TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 33. Only if you do it wrong ... |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-12-05 10:23 AM by TahitiNut
... or pay too little.  "Notice: Copulation permitted herein only in state-sanctioned manners, and only between enfranchised adults of opposite genders." |
| -Right to privacy in restroom not absolute |
rainbow4321 |
Jan-12-05 08:53 AM |
#0 |
 -
Let's ask George Michaels. |
seriousstan |
Jan-12-05 08:56 AM |
#1 |
  -
So why fine Randy Moss if they want to look at our naked butts anyway? |
hector459 |
Jan-15-05 10:15 AM |
#88 |
| -
I learned that when I was married |
slackmaster |
Jan-12-05 08:58 AM |
#2 |
| -
In Cedar Rapids? |
CornField |
Jan-12-05 08:59 AM |
#3 |
| -
It's not too well known if those of us that live here don't know it. |
Pirate Smile |
Jan-12-05 09:23 AM |
#10 |
| -
lol ... I lived in Cedar Rapids and in Atkins/Shellsburg |
fishwax |
Jan-13-05 02:54 PM |
#69 |
| -
That makes no sense at all |
BBradley |
Jan-12-05 09:03 AM |
#4 |
| -
I can think of several ways. |
seriousstan |
Jan-12-05 09:05 AM |
#5 |
| -
exactly... |
rabid_nerd |
Jan-12-05 09:36 AM |
#13 |
| -
I thought everyone here could connect the dots. |
seriousstan |
Jan-12-05 01:12 PM |
#45 |
| -
and if I"m having a particularly traumatic episode of constipation |
SemperEadem |
Jan-12-05 03:05 PM |
#53 |
| -
I guess you didn't read the article. It was clearly stated..... |
seriousstan |
Jan-12-05 03:32 PM |
#55 |
| -
I guess you didn't pick up my sarcasm |
SemperEadem |
Jan-12-05 08:31 PM |
#56 |
| -
but stan is serious |
cincinnati_liberal |
Jan-13-05 05:00 AM |
#60 |
| -
lol, hence the name ;) |
SemperEadem |
Jan-13-05 03:19 PM |
#77 |
| -
benefits the government |
tives12 |
Jan-12-05 09:10 AM |
#8 |
| -
Here are a couple clues for the cops: |
Pirate Smile |
Jan-12-05 09:37 AM |
#14 |
| -
Does this 'opposite gender' thing apply when I assist my son in the stall? |
patsified |
Jan-12-05 10:05 AM |
#27 |
| -
If your son's anything like mine... |
athenap |
Jan-12-05 10:13 AM |
#30 |
| -
I assume they recognize the difference between children and people |
Pirate Smile |
Jan-12-05 10:25 AM |
#35 |
| -
But wouldn't they have to open the stall door to find out? |
patsified |
Jan-12-05 10:33 AM |
#37 |
| -
Well, I took it as meaning they saw who had gone into the bathroom and |
Pirate Smile |
Jan-12-05 11:02 AM |
#38 |
| -
But what would be an "inordinate amount of time?" |
patsified |
Jan-12-05 01:00 PM |
#43 |
| -
In Europe, they have timed crappers |
MADem |
Jan-13-05 05:06 AM |
#62 |
| -
What do you mean, "IN Europe" |
praxiz |
Jan-13-05 08:34 AM |
#66 |
| -
I've enjoyed the timed crapper in Zurich and |
MADem |
Jan-13-05 01:33 PM |
#67 |
| -
Your subject line made me laugh out loud! |
tblue37 |
Jan-12-05 01:20 PM |
#46 |
| -
I looked back at it and it made me laugh too. |
Pirate Smile |
Jan-12-05 01:37 PM |
#48 |
| -
Not just mid-century peds |
Southpaw Bookworm |
Jan-12-05 03:31 PM |
#54 |
| -
Yeah, |
tblue37 |
Jan-13-05 01:55 AM |
#58 |
| -
Yeah, and when the kids grow up and move out |
MADem |
Jan-13-05 05:08 AM |
#63 |
| -
babywise |
area51 |
Jan-13-05 06:14 AM |
#64 |
| -
He wrote them n/t |
Southpaw Bookworm |
Jan-13-05 08:13 AM |
#65 |
| -
This ruling highlights the ethical bankruptcy of coupling a human right .. |
TahitiNut |
Jan-12-05 09:07 AM |
#6 |
| -
You have no right to have sex and do drugs in anyones property |
seriousstan |
Jan-12-05 09:10 AM |
#7 |
| -
seriousstan, you're right... |
Redstone |
Jan-12-05 09:22 AM |
#9 |
| -
no offense, |
ender |
Jan-12-05 09:50 AM |
#20 |
| -
No offense taken. |
Redstone |
Jan-12-05 10:05 AM |
#26 |
| -
One other thing . . . . |
toopers |
Jan-13-05 03:08 PM |
#73 |
| -
Aw, c'mon.... |
PaganPreacher |
Jan-12-05 09:32 AM |
#11 |
| -
So, unless you're able to BUY a place to exercise a human right ... |
TahitiNut |
Jan-12-05 09:33 AM |
#12 |
| -
less about property than about public vs. private |
rabid_nerd |
Jan-12-05 09:38 AM |
#15 |
| -
"convenience store" sounds like private property to me. |
TahitiNut |
Jan-12-05 09:45 AM |
#17 |
| -
it doesn't sound so bad if you think of another example |
barackmyworld |
Jan-12-05 11:41 AM |
#40 |
| -
It's not a 'right' - it's (literally) an entitlement. |
TahitiNut |
Jan-12-05 11:50 AM |
#42 |
| -
Safety issue, not property |
sandnsea |
Jan-13-05 03:33 PM |
#80 |
| -
Well, go ahead and open up your place to anyone who wants |
Pirate Smile |
Jan-12-05 09:40 AM |
#16 |
| -
Apples And Oranges. |
jayfish |
Jan-12-05 10:15 AM |
#31 |
| -
I have sex in hotel rooms which I do not own... is that illegal? nt |
patsified |
Jan-12-05 10:07 AM |
#28 |
| -
Only if you do it wrong ... |
TahitiNut |
Jan-12-05 10:20 AM |
#33 |
| -
And |
patsified |
Jan-12-05 10:31 AM |
#36 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-12-05 01:11 PM |
#44 |
| -
That's not the issue. In places where you have an expectation of privacy.. |
AP |
Jan-12-05 10:22 AM |
#34 |
| -
Another view on lavatory privacy... |
KevinJ |
Jan-12-05 09:47 AM |
#18 |
| -
I wonder what it looks like at night. |
TahitiNut |
Jan-12-05 09:49 AM |
#19 |
| -
If the door locks and you lock it and there's one toilet, it's private. |
AP |
Jan-12-05 09:55 AM |
#21 |
| -
Goddamn it, as if I already don't have enough of a shy bladder |
patsified |
Jan-12-05 10:02 AM |
#22 |
| -
Well ... |
TahitiNut |
Jan-12-05 10:05 AM |
#25 |
| -
That reminds me (sidebar) |
patsified |
Jan-12-05 10:10 AM |
#29 |
| -
Yup. The maxim is "more than three times is self-abuse." |
TahitiNut |
Jan-12-05 10:17 AM |
#32 |
| -
No matter how you shake and dance... |
deacon2 |
Jan-12-05 02:20 PM |
#51 |
| -
..too many shakes might be against the law in some places. |
0007 |
Jan-13-05 03:01 PM |
#70 |
| -
You'll have to pry my toilet bowl out of my cold, dead fingers |
DS1 |
Jan-12-05 10:03 AM |
#23 |
| -
lol. |
Harvey Korman |
Jan-13-05 03:44 PM |
#83 |
| -
This is why FReepers travel with their own private porta-potties |
DS1 |
Jan-12-05 10:05 AM |
#24 |
| -
I thought that FReepers used those stalls with the holes in them. n/t |
VegasWolf |
Jan-12-05 02:09 PM |
#50 |
| -
LOL!!! |
Megahurtz |
Jan-13-05 03:01 PM |
#71 |
| -
"The Fourth Amendment protects people and not places" |
ticapnews |
Jan-12-05 11:32 AM |
#39 |
| -
It's the Achilles Heel of victim-less crime. |
TahitiNut |
Jan-12-05 11:45 AM |
#41 |
| -
The police should stay out of it, at least the prostitute had a job, |
VegasWolf |
Jan-12-05 01:33 PM |
#47 |
| -
well it seems to me |
northzax |
Jan-12-05 02:05 PM |
#49 |
| -
Can you hear that?........here listen some more........ |
genieroze |
Jan-12-05 02:51 PM |
#52 |
| -
Chip, chip, I thought that was the sound of a FREEPER digging a |
VegasWolf |
Jan-12-05 08:37 PM |
#57 |
| -
HaHaHaHaHa!!! |
Megahurtz |
Jan-13-05 03:05 PM |
#72 |
| -
You have the right to privacy in *your* restroom. |
jayctravis |
Jan-13-05 04:41 AM |
#59 |
| -
So I Guess The Next... |
jayfish |
Jan-13-05 02:11 PM |
#68 |
| -
That reminds of a joint in the 50's in Long Beach California |
0007 |
Jan-13-05 03:14 PM |
#75 |
| -
not if they tell you they are doing it |
northzax |
Jan-13-05 03:17 PM |
#76 |
| -
Let's See. |
jayfish |
Jan-13-05 03:32 PM |
#79 |
| -
ahh, so they were ok going in? |
northzax |
Jan-13-05 03:36 PM |
#81 |
| -
The Article ... |
jayfish |
Jan-13-05 03:51 PM |
#84 |
| -
And the moral of this story? |
cincinnati_liberal |
Jan-13-05 05:02 AM |
#61 |
| -
The moral is that the police can bust into restrooms without any good |
AP |
Jan-13-05 03:10 PM |
#74 |
| -
er, no it isn't |
northzax |
Jan-13-05 03:23 PM |
#78 |
| -
This is a desicion about the admissability of evidence the police |
AP |
Jan-13-05 05:06 PM |
#85 |
| -
and it seems to me that a business owner |
northzax |
Jan-14-05 01:46 PM |
#86 |
| -
I'm not sure I'm prepared to let Gladys Kravits-style business owners |
AP |
Jan-15-05 09:53 AM |
#87 |
| -
This proves we need tort reform. |
Democrats_win |
Jan-13-05 03:39 PM |
#82 |
| -
What about right to privacy in a retail store dressing room? |
WatchWhatISay |
Jan-15-05 11:19 AM |
#89 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread