM |
#43 |
-
A case of too little, too late |
kweerwolf |
Jan-14-05 07:25 PM |
#33 |
 -
Bravo -- well said! |
LTRS |
Jan-14-05 07:56 PM |
#36 |
 -
You got it"progressive agenda" neutralizing democratic party. |
orpupilofnature57 |
Jan-14-05 07:58 PM |
#37 |
 -
Exactly!!! |
Biased Liberal Media |
Jan-14-05 08:19 PM |
#40 |
-
Like Bu$h will listen! Bwaa Haaa Haaa! |
DemoTex |
Jan-14-05 08:11 PM |
#38 |
-
Bout freakin time they said something |
Biased Liberal Media |
Jan-14-05 08:19 PM |
#39 |